YMMV, but from working an hourly job with an on-call component in MA I can tell you they make a distinction between two classes of 'On call'
Someone who is 'engaged to wait' on-site, like the firefighter analogy, is considered to be 'working' and therefore must be paid for their time.
Someone who is 'waiting to be engaged', but can otherwise go about their life as usual, is not working and therefore need not be paid. Once a call is made though they're on the clock for the hours spent dealing with the issue.
IANAL, and if you're taking your legal advice from Slashdot posts you really should have your head examined.
From the abstract: We identified regular cycles of acorn production... and found evidence that annual acorn production is affected by the interactions of precipitation, which is highly variable..., with endogenous reproductive patterns. In contrast, acorn production showed no significant association with minimum winter temperatures.
Indeed. We have this little chestnut to roast too:
"...has previously used ultrasound fields to levitate globs of iridium and mercury, very heavy materials."
A 1 gram 'glob' of mercury is equal in weight to 1 gram of feathers. Iridium and mercury may have a higher density, but they are not intrinsically heavy.
When even the author of an article is confused about basic physical properties you have to worry, IMHO.
Slashdot Mirror
If you want coffee real bad, they've got some real bad coffee.
YMMV, but from working an hourly job with an on-call component in MA I can tell you they make a distinction between two classes of 'On call'
Someone who is 'engaged to wait' on-site, like the firefighter analogy, is considered to be 'working' and therefore must be paid for their time.
Someone who is 'waiting to be engaged', but can otherwise go about their life as usual, is not working and therefore need not be paid. Once a call is made though they're on the clock for the hours spent dealing with the issue.
IANAL, and if you're taking your legal advice from Slashdot posts you really should have your head examined.
For those in MA, see http://www.lawlib.state.ma.us/subject/about/employmentfaq.html#oncall for ‘official’ info on the topic.
Nationally, the US Federal Fair Labor Standards Act has similar language, see http://labor-employment-law.lawyers.com/Pay-for-On-Call-Time.html
"LONG-TERM PATTERNS OF ACORN PRODUCTION FOR FIVE OAK SPECIES IN XERIC FLORIDA UPLANDS"
Study of acorn production across several species in FL from 1969 to 1996 http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/01-0707
From the abstract: We identified regular cycles of acorn production ... and found evidence that annual acorn production is affected by the interactions of precipitation, which is highly variable ..., with endogenous reproductive patterns. In contrast, acorn production showed no significant association with minimum winter temperatures.
Coincidence? Likley not, IIRC "ad astra" is latin for "to the stars"
Indeed. We have this little chestnut to roast too:
"...has previously used ultrasound fields to levitate globs of iridium and mercury, very heavy materials."
A 1 gram 'glob' of mercury is equal in weight to 1 gram of feathers. Iridium and mercury may have a higher density, but they are not intrinsically heavy.
When even the author of an article is confused about basic physical properties you have to worry, IMHO.