Slashdot Mirror


User: me_mi_mo

me_mi_mo's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10

  1. Re:14Pb for 170k employees... on World's Five Biggest SANs · · Score: 1

    Mod parent down.

    Grandparent is correct.

  2. Re:The future of America on Kansas Adopts New Science Standards · · Score: 1

    >Evolution flips a coin thousands of times and discards the tails. It would be amazing if it didn't get fifty heads that way.

    Well, I'll clarify. The amazing coincidences that I speak of vary from the profound (the fine tuning problems that make physicists invoke the so-called anthropic principle) to the mundane (asteroid crashes into the earth and wipes out all life).

    So the point is that for you to exist, today, an unbelievable number of things must have happened, all at the right time. If one of your ancestors had died before they reproduced you woulnd't be here. Heck, if a different sperm had done the business anywhere along the line, you wouldn't be here.

    And please note (from my post) that I was referring specifically to homo sapiens in general, and to the crowd at slashdot in particular.

    Regards, me

  3. Re:The future of America on Kansas Adopts New Science Standards · · Score: 1

    Natural selection is not random.


    Hey, don't rag on random!

    While natural selection per se may not be entirely random, I think it is fair to say that the vast majority of scientists believe that we (as a species and as individuals) would not be around today except for an amazing string of coincidences.

    You can't have it both ways: it is either physcial law plus random events, or God.

  4. Re:Try checking your punctuation on Games Analysts Weighs In On Console War · · Score: 1

    So while we are playing the "trends" game: no one calls it an "xbox360". Just 360. Then things change quite a bit.

  5. Re:How is this any different? on The Birth of Quantum Biology · · Score: 1
    Parent makes good points. However, most /. readers may not realise that there are a number of ways to approximately solve many of these problems. One of the most powerful is the so-called density functional theory. This is (in principle) a way of computing physical properties for (bio)chemical systems. It scales as the cube of the number of electrons in the system.

    Using todays supercomputers, we can deal with about ten thousand atoms. So by Moores law, it takes eight years to double the number of atoms.

    where does one draw the line between physics, chemistry, biochemistry, and biology?

    Traditionally,

    Physics: Solids, periodic systems.

    Chemistry: A molecule or two.

    Biochemistry: A few organic molecules.

    Biology: Many organic molecules.
  6. Re:Obligatory on Adult Film Industry Moving To HD DVD · · Score: 1

    More like, "She's there, she's naked, and probably wants to fuck every guy in the room BUT you."

    Jeez, how many guys are in there?

  7. Re:The Real Problem: Harrison Ford or George Lucas on Harrison Ford Turned Down Han Solo Role · · Score: 1

    Ben: You will go to the Dagobah system. There you will learn from Yoda, the Jedi Master who instructed me.

    Maybe in the sense "gave me instructions"? As in to send Luke to him if he showed Jedi potential?

  8. Re:Does anyone else see the contradiction? on No Ceasefire in DVD Format Battle · · Score: 1

    if you can get an ADSL connection, then you probably have somewhere between 2-8 MB/s bandwidth at the moment.

    Yes, if by 2-8 MB/s you mean 2-8 Mb/s. My ISP genuinely doesn't know the difference between a 2 Megabit connection and a 2 Megabyte connection (BT Ireland).

  9. Another Obliatory.. on The Unfriendly Side of German Game Development · · Score: 2, Funny

    We Germans are not all smiles...

  10. Re:Quantum Chemistry on Sense of Smell Tied To Quantum Physics? · · Score: 2, Informative

    You keep repeating that things like photons, electrons and the like are "merely models". I have to take issue with this, as they happen to be effective models.

    I would *love* to see how you would *begin* to explain how light and matter interact at a *fundamental* level, without using the concept of electrons and photons.

    These guys are not cranks - the (free, as in beer) preprint seems to be a pretty typical quantum transport paper, albeit with a slightly "sexed up" angle.

    Models are good, if they work.