My question is how small will be too small? Sure phones can still get thinner but there should be a point where they would be thin enough. I mean if they get too thin people will be cutting themselves with their phone. A fast answer of the call... Opps there goes their ear. But well before that, If the phone will stay a rigid device, the phone will probably reach Thin enough. If you can make a folding phone, then you may go thinner.
Because Astronauts rode in it too. Or... Because Slashdot is filled with a bunch of fake atheists who somehow feel connected to the pope and see him as a holy man, even though they wouldn't publicly admit it.
Part of the reason why there are so many Catholic Sex Abuse jokes out there is that there were a lot of people non-catholic who still saw priests and bishops as being people who were better then everyone else, and these jokes (which are not funny) are ways to make them feel better that these people are no better then the rest of the population.
Bad economic times always cause people to think the world will continue to decline.
We are in the face of a world wide recession. Even those Elitist Europeans and those Arrogant American, are toning down their banter with each other as things are not good everywhere... And it is only time where countries that are doing well will face problems shortly.
Because everything right now is depressed and people are in generally fearful, they assume the world will not get better.
When Economics are tight people are thing about the short term and short term they need money. So they need Ideas that will bring them money.
When the Economy improves we will start again thinking and planning for newer bigger things, as we are not worried about money.
For the last 20 years our prosperity has been based on bubbles. Technology, Housing... So those outside the bubble have been hurting for years. So they were figuring out how to make it, thus big ideas for this generation have been small. Hopefully we wont have any more big bubbles and slowly rise out these problems and have a real economy world wide where global prosperity can lead to new bigger ideas.
The problem is that they are mixing methodologies... Web Apps don't have version numbers, This is fine, as when you access a Web App you are getting the latest and greatest that you can can on that site. But for the browser you should know if you are lagging in versions and you may have a good reason to lag. As this is software that is on Your PC, no someone else that you are using as a service. OK fine Google Chrome doesn't do this... So what It doesn't been Google chrome is right, or Google knows all. The reason why people like chrome is because it is fast and light... Not because of some insane versioning scheme. They liked Firefox in the Past Because it was fast and light... It has gotten slower and heavier (mostly due to Google raising the bar).
It wasn't meant to criticize HIPAA, It was to point out that companies have less of a defense against public opinion. So allowing open forums is not a good idea.
Commemoration a movie with top of the line special effect and a mediocre plot, That has chance the thoughts and minds of generations. Which made people believe if they focus enough they could get that remote control from the other end of the couch without getting up. And teach us such important moral lessons like. Running away from your home to talk to a stranger is a good idea. Allie yourself with criminals. Join a religion which only has a few followers. Do, not think. Its OK to quit just as long as you get back before your teacher dies. A 3 foot noisy light saber can stop everything Bad guys do not have smart bombs. There are only two sides to things they are either good or bad, no middle ground.
Well (Tongue in cheek) if you even think about money you are violating the GPL 3 code, with the unless you are IBM clause. That said most companies should avoid GPL Code like the plague, if they plan to redistribute anything based on it, as their business model is incompatible with the GPL code, and if they find a way to make it work chances are the next version of the GPL will find a way to block it. So yes Hamstersoft Ebook shouldn't have use the GPL 3 code, and they are wrong to do so.
There is a problem with Public Communication on Healthcare in general. HIPAA So if you bust on a drug company unfairly (which often happens on the internet as many makes their opinion of what a friend of a friend said about something) The healthcare company cannot make a rebuttal, because say for example someone says Drug X killed their friend the Drug company who looked into the matter found that they were just prescribed the drug, but an unrelated condition killed them, eg. They took a anti-depressant drug when they were already in the advanced sets of cancer. They cannot rebuttal the claim thus are forced to look bad.
The patient and public is free to discus anything about a medial condition, however the healthcare organization cannot. And moderation of comments will look bad like they are trying to hide things.
"Do you want you want you kids to have cancer? Do you know that you car could be powered by a radioactive substance?" Queue to stock footage of a nuclear bomb. "There are those out there who wants your kids to get cancer, call your Congressmen and have him vote NO on the Oil Reduction, Thorium Investment and Cancer Prevention funding bill. It is for your child's safety." Sponsored by those crazy nuts who hate everything, and will not do any real research before jumping to a conclusion.
What you forgot is durring the process the Consulting company may really try to say you should do it this way it is more secure, but normally it will not go threw because consultants are not to be trusted.
The 286's didn't often have over 640k anyways. the 386 did though, It was common to see a Meg or two of Ram. the 486 it is normal around 8 - 16 megs, The Pentium normally had 32 - 64 megs. The P2 had 128-256 megs, P3 512-1024 megs, P4 2-3 gigs... Then it slowed down for a bit and with 64 bit PC's and OS's they are moving up again... However now normal seems to be 4 - 8 gigs. We lost some time in progress, during the 2000's the 2000's we saw a lot of stagnation in Computer progress...
If Slashdot were to write a review of the IBM PC. No WiFi less space then the Nomad... Lame...
That 640k limit while we all make fun it now. 640k ram cost a lot of money... PC's were supposed to be the Baby Computers not much more then slightly useful toys, where the real work was on the mainframe. At the time there wasn't any App for the PC processing power that you sanely consider that you would need to run on such a platform... Also at the time the PC wasn't expected for greatness and they figure in 2 or 3 years to replace it with a brand new Computer that had nothing to do with the old one. But they didn't expect all that legacy software to be made.
Besides how many of you guys who need to use windows now need to make a choice on staying with 32bit or 64bit OS, for software compatibility. When the 386 came out, why didn't the Hardware and the OS designed to take more the 4 gigs of RAM... Because when the 386 came out 4 gigs was unheard of amount of ram that would cost tens of thousands of dollars or more to purchase. Now with the 64 bit systems now we see the 16 exabytes accessible RAM. Who in their right mind will use 16 eb of storage? 40 years down the line I wouldn't be surprised, granted I can't figure it being smaller then a 6 meter cube.
Consultants, they will hire consultants to do the work. Then point their finger back at them when there is a problem and go BAD BAD consultants, then hire them for the next job. That is what the government does. If they need to do something that is politically risky they get a consultant to do it, if it succeeds they person get the credit, it it fails they blame the consultant, which privately the consultant happily takes because he knows that he will probably get the next job as well because why would the government authority get rid of a perfectly good skate-goat, for any mistakes (probably due to bad leadership).
Then expect no new devices to be released. And put the world into a worse recession..
If you fine them too much then they will calculate that it isn't a profitable sector to be in... Then they won't be in the sector. There is only a limit on how prices will rise for a personal device. Airline travel can allow a high price variant as the value of getting there faster is very high. However for your Personal Device getting the newest and greatest if it is too expensive will not add any value to the customer. They won't buy them at a high price.
Most security holes do not have a wide effect, and can be fixed before major problems occur. In the meantime they can have sold thousands or millions of units before then.
And what about Open Source developers... You release some code to the public and you may know there is a security hole in it, perhaps because you don't know how to fix it, and looking for a better solution, perhaps someone uses your code and gets hacked who is responsible... Probably you so you get to pay a nice hefty fine.
When the government needs to control and fine products to meet a particular standard they need to be careful about it, lets say a device cost the life of one person... However being able to ship the device 5 years earlier can save the lives of 50 people. Too tight regulation is just as bad as having no regulations.
I disagree with your view. 1. Age has little to do with it. It isn't that the 20 year old code money has so much more energy, it is that they have no life, so they will just spend all this time coding... I have actually had to tell 20 somethings to stop spending all this time coding because they will burn themselves out before we really need to to give the extra push. Also a lot of the stuff that they do past hours gets more and more problematic over time and needs to be fixed again and again, they come in the next morning tired out and not able to focus on the new set of requirements. And these kids are really good at coding, it is they just go to far and it really shows.
2. Your price has little to do with your age and experience, how much you get paid is controlled by economics supply vs. demand you may be overvaluing your skills or when you were being paid more it was because there was a much higher demand... It took me about 5 years to get myself back to the pay I got when I graduated from college. Because I graduated right before the tech bubble pop. Then Demand dropped for my skills so I needed to work for less then my skills slowly got more valuable. With a Masters in CS you are probably looking in the wrong spots for jobs. You have a lot of extra skills but you are trying to do work that an undergrad can do... So expect to get the undergrad pay. Experience counts a lot though that is why experience usually pays more. But know your place and the job you are doing and don't expect too much.
3. Having a bad attitude has nothing about age it is you having a failing. No matter how good you are, if people don't want to work with you will have trouble getting a job. And this is probably your biggest problem. You need to work with people, managers and your bosses who I bet you are seeing are becoming much more younger then you are coming up and taking jobs you want to do, or getting promoted while you stay stuck. It is because when someone has a positive attitude they are more trusted, and management doesn't need to wast their time arguing with you trying to get a deadline, where if you just shut up and started working you would get it done. Back in the old days techies having these Quarks were tolerated because it was tough to get a replacement. But today you can get a highly skilled tech (even if they are say 75% of your perceived skills) who can get the job done and not give management that 25% extra overhead of trying to battle unprofessional Quarks. These mind games aren't mind games it is them trying to nicely getting you to stop being a pompous elitists ass, and focus on what you are paid to do. Management isn't looking at these problems the same way you do, they often have reasons to do something you disagree with, for the most part they are OK if you disagree, but you need to give them a better solution, if they disagree with your solution you still need to do it the way they want.
I have worked with plenty of good developers making a good life to retirement. How do they do it? They are very professional in what they do when they make a mistake they fess up to it and make a plan to prevent it. When a new technology comes along they don't go on saying how bad it is but learns it and embraces it. They allow their age and experience become their greatest asset.
Actaully Early power steering was much different then it is today's. I had the opportunity to drive my Dads 1968 Caddi. Its power steering was a full power steering so you had no feeling of the road or resistance when you turn the wheel, It was like driving a video game steering wheel. It was later replaced with the partial power steering we have today because it was safer when people could feel and respond to the road.
The car safely arrived at its destination. In other news dissidence have seem to have been in some sort of hit in run by a car speeding at 286kmh.
Back in AI Class when I was in college we discuses the AI for driving on a highway we noted on a good stretch we could drive a car with some simple AI... Heck you can get fairly good if you just put a brick on the petal.
Then they asked how about having you car to drive in New York City... We came up with an algorithm that works just as well as the average human... Put a brick on the petal...
For some reasons American these past couple of generations have been playing it safe, In my opinion too safe, we are loosing a lot innovation to other countries because new innovative ideas are tossed out because there is some odd chance that something dangerous will happen. Other countries for years earlier had cars that can parallel park on their own, they didn't go to the US Market because of the Law Suits that could happen if a kid or a pet was in the sensors blind spots. (which would probably be a humans blind spot). Yes Human lives are valuable and should give due diligence towards keeping them safe, however it has gone too far in many cases (I know if I loss a loved one due to a safety accident I wouldn't care that it is for the greater good) it is preventing the improvement of technology for humans,
Well for most IE users they don't even use that search bar. They will click on a shortcut to google then type in the search box something like www.yahoo.com. For firefox users I think their head will explode if the search box went to Bing.
Is there really that much hatred of the both just because both have browsers. In normal business it is very common for companies to Partner with each other and Compete with each other at the same time. And their Partnership is very strong with a lot of good MBA Buzzwords like Synergy. And their competition is very aggressive against each other.
How do they do this? Simple neither side is Stupid. Mozilla need to partner with the Search Engine area of Google were the success of both is beneficial. And Mozilla is competing with Chrome the Software development unit of Google. Where one product can take market share of the other.
If Google made the Search Engine Google only work for chrome they will hurt both sides as a lot of people will not switch their browsers to use the search engine and without the search engine money they cannot put more development effort into chrome.
Life isn't black and white... It is a very complex thing.
The technology is still new and the full environmental impact isn't known. Trying it out in a controlled method as they ramp up to more is reasonable. This method is no worse then other energy extracting methods such as drilling for oil or coal mining. We need smart environmental laws that realize that some things do have a cost however the benefits out weight the costs. It seems like environuts are booing every idea that has a negative impact on the environment, forcing us to stick to the old end even more environmental damaging methods, Oil Drilling, Coal Mining...
Too bad what we call Cloud computing isn't what it use to be. Today is is a data center. It was supposed to be a distributed computing platform where PCs who joined the cloud will use their unused CPUs to create a massive super computer.
Slashdot Mirror
My question is how small will be too small?
Sure phones can still get thinner but there should be a point where they would be thin enough. I mean if they get too thin people will be cutting themselves with their phone. A fast answer of the call... Opps there goes their ear. But well before that, If the phone will stay a rigid device, the phone will probably reach Thin enough.
If you can make a folding phone, then you may go thinner.
Because Astronauts rode in it too. Or... Because Slashdot is filled with a bunch of fake atheists who somehow feel connected to the pope and see him as a holy man, even though they wouldn't publicly admit it.
Part of the reason why there are so many Catholic Sex Abuse jokes out there is that there were a lot of people non-catholic who still saw priests and bishops as being people who were better then everyone else, and these jokes (which are not funny) are ways to make them feel better that these people are no better then the rest of the population.
Bad economic times always cause people to think the world will continue to decline.
We are in the face of a world wide recession. Even those Elitist Europeans and those Arrogant American, are toning down their banter with each other as things are not good everywhere... And it is only time where countries that are doing well will face problems shortly.
Because everything right now is depressed and people are in generally fearful, they assume the world will not get better.
When Economics are tight people are thing about the short term and short term they need money. So they need Ideas that will bring them money.
When the Economy improves we will start again thinking and planning for newer bigger things, as we are not worried about money.
For the last 20 years our prosperity has been based on bubbles. Technology, Housing... So those outside the bubble have been hurting for years. So they were figuring out how to make it, thus big ideas for this generation have been small. Hopefully we wont have any more big bubbles and slowly rise out these problems and have a real economy world wide where global prosperity can lead to new bigger ideas.
The problem is that they are mixing methodologies... Web Apps don't have version numbers, This is fine, as when you access a Web App you are getting the latest and greatest that you can can on that site. But for the browser you should know if you are lagging in versions and you may have a good reason to lag. As this is software that is on Your PC, no someone else that you are using as a service.
OK fine Google Chrome doesn't do this... So what It doesn't been Google chrome is right, or Google knows all. The reason why people like chrome is because it is fast and light... Not because of some insane versioning scheme.
They liked Firefox in the Past Because it was fast and light... It has gotten slower and heavier (mostly due to Google raising the bar).
Is that your comment, or a comment for an installed piece of spyware?
It wasn't meant to criticize HIPAA, It was to point out that companies have less of a defense against public opinion. So allowing open forums is not a good idea.
Commemoration a movie with top of the line special effect and a mediocre plot, That has chance the thoughts and minds of generations. Which made people believe if they focus enough they could get that remote control from the other end of the couch without getting up. And teach us such important moral lessons like.
Running away from your home to talk to a stranger is a good idea.
Allie yourself with criminals.
Join a religion which only has a few followers.
Do, not think.
Its OK to quit just as long as you get back before your teacher dies.
A 3 foot noisy light saber can stop everything
Bad guys do not have smart bombs.
There are only two sides to things they are either good or bad, no middle ground.
Well (Tongue in cheek) if you even think about money you are violating the GPL 3 code, with the unless you are IBM clause.
That said most companies should avoid GPL Code like the plague, if they plan to redistribute anything based on it, as their business model is incompatible with the GPL code, and if they find a way to make it work chances are the next version of the GPL will find a way to block it.
So yes Hamstersoft Ebook shouldn't have use the GPL 3 code, and they are wrong to do so.
They cannot defend themselves because they are regulated under HIPAA unlike the rest of the population who can say whatever they want.
And under HIPAA they cannot publicly defend any personal claims, in a public environment like Facebook.
Sometimes the Company isn't trying to be evil.
There is a problem with Public Communication on Healthcare in general.
HIPAA
So if you bust on a drug company unfairly (which often happens on the internet as many makes their opinion of what a friend of a friend said about something) The healthcare company cannot make a rebuttal, because say for example someone says Drug X killed their friend the Drug company who looked into the matter found that they were just prescribed the drug, but an unrelated condition killed them, eg. They took a anti-depressant drug when they were already in the advanced sets of cancer. They cannot rebuttal the claim thus are forced to look bad.
The patient and public is free to discus anything about a medial condition, however the healthcare organization cannot. And moderation of comments will look bad like they are trying to hide things.
That is why you need to worry about regulations. If you are a small minority group you can get hit by a regulation that see you as a fringe player.
So we can call it Mr. Fusion even though it isn't fusion... Cool!!!
"Do you want you want you kids to have cancer? Do you know that you car could be powered by a radioactive substance?" Queue to stock footage of a nuclear bomb. "There are those out there who wants your kids to get cancer, call your Congressmen and have him vote NO on the Oil Reduction, Thorium Investment and Cancer Prevention funding bill. It is for your child's safety." Sponsored by those crazy nuts who hate everything, and will not do any real research before jumping to a conclusion.
What you forgot is durring the process the Consulting company may really try to say you should do it this way it is more secure, but normally it will not go threw because consultants are not to be trusted.
The 286's didn't often have over 640k anyways. the 386 did though, It was common to see a Meg or two of Ram. the 486 it is normal around 8 - 16 megs, The Pentium normally had 32 - 64 megs. The P2 had 128-256 megs, P3 512-1024 megs, P4 2-3 gigs... Then it slowed down for a bit and with 64 bit PC's and OS's they are moving up again... However now normal seems to be 4 - 8 gigs. We lost some time in progress, during the 2000's the 2000's we saw a lot of stagnation in Computer progress...
If Slashdot were to write a review of the IBM PC.
No WiFi less space then the Nomad... Lame...
That 640k limit while we all make fun it now. 640k ram cost a lot of money... PC's were supposed to be the Baby Computers not much more then slightly useful toys, where the real work was on the mainframe. At the time there wasn't any App for the PC processing power that you sanely consider that you would need to run on such a platform... Also at the time the PC wasn't expected for greatness and they figure in 2 or 3 years to replace it with a brand new Computer that had nothing to do with the old one. But they didn't expect all that legacy software to be made.
Besides how many of you guys who need to use windows now need to make a choice on staying with 32bit or 64bit OS, for software compatibility. When the 386 came out, why didn't the Hardware and the OS designed to take more the 4 gigs of RAM... Because when the 386 came out 4 gigs was unheard of amount of ram that would cost tens of thousands of dollars or more to purchase. Now with the 64 bit systems now we see the 16 exabytes accessible RAM. Who in their right mind will use 16 eb of storage? 40 years down the line I wouldn't be surprised, granted I can't figure it being smaller then a 6 meter cube.
Consultants, they will hire consultants to do the work. Then point their finger back at them when there is a problem and go BAD BAD consultants, then hire them for the next job. That is what the government does. If they need to do something that is politically risky they get a consultant to do it, if it succeeds they person get the credit, it it fails they blame the consultant, which privately the consultant happily takes because he knows that he will probably get the next job as well because why would the government authority get rid of a perfectly good skate-goat, for any mistakes (probably due to bad leadership).
Then expect no new devices to be released. And put the world into a worse recession..
If you fine them too much then they will calculate that it isn't a profitable sector to be in... Then they won't be in the sector.
There is only a limit on how prices will rise for a personal device. Airline travel can allow a high price variant as the value of getting there faster is very high. However for your Personal Device getting the newest and greatest if it is too expensive will not add any value to the customer. They won't buy them at a high price.
Most security holes do not have a wide effect, and can be fixed before major problems occur. In the meantime they can have sold thousands or millions of units before then.
And what about Open Source developers... You release some code to the public and you may know there is a security hole in it, perhaps because you don't know how to fix it, and looking for a better solution, perhaps someone uses your code and gets hacked who is responsible... Probably you so you get to pay a nice hefty fine.
When the government needs to control and fine products to meet a particular standard they need to be careful about it, lets say a device cost the life of one person... However being able to ship the device 5 years earlier can save the lives of 50 people. Too tight regulation is just as bad as having no regulations.
I disagree with your view.
1. Age has little to do with it. It isn't that the 20 year old code money has so much more energy, it is that they have no life, so they will just spend all this time coding... I have actually had to tell 20 somethings to stop spending all this time coding because they will burn themselves out before we really need to to give the extra push. Also a lot of the stuff that they do past hours gets more and more problematic over time and needs to be fixed again and again, they come in the next morning tired out and not able to focus on the new set of requirements. And these kids are really good at coding, it is they just go to far and it really shows.
2. Your price has little to do with your age and experience, how much you get paid is controlled by economics supply vs. demand you may be overvaluing your skills or when you were being paid more it was because there was a much higher demand... It took me about 5 years to get myself back to the pay I got when I graduated from college. Because I graduated right before the tech bubble pop. Then Demand dropped for my skills so I needed to work for less then my skills slowly got more valuable. With a Masters in CS you are probably looking in the wrong spots for jobs. You have a lot of extra skills but you are trying to do work that an undergrad can do... So expect to get the undergrad pay. Experience counts a lot though that is why experience usually pays more. But know your place and the job you are doing and don't expect too much.
3. Having a bad attitude has nothing about age it is you having a failing. No matter how good you are, if people don't want to work with you will have trouble getting a job. And this is probably your biggest problem. You need to work with people, managers and your bosses who I bet you are seeing are becoming much more younger then you are coming up and taking jobs you want to do, or getting promoted while you stay stuck. It is because when someone has a positive attitude they are more trusted, and management doesn't need to wast their time arguing with you trying to get a deadline, where if you just shut up and started working you would get it done. Back in the old days techies having these Quarks were tolerated because it was tough to get a replacement. But today you can get a highly skilled tech (even if they are say 75% of your perceived skills) who can get the job done and not give management that 25% extra overhead of trying to battle unprofessional Quarks. These mind games aren't mind games it is them trying to nicely getting you to stop being a pompous elitists ass, and focus on what you are paid to do. Management isn't looking at these problems the same way you do, they often have reasons to do something you disagree with, for the most part they are OK if you disagree, but you need to give them a better solution, if they disagree with your solution you still need to do it the way they want.
I have worked with plenty of good developers making a good life to retirement. How do they do it? They are very professional in what they do when they make a mistake they fess up to it and make a plan to prevent it. When a new technology comes along they don't go on saying how bad it is but learns it and embraces it. They allow their age and experience become their greatest asset.
I am sorry you never grew up, you just grew old.
Actaully Early power steering was much different then it is today's. I had the opportunity to drive my Dads 1968 Caddi. Its power steering was a full power steering so you had no feeling of the road or resistance when you turn the wheel, It was like driving a video game steering wheel. It was later replaced with the partial power steering we have today because it was safer when people could feel and respond to the road.
The car safely arrived at its destination. In other news dissidence have seem to have been in some sort of hit in run by a car speeding at 286kmh.
Back in AI Class when I was in college we discuses the AI for driving on a highway we noted on a good stretch we could drive a car with some simple AI... Heck you can get fairly good if you just put a brick on the petal.
Then they asked how about having you car to drive in New York City... We came up with an algorithm that works just as well as the average human... Put a brick on the petal...
For some reasons American these past couple of generations have been playing it safe, In my opinion too safe, we are loosing a lot innovation to other countries because new innovative ideas are tossed out because there is some odd chance that something dangerous will happen. Other countries for years earlier had cars that can parallel park on their own, they didn't go to the US Market because of the Law Suits that could happen if a kid or a pet was in the sensors blind spots. (which would probably be a humans blind spot). Yes Human lives are valuable and should give due diligence towards keeping them safe, however it has gone too far in many cases (I know if I loss a loved one due to a safety accident I wouldn't care that it is for the greater good) it is preventing the improvement of technology for humans,
Well for most IE users they don't even use that search bar. They will click on a shortcut to google then type in the search box something like www.yahoo.com. For firefox users I think their head will explode if the search box went to Bing.
Is there really that much hatred of the both just because both have browsers. In normal business it is very common for companies to Partner with each other and Compete with each other at the same time. And their Partnership is very strong with a lot of good MBA Buzzwords like Synergy. And their competition is very aggressive against each other.
How do they do this? Simple neither side is Stupid. Mozilla need to partner with the Search Engine area of Google were the success of both is beneficial. And Mozilla is competing with Chrome the Software development unit of Google. Where one product can take market share of the other.
If Google made the Search Engine Google only work for chrome they will hurt both sides as a lot of people will not switch their browsers to use the search engine and without the search engine money they cannot put more development effort into chrome.
Life isn't black and white... It is a very complex thing.
The technology is still new and the full environmental impact isn't known. Trying it out in a controlled method as they ramp up to more is reasonable. This method is no worse then other energy extracting methods such as drilling for oil or coal mining. We need smart environmental laws that realize that some things do have a cost however the benefits out weight the costs. It seems like environuts are booing every idea that has a negative impact on the environment, forcing us to stick to the old end even more environmental damaging methods, Oil Drilling, Coal Mining...
Too bad what we call Cloud computing isn't what it use to be. Today is is a data center. It was supposed to be a distributed computing platform where PCs who joined the cloud will use their unused CPUs to create a massive super computer.