While it may be hyperbole to call it "a new form of life" you can easily see the dangers are very real if you account for human incompetence and greed.
I'd like to see proof that it couldn't have happened without his knowledge if they simply asked one of his employees instead, or that he could have even stopped it if he knew.
Yea, the monitoring time is the real question I have here. Weeks... eh, slight confidence boost. Months... better. YEARS (multiple) and maybe we have reasonable confidence there isn't some timeout that waits before trying other outbound ports.
Second time I've seen this post, and I want to believe it's accurate and complete. Can any 3rd party verify this information in any way with a citation?
At this point all AMD has to do is willingly release the information to provably disable their own management engine equivalent and they can sweep the market.
Yea, but the point you all missed is it was only a day after it made the front page of Slashdot that Apple took action. Coincidence? Maybe. But the conspicuous correlation brings up a horrifying thought... and all your angry reactions exhibit a even more disturbing psychological cue that does an even better job at providing supporting evidence that you all subconsciously fear I'm right.
It's amazing how the empirical evidence on hand belies the essence of your statement as much as your little tantrum exposes the part about it that you can't admit to yourself.
The really fun part will be when people find out that it doesn't care whether the picture is of you or not. It will just accept the first one uploaded for you, and anyone too slow will be locked out of their own account by a picture of a parked car or some stock photography with a blur filter.
He belongs to neither political party. He's a paid astro-turfer and his only goal is to hilariously cause the exact divisiveness he's pretending to rail against.
He's just another astro-turfer, trying a new tactic for getting a rise out of us by blaming the real people here for the actions of other astro-turfers. Don't feed them by mistaking their statements as sincere.
Net neutrality is about bandwidth allocations by upstream ISPs. Stop trying to conflate that with platform's own rules for content moderation. Furthermore, you're a bad person for trying to claim this only happens to "leftist" content or that "leftist" is even a thing.
While you're on the money about the fact there's a specific subculture that is regressive and counter-productive to software quality that is apparently belligerently persisting to fight against industry best practices, should we really be using the word "Hipster" as a label for them? Don't get me wrong, I've got no special love for "Hipsters", and all their tight-pants flannel-wearing beard-sporting shenanigans, I'm not sure they actually have anything to do with this. As far as I can tell it seems to be actually a flood of current, former, and aspiring Microsoft programmers causing this, with some inside help from RedHat (who we never really should have trusted anyway) and while some of them may incidentally be Hipsters, I don't think most Hipsters are actually even coders. You may be wrongfully lambasting the wrong subculture here.
I think this is the real question here. Are there entities other than the obvious market forces working to drive up the price of bitcoins for reasons other than the apparent ones?
They're already throttling OpenVPN and ssh connections globally under the pretense that all encrypted traffic constitutes unlawful use. Why have they still been allowed to get away with this while claiming they're not doing it?
Slashdot Mirror
While it may be hyperbole to call it "a new form of life" you can easily see the dangers are very real if you account for human incompetence and greed.
I just want A.I. to replace me for the parts that suck.
I'd like to see proof that it couldn't have happened without his knowledge if they simply asked one of his employees instead, or that he could have even stopped it if he knew.
Yea, the monitoring time is the real question I have here. Weeks... eh, slight confidence boost. Months... better. YEARS (multiple) and maybe we have reasonable confidence there isn't some timeout that waits before trying other outbound ports.
Oh, admit it, you're thinking of drilling some holes in a few motherboards as a test, too.
Second time I've seen this post, and I want to believe it's accurate and complete. Can any 3rd party verify this information in any way with a citation?
At this point all AMD has to do is willingly release the information to provably disable their own management engine equivalent and they can sweep the market.
I want to belieeeeeve!!! Save us system76 you're our only hope!!
Yea, but the point you all missed is it was only a day after it made the front page of Slashdot that Apple took action. Coincidence? Maybe. But the conspicuous correlation brings up a horrifying thought... and all your angry reactions exhibit a even more disturbing psychological cue that does an even better job at providing supporting evidence that you all subconsciously fear I'm right.
It's amazing how the empirical evidence on hand belies the essence of your statement as much as your little tantrum exposes the part about it that you can't admit to yourself.
Employees that are paid better are harder to bribe. That's not a new thing.
Well, a little. It lowers the attack requirements from 10 minutes with extra equipment to 10 seconds and your bare hands.
Apple is paying more attention to Slashdot press than their own support forums?
The really fun part will be when people find out that it doesn't care whether the picture is of you or not. It will just accept the first one uploaded for you, and anyone too slow will be locked out of their own account by a picture of a parked car or some stock photography with a blur filter.
He belongs to neither political party. He's a paid astro-turfer and his only goal is to hilariously cause the exact divisiveness he's pretending to rail against.
Reporter: Thus solving the problem once and for all.
Little girl: But...
Reporter: ONCE AND FOR ALL!
He's just another astro-turfer, trying a new tactic for getting a rise out of us by blaming the real people here for the actions of other astro-turfers. Don't feed them by mistaking their statements as sincere.
Net neutrality is about bandwidth allocations by upstream ISPs. Stop trying to conflate that with platform's own rules for content moderation. Furthermore, you're a bad person for trying to claim this only happens to "leftist" content or that "leftist" is even a thing.
Unfortunately this lame ploy will work on 9 out of 10 regular people.
While you're on the money about the fact there's a specific subculture that is regressive and counter-productive to software quality that is apparently belligerently persisting to fight against industry best practices, should we really be using the word "Hipster" as a label for them? Don't get me wrong, I've got no special love for "Hipsters", and all their tight-pants flannel-wearing beard-sporting shenanigans, I'm not sure they actually have anything to do with this. As far as I can tell it seems to be actually a flood of current, former, and aspiring Microsoft programmers causing this, with some inside help from RedHat (who we never really should have trusted anyway) and while some of them may incidentally be Hipsters, I don't think most Hipsters are actually even coders. You may be wrongfully lambasting the wrong subculture here.
Doesn't that already exist?
I think this is the real question here. Are there entities other than the obvious market forces working to drive up the price of bitcoins for reasons other than the apparent ones?
I'm still kicking myself.
They've been doing it for years. Test it yourself on any connection with more than 128kbps available.
They're already throttling OpenVPN and ssh connections globally under the pretense that all encrypted traffic constitutes unlawful use. Why have they still been allowed to get away with this while claiming they're not doing it?