Slashdot Mirror


Starbucks Frees Wi-Fi

CWmike sends in this excerpt from Computerworld: "Free unlimited Wi-Fi is coming to nearly 7,000 company-operated Starbucks stores in the US beginning July 1, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz said on Monday. Schultz also said that Starbucks is partnering with Yahoo! to debut the Starbucks Digital Network this fall. Starbucks customers will have free unrestricted access to various paid sites and services, such as wsj.com, as well as other free downloads Starbucks didn't detail. A spokeswoman said the access will be 'unlimited' and 'simplified, one-click.' By comparison, first-time Wi-Fi users in Starbucks stores now get up to two hours free after registering, but then must purchase additional time at the rate of $3.99 for two consecutive hours. That Wi-Fi access is already free to AT&T DSL home customers and AT&T mobile customers, according to the Starbucks website, but the connection process requires up to nine steps. McDonald's added free Wi-Fi to 11,500 locations earlier this year."

241 comments

  1. Yay! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I can get a small cup of coffee and free WiFI for only $7!

    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They don't have small... Foamy the Squirrel (http://www.illwillpress.com/sml.html)

    2. Re:Yay! by selven · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do realize that you can, even before this change, use Starbucks's wifi without ever buying a single thing from them?

      Also, try tea. It's cheaper.

    3. Re:Yay! by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      For San Diegans, I recommend The Living Room. The food's a total ripoff but you can get an Iced Vietnamese with four whopping shots of espresso, for four bucks and free wi-fi with no purchase necessary for the wardrivers and mooches.

      There's nothing like hours of hard study with the jitters and the screaming shits and the sight of spiders crawling out of your pores.

    4. Re:Yay! by maxume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it costs more than $3 it isn't coffee anymore.

      Most of the time, that also works for $2.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Yay! by 2.7182 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even better - I go with my mug and just fill it with half-and-half and drink that all morning. Then by lunch time I so full I don't need to eat. Free dairy! mmmm.....

    6. Re:Yay! by catmistake · · Score: 1

      You should try Breugger's Begals. For only a few pennies more, you can get a smaller portion that tastes like ass.

    7. Re:Yay! by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I didn't even see a story here worth commenting on - til I read your comment.

      Coffee costs a buck to a buck and a half in most restaurants. Real coffee. What Starbucks offers has almost nothing in common with coffee. Flavorings? Cream and/or sugar. Want something rather exotic? Espresso, or cappuccino. All the rest of what Starbucks offers is just so much pretentious bullshit.

      Starbucks is what happens when to many people have more money than sense.

      Posers and wannabes gather anywhere and everywhere they can, trying to be "cool". We saw the same thing a generation or so back, with "Cafe Racers" and "Truckstop Cowboys". You couldn't find a real racer or a real cowboy in the same room with either of them.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:Yay! by Graff · · Score: 1

      Now I can get a small cup of coffee and free WiFI for only $7!

      Yeah, that's mildy funny and you scored some points with the moderators. Grats for finding the low-hanging fruit!

      Honestly though, as long as you aren't getting all of those espresso shots, flavored syrups, and other strange add-ons the price of a plain coffee at Starbucks is about the same as the stuff at their competitors. A coffee the same size at Dunkin Donuts is about the same price as one at Starbucks.

      If you really want to save money you can go to a diner or a local mom-and-pop place and get coffee for about 1/2 the price of any of the large chains. Of course, the quality of the coffee might wildly vary between one place and another so when visiting somewhere unfamiliar you are usually best off just paying the extra money for a sure thing.

    9. Re:Yay! by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Try bringing a thermos with your own coffee. That way, even in an unfamiliar place you have guaranteed quality at a price that beats all the local stores!

    10. Re:Yay! by maxume · · Score: 1

      Hells yeah, Starbucks is sure to burn the shit out of their beans.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:Yay! by Graff · · Score: 1

      Starbucks is sure to burn the shit out of their beans.

      Yeah, I agree that Starbucks coffee is usually heavily-roasted. I guess some people go for that kind of flavor.

      I'll admit that it's not my thing but it's ok once in a while as an iced coffee with cream and sugar.

    12. Re:Yay! by schon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny, but I liked the opening scene to "Role Models" better - with the exception of "Congratulations, you're stupid in three languages", it was almost word-for-word my first experience with Starbucks.

    13. Re:Yay! by maxume · · Score: 1

      It makes it easier for them to produce a consistent flavor. The quality of that flavor apparently is not as important.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    14. Re:Yay! by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      Tea tastes just like water, and everyone who's said different puts tons upon TONS of sugar to make the taste pop.

      I'm pretty sure I've tried the "legit" teas too and felt the same way.

      I really would switch to tea if it weren't for that. Until then, dame mas cafe!

    15. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Starbucks offera real coffee, in three fairly standard sizes, for prices not out of line with similar establishments. In spite of their lack of Fair Trade credentials, they pay more to the farmers who grow their beans than most companies ( contributing to the price ). Restaurants may also be offering you discounted coffee as a lure to customers who may also purchase meals.

      Most of what Starbucks offers is espresso or cappucino... with flavors... toward the goal of making them delicious. It doesn't seem terribly pretentious to me. It would seem more pretentious if they refused to offer anything but drip, espresso, or cappucino on grounds of purity.

      They haven't brainwashed hipsters with a ray gun. They offer products that people like to drink, at prices they are willing to pay, in a clean, pleasant establishment.

      Starbucks is what happens when many people have money. The two conclusions one can draw from your original statement are that nobody deserves to make enough money that they can enjoy an occasional trip to Starbucks, and/or that everyone who enjoys it enough to pay the asked price is stupider than you.

      Racing is dangerous, and being a cowboy would be, for many people, tedious and unfulfilling. And yet both professions boast a stylish, dramatic wardrobe. A character in a cartoon once said that a great man once said that to be truly human is to be constantly experimenting. If people feel like dressing up to change how other people view them, or they view themselves, do they deserve to be pissed on? They're trying something. Kudos to them. They're meeting their friends at a location they enjoy. Is that something that should be frowned upon? Are "real" racers and "real" cowboys superior human beings? Is it because they're so damned authentic in their attire? Many racers are initially drawn to the sport for the "cool" it lends. Is it still authentic, as long as they risk their lives for it?

      Starbucks is a place for normal people to purchase a good tasting drink, which they may or may not consume on a comfortable couch in subdued lighting. Some of them are pretentious. Some cowboys are pretentious, too.

    16. Re:Yay! by MrCrassic · · Score: 1
      Actually, Starbucks has some of the best beans in the world and are highly ranked in coffee tastings and such. The only problem is that they sell the low-grade shit; their Pike Place roast is fucking terrible (it's their cheapest roast), but their Bold roasts are much better.

      I also highly disagree that most restaurants sell "real" coffee. I've been to tons of restaurants/diners/coffee shops across the country and have only been to a select few that don't sell watered-down bullshit that people pass as decent. And guess what? Most of them charge the same for a 8oz cup as Starbucks does. Funny anecdote, actually: one of the places I love and frequent sells one of the best-tasting cups of coffee I know at 6oz a pop. The place is a super small bar out in (practically) the middle of nowhere. I hear their alcohol is pretty good too; maybe I'll have some next time I go out there to work on some things.

      Starbucks is what happens when to many people have more money than sense.

      No; Starbucks is what happens when you want to actually sit down and enjoy the drink. They have TONS of variety; have you looked at their menu? They might not be the best, but most places are set up so damn well that you have to overlook that.

    17. Re:Yay! by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      I remember a recent trip to a Tulsa, OK Starbucks after having not visited one for over 2 years. I walked in, asked the associate, "You guys have free WiFi?"

      He replied, "Yeah."

      I said, "Ok, I'll have %FAVORITE_DRINK% and a Scone."

      He said, "Alright, that will be $7.00."

      So I pony up the dough and break out my laptop. I connect to the access point and instantly hit the login screen. I ask him why there's a log in screen and he replies, "Oh, to reach the internet you gotta pay three bucks." So I ask, "So, the WiFi is free but if I want to reach the internet I gotta pay $3.00?" He says, "Yeah." (Face palm.) After a few choice words with him I folded up my stuff and left the drink and scone, untouched, on the table.

      3 doors down was a local mom & pop shop that had bona-fide free Wifi. My new drink and 3 small cinnamon buns cost $3.25 and all the free "wifi + internet" I could handle. Lesson learned.

    18. Re:Yay! by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Tea tastes like water polluted with cured leaves.
       
      That said, it makes lake water (most of the drinking water in Texas is sanitized lake water) taste less horrible. Especially in July/August when the lakewater inverts and tastes bad enough that the local water companies put out statements and buy ads to tell the public that it's safe to drink.
       
      In addition to masking flavors, it also gives soft water some flavor. You might have amazing stream fed, high mineral content, low chlorine tap water that tastes fucking delicious, but water quality, even in the first world, varies widely.
       
      Drinks 1-2 cups of tea/coffee a day

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    19. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do have a small, they just don't put it on the menu since people will normally buy the middle size shown.

    20. Re:Yay! by clifyt · · Score: 1

      Sugar in tea? Seriously? That ruins it. That said, I grab about 3 or 4 green iced teas from SB's every day...no added water, no syrup (they make it strong so they can store it smaller containers, and dilute it when fixing the drink).

      So drink it strong...and it won't taste like water.

    21. Re:Yay! by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      I tried that and it didn't taste like water; it just tasted like more of stuff I didn't like. But I will give it another shot someday when I get tired of drinking coffee.

    22. Re:Yay! by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tea. Earl Grey. Hot.

    23. Re:Yay! by Eudial · · Score: 1

      Uh, if water tastes something, you may want to check into getting a different source of water.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    24. Re:Yay! by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "If people feel like dressing up"

      gag *cough* gag

      I think that I used the word "posers" earlier. Maybe more people should get real lives.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    25. Re:Yay! by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 2, Informative

      What Starbucks offers has almost nothing in common with coffee.

      You mean, except for their brewed coffee
      that starts at around a buck and includes free refills? It's easy to hate the frou-frou drinks they serve, but the still do offer basic coffee at reasonable prices.

    26. Re:Yay! by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      You know, it IS possible some people enjoy frappucinos (or whatever Caribou's equivalent is), and that it has nothing to do with being pretentious. Some people (GASP) actually enjoy some of the drinks you can get there once in a blue moon. And "most restaurants" dont really offer anything beyond coffee-- every try asking for an espresso at a restaurant? And have you seen how much McDonalds charges for a tiny iced coffee?

      Dont get me wrong, I drink there maybe once a month-- and that mainly because ive been given a gazillion gift cards. But it can be a nice place to meet up, and a nice place to grab a drink if you dont feel like just normal coffee. Way to scoff at something just cause you dont like it tho.

    27. Re:Yay! by phylevn · · Score: 1

      Humm.. 7x30=210 Us Dlls... In México will be ten times more cheaper a 3G Connection. :) I I will want coffee then I can go to OXXO where I get a cup of coffee for 1 Dollar, Then 3G+31 Cups of Coffee to month will be more less 51 dlls less expensive to go Starbucks..

      --
      "Daria todo lo que se, por la mitad de lo que ignoro" http://blog.oaxrom.com
    28. Re:Yay! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      La-dee-da! Aren't you Mr. Millionaire! I fill a mug with my fresh warm urine in the morning and go through Starbucks dumpsters looking for used tea bags and yesterday's lemons!

    29. Re:Yay! by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      They do have a small size, it's not on the menu though. If you would like to order it, just ask for a 'short' whatever.

      Also, Foamy the Squirrel is one of the most unfunny things I have ever been forced by a friend to watch.

    30. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A large cup of plain old Starbucks coffee is $1.70. You filthy coffee fags should try it, black. You'll never go back. But you probably can't handle it.

    31. Re:Yay! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      La-dee-da! Aren't you Mr. Millionaire!

      We re-use our recycled loo paper. :D

    32. Re:Yay! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1


      T = K9P
      'nuff said.

    33. Re:Yay! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's mildy funny and you scored some points with the moderators. Grats for finding the low-hanging fruit!

      Yes, it was a joke. I don't go to Starbucks because I don't like their coffee and I don't like their prices. I hit a local chain that has 24oz coffee (regular, flavored, any way you want it) for $2.13 including tax.

      AFA 'low hanging fruit', well, perhaps I should have focused on Starbucks' claim that they're going to have 'proprietary content' you can't get anywhere else. Or maybe that they are telling you right up front that they will know who you are and track all your traffic so they can hit you with very focused ads. Those two things are much more interesting and important than a joke about $7 coffee.

      It did get modded up, and someone will come along and mark it 'overrated' to knock it down a point or two. Doesn't matter to me. The 'joke' resulted in some interesting comments related to coffee in general including "For only a few pennies more, you can get a smaller portion that tastes like ass." That means the process is working.

    34. Re:Yay! by number11 · · Score: 1

      Coffee costs a buck to a buck and a half in most restaurants. Real coffee.

      Well, Folger's. Or whatever brand Sysco (or whatever food service they use) sells.

      Starbucks is better than that. Overpriced, sure. You can make better coffee at home, sure, if you buy good coffee and clean the coffeemaker out. But in the US, the average restaurant coffee is pretty bad.

    35. Re:Yay! by cusco · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You saved me the time, and said it better than I would have anyway.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    36. Re:Yay! by tuomoks · · Score: 1

      Hm, in Mexico! I get a cup of real Illy $20 (pesos!), real cup - not paper, free Internet, many but best (today) from corner ice-cream shop, nice outside patio, no rush or hurry, etc. To be honest, it is almost as good in Seattle / Ballard, many small, nice cafes with free Internet and excellent coffee in real cup, yes - Seattle coffee and beer, have to try to believe! S.F. much the same so Starbucks is not the first or only one. I hate paper cups!

    37. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Starbucks offers has almost nothing in common with coffee.

      I don't know *what* they put in their coffee, but it's the only coffee chain who's product makes my teeth chatter and causes sounds to sharpen and claw at me.

    38. Re:Yay! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      And as an added bonus you will pretty much guarantee yourself plenty of workspace, I doubt there are a lot of people who will want to get anywhere near someone who has been drinking room temperature dairy all day.

    39. Re:Yay! by Graff · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was a joke. I don't go to Starbucks because I don't like their coffee and I don't like their prices. I hit a local chain that has 24oz coffee (regular, flavored, any way you want it) for $2.13 including tax.

      That's actually about the same price you'll pay for coffee at Starbucks, the flavored syrups are free if you use their cash card. "De gustibus non est disputandum" on the coffee, personally I'm more of a tea person but I'm not a huge fan of their coffee either.

      My main point on the joke is that it's a standard complaint and it usually comes from people not comparing apples to apples. People look at the Starbucks menu and see drinks costing 4 or 5 bucks so they say to themselves "Starbucks is expensive". What they're doing is comparing expensive speciality drinks to what they think a plain cup of coffee should cost. Compare the Starbucks plain coffee to what you expect a plain coffee should cost and they are in the same ballpark.

      Of course the process is still working here on Slashdot and you're free to make any joke or comment you want. It just doesn't seem fair to perpetuate stereotypes of any sort, even if it is a faceless corporate entity.

    40. Re:Yay! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Best coffee I ever had was at the restaurant at the Surfrider on Waikiki beach. Rich and bold, without needing to be overly strong to do it.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    41. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word "posers" has been dead for at least ten years. SLC Punk pushed dirt over the grave. Before its demise, it was the modern equivalent of Holden Caulfield's petulent, self-important "phony".

      If self-actualization means not having to dye your hair blue for attention from the ladies, the next rung down means being at peace with your need to dye your hair blue for attention from the ladies... to enjoy wearing an undeserved cowboy hat without having to justify it with claims of irony.

      Somewhere below that is kvetching about people who are using your gimmick without wasting their time with any level of commitment to the backstory.

    42. Re:Yay! by Kangburra · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this has been modded up. has it been missed, or are the geeks away this week? You have the con no.1

      --
      Common sense is not so common
    43. Re:Yay! by Kangburra · · Score: 1

      *hasn't, not has, preview,preview,preview!

      --
      Common sense is not so common
    44. Re:Yay! by Malc · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... you live in the USA? I was forced to import tea from the UK when I lived in Denver in the mid-90s. De facto American black tea then was some shite from Lipton that required boiling in the mug in a microwave for several minutes just to squeeze some flavour out of it.

      Sugar ruins tea. Just add some milk. Unless it's mint tea ;)

    45. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People enjoying their lives make me so angry.

    46. Re:Yay! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hand on, what's in the middle if small isn't there? Does it go "large", "even larger", and "so fucking large it's unbelievable" or something retarded like that?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    47. Re:Yay! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Been in a similar situation. In the end a colleague pointed me to an Asian store that had all the brands I'd heard of - bags and loose - plus several I couldn't even read.

      I think Amercans are still using the batch they threw into Boston harbour.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    48. Re:Yay! by AVryhof · · Score: 1

      Ahh....so that's why so many Starbucks are closing in my area.... (the Burger Kings closing were throwing me off) ....no one has enough money to pay as much for a cup of coffee as they do to buy a can of grounds. ($2.50/48C can Colombian blend...mmm mmm good!)

      The more interesting part of TFS is the 11,500 McDonalds locations with Free Wifi, that way, while you are buying your overpriced coffee, you can get an Egg McMuffin and Hash brown for about the same price.

      It's nice to know that I can (and for the last few years) go to just about any McDonalds or Denny's (or now, in upscale neighborhoods Starbucks) and access the Internet in a pinch, rather than paying a cellular carrier for the frustration of a 3G card.

    49. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try ordering a Macchiato. It should be a shot of esspresso with a touch of foam (less foam than a capacchino). At starbucks for some reason it means a capacchino with flavoring.

    50. Re:Yay! by jvkjvk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We all pose for society.

      To pretend that you do not is simply hiding that truth from yourself.

      Regards.

    51. Re:Yay! by delinear · · Score: 1

      The problem is (or used to be, forgive me if I'm wrong and this is different now but it's why I stopped drinking their filter coffees) they use the same beans for the plain old filter coffee as they use for the foamy coffee flavoured milk drinks. The only way they can get enough flavour into the milk drinks is by burning the coffee beans horribly, meaning you get the horrible burnt bean flavour intensified greatly in the filter where there's less milk to take the edge off, especially if you don't take sugar. I guess some people like that, but to me that doesn't reflect the real flavour of the bean (and yes, I can handle and actually do enjoy strong coffee when it's not incinerated). Now, maybe this is intentional as there's a better profit margin on the milky drinks, either way there's zero real competition in the UK outside the franchise corporate coffee shops so I'm stuck drinking cappucino.

    52. Re:Yay! by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      True, I've just bought some modded phones with wi-fi skype. I'm finding it pretty useful.

      Phaistoscommunications@gmail.com is selling them.

    53. Re:Yay! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I should pour my nasty micro-brew down the sink too and drink a Coors Light. I can't handle the deliciousness. Just like good coffee.

    54. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a related topic, is Starbucks still even seen as a "pretentious" coffee shop in the US? Over here in the UK it used to be viewed as slightly up market and frequented by "yuppies" (remember those?) and artsy types back in the 90's (when everyone was still reeling from the shock of a £4 cup of coffee when you could walk into any cafe and get one for 75p), but these days they're pretty much always full of what we lovingly refer to as "chavs" (in a similar manner to their co-opting of the Burberry brand to the point where the two become synonymous). I try to avoid it for that reason these days as much as the coffee they serve (not that I'm particularly snobbish, I just prefer to drink my coffee in relative peace without being surrounded by shouting teens and their bawling babies).

    55. Re:Yay! by nametaken · · Score: 1

      *hasn't, not has, preview,preview,preview!

      Facepalm.

    56. Re:Yay! by ptbarnett · · Score: 1

      That said, it makes lake water (most of the drinking water in Texas is sanitized lake water) taste less horrible. Especially in July/August when the lakewater inverts and tastes bad enough that the local water companies put out statements and buy ads to tell the public that it's safe to drink.

      Get a reverse osmosis filter. It completely removes the taste.

      If you don't want to invest in that, at least get a Brita pitcher with the carbon filters. It works almost as well.

    57. Re:Yay! by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Coffee costs a buck to a buck and a half in most restaurants.

      Sure enough, but just try ordering only a cup of coffee in a restaurant and sitting there for four hours straight working on your laptop. Some restaurants will allow that, but some won't. At least with Starbucks, I know what to expect.

    58. Re:Yay! by internic · · Score: 1

      Don't you have to go through some sort of sign up process to get a card from them (which contains an identifier used to track your time and allows you to buy more time). I know I've looked at using the "free" wifi at Starbucks before and decided it was too much hassle. I typically just go down the street to buy something at another coffee shop that invariably has ordinary free wifi. I mean, even McDonalds and Denny's have free wifi these days.

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    59. Re:Yay! by Elder+Lazarus · · Score: 1

      If you want coffee real bad, they've got some real bad coffee.

      --
      I need a rest between naps some days
    60. Re:Yay! by Duradin · · Score: 1

      It's nice to find someone who understands that coffee houses (Starbucks, as much as I loathe to, included) include the 'rent' for your seat in the price of their coffee. (Much like bars and their drink prices, but bars get a pass on this as they aren't as "pretentious" or "intellectual" and "hip" as the coffee house.)

      A business that is in the business of providing a social gathering space and a nice environment while selling only a cup or two an hour (or less) to each patron who may stay there for hours on end has to make money somehow.

      If you don't like 'overpriced' coffee and complain bitterly about coffee house prices then go to McDonald's, get their McCafe', and go about your business (as I doubt you'll want to linger there long). If you understand what you're paying for and take the time to enjoy everything that comes with the purchase, well, you know what you are doing and don't need anymore advice.

    61. Re:Yay! by akakaak · · Score: 1

      We all pose for society.

      We all pose, because the "self" is nothing but a pose. To think that there is a way to be a living human and not pose is naive, and to berate others for posing is just silly.

    62. Re:Yay! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      If you go with plain coffee, it's about the same price as most other coffee franchises. If you choose to get the coffee milkshake, or the fancy "cappuccino" and similar drinks, you can pay quite a bit.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    63. Re:Yay! by jb_02_98 · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this has been modded up. has it been missed, or are the geeks away this week? You have the con no.1

      I can't believe that Picard would name the replicator "Earl Grey." That just doesn't make any sense to me.

    64. Re:Yay! by snooo53 · · Score: 2

      So to punish them you left a scone and a coffee that you already paid for? face palm, indeed.

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    65. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well smart guy, what was the alternative at that point? It sounds like a $7 lesson which he has shared with you and me. If you keep hitting yourself in the face, it'll stay red.

    66. Re:Yay! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      It's nice to know that I can (and for the last few years) go to just about any McDonalds or Denny's (or now, in upscale neighborhoods Starbucks) and access the Internet in a pinch, rather than paying a cellular carrier for the frustration of a 3G card.
      The IHOP in my neighborhood also has free wifi, meaning that you can enjoy up to infinite times as much coffee as you would get at Starbucks for 1/7th of the price, and it tastes better. Also, the booths are comfy, and the space is well-lit, and there aren't a bunch of people trying desperately to be cool.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    67. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop feeding the trolls you guys. This is embarrassing.

    68. Re:Yay! by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      All the rest of what Starbucks offers is just so much pretentious bullshit.

      You haven't SEEN pretentious until you visit a Stumptown coffee roasters in Portland, Oregon. You can choke on the skintight black jeans and irony just stepping into that place.

    69. Re:Yay! by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      I'm lactose intolerant you insensitive clod!

      But seriously, I grew up on Red Rose with milk and a touch of sugar. Every time I'm forced to resort to Lipton I feel a little dirty.

    70. Re:Yay! by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I don't quite understand the Starbucks hate meme, and I thank you for dispelling the silly "Coffee at Starbucks costs $6,000,000 a cup" meme, but... Starbucks coffee isn't very good. Some of their (in store) blends are okay (Pike's Place), but most of them are over roasted, and lack any subtly.

      They over roast their coffee to promote uniformity between batches and locations, so the coffee at every location at any time tastes exactly the same. They are the McDonalds of coffee.

      I really don't mind their coffee for a quick pick me up. But if I want gourmet coffee I'll brew it at home, or find a (now scarce) independent shop.

      As an odd aside, me and the lady friend recently took a trip to the Washington state, and were floored that Seattle had less Starbucks than Phoenix. In our hometown Starbucks pretty much completely killed our local coffee ecosystem, even our nice local chain (The Coffee Plantation), which is a shame.

      Also, Starbucks makes most of their money on drinks that could barely be considered coffee. And oddly enough, the locations in poor areas make more money off of "vaguely coffee flavored milkshakes", than those in more affluent areas.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    71. Re:Yay! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      In spite of their lack of Fair Trade credentials, they pay more to the farmers who grow their beans than most companies ( contributing to the price ).

      That is like saying that you should buy from the Nazis instead of the Stalin, because the concentration camps are not as bad as the Gulags.
      It’s still evil. It’s still wrong. Killing one person instead of two does not make you acceptable.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    72. Re:Yay! by orngjce223 · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, that's /exactly/ what Tall, Grande, and Venti mean. Large, Larger, and Even Larger.

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    73. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even know what a cafe racer is?

    74. Re:Yay! by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Nice comment. I'll add that on a recent trip to NY, I noticed that a cup of regular coffee at Starbucks cost less than the same at Dunkin' Donuts, and both were slightly under $2.

    75. Re:Yay! by Herkavar · · Score: 1

      Now I can get a small cup of coffee and free WiFI for only $7!

      I work at starbucks. Our smallest cup of coffee, the tiny 8oz short, is a $1.50. The tall, which I consider our small, at 12oz, is $1.65. What exactly are you ordering that it costs you $7? Now, if you were to get clever, and put $5 on a starbucks card, then immediately use that card to buy a large (vente) 20 oz. coffee, get online and register your card, you can get a free refill on that coffee. 40 ounces of coffee, free wifi, for $2.14. How does that deal sound now?

    76. Re:Yay! by Meest · · Score: 1

      You know, I tried to not pose for Society one time...

      But then the officer told me to put my pants back on....

    77. Re:Yay! by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Pretentious? Moi?

    78. Re:Yay! by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      If you use the Starbucks card you can pay just $1.50 for Pike Place blend and get as many refills as you want for free plus free wifi.There is often a copy of the Times available to read again for free. The seating is comfortable and on cool Tucson evenings one can sit on the patio and enjoy the outdoor gas fireplace.

    79. Re:Yay! by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Breugger quick, hide the dog! I think someone is planning to eat it.

    80. Re:Yay! by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

      I would rather pay $7 for a good cup of coffee at Starbucks, than nothing at Mcdonalds for a coffee that is not fit to drink.
      The people at McDonlald's seem to think they can pass left over coffee grounds and call it a lattee and charge a few bucks.

    81. Re:Yay! by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

      If you can't taste the difference in coffee's then maybe Mcdonald's is just your cup of tea. :D

    82. Re:Yay! by Meski · · Score: 1

      Hand on, what's in the middle if small isn't there? Does it go "large", "even larger", and "so fucking large it's unbelievable" or something retarded like that?

      No, but it goes to 11

    83. Re:Yay! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Actually it goes to twenty.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    84. Re:Yay! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Now I can get a small cup of coffee and free WiFI for only $7!

      Fixed that for you. Now I can get a small cup of BURNED coffee and free WiFI for only $7!

      Yes, Starbucks is literally proud of the fact they burn their beans so every store delivers the same burned coffee flavor. I've very rarely tasted worse coffee than what Starbucks serves - and at premium prices.

    85. Re:Yay! by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      We all pose for society.

      Yes, but to breate someone for adopting a pose that denies their very existence is delicious.

      Yum.

  2. Finally by areusche · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The joke is that it took them this long. Paying for wifi is such a 2004 thing.

    1. Re:Finally by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      1999's era of Internet Cafes was in part created by the overheatted economy. Then when things got bad, business started to charge more for everything. Now the economy is showing signs of not getting worse, which is usually the first step towards getting better and....

    2. Re:Finally by Darinbob · · Score: 1, Troll

      And I'm still not interested in using any wifi device in a coffee shop. And not interested in drinking coffee either. Or hanging out with the sorts of people who hang out in coffee shops.

      Sometimes it's nice to actually NOT be connected to the internet.

    3. Re:Finally by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. Every independent coffee shop I've gone into in the past 5 years has had free WiFi. It's often better coffee, cheaper, nicer atmosphere, and free WiFi. I don't know how Starbucks expects to compete.

      But then, I live in an area that has a lot of independent coffee shops and not a lot of Starbucks locations, so I guess they're not competing.

    4. Re:Finally by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      The joke is that it took them this long. Paying for wifi is such a 2004 thing.

      And a 'not-too-distant-future' thing. Sadly.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Finally by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      But then, I live in an area that has a lot of independent coffee shops and not a lot of Starbucks locations, so I guess they're not competing.

      How can you compete against the distributor that has a damn shop on every other corner on an avenue?

    6. Re:Finally by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Where I live, there's only one Starbucks that I know of within several miles, and it's often almost empty. Meanwhile, there are loads of coffee shops and bakeries-- probably at least 8 that have better coffee than Starbucks within 2 miles, all of which offer free WiFi.

      I recognize that's not common, and I'm sure part of the reason it works out is that I live in an area that values good coffee and will give an independent coffee shop a chance. Still, it's better coffee, often cheaper coffee, better service, free wifi, often free (or cheap) refills, and these places are profitable. I think it's evidence that the little guy can complete, so long as people are willing to give them a chance.

    7. Re:Finally by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I would imagine they signed multi-year agreements with certain cell phone carriers (AT&T? T-Mobile?) that gave their users free wifi access while others would have to pay. This created a new selling point to get people to switch to their cell phone service. Starbucks may have been contractually obligated to charge a reasonable amount for wifi through the end of the contracts.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:Finally by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      ...and provided that they're in the right area. You can't really compete with Starbucks in the urban space, as they will just open another store two blocks down where more folks waiting to be assimilated by the corporates that be will willing shell $3.95 three times a day for weak lattes.

      This isn't so much the case in a place like, say, Martinez, CA.

    9. Re:Finally by initialE · · Score: 1

      The problem with free unencrypted wifi is that it is a risk you take every time you connect. It's pretty trivial to spy on your activities - all it takes is to run a repeater and transparent proxy, and even if all you are doing is going onto facebook, there are probably ways to turn the information that people can collect about you, against your interests.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    10. Re:Finally by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      unless you run it through a proxy:
      ssh -2ND 1080 username@some-server-you-can-ssh-into
      Then config your browser to localhost:1080 as a socks proxy.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    11. Re:Finally by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I live in an urban space, and for the time being, Starbucks is getting trounced.

    12. Re:Finally by michaelhood · · Score: 5, Funny

      And I'm still not interested in using any wifi device in a coffee shop. And not interested in drinking coffee either. Or hanging out with the sorts of people who hang out in coffee shops.

      Sometimes it's nice to actually NOT be connected to the internet.

      Thanks for sharing. I'll look for next week's post about you not watching TV.

    13. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story bro?

      Now what's your stand on women's rights? I'm sure everyone is just as interested in that as your stance on coffee, coffee shops, wifi devices, and being connected to the internet.

    14. Re:Finally by delinear · · Score: 1

      Very likely - they've recently had to compete with smartphones offering free (often unlimited) mobile data, or mobile broadband which, while offering a paid experience, is at least offering a consistent paid experience that you can budget for. In that case it's better to give your flaky WiFi away free and support it with ads, or use it as a selling point for the store and charge them a small fee. Now it looks like more mobile carriers are shying away from big, cheap mobile data, we might see a return to paid WiFi as a viable alternative model (but they really need to drop their prices a lot and improve their service to compete). On a side note, I was using Google Goggles to scan a DVD in a store the other day to do a quick online comparison, and while I had a full signal, the service wouldn't connect - coincidence, I'm sure, but it made me wonder how long before shops and eateries start shielding against mobile data so you have to use their services/can't do easy online comparisons? They could mask it as protecting their own WiFi from wardrivers and the like, but it seems companies selling shielding might be a lucrative bet in the future...

    15. Re:Finally by aceboomblain · · Score: 1

      Last summer when I was traveling around the US on a motorcycle, I tried to save money by booking hotel rooms same day via the internet. To that end I sought out free Wifi upon arrival to any town that I intended to stay the night in. I tried going to Starbucks, but it was too much hassle to use their Wifi, particularly since Panera Bread had no-strings-attached, free Wifi. After the first experience with Starbucks, I never even bothered to look for one again. After a few days, whenever I rolled into any moderately sized town, I visited the Panera Bread first since they were easily found on my GPS. Of course, I would have preferred to give my business (as meager as it was) to some independent shop, but that's just not an option if you don't know the area (yet).

    16. Re:Finally by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I don't know how Starbucks expects to compete.

      Well, look at how Apple competes. Or Microsoft, for another strategy.
      Being much better does not mean much in a world full of passive-reactive cattle.
      The louder stronger dick with the worse offer still might win easily.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    17. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with free unencrypted wifi is that it is a risk you take every time you connect. It's pretty trivial to spy on your activities - all it takes is to run a repeater and transparent proxy, and even if all you are doing is going onto facebook, there are probably ways to turn the information that people can collect about you, against your interests.

      The same thing is true for encrypted wifi, unless you're running some fancy corporate level encryption with predistributed credentials.

    18. Re:Finally by Raisey-raison · · Score: 1

      Now that Starbucks has free wifi it should do better. I do wish though, that they would have comfy chairs. The hard wooden ones hurt my butt. Indie stores often have very comfy ones.

      I also wish that Starbucks would use more variety in their color scheme. They all look the same and after a while it's quite boring. I hope they would consider having different stores in different colors.

  3. I've noticed something interesting by Pojut · · Score: 2, Informative

    For a long time, our local Starbucks was primarily dominated by Apple laptops. About a year ago, seemingly overnight, the ratio shifted; hardly a MacBook to be seen. Now, it's gotten back to 50/50, but the majority of Apple users there are either holding an iPod Touch, iPhone, or iPad.

    Has anyone else noticed this kind of shift at their local haunts?

    1. Re:I've noticed something interesting by selven · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mine is still a nearly 100% Mac shop, when I'm inside even at peak time Linux temporarily becomes more popular than Windows.

    2. Re:I've noticed something interesting by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I was actually startled the last starbucks I went into (this past friday), there were 4 other people there, all with laptops, all macbooks.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    3. Re:I've noticed something interesting by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      ...when I'm inside even at peak time Linux temporarily becomes more popular than Windows.

      So you're the only guy that actually sits down and pays for Wi-Fi at Starbucks?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:I've noticed something interesting by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, and it's largely due to the fact that most of these people don't have anything better to do. Like work. So them being in public with a macbook a couple years ago was their way of showing off. Now it's trendy to have an Ipod/phone/pad so that's what they have. They still aren't getting anything useful done, but damn if they don't look all sleek and new agey not doing it.

    5. Re:I've noticed something interesting by siride · · Score: 1

      I spend a lot of time in coffee shops with my computer, but I'm actually doing work (that I get paid for) and my ThinkPad definitely doesn't look trendy.

    6. Re:I've noticed something interesting by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Has anyone else noticed this kind of shift at their local haunts?

      My local coffeeshop has seen a couple of new iPhones this last couple of weeks, but other than the four year old Nokia's they replaced the only other significant electronics noted there has been a GPS on it's way out the door on a geocaching expedition.
       
      But then my local coffeeshop is my kitchen, where I can get better coffee far cheaper than any Starbucks and I have a view of my yard rather than concrete and asphalt.

    7. Re:I've noticed something interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine is still a nearly 100% Mac shop, when I'm inside even at peak time Linux temporarily becomes more popular than Windows.

      Because everyone leaves.

    8. Re:I've noticed something interesting by Pojut · · Score: 1

      But then my local coffeeshop is my kitchen

      This will soon be the case with us. We have an awesome espresso machine on our wedding registry, and someone in one of our families actually bought it! not sure who it was, but we've decided that whoever did it gets to take the leftover booze home after the party :-)

    9. Re:I've noticed something interesting by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Now it's trendy to have an Ipod/phone/pad so that's what they have.

      Is a mere iPod trendy again? I thought that they were basically ubiquitous, and thus couldn't have any hipster cred? I'm glad I'm accidentally hip again, at any rate. At some point in the mid 00's, I somehow became hip because my college had a iBook/iPod combo on sale for $700. I bought it because I had a back to back bad experience with Windows and Linux, so I figured spending some hard-earned grant money on something retardedly stupid to use was a good idea, since I should be focused on my papers and not on installing drivers. I also hung out at a coffee shop (bad room mates, plus cheap caffeine) with said laptop and ipod (much easier than lugging a full tower dual booting Windows and whatever flavor of Linux I liked at the time around).

      I'm relieved to hear that ipods are hip again, though, since now when I sit at Starbucks with my old HP booting Ubuntu, I can equal out to be just normal.

      I personally believe that people who avoid the appearance of pretension at any cost are just as pretentious as those they strive so hard not to be. Screaming "look at me, I'm different than you!" is pretentious if your using an iPad or not.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  4. sure. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    I see the business model here.

    People willing to pay $5 for mediocre coffee and the chance to overhear inane babble conducted by other people willing to pay $5 for mediocre coffee will, pretty much, pay for anything.

    But if what they're paying for wants to pay the fee for them, we'll give them free access to that.

    1. Re:sure. by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really it's free-WiFi-as-long-as-we-have-a-sponsor that's catching on. AT&T sponsored it for their own customers at McDonald's and StarBucks for a while... now there's a deal in place to open it up to everybody, but that will likely only last as long as there's somebody other than Starbucks paying for it.

    2. Re:sure. by adolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've always been lost as to the reason WiFi needs to be so heavily monetized.

      I mean: It's a business, right? Presumably, in the course of running the business, they already have a need for Internet access -- that it exists, and is working, is a foregone conclusion.

      Why is it that companies (like, say, Starbucks and McDonald's) have found that it's so bloody expensive to open the pipe up for random folks to use? The initial investment of cabling in an AP or two is pretty small, even with union labor. Configuration should be near-zero cost, as since there are thousands of devices and they can all be set up pretty much identically in advance.

      I realize that the fact that it's cheap doesn't mean that it's free, but geez. Air conditioning is more expensive to offer than free WiFi, but we don't see ever see them charging extra (or looking for looking for sponsorships -- WTF?) for that.

      My favorite local coffee shop has offered free 802.11 since before the term "WiFi" existed, and still has functional Ethernet jacks beside the tables that are left over from the time before anything wireless was common. I'd like to suggest that they've got more invested their network than any particular Starbucks, that the coffee is better and cheaper, and that the barristas are more nubile. Oh, and it's air conditioned, too. ;)

      Someone please enlighten me.

    3. Re:sure. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As I pointed out above, many sponsorless mom-and-pop style places whose prices are less than or equal to(and food and drink quality is much greater than) Starbucks have been providing free wifi for years, even on the beach in tourist-gouging San Diego -- where a mandadory 12% tourist tax is slapped on top of all hotel stays.

    4. Re:sure. by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They lowered the price of a coffee to 1.50. With the card it's free refills and free flavored syrups. With the flavored syrup, it's getting damn close to being a good enough replacement for the $4 drinks. My wife and I have oddly started spending a lot more bread at starbucks since we discovered this.

      They'll probably raise the price again.

    5. Re:sure. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Probably because consumers demand air conditioning, or they won't even go into a store, let alone buy anything. And wi-fi a business doesn't even get people in to look at things let alone buy them when they're using the next from a half block away.

      But there's also the fact that Starbucks and these places don't generally provide the infrastructure, 3rd parties do, and getting them to do so is tough. Starbucks wanted to do this a while ago, but couldn't as it wasn't really their wi-fi to give away. AT&T gets away with giving it away because it's their bandwidth and they do give it away to other customers as well through bandwidth swaps. It isn't really free it's just already priced into their internet plans.

    6. Re:sure. by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      Here, high-speed internet is about $40/month for a residential address, but $300/month for business (with a cap of either 50 or 200 GB, depending on who you're dealing with). The speeds aren't that much different than residential, but you get web space and five shiny static IPs.

      I doubt any small-ish coffee house would require a FT3 or T3, but it does make me wonder what "options" for connections they are even offered as a business. The cost of wireless itself could be essentially nil as you could do one or two cheap access point set up on different radios. It's possible the cheapest wired connection offered to their building isn't cheap. I'm speculating, here.

      Of course, if the business needs to hire someone to set it up for them (especially if it's a chain), they are likely buying Cisco equipment at full price somewhere, not on eBay.

    7. Re:sure. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Since starbucks is the creation of lots of money, and nothing to spend it on. Lowering the price is the opposite. I've never liked their coffee anyway. Second cup is much better.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:sure. by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      Because you can get people to pay for it, and therefore, they do.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    9. Re:sure. by adolf · · Score: 1

      Read it again.

      My second paragraph covers your first and second paragraphs. But if I may add my own analog: Good "consumer" broadband here is about $50. "Business" broadband is about $80. I'm generalizing, obviously, but so were you.

      Your third paragraph is lunacy. Even if it is licensed-and-proper Cisco gear, it's still cheaper than air conditioning.

      You fail at enlightening me.

    10. Re:sure. by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      Cisco gear *and* a professional group supporting it is more expensive than somebody's buddy "who knows computer stuff" picking up a $40 AP from Future Shop. A business may or may not decide to make that impact how they do their wireless access. Or... they may have other reasons for doing so (i.e. not wanting it abused). I am game for free unrestricted access everywhere, but businesses are free to do as they please when providing this service.

      And clearly, we have learned that business vs personal internet access pricing is not comparable all over the globe. Sometimes there is a big variation, sometimes there is not.

      Third, I hope you don't express yourself like this in person and at work. It would be nice if us nerds could shed our reputation of having poor personal skills. I know the internets aren't really serious business, but let's keep it professional, ok?

    11. Re:sure. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I mean: It's a business, right? Presumably, in the course of running the business, they already have a need for Internet access -- that it exists, and is working, is a foregone conclusion. There is not any real reason why a business like Starbucks would have to have internet. They might have it for their credit card machine, but frankly, the extra amount that FirstData and others charge for an internet versus dialup connection is prohibitive to any small business. However, the rest of your post is valid. I have a small business that offers free Wifi. It cost maybe $100 in cabling and a wireless router, and the DSL service is $40 a month. I don't need a corporate subsidy for $40 a month. Though if AT&T or somebody wanted to offer it to me, I would take it.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    12. Re:sure. by adolf · · Score: 1

      Cisco gear *and* a professional support group cost almost nothing when spread across thousands of units, if the support group and the gear they're supporting is worth a fuck.

      And frankly, I don't care what you think about how I might express myself in person and at work. My actual peers accept me just fine, and my ideas are more profitable than theirs.

      Next?

  5. Uff... by Alworx · · Score: 1

    Uff... make it a "to go" please, there's no seating place right now. Thanks

  6. What the? by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Did nobody else catch this?

    "Starbucks customers will have free unrestricted access to various paid sites and services, such as wsj.com, as well as other free downloads Starbucks didn't detail."

    It's not "free unlimited access." It's "free unlimited access to select Starbucks-chosen sites, most of them you have to pay for."

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:What the? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Macbooks are the new teal, the people in it for the style (read: just about all of them in my humble experiance...) wouldn't be caught dead with it right now.

      I predict that in 2-4 years there will not be a Macbook anymore. MBP will probably still be around, but I think Apple is definetly trying to phase out their old, and nicely rather open comparitively, OSX.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    2. Re:What the? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Appologies, this comment was meant to be in response to this comment.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    3. Re:What the? by rockNme2349 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Schultz also said that Starbucks is partnering with Yahoo! to debut the Starbucks Digital Network this fall. Starbucks customers will have free unrestricted access to various paid sites and services, such as wsj.com, as well as other free downloads Starbucks didn't detail.

      It sounds to me like they will get free WiFi access to the internet, as well as a free pass around a couple pay-walled websites, although neither the article or the summary explicitly says it.

      --
      Sewage Treatment Facilities - "Our duty is clear."
    4. Re:What the? by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Informative

      You read it wrong, they are providing free access to paywalled sites like wsj.com. Similar to the system a University has in place with research journals.

    5. Re:What the? by Pojut · · Score: 1

      It's just really odd...like I said, the initial switch happend literally almost every night. One day, Macs everywhere. The next day, MIA. It was really weird.

    6. Re:What the? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I definetly noticed it too in all of my CS classes.

      Hell if I know why people like these things though, all of the Apple kids look so uncomfortable trying to prop their ipads up with one arm while "1 finger pecking" at a software keyboard with the other.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    7. Re:What the? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Cool and stylish is not supposed to be comfortable or convenient. Or at least that's what I think the explanation behind heels and most other fashionable clothing for women is.

    8. Re:What the? by Graff · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not "free unlimited access." It's "free unlimited access to select Starbucks-chosen sites, most of them you have to pay for."

      You already get free, unrestricted access to any site if you use a Starbucks card. You get the card for free, throw a few bucks on it, and use it for purchases. As long as you make 1 purchase a month (of any amount) you get free access for the month. They also give you other perks like free addons (flavored syrup and such), free refills, and every so often they send you a card for a free drink of any kind you want.

      I'm not big on using cards like this but they do compensate you pretty well for using it.

      My big quibble with all of these "click to log on" types of systems is they are a pain in the butt. Say I just want to check my e-mail or do something else that's not HTTP, I can't do it unless I load up my web browser, visit any web site, get redirected to their landing page, and do their login dance. It's a huge waste of time, there should be some way for them to build their login directly into the wifi login to avoid HTTP if we aren't currently using it.

      Not to mention that they all have some odd reasons for timing out the login and I'll be in the middle of doing something (like a Slashdot post!) and it fails because I have to re-login. What a pain in the ass!

    9. Re:What the? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did nobody else catch this?

      "Starbucks customers will have free unrestricted access to various paid sites and services, such as wsj.com, as well as other free downloads Starbucks didn't detail."

      It's not "free unlimited access." It's "free unlimited access to select Starbucks-chosen sites, most of them you have to pay for."

      I didn't "catch it" I understood it. They were referring to some paid sites would be free as well as unlimited surfing. They aren't giving you less they are offering more. Even paranoia can be taken too far.

    10. Re:What the? by Graff · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not "free unlimited access." It's "free unlimited access to select Starbucks-chosen sites, most of them you have to pay for."

      Oh, and if you go directly to the Starbucks press release linked in the article:

      As part of this commitment, Schultz recognized customers' desire for a better in store Wi-Fi experience and announced that on July 1, Starbucks will turn on one-click, free Wi-Fi through AT&T in all U.S. company operated stores.

      Building on the Wi-Fi update, Schultz also revealed plans for a new online customer experience called the Starbucks Digital Network, in partnership with Yahoo!, which will debut later this fall. This online experience - available only in U.S. company operated Starbucks stores - will be unique in its content offerings, allowing customers free unrestricted access to various paid sites and services such as wsj.com, exclusive content and previews, free downloads, local community news and activities, on their laptops, tablets or smart phones.

      So it's both free access to the entire internet and free, unrestricted access to sites that you might normally pay for such as wsj.com.

    11. Re:What the? by macshit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I definetly noticed it too in all of my CS classes.

      Hell if I know why people like these things though, all of the Apple kids look so uncomfortable trying to prop their ipads up with one arm while "1 finger pecking" at a software keyboard with the other.

      The ipad does make sense as a "couch computer" you use to browse slashdot while vegging out and half-dozing, but yeah, it seems horrible if you're doing actual work on an actual table...

      I suppose it's yet another case of fashion trumping comfort.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    12. Re:What the? by sv_libertarian · · Score: 1

      Good thing I live in Olympia, about 60 miles from Starbucks HQ. Somehow I'll bet most of the corporate stores around the Puget Sound will have free wifi. As well as... oh yes, the one that's closest to the State Capital Campus in downtown Oly. Works for me. Now I don't have to go to some grungy weirdo hippie coffee shop just to get free wifi. I can go to a nice happy corporate coffee shop that doesn't pretend to be edgy, hip and cool simply because they cater to the liberal nutter crowd. Never thought I'd miss yuppies...

    13. Re:What the? by Graff · · Score: 1

      Hell if I know why people like these things though, all of the Apple kids look so uncomfortable trying to prop their ipads up with one arm while "1 finger pecking" at a software keyboard with the other.

      The software keyboard isn't too bad for short entries. I wouldn't use it to write long papers or anything. If I was going to do that I'd get the keyboard/stand attachment which basically turns the iPad into something similar to a netbook.

      The iPad is mostly meant to be a content consumption device that can do some extra stuff. It excels at that purpose but if you need a device to create content I'd recommend a real netbook or laptop.

      I use a 15" Macbook Pro and it's easy to carry, has great battery life, and it's easy to code on. Plus it can run Windows if I ever need that. That's the real selling point for a Mac for me: the ability to easily run just about any modern operating system, even simultaneously with virtualization. Nothing beats being able to code and test Macintosh, Windows, and Linux applications on one machine.

      Yeah, there are some non-Apple machines out there that you can get to run Mac OS X but I really don't feel like keeping on top of compatible drivers and operating system updates.

    14. Re:What the? by Wiseleo · · Score: 1

      That statement likely means "You normally have to pay for it, but now you can access wsj.com at no extra charge from a Starbucks-hosted network in addition to the rest of the Internet". I don't think that's a bad thing. :)

      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Find me on Quora :)
    15. Re:What the? by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, if the situation were reversed, you'd (you meaning most of /.) probably be screaming bloody murder against MS for making it so hard to port their OS. Different expectations I suppose. Odd though, if you think on it.

    16. Re:What the? by Graff · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, if the situation were reversed, you'd (you meaning most of /.) probably be screaming bloody murder against MS for making it so hard to port their OS.

      For years now Windows hasn't been able to run (directly) on Apple's hardware and I don't think most people even cared, including the ubiquitous "you" here on Slashdot.

      If a company wants their software to only run on one platform then that's up to them, I've never had any problem with it. It's all a matter of what set of hardware the company supports. There will always be a small group of people who will try to beat those restrictions and as long as they don't do it in such a way that seriously undermines the original developer of the software then I don't have a problem with that either.

    17. Re:What the? by Graff · · Score: 1

      screaming bloody murder against MS for making it so hard to port their OS.

      Also, it's not hard at all to run Mac OS X on non-Apple hardware. The main problem is that there aren't a ton of drivers out there for non-Apple hardware. All it takes is for people to write some drivers and making a "hackintosh" would be a lot easier.

      It's less a matter of Apple making life difficult to install Mac OS X on other manufacturers hardware and more a matter of Apple only writes drivers for their hardware. Of course that's good business for Apple because why would they want to support other manufacturer's hardware sales over their own?

    18. Re:What the? by WidgetGuy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that they all have some odd reasons for timing out the login and I'll be in the middle of doing something (like a Slashdot post!) and it fails because I have to re-login. What a pain in the ass!

      Please tell us you don't use the /. editor to compose posts. You were using Google Docs or some other cloud-based editor. Right?

      By the way, Barnes & Noble Cafes (basically, Starbucks in a B&N store -- without the too-loud music and snooty baristas) has a similar policy (also AT&T WiFi). They kick you off every two hours or so. I know because, all of a sudden, Pandora will just "disappear." 8-) If I recall, they won't let you log on three consecutive times. That's when I haul out the ol' MAC "spoofer." Only three clicks gets you (back) on line.

      Barnes & Noble has a "Members Card" program as well. Gets you money off your drink and food, but no extra perks on WiFi (and you pay $25 per year to use that card). But, it's still a great deal (free shipping form bn.com and nice in-store discounts, for example). I always get my $25 back and then some.

      --
      One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
    19. Re:What the? by Graff · · Score: 1

      Please tell us you don't use the /. editor to compose posts.

      Lol, I do actually. It's ok though, I do a select all and copy before I submit. That way if something goes wonky I still have my post and can do a quick re-submit. I've gotten into the habit of doing that with anything web-based.

    20. Re:What the? by mikaw · · Score: 0

      My big quibble with all of these "click to log on" types of systems is they are a pain in the butt.

      These are also frustrating when you use something Nokia E51 mobile phone. Problem is with small screeen and also Nokia's browsers sometimes isn't really good with these. It does work but it's a lot nicer when you can use normal open wlan.

    21. Re:What the? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      My big quibble with all of these "click to log on" types of systems is they are a pain in the butt.

      I assume you are talking about captive portal systems. The are a way of having encryption without having to distribute a password. Certain captive portals allow individual device encryption and it's also device independent (meaning your device does not need to support WPA2 or other encryption). Also captive portals are good for enforcing session/download/bandwidth limits (quit bitching, its free and if you've ever run a public AP you'd understand why you'd need these limits, like some arsehole connecting and starting up a dozer torrents killing bandwidth for all your customers).

      KLIA (Kuala Lumpur International Airport) has such a system, as soon as I log on using a web page, I can close that browser session and run Apt, FTP, SMTP or whatever I want (Apt, FTP and SMTP are all I tested in my 3 hour stopover). BTW, if you're a cheapskate like me, the best spot for WiFi I've found in the LCC Terminal is near gate T6.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    22. Re:What the? by Graff · · Score: 1

      I assume you are talking about captive portal systems. The are a way of having encryption without having to distribute a password. Certain captive portals allow individual device encryption and it's also device independent (meaning your device does not need to support WPA2 or other encryption).

      They are also completely unnecessary. All they are doing is associating your device's MAC address with a profile, something they could do completely without a web page.

      I believe the true purpose of the login web pages are to advertise who is providing the access, provide them with plausible deniability in case you do something unlawful because they have a link to their terms of service on the landing page, and to make a little cash by advertising more services. All of these are good reasons for having a login page but it doesn't make it any less annoying.

    23. Re:What the? by delinear · · Score: 1

      Ditto, I wonder if there's sufficient demand for a browser plugin that works like Tortoise SVN's ability to store/recall recent text entries but for form fields, so when something catastrophic does happen you just re-populate from a "recently typed entries" context menu.

    24. Re:What the? by afiske · · Score: 1

      It's not "free unlimited access." It's "free unlimited access to select Starbucks-chosen sites, most of them you have to pay for."

      You have it backwards. The idea is that, in addition to free Wi-fi, you'll get free access to various websites which are normally paid-access only.

      From their press release (emphasis is mine):

      "...on July 1, Starbucks will turn on one-click, free Wi-Fi through AT&T in all U.S. company operated stores. Building on the Wi-Fi update, Schultz also revealed plans for a new online customer experience called the Starbucks Digital Network, in partnership with Yahoo!, which will debut later this fall. This online experience – available only in U.S. company operated Starbucks stores – will be unique in its content offerings, allowing customers free unrestricted access to various paid sites and services such as wsj.com, exclusive content and previews, free downloads, local community news and activities, on their laptops, tablets or smart phones."

    25. Re:What the? by Graff · · Score: 1

      Mmm, yeah, that's a good idea actually. Safari kinda sorta has it but only for common web forms - stuff like name, address, etc.

      Definitely a feature to suggest for your favorite browser.

    26. Re:What the? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      All they are doing is associating your device's MAC address with a profile, something they could do completely without a web page.

      Spoken like someone who has never run a public AP before.

      Captive portals have many uses that simply associating a users MAC address cannot provide, they can be used to protect a vlan on wireless networks (I.E. you can have a secure network for staff and a free wireless service for visitors, on the MAC level (layer 2) this can only be done by physically segmenting the network). IP/MAC addresses can be easily spoofed so the captive portal uses the browser for authentication (while not perfect is a hell of a lot better then layer 2 controls).

      Even just displaying an AUP is reason enough, many nations have laws that you may not be aware of (including your own).

      All of these are good reasons for having a login page but it doesn't make it any less annoying.

      Going to one web page is annoying?

      After all your whining my only response is, Harden up princess. It only takes 10 seconds to connect to a free service.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  7. Today's free sample is a cup of wsj.com by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    Interesting here that WSJ is willing to open a hole in their paywall for users at Starbucks... typically this is done so that customers will get hooked on the concept and pay to have access everywhere. Could they be behind paying Starbucks' Internet service bill?

    1. Re:Today's free sample is a cup of wsj.com by hedwards · · Score: 1

      More likely, Starbucks is trying to attract and retain business people at their locations and is willing to pay a bit to do so.

  8. That is the sound of Progress by darjen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Business adding more value for customers.

    1. Re:That is the sound of Progress by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      AT&T has also announced that Wi-Fi technology has been added in Times Square to relieve network congestion in New York City, and said the strategy could be deployed elsewhere.

      I'm surprised this was buried so deep in TFA.
      It seems like a good thing, but Steve Jobs' embarrassing iPhone v4 demofail comes to mind.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  9. Starbucks Irrelevancy by fermion · · Score: 1
    There is no way to spin this positively. Starbucks is doing this, for example, because I have three coffeshops, 3 bars, and 4 MacDonalds that will give me free access within an area that has three starbucks that want to charge me for the access. This is why it has been forever since I have gone to Starbucks. Now that they offer free access, I might go in while traveling, but that is about it.

    We hear that people just sit around and use the internet without buying anything. I don't see this. I see people sitting around and studying, often not using the internet, taking space, without buying anything. Mostly what I see is people getting coffee to go. The only time I have been to a starbucks when there are no seats is during a widespread power outage after a storm. Even so people did not linger for hours.

    I like firms that give me a simple deal. Starbucks has never been this way. Even the Starbucks card, which should be useful for more than wifi, is not useful at the Starbucks branded outlets. How Lame.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  10. 9 steps? Are we counting "turn on laptop"? by Pirate_Pettit · · Score: 1

    ATT Customer here, been enjoying free wi-fi at Starbucks for a long time...it's not a difficult setup, and only done once. That said, I'm not a fan of exclusivity deals, so if Starbucks is making it easier, more power to them. Hopefully the "Starbucks Digital Network" partnership with Yahoo that is most assuredly funding this free wifi isn't going to be too intrusive.

  11. Huh? by brit74 · · Score: 1

    I'm not even sure what this story is talking about. For the past few years, all the Starbucks in my area (Denver) simply require you to get a (free) Starbucks gift card and sign-up for free wifi. As long as you have some activity on the card within the past 30 days (either putting money on the card or using it to pay for something), then you get free wifi. They say that you only get 2-hours of wifi per day (not two hours total, as this story implies), but I've never been kicked off their system. And there are no restrictions on which websites I visit. (No, I don't have AT&T.)

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's been that way for a while now. Get a card, put some cash on it, but something with it, use internet. If you're worried about privacy, you can pay for the card in cash, and just get a new card every day.

  12. TANSTAAFL by rossdee · · Score: 1

    "There Aint No Such Thing As A Free Lunch - or drinks would cost half as much"

    RAH

    1. Re:TANSTAAFL by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      At Genting in Malaysia internet cafe's were charging "daylight robbery" rates so I went to Starbucks and got charged similar rates for coffee but the wifi is free (I thought all starbucks stores had that). Anyway I went back the next day and just sat outside and used their wifi but they banned my mac address when I hit 30 MB download.

      My eeepc is banned from about half the wifi hotspots in malaysia, or it seems that way anyway.

    2. Re:TANSTAAFL by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could pay someone to solder in a new MAC address...

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:TANSTAAFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or, you know, just ifconfig wlan0 down && ifconfig wlan0 hw ether 11:22:33:44:55:66 && ifconfig wlan0 up.

      What was that I heard over my head? It sounded a bit like a 'whoosh'

    4. Re:TANSTAAFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does it matter that your mac address got banned? you should be able to change it? sudo ifconfig eth0 hw ether 01:23:45:67:89:ab:cd:ef?

  13. US Only? by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 3, Informative

    Please bring this to Japan. It is impossible to find free wifi here. SBC used to have it but they seem to have completely folded.

    1. Re:US Only? by macshit · · Score: 1

      Please bring this to Japan. It is impossible to find free wifi here. SBC used to have it but they seem to have completely folded.

      There are still SBC shops in Japan (e.g., there's one near shinjuku stn), but yeah, many fewer than there were 10 years ago... a shame since they generally seemed seemed nicer than sbux, with better coffee too.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    2. Re:US Only? by daid303 · · Score: 1

      Not sure if McDonalds is widespread in Japan, but the Mcdonalds deal doesn't seem to be limited to the US, as I also see "free WiFi" signs popping up here in The Netherlands.

    3. Re:US Only? by ztransform · · Score: 1

      Please bring this to Japan. It is impossible to find free wifi here. SBC used to have it but they seem to have completely folded.

      You're kidding, right? Really? I mean, I understand in Australia free Wi-Fi would be impossible to get - hotels routinely charge AU$30/day access. But hotels in Japan offer Wi-Fi for free, so are you saying that it's only hotels that offer free Wi-Fi (well actually Japanese hotels don't do Wi-Fi, they do Ethernet access, but we're talking about internet access)?

    4. Re:US Only? by Graff · · Score: 1

      SBC is Starbucks, they were bought out nearly 10 years ago.

  14. What?! by snikulin · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean that SSID "very poor Mom-n-Pop shop" I use all the time for donwloading iTune HD content is not Starbucks'?
    Oops!

  15. What a brilliant idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Partnering with Yahoo! I guess they also are buying stock in BP....

  16. It was basically free already. by El+Cabri · · Score: 1

    By registering a Starbucks card and buying with it once a month, customers already got 2 hrs/day of free wifi with the AT&T hotspots in Starbucks coffeeshops, and I'm pretty sure I occasionaly stayed longer than that without being disconnected. Also most of the Starbucks in my area are, for example, Verizon hotspots that could be used by Verizon customers, and I noticed that because I am one, it could also apply to other ISPs.

  17. Unlimited free time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFS:

    two hours free after registering

    1. Release DHCP (isc.org: dhclient -r)
    2. Change Mac address (in Linux: ip link set DEVICE addr LLADDR)
    3. Clear cookies, reconnect
    4. ?????
    5. Profit!

  18. Starbucks: Sluts of the WiFi with Coffee World by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

    First Starbucks was teamed with T-Mobile. You got a relatively easy to find set of [pay] WiFi hotspots around the U.S. that all worked with a single account.

    Next Starbucks teamed up with AT&T for limited free WiFi and gave free WiFi to iPhone users. Slow phase-out of T-Mobile from Starbucks.

    Now Starbucks is offering unlimited WiFi through Yahoo!. Does this mean the slow phaseout of AT&T from Starbucks?

    They did seem to hold on to the pay model for quite a long time. Perhaps they were just waiting for someone else to get in bed with them and foot the bill? My guess is that none of these schemes cost Starbucks anything. More likely they got free business internet access for their shops and perhaps a piece of the profits, if any, from selling the online time. All they had to do was provide the little bit of electricity to run the router.

  19. BFD by rueger · · Score: 1

    In these parts pretty much every coffee joint offers free Wifi, plus much better coffee than Starbucks.

    Our local chain offers really good food, super staff, good coffee, and they encourage people to hang out, chat, and work. They may not turn over the space as frequently as Starbucks, but the shop is always full, and people keep coming back.

    1. Re:BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep, same here. Free wifi w/o restrictions is one of my basic requirements for a cafe. If they don't have it, I'm not ordering or staying. If cafes encourage people to sit around and chat while drinking their coffee, wifi is such a minimal additional step that it's ludicrous not to offer it as well -- it's insulting to try and dupe customers into thinking it's some kind of huge extra cost for the company.

    2. Re:BFD by macshit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In these parts pretty much every coffee joint offers free Wifi, plus much better coffee than Starbucks.

      I don't think sbux is really competing on quality or value though. They're trying to be the "good enough" ubiquitous choice. Locals and those in the know may go to delicious and funky local coffee-shops with free wifi, but there's always a lot of people who don't know, or just don't care, and if there's a sbux every 5m, all of which offer products and atmosphere you're already familiar with...

      [I think this sort of "comfortable homogenization" is sort of depressing, but it's clearly a business strategy that works. And I admit, when I want a quick coffee, given the choice between a 10 minute walk to a nice local cafe and the sbux right in front of me, I'll often choose the latter... my bad I suppose:( ]

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  20. Free, only now ?? by Airdorn · · Score: 1

    It took Starbucks this long to get free Wi-Fi? The great purveyors of anti-corporatism has been *gulp* charging their customers for Wi-Fi all this time?

  21. try brueggers bagel shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the coffee is better, the bagels are much better then the dreck that starbucks offers for pastr, and their is free, unlimited web access

  22. WTF tags? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is tagged "freethebsd". I'm not sure if that's the free thebs daemon (and, if so, wtf a theb is) or free the bsd, in which case I thought one was already free, another one was open, and the best one was net.

    In any case, WTF has "freethebsd" to do with starbucks wifi? Or am I just high and seeing things?

  23. Um... WTF paid? by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    So.. you pay $1 to register... and get a card... and then you can either:

    1) Pay $3.99/hr after 2hrs.
    2) Pay $1 again to register again, and get another card, which works for at least 2hrs each day.

    Please choose.

    (In practice, worldwide, if the bloody access points work, then it is rare that the time limit is enforced.)

  24. Paywall Access? Proxy Time!! by Maarx · · Score: 1

    ... customers will have free unrestricted access to various paid sites and services, such as wsj.com ...

    This is the part that caught my eye. I have a friend who's apartment is within range of the Starbucks Wi-Fi.

    I'm thinkin' I'll take one of my cheap laptops kicking around, leave it running in his apartment, and let my friends and I proxy through it to peruse Murdoch's prized possessions.

    Anyone know if they have systems in place to prevent such tomfoolery?

    1. Re:Paywall Access? Proxy Time!! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Anyone know if they have systems in place to prevent such tomfoolery?

      One starbucks blocked my mac address after I transferred 30 megabytes in half an hour or so. If you tread lightly they might not worry so much. My traffic was tunneled through SSH. I don't know if they treat plain http differently.

    2. Re:Paywall Access? Proxy Time!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit.

    3. Re:Paywall Access? Proxy Time!! by delinear · · Score: 1

      I'm thinkin' I'll take one of my cheap laptops kicking around, leave it running in his apartment, and let my friends and I proxy through it to peruse Murdoch's prized possessions.

      Anyone know if they have systems in place to prevent such tomfoolery?

      They're relying on the "quality" of their "journalism" to be the biggest deterrent.

  25. Price by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I know people like to make fun of Starbucks for "$7" coffee, but last time I visited one here in Seattle, a 20 ounce drip was under $2.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Price by Raguleader · · Score: 1

      Obviously you're not one of the cool kids. It's the hip trendy thing now to grossly exaggerate the price of a cup of coffee at Starbucks to show how cool you are. Me, sometimes I'll grab a cup of coffee or a Chai or a snack cake or something because there is a Gamestop and a Wal Mart nearby and I happen to already be in town shopping. Sadly, sometimes I need a caffeine fix when I am away from Mr. Coffee.

      --
      --Rags
      Life is like a burrito. Sometimes the beans go bad.
    2. Re:Price by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Obviously you're not one of the cool kids. It's the hip trendy thing now to grossly exaggerate the price of a cup of coffee at Starbucks to show how cool you are...

      I said a 20 ounce DRIP was under $2.

      Now, that Iced Chai Mocha Caffè Macchiato (Organic Rain Forrest) Light Soy Whip With a Carab Dusting and a Shot Of Almond... That was $27. In a recycled paper cup.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:Price by Raguleader · · Score: 1

      Was it extra for the recycled cup? Like, if I get one made from virgin tree pulp, will that knock a bit off the price?

      --
      --Rags
      Life is like a burrito. Sometimes the beans go bad.
    4. Re:Price by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Like, if I get one made from virgin tree pulp, will that knock a bit off the price?
      More than likely, yes. For some reason, it costs more to process a piece of paper into a piece of paper than it does to process a tree into a piece of paper. Or at least they charge more.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  26. Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any idea when this will be coming to Canadian Starbucks and McDonalds? So far there's none. Must think we don't have laptops up here.

  27. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in their right mind would go to a public place just to then bury their face in a computer? No thank you, I can do that at home.

  28. Out of proportion? by blazemonkey · · Score: 0

    You guys are really blowing this out of proportion. Starbucks coffee isn't great, it's also not that expensive unless you order something that takes half an hour to say. i can get beans from a roasting house that cost more than the coffee at atarbucks if i wanted to. Why to people bring laptops there? I don't know, maybe for work. I work close to a starbucks, when our power went out, I was able to walk over, and get work done for most of the day... They've also had free wifi here at all starbucks for as long as i can remember. (yay canada!) Sure, starbucks caters mostly to trendy fucks with macbooks, but that doesn't mean they're a total wright off...

  29. This would have been great news! by MrCrassic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is a great announcement for those that consider Starbucks the only "real" cafe in their vicinity, i.e. suburban areas. Before I started branching out for different places to work at, I thought the same way: Starbucks has huge sit-downs with tons of outlets and decent coffee, so why should I have to look anywhere else?

    This year, however, I've learned how far from the truth that notion really is. While I still stop at some Starbucks places sometimes when I'm on the move, I always prefer to do my work at a smaller, more personal cafe. They are usually much smaller than Starbucks and are definitely not as widespread., but the key is that they usually serve REAL food (in fact, some coffee shop owners grow their own fruits/vegetables in the cafe's backyard) and REALLY good coffee at cheaper prices. Additionally, the handful of people that run these cafes actually like their jobs, which I'd wager is probably because the patrons of such coffee houses are not the type that only care about getting their morning fix, regardless of their attitude. (They are almost universally Mac users, though.) It also helps that these places almost always have free Wi-Fi and MUCH better music selections.

    I know I'm already way off-base (go ahead and mod me down if you think so, though if you've read this far, why would you?), but it also saddens me how Starbucks managed to turn the cafe into a McDonald's like franchise, drive-thrus, working conditions and all. From the many baristas that I've shot the shit with, their jobs really suck and are akin to working at McDonald's (minus the low pay and usually inept managers), which is exactly OPPOSITE to the way working at cafes should be. They're experimenting with starting a new tea house branch; I wonder how that'll work for them in the long run.

    Nonetheless, free Wi-Fi is always good Wi-Fi.

    1. Re:This would have been great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You arent pretentious at all. Lol no I'm kidding you fucking yuppie.

  30. I just want a place to sit down... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    It's hard enough trying to find a place to sit down, now with people getting free "unlimited" (exact details to be clarified at some point) without having someone use their local starbucks as a library and occupying the seating while they research their doctoral thesis or pontificate how they'll write the next great blog.

    I just want a place to sit for 10minutes while I drink my beverage. I don't care if they give away free wifi, but they should install "parking meters" on the seats.

  31. The coffee shop culture in Singapore by rubenerd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Probably not all that relevant to this discussion, but my SG$0.02.

    All the Starbucks branches here in Singapore have free WiFi provided you register first, it's part of the government's Wireless@SG initiative, which I can forgive the corny 1990s name for because it Just Works. The irony is this free internet is faster and more reliable than the ADSL I was paying a small fortune for back in Australia!

    There's a huge coffee shop culture here. It's really fascinating to see Starbucks (and Coffee Bean, and Killiney etc), even at 11pm they're absolutely packed with students studying on their MacBooks and business folk frantically typing away. I asked a few local friends why, and mostly it's because apartments here are so small an overpriced cup of coffee is a small price to pay for a comfy chair, relaxing music and a place to do some work on the Internets without your siblings making noise in your ear.

    --
    Cheers, ~ Ruben
  32. US finally catching up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So much of the rest of the world (eg Europe, bar stupid Germany) has had free wifi in these places for so long now, its odd to see the US only just catching up on this stuff...

  33. Tea needs milk (really) by mcferguson · · Score: 1

    Try your tea with milk (the way many people in other countries drink it). Starbucks will also make it this way upon request. Chai tea lattes are great. :D

    1. Re:Tea needs milk (really) by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      Chai tea with real leaves or the chai tea concentrate that they sell? They're quite different (they almost always use the concentrate; not sure if they do it with leaves if you ask), though those lattes are really good :-)

  34. Re:Give up caffeine, people... by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I drink Brawndo, because Brawndo's got electrolytes.

  35. I've been away too long... by herojig · · Score: 1

    The last time I lived in the US, all wifi at starbucks was free (circa 2003 or so). Some of the locations would leave their routers on 24x7, so while traveling in a campervan I would park near one of those for free service and to get my work done (travel writing). I guess things changed when I left, but now are coming back full circle. The paid wifi hotspot experiment in America must have failed...

    --
    I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
  36. How Starbucks competes by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Every independent coffee shop I've gone into in the past 5 years has had free WiFi. It's often better coffee, cheaper, nicer atmosphere, and free WiFi.

    I have little interest in Starbucks coffee myself but "better" and "nicer" are subjective in this case and I've rarely found any coffee shop in the last 10 years that was actually much cheaper. They won't stay in business long selling just $1.00 cups of black coffee. Not enough profit and not enough differentiation to do that.

    You're right about the free wifi though.

    I don't know how Starbucks expects to compete.

    Starbucks competes the same way McDonalds and Coke compete. A familiar product that enough people like that is consistent no matter where you go and available everywhere. They don't have to make YOUR favorite product to succeed. Face it, Starbucks makes a product that a lot of people like. Maybe its not for you personally but they sell billions of dollars of coffee a year so they clearly are doing something that appeals.

    1. Re:How Starbucks competes by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, you can argue all taste is completely subjective, that nothing is better or worse, that it's all subjective. Poop tastes as good as ice cream, maybe? Whatever.

      Anyway, I have no problem with Starbucks. I just think they provide an inferior product to what I can get elsewhere. When I lived in a different place that had fewer choices, that wasn't the case.

    2. Re:How Starbucks competes by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, you can argue all taste is completely subjective, that nothing is better or worse, that it's all subjective. Poop tastes as good as ice cream, maybe? Whatever.

      Don't be a moron. We're talking about coffee here, not some deep philosophical relativism. Pointing out that taste in coffee and the places that sell coffee is subjective is not remotely the same thing as claiming all tastes are good or equivalent or that there is no such thing as bad coffee. You don't have to care about Starbucks one way or the other to understand how it is that they succeed.
         

    3. Re:How Starbucks competes by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Anyway, I have no problem with Starbucks. I just think they provide
      > an inferior product to what I can get elsewhere. When I lived in a
      > different place that had fewer choices, that wasn't the case.

      See, here's the thing... In The City, Berkeley, and parts of San Jose, I know exactly where to go for a much better cup of coffee than I can get at Starbucks. In the rest of the Bay Area, Yelp can probably direct me to a better cup of coffee if I'm willing to drive to it. But if I'm somewhere unfamiliar, and outside an area that has lots of Yelpers doing reviews; I have no idea whether joe schmoe's local coffee shop is decent or if it's swill. But bad coffee is far more common than good.

      With Starbucks and Peets I get at least a reliably better-than-average cup of coffee. And if I'm in an unfamiliar location, or a better coffee shop is too far away, and Yelp isn't helpful where I am; it's better than taking the chance of getting swill.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    4. Re:How Starbucks competes by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I feel like you're getting defensive or something, but like I said, I have no problem with Starbucks. I'm just saying that they're not very competitive in my area.

    5. Re:How Starbucks competes by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Pointing out that taste in coffee and the places that sell coffee is subjective is not remotely the same thing as claiming all tastes are good or equivalent

      Either all tastes are subjective or they're not. If it's possible for one thing to taste better than another, then it's possible for one thing to taste better than another, and therefore it's possible for one cup of coffee to taste better than another cup of coffee.

      It's not philosophy. It's tautology.

  37. How to find the wifi Starbucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their coffee's so-so, but the free wifi will be a boon to those of us iPad'ers with only WiFi.

    The Starbucks map at their site is brutal to use, which is why I use this map

    http://www.spatialdatabox.com/map-demos/starbucks-map.html

    It's easier to use, and lists 18 thousand or so Starbucks (good grief!) and lets you filter by WiFi (there's 8,000), iTunes, etc.

  38. It's free for me by exentropy · · Score: 1

    "then must purchase additional time at the rate of $3.99 for two consecutive hours" Unless you've got macspoof... or a dns tunnel... or an icmp tunnel... or a separate computer... or a separate starbucks...

  39. Sweet tea by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Sugar in tea? Seriously? That ruins it.

    You clearly are not from the southern US.

    So drink it strong...and it won't taste like water.

    Strong does not automatically mean tasty. In fact bad tea that is strong is worse than bad tea that is weak.

    1. Re:Sweet tea by delinear · · Score: 1

      To be fair, he didn't say it would be tasty, just that it wouldn't taste like water. I can't speak for Starbucks' tea, but there are some very nice flavoured teas (I still prefer proper black tea rather than green tea or infusions even then, as I like to add milk - but never sugar). I particularly like the spiced or cinnamon teas, very christmassy and a nice change from coffee.

    2. Re:Sweet tea by clifyt · · Score: 1

      I grew up in the south for much of my childhood. I didn't touch tea again until my 20s because I was convinced it all tasted like sugary pop as one of the posters mentioned. Ended up having nothing to drink but iced tea on a hot day at college, tried it...and it tasted pretty good.

      As for bad strong tea, I think this sentiment could be added to any food...I like banana cream pie, but if it is bad, tasting especially strong isn't going to make it any better...it might make me even never want to touch banana cream pie again!

  40. Water does have taste by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Uh, if water tastes something, you may want to check into getting a different source of water.

    Virtually all water (except distilled) has taste. Trace amounts of various impurities can actually be desirable. If it tastes BAD you might want to get a different source.

    1. Re:Water does have taste by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Have you never tasted distilled water? Even that has a taste! (A pretty bad one) Taste is determined by how your senses react to different substances. The more frequently you drink one kind of water, the more tolerant you become and it appears to have less taste.
      I'm used to high quality untreated ground water from a tap, so anything other than that tastes weird, even the "natural" spring water they sell in plastic bottles and ship around the world.

  41. Yuck. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but if you want good coffee, you're better off staying at home and making it yourself. You would have to be in a bad way if you have to drink Starbuck's coffee just to get an internet connection.

  42. Re:Give up caffeine, people... by Antisyzygy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would you like a coffee with "full release"?

    --
    That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
  43. And free electric outlets! by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few years ago, there was a modernistic little tea shop in Palo Alto which not only had free WiFi, but electric outlets at every table. So the place was full of people with laptops. It was very quiet. Nobody talked.

    They didn't buy much, though. The woman behind the counter had so little to do that she was usually reading (a book, not a screen, typically some 19th century classic; she was a philosophy major.) The place lasted about six months. Then it went over to being a coffee bar. That didn't work either. Now it's a yogurt place, with few tables and no available power outlets.

  44. Free WiFi won't last given 'three strikes' by Cato · · Score: 1

    Enjoy your free WiFi - it won't last, most likely. Governments around the world are tightening the screws on copyright infringement, and open WiFi is in the cross-hairs - see one example here: http://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2010/the-death-of-open-wifi

    This is part of 'graduated response', also known as 'three strikes', which is the copyright owners' term for various actions to discourage infringement short of lawsuits - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graduated_response or http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/tag/graduated-response/

    1. Re:Free WiFi won't last given 'three strikes' by delinear · · Score: 1

      There's no reason it wouldn't work so long as they had a reliable way to tie your identity to your WiFi account - simply making you sign up to a scheme with a login on the basis of reliable ID would probably be enough (and plenty of disclaimers that "you're responsible for anything downloaded on it, so don't give out your login details" to close the "my friend must have used my account" loophole), so long as it was relatively universal, as you'd not want to have to sign up to dozens of schemes depending on where you eat or buy coffee.

  45. Finally-Free Podcasts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The New York Times best-selling author heralds the future of business in Free. In his revolutionary best seller, The Long Tail, Chris Anderson demonstrated how the online marketplace creates niche markets, allowing products and consumers to connect in a way that has never been possible before. Now, in Free, he makes the compelling case that, in many instances, businesses can profit more from giving things away than they can by charging for them.

    Far more than a promotional gimmick, Free is a business strategy that may well be essential to a company's survival. The costs associated with the growing online economy are trending toward zero at an incredible rate. Never in the course of human history have the primary inputs to an industrial economy fallen in price so fast and for so long. Just think that in 1961 a single transistor cost $10; now Intel's latest chip has two billion transistors and sells for $300 (or 0.000015 cents per transistor - effectively too cheap to price). The traditional economics of scarcity just don't apply to bandwidth, processing power, and hard-drive storage.

    Yet this is just one engine behind the new Free, a reality that goes beyond a marketing gimmick or a cross-subsidy. Anderson also points to the growth of the reputation economy; explains different models for unleashing the power of Free; and shows how to compete when your competitors are giving away what you're trying to sell.

    In Free, Chris Anderson explores this radical idea for the new global economy and demonstrates how this revolutionary price can be harnessed for the benefit of consumers and businesses alike.

  46. good locally-owned coffee joints by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    In Santa Cruz (CA) downtown: Lulu Carpenter's for nice ambiance and good coffee. Pergolesi's for more alternative younger crowd.

    Midtown, The Buttery rocks. The pastries are delicious as are a good many of the staff.

  47. Starbucks Are Also Changing The Seating Plan.... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...so all of the Apple fanbois can position themselves in such a way as to reflect the light from the little silver apple directly into the eyes of customers coming into the store.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  48. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all your free wifi are belong to me now mhaw hah hahaa

  49. RE: by helix2301 · · Score: 1

    I like this idea I hate the fact of having buy coffee then buy internet. Thanks Starbucks and Yahoo.

  50. The Starbucks inside the McDonalds.... by bodland · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Inside the WalMart...Now has free WiFi...??

  51. Eh. by NetServices · · Score: 1

    Eh... not really much of a story these days.

  52. Make your own!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    All these people with laptops, and now I can't find a seat. This is why I bought a good coffee grinder and a French press for about the cost of 30 cappuccinos. This makes me wonder, how does free wifi increase revenue? Does free wifi increase the need for espresso?

  53. Is this legal in Germany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If people in Germany use these free unsecured wireless networks to download copyright infringing material, the owners of Starbucks are going to get in some legal troubles.

  54. Better places already have free wi-fi by Roblimo · · Score: 1

    If I want great coffeehouse atmosphere and free wifi, I go to locally-owned Luv A-Da Coffee. Panera, McD, and Denny's all have free wifi if I want to go to a chain joint. Starbucks is overpriced. No reason to go there.

  55. Re:Starbucks Are Also Changing The Seating Plan... by soppsa · · Score: 1

    Lol one of slashdots most prolific Apple-haters somehow weaselling Apple into a non-Apple story just to diss them. Amazing! You must be wicked popular outside of the internet...

  56. Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their coffee tastes like shit.

    Do you work for Starbucks marketing?

  57. Re:Starbucks Are Also Changing The Seating Plan... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    That seems to be something of a large and strange assumption you have made... so you're basically saying that it's impossible to have a wide circle of social friends if you don't like Apple?

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.