Slashdot Mirror


User: Pig+Hogger

Pig+Hogger's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,650
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,650

  1. Re:Not Quite Right on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    Scroll to the bottom of this page for more information on the complexities of this corner of the world.

    Watch this:

    Independence: 221 BC (unification under the Qin or Ch'in Dynasty 221 BC; Qing or Ch'ing Dynasty replaced by the Republic on 12 February 1912; People's Republic established 1 October 1949)

    Wow!

    221 years ***BEFORE*** Jesus H. Fucking Christ (yeah, the dude who got nailed 1968 years ago) !

    Beats the shit outta 1776!!!!


    --

  2. Re:"hyperreal" is hyperhogwash on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    Note to Katz: go to Mongolia. Don't bring any techno-gizmos at all. Remain unwired for a month. Watch the traders and tribesmen. See how they interact.

    Note to infonaut : Mongolia used to rule China.


    --

  3. Re:1 death vs. 24 forcibly imprisoned on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    So what do they do in response? They forcibly imprison 24 of our people. 24 people denied their freedom and separated from their friends, coworkers, and family.

    Those 24 people (as well as the one who died) are **SOLDIERS**, who are, by definition **EXPENDABLE**. It's even part of their JOB DESCRIPTION.

    This is the true face of Communism.

    And the true face of capitalism wants to send people to jail for copying songs or movies.


    --

  4. Re:China is pure evil. on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    Taken from a liberal standpoint they have the worst record on "human rights violations".

    They also been around for 20 times longer than the U.S.

    They ignore the environment only to further their communist regime (all commi countries do this).

    How about Dubya's plans to open up Alaska for oil drilling?


    --

  5. Re:China far more dangerous than we think on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    The rhetoric that comes out of their country is largely overlooked in the US. Many of their leaders (political, social, military) have spoken openly of their expectations that the US will become a "has been" in the coming century. [...]

    And can you blame them, when in the USA, the pityfully small movie and recording industry demands that the much bigger computer industry includes compulsory copy protection in storage devices, to insure that it's wares aren't fairly used???


    --

  6. Re:Nationalism is outdated... on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    Nationalism is outdated, and rather illogical in the first place.[...]

    Words that can only come from a citizen of an imperialist nation. You would not say that if your nation was dominated by another one whose values are quite alien to yours, and forced to follow alien rules.


    --

  7. Re:hrm on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    If a nation simply appeases at each standoff, then the smaller wolves will gain some bravery. Look at Israel and it's neighbors.. They've gone to war numerous times to assert themselves in the bullied area. Sure they don't play nicely either, but they're still here as a nation because they have the means and the resolve to confront bullies.

    That's because the american media is pro-israeli and is thus able to make public opinion believe that israel is good whilst the arabs are bad. Thus, no anti-israeli politican ever gets elected (they get weeded-out pretty fast) and so, the official US policy is to back israel.

    In fact, the arabs are quite stupid in that matter; if they were any intelligent, they'd make peace with the jews, and then, deprived of an ennemy, the jews would kill each other...


    --

  8. Re:Are You on Drugs? on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    Nothing could be futher from the truth. China is a xenophobic, imperialist, racist nation. Only the most xenophobic people on earth could have come up with the Great Wall of China. China has always shunned the outside world, even when the ideas from the outside world would better their society. That is why the nation that 1000 years ago was the greatest nation on earth no longer is the greatest nation on earth. They cannot learn from the outside world.

    If I'm not mistaken, Communism is an European invention. And Mao used Communism to better the life of HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of peasants. So what is your point?


    --

  9. Re:China said they were in international airspace on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    The *REST* of the planet is trying their damndest to get Madonna and McDonalds in their countries as fast as they can. The LEADERS in other countries have a ton of ideas about how the world should be run -- all of them bad. American doesn't want to rule the world, they just want to have a good time on Saturday night.

    Correction. Mc Donald and Watchamacallit records marketing directors are making their damnest to **SHOVE** Madonna & Mc Donald's down the throats of other countries who normally wouldn't give a shit about that. The rest of americans **ONLY** want to have a good time on Saturday night.


    --

  10. Re:They were, twice. on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    Another story that I seem to recall: In the 1970's, when a Russian spy plane was forced to land near Japan, it was taken quietly into an American base, dismantled, and sent back to Russia in pieces two/three weeks later.

    Was the pilot at least offered political asylum? For it's sure that after that stunt, he'd end up in the G.O.U.L.A.G...


    --

  11. Re:What's to apologize for? on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    As a side note. KAL 007 was a Korean Air Lines 747 passenger jet that penetrated Soviet airspace accidently and was shot down. It is interesting to note that its course matched what a recon penetration would look like, and a 747 on radar looks just like an E-2 (military 707). That said, the Soviet pilots got a visual ID before they fired, so they knew it was a civilian aircraft.

    KAL has a long history of having planes straying over soviet airspace. In the late 1970's, a KAL Boeing 707 was shot down over the Soviet-Union and was able to do an emergency landing on a frozen lake. Turns out that it was a gross navigational error where the crew mistook the geographic north pole with the magnetic north pole; the plane turned changed almost 180 near the pole; when they were shot down, they were damn sure they were over Canada...

    As for KAL-007 (what a number!), there were american spyplanes in the vicinity when it got shot down.


    --

  12. Re:International law... on Hyperreality: The U.S-China Standoff · · Score: 2

    Of course, the Chinese pilot was already violating FAA rules. Specifically, 91.111.b states that formation flying requires arrangement with each of the involved pilots.

    I didn't know that the FAA had jurisdiction over International airspace, or over Chinese airspace, for that matter...


    --

  13. Re:One word. on Adam Hinkley's IP Hindsights · · Score: 3
    Blackmail. Work at any corporation and you will immediately find out that they do something terribly illegal. In fact, if you're in IT, you're definitely going to find out. You manage their information. You see everything. You know all. When the time comes you can truly make them pay.
    Indeed. I know someone who was managing the IT ressources of a small manufacturer. That small manufacturer once decided to fund a political party, in contravention to the political financing law (no corporation can give money to a political party, only individuals, and to a maximum of $100 per year). So, they asked my friend to make every employee donate $100 to that political party during the next payroll iteration.

    Of course, the political party in question was not the one most of the employees voted for, so he blew the whistle on the unionized employees who, got pretty pissed-off at it. To make a story short, the company owner's got his Mecedes torched, his office was smeared with grease and other gooey disgusting stuff, his lawn sprinkled with pesticides and fertilizer at different places, and plenty of the employees who "gave" to the political party went to the political party to demand their money back, and my friend provided information about all this to the Elections Supervisor office, who promptly laid charges against the company and the political party (the candidate was later convincted of election fraud for paying people to vote several times for him).

    The company, each director, the political party and the candidate were each fined six times the amount of the "contributions", it's directors and the candidate deprived of civic rights for 10 years (they can't vote and can't present themselves as candidates to elections),

    Better yet, the insurance company didn't pay a cent for the torched Mecedes, as it was able to allege that the owner deliberately torched it himself to commit insurance fraud (the owner didn't bother fighting this as he was entangled with the bigger legal problems with the Elections Supervisor), and when my friend was fired for blowing the whistle, he successfully went to court and was reinstated with indexed back pay (the case took two years). And the company had to keep his replacement, too.

    So, as you can see, in a Socialist country, democracy cannot be corrupted easily, and the workers cannot be screwed either.

    (there. Score: 5: flamebait+3, troll+2)

    --

  14. Ooops, will he be moderated as "flamebait"???? on Adam Hinkley's IP Hindsights · · Score: 1
    2. Investment: You DO NOT need it, and it is NOT worth the trouble! Furthermore the money is non-existant anyway, there is only a weak promise. If you push yourself, you would be surprised at how much you are capable of by yourself. There are government and industry bodies that provide assistance and grants, WITHOUT you having to sell your soul. Consult these instead, apply for a grant if you need it.
    Now, let's wait until those rabid anglo-saxon libertarians start harping about the government being evil...

    --

  15. Re:What is the point? on FCC Lays Down the Law On Decency · · Score: 2
    We are, IMO, far too fixated on "the children" these days. Society and civilization exist for the benefit of all their members, not solely the next generation. We do children a disservice when we overprotect them - it renders them incapable of dealing with the wider world when they are released into it. [...]
    This is total oxdung. Society doesn't give a flying fuck about children, given the way pollution is spewed forth and natural ressources are being wastefully depleted, in order to bring profits to a very select few. The next generation will be stuck with an awesome cleaning bill!!!

    --

  16. Re:but on Surveillance Society · · Score: 2
    If I notice it's drifting and looking / spying into my house, I'll pull the courtains and then complain.
    I'd shine a powerful spotlight into the bloody camera...

    --

  17. Re:obviously... on Surveillance Society · · Score: 2
    Am I from the US? Nope.. Finland. But if the USA is like you say it is ("our entire system of political philosophy is based on the concept that government is essentially evil and oppressive and must be carefully limited by the people to restrain its power") then I think it's a little funny to call it "land of the free". Sounds pretty opressed to me...


    That's because England, the seminal culture of the USA (no matter how much the americans drum being a colony that broke free) had quite a few "revolutions" where powerful barons revolted against weak kings, and thus the notion that the State (the king's power) was nocious was slowly, over the centuries, brewed into public opinion.

    The corolary is that it is not seen wrong that the powerful barons/big corporations are able to accumulate so much wealth and influence so they can directly challenge the State/king. This is why the US is so corrupted: it's okay for powerful corporations to abuse the people, but the State cannot abuse the people (or big powerful corporations).

    --

  18. Re:obviously... on Surveillance Society · · Score: 2
    The police are not on "my" side of anything. Police can do very little to directly protect you, and a hell of a lot to destroy your life. I'm increasingly of the opinion that the idea of large full-time professional police forces, at least as we currently structure them, is a failed experiment.
    There should be a national service program, in where everyone, to earn his citizenship, has to do service in the police forces. The high number of enlisted people amongst professionnal officers should ensure that there would be no assault on private rights by professional police force officers.

    --

  19. Re:But crime in Britain has skyrocketted on Surveillance Society · · Score: 2
    I used to live in an area in North Wales where a fairly comprehensive network of security cameras were fitted. After one year, the violent crime figures in that area were down something like 40-50% on the previous year.
    And the violent crime rate went up something like 40-50% in the unsurveillanced neighbouring areas, right?

    It's like when you drive out the pimps and the prostitutes from a district, they just move elsewhere.

    That's a so fucking typically anglo-saxon "solution": drive the problem elsewhere, so someone else is stuck with it.

    --

  20. Fiberglass and copper, eh? on Negative Index of Refraction Created · · Score: 3

    The composite, made of fiberglass and copper, caused microwaves shot through it to bend in an opposite direction than the laws of physics predict, making it the first material to have a ``negative index of refraction,'' physicists said in a study appearing in the journal Science.

    Fiberglass and copper, eh? Well, how about the fiberglass REFRACTING it in the PROPER direction, and right after the copper REFLECTS it exactly the other way????


    --

  21. Re:If there is a will, there is a way (to prison) on CPRM Voted Down · · Score: 2
    The DMCA was passed into US law to comply with an international treaty. You'll get yours soon enough.
    Here, courts will not penalize someone for exercing his fair use rights.

    --

  22. Re:Right after Alternic on Cracking the Verisign Monopoly · · Score: 2
    Still, this seems unlikely. People want .com. They don't want country codes, and they don't want the other minor ones.
    I don't want .com (et al.). I used to have a country code (it was *FREE* until this year), but the morons-in-"charge" "opened" it to "competition", and it would have cost me at lear $50 to get back my country code.

    Fortunately, I was able to get a .org (et al.) for only $11 there. I still miss my country code, just because the .com (et al.) really needlessly obfuscates the Internet beyond reason.

    --

  23. Finally!!! on New Evidence for Open Universe · · Score: 3
    Observations made by the Hubble telescope have produced evidence that the universe is full of "dark energy", stuff that has mass but does not emit nor block light, ...
    Ah, great! They finally found the styrofoam packing peanuts the Universe was packed with when it still was in the crate...

    --

  24. Re:Where are IBM's priorities? on CPRM Voted Down · · Score: 2

    This only marks you as under 40. Older programmers and hackers used to regard IBM the way young kiddies do Microsoft, and with better reason, since their monopoly was more complete and there weren't nice squishy linux sandboxes to play in. Ouch! Did I just bite a troll? Hate when I do that, it's like biting tinfoil.

    I wonder if somehow, something bad will eventually happen to Microsoft and cause it to shrink into underdog status, just like it happenned to IBM.

    But, to do that, it's gonna have to be FRIGHTFULLY bad, and whatever does it will have to be EVEN MORE frightful than Microsoft nowadays...


    --

  25. Re:If there is a will, there is a way (to prison) on CPRM Voted Down · · Score: 2


    Even if those copy protected hard drives become your staple diet, what stops people from developing mod-chips for them...?

    Umm, how about five years in federal prison?

    Er, this does applies ONLY to american citizens. Fortunately, 95% of the earth population are NOT american citizens.


    --