If it's the former then requiring authentication might be possible, but that'd be a real pain for the latter. Having random, unguessable paths as unique keys is about all you can do without crippling the ability to share them.
I'd rather recive pictures via email than use link to someone else's server.
Because if you like something it's nice to support the author.
I payed for mIRC despite it being free.
I have also purchased DVDs even after downloading them, I fail to see any harm in downloading something for free, I don't even take any bandwidth from the author.
Because software isn't food or clothing. You're not entitled to it. If you can't afford it, use a free alternative, or nothing at all. You'll still be alive tomorrow even if you don't get to use the latest and greatest software.
So let me reverse the question with the above: Why is it that you feel people are entitled to luxury?
Because they can get it!
What gives you the right to tell someone they are not entitled to it, them gaining something doesn't affect you in anyway.
If we are going to learn a new system we should use morse code, not only can we do it with just one button but we can also recive messages by touch quite easily.
So if my server is offline my visitors get redirected to another site, what happens when my server comes back online? I guess I have to wait for the user to flush their DNS.
I don't want my users being taken to another site if the server in oneday offline.
Slashdot Mirror
And get locked up as a terrorist suspect.
Do you have something to hide?
So your punished without even a fair trial to prove that you where shareing illegal content.
This is yet another attempt at silencing freespeech.
Whats wrong with libel?
Is it not free speech?
It's true about the mail box.
But openID doubles the risk since there are now 2 accounts that can be compromised instead of just the one.
I've ever heard of it used on. I've never been to an OpenID site.
That's because most people try to encourage their users to be MORE secure.
So now you really are fucked if someone gets your password.
1. Too logical.
2. Too simple.
free for $9.95 a month.
Ummm..
Ok.
Why not disable the voicemail?
Followed of course by the conventional phone call.
Off?
What is this concept?
We /.ers don't understand.
If it's the former then requiring authentication might be possible, but that'd be a real pain for the latter. Having random, unguessable paths as unique keys is about all you can do without crippling the ability to share them.
I'd rather recive pictures via email than use link to someone else's server.
http://pictures.sprintpcs.com/guest/message/reply/compose.do?messageId=001_2359418f2c1d5b75_1&invite=qEArJQ7X55kZn5vz8U50&COMPOSER_OPTION=REPLY
look at this.
Apparently you can reply as someone else.
Why, then, should anyone pay for the software?
Because if you like something it's nice to support the author.
I payed for mIRC despite it being free.
I have also purchased DVDs even after downloading them, I fail to see any harm in downloading something for free, I don't even take any bandwidth from the author.
Because software isn't food or clothing. You're not entitled to it. If you can't afford it, use a free alternative, or nothing at all. You'll still be alive tomorrow even if you don't get to use the latest and greatest software.
So let me reverse the question with the above: Why is it that you feel people are entitled to luxury?
Because they can get it!
What gives you the right to tell someone they are not entitled to it, them gaining something doesn't affect you in anyway.
I download because I don't want to pay?
Products are only worth what someone is willing to pay, and Im not willing to pay.
Shit, if someone can't see a dam road sign then what the fuck are they doing driving a car!
most people don't RTFA,
Why not copy the whole article onto slashdot? that would reduce the load on linked sites dramatically.
If we are going to learn a new system we should use morse code, not only can we do it with just one button but we can also recive messages by touch quite easily.
The point is we shouldn't have to use a third party DNS.
So if my server is offline my visitors get redirected to another site, what happens when my server comes back online? I guess I have to wait for the user to flush their DNS.
I don't want my users being taken to another site if the server in oneday offline.
What have O2 done wrong?
People should not share their emails with the public.
http://1000milesdown.blogspot.com/2008/04/day-3-foyers-connell-84-miles.html
http://1000milesdown.blogspot.com/2008/04/day-3-foyers-connell-84-miles.html
The email they got from O2 is on this blog
Google cache anybody?