Slashdot Mirror


User: PsyHawk

PsyHawk's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Re:Rule of Law on Judge Tentatively Dismisses Case Against Lori Drew · · Score: 1

    That all sounds wonderful until .... you hit a psychological disorder or a chemical imbalance in people which would affect their thinking. You can teach all you want and those people can nod like bobble heads and walk right out and do what you just warned about. Hence the phrase PSYCHOLOGICAL TROUBLED/IMPAIRED/ETC ...

  2. Re:WTF on $74k Judgment Against Craigslist Prankster · · Score: 1

    "...exposing 178 guys who are a little too eager for snatch"
    What if it were exposing people for being to eager for pot? Or for their next high (whatever that might be)?

    "I don't believe it was all that harmful."
    Really? Define harmful. I mean by your own definition, it shouldn't be harmful for YOU to post your nude pic and send everyone the link, right? We'll wait! I mean, its just the internet.

    Surely you can take people laughing at you and all that. You can take local people printing it out and posting it around town too right? And what about any rumors and completely fabricated stories that may float around about you? And if it cost you your job (and eventually house, car, etc...)

    Would you then feel it was harmful?

    Would you feel the same if one of those people were just psycho enough to visit you and 'take care of things'?
    I think he got lucky!

    Finding his information was not that hard immediately after the prank. He changed his phone number based on the stories and all - apparently he was getting threats and he got all weepy eyed and scared!

    I mean its just craig's list. Right? Its not like anyone could die from it.Right? Oh wait.... already happened!

    I guess it can be harmful!

  3. Re:federal crime on $74k Judgment Against Craigslist Prankster · · Score: 1

    Hehehehe "to use a telecommunication devise with the intent to annoy..." Heck, you can nab half of /. for that ;-)

  4. Re:Good News for Blizzard, bad news for copyright on Blizzard Wins Major Lawsuit Against Bot Developers · · Score: 1

    Even beyond the other points here is simply this: When you no longer agree to the EULA and/or TOU, you are no longer authorized to use the software (WoW in this case). By using glider, you are violating that agreement which prohibit bots and "third party" software. At that point of usage, you lose authorization to use the game. It doesn't matter WHEN you load what in this case. If you buy software and read the EULA/ToS/ToU and do not agree with it, return it immediately.

  5. Re:But but but on Windows XP SP3 Postponed Until 2008 · · Score: 1

    Sorry mate but pirates are not the only ones to slipstream updates into installation media. Sounds like you've been following too much hype. Get with the program ;)

    See Microsoft's own KBA:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/814847

    I work with companies who do it quite often. When imaging isn't used, it beats having to install the OS and wait through all the screens and clicks, AND THEN install the service pack.

    To the original poster: If you look around, you will find out how you can slipstream most updates into an installation package. Look into "nLite"

    Also read up on
    http://www.petri.co.il/forums/archive/index.php?t- 5079.html