I Agree, this is REALLY stupid... industry can't even agree on an open calendar format that EVERYONE will use... let alone some hideous thing like this. The reason ASCII has lasted and keeps lasting is because corporations haven't tried to make it all proprietary, and screw up the interoperability.
I agree, contracts that state "everything i create belongs to them" or some such general terms, are not binding. The courts will notice immediately that your company cannot claim your child, which you also could create while in their employ. This also includes self built additions to your house, birdhouses, shelves, etc.
The contract is invalid because its applicability is in question.
Perl really REALLY needs an effective way to distribute applications, or utilities for that matter... Anything that is written ends up forcing the user into package upgrade hell... there has to be a way to bundle things like OSx does so that you can have a stable app thats easy to install...
Just my 2 cents.
The scheme makes sense... but i have personally had knock-down drag out fights over this and whats picked is something that has no structure, and no mathematical attributes whatsoever. Managements picks something that conveys little information to software, and less to the customer, then blames the developers when its shown to be useless...
Thats modern day software development...
Well, if its really just a joke, you got me on that one,
I have unfortunately had pretty bad experiences using offshore developers. And the type of attitude portrayed in your comments are a dead ringer to the conversations i have had with them. Even when we outright fired them for incompetance, they still continued to believe the problem was with OUR understanding, not thier implementation.
-Code
That is the most nieve response i have ever heard. Unlike the commerical world DOD is attempting to design systems that actually WORK as intended, and cannot be compromised.
They typically develop 10 or more years ahead of technology, and cannot afford to hand over the intellectual property to a bunch of people who dont have the security clearances to even read the labels, let alone implement it.
There is much more going on in the world besides JAVA programming.
Slashdot Mirror
haha.. Awesome.
All your questions and more can be answered by reading the damned article.
Your point being? ...
seriously ? Thats your response ? Your too much of an idiot to read a reasonable sentence and understand its meaning ? grow up.
I Agree, this is REALLY stupid... industry can't even agree on an open calendar format that EVERYONE will use... let alone some hideous thing like this. The reason ASCII has lasted and keeps lasting is because corporations haven't tried to make it all proprietary, and screw up the interoperability.
I agree, contracts that state "everything i create belongs to them" or some such general terms, are not binding. The courts will notice immediately that your company cannot claim your child, which you also could create while in their employ. This also includes self built additions to your house, birdhouses, shelves, etc. The contract is invalid because its applicability is in question.
OMG they are POSTAL over water damage on those... so im thinking they'd say its voiding the warranty...
Perl really REALLY needs an effective way to distribute applications, or utilities for that matter... Anything that is written ends up forcing the user into package upgrade hell... there has to be a way to bundle things like OSx does so that you can have a stable app thats easy to install... Just my 2 cents.
The scheme makes sense... but i have personally had knock-down drag out fights over this and whats picked is something that has no structure, and no mathematical attributes whatsoever. Managements picks something that conveys little information to software, and less to the customer, then blames the developers when its shown to be useless... Thats modern day software development...
I'd go for frozen Han Solo.
Hey ! I'm watching that right now... :)
Well, if its really just a joke, you got me on that one, I have unfortunately had pretty bad experiences using offshore developers. And the type of attitude portrayed in your comments are a dead ringer to the conversations i have had with them. Even when we outright fired them for incompetance, they still continued to believe the problem was with OUR understanding, not thier implementation. -Code
That is the most nieve response i have ever heard. Unlike the commerical world DOD is attempting to design systems that actually WORK as intended, and cannot be compromised. They typically develop 10 or more years ahead of technology, and cannot afford to hand over the intellectual property to a bunch of people who dont have the security clearances to even read the labels, let alone implement it. There is much more going on in the world besides JAVA programming.