Slashdot Mirror


User: Pig+Hogger

Pig+Hogger's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,650
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,650

  1. Re:Can we speed up the slowpokes? on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 1
    And even little green trolls like you should know that someone who's driving 40 in a 65 zone is as much a traffic hazard as the fucktard who is doing 100.
    So fucking what? If the lower speed limit is 40, he's perfectly well entitled to go 40 (but if so, it's on a "interstate", so you just pass the fucker and go on with your life). And if there is not lower speed limit, well, though fucking noogie. He's not a hazard, others are, because the one who buttfucks the other car IS responsible, asswipe.

    You fucking carheads are so neuron-deprived (must be the gas fumes) that you think that your car is an extension of your penis. Well, I've got news for you, it's NOT, dope.

    Go back to your bridge. And if you don't like my tone? You get what you dish.
    You can say what you want, it does not makes you right. Following the law makes you right, and the law says that the buttfucker is responsible for the accident, nyah, nyah, nyah.

    Learn to drive properly, moron.

  2. Re:Can we speed up the slowpokes? on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 1
    Not when I'm doing the speed limit and then I have to slam on the brakes because I come upon some idiot in a Cadillac, who ignores all headlight flashes and horn honks,
    Who the FUCK are YOU to tell someone else to drive faster than he is comfortable? It is assholes like you who make roads unsafe and who will millions of innocents every year!!
  3. Re:Twister on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 1
    "Okay honey, don't worry, we can outrun it. WHAT THE F***?!?!"
    You're not in Kansas anymore...
  4. Re:Parallel streets? Overpasses? Real limits? on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 1
    So, I'm driving on the 401 here in Toronto. The GPS suddenly decides I'm on Wilson (a major street that parallels and slips under the 401) and I'm going 50kph over the speed limit. What happens?
    Next time, you ride the rocket.
  5. Re:Just to get the facts straight: on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 1
    and they are generally considered arseholes with tiny wangs.
    What's the proper german word for that? Kleinwangarschöler???
  6. Re:And who defines "significantly?" on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 1
    Hell, why not just issue a speeding ticket out of the dashboard?
    "Korben Dallas, you have one point left on your license".
  7. Re:Safety issues? on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 2, Funny
    I drive a suped up Z-28. Back home in Va, I'll get kids in civics who want to think that they're fast who will tailgate and try to race. When one of those jerks comes to close (some of those putzes get pretty close to hitting you), I blast forward a bit to keep from getting my bumper tagged by some 16 year old who saw The Fast and the Furious too many times.
    This is pretty stupid. What you should do is slam the brakes and have the kid buy you a new car...
  8. Re:Hopefully the GPS will work when ....... on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 2, Insightful
    How about when your father is having a heart attack and there is no local ambulance?
    Do you have an emergency vehicle license? If you don't, it means you're not trained to drive in an emergency situation. Then, you increase the danger to yourself and others while rushing someone to the hospital.
  9. Re:Yay! Finally!!! on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 1
    This argument is silly. It shows a real lack of insight into the situation.
    Do we not have a fundamental right to freedom of travel?
    Who says you HAVE to travel by car? Myself, I travel by foot, bicycle, bus, subway or train (I have also flown and sailed). And when I ride a car, you can betcha your arse I'm not driving, coz, buddy, I ain't got a license.
    Does freedom of speech being a "right" therefore make us unaccontable for what we do with it?
    Look up "prior restraint". This is exactly what a driver's license is about. (Besides, here, I can be jailed for saying "the holocaust did not happen" - now waiting for that knock on my door).
    The real situation is a lot more nuanced than silly slogans. One that should be discussed in a manner that uses actual reasoning, as opposed to repetition of something you heard someone else say but never really examined in detail.
    It's not a silly slogan, it's an absolute fact which you are welcome to disprove (good luck!).

    Okay, let's examine it.

    To drive a car, you need a license, right?

    Now, if you drive badly, they pull your license, right?

    Therefore, driving is a privilege, not a right.

  10. Re:Yay! Finally!!! on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 0
    Nothing is a privelege, you've been brainwashed by the Canadians too long.
    If someone has been brainwashed, it's you, and by the automobile industry...
    It's basically your inherent right to do whatever you damn well please, so long as it doesn't *directly* interfere with someone else doing whatever they damn well please.
    Weeeelllll, surpriiiiiise!!!!! When YOU drive your car like a jerk (speeding, running a red light, tailgating - because you must be one of those libertarian jerks who can't stand to have another car in front of you on "YOUR" road), you can damn well interfere with someone else when you lose control of your scrapheap with wheels.

    Incidentally, you have to have a license to drive your jitney that ensures that you "know" how to use it, and what to do to avoid being lethal to other people.

    And when you don't behave, welllll, lose your license you do. Walk, walk, walk, baby.

    Anything else is an artificial control construct designed to keep powerful entities in power, directly or indirectly.
    You being addicted to your scrapheap on wheels keeps the automobile industry full of lobbying money against transit, and the oil industry to wager foreign wars that make the world hate the yankees.

    And in order to make the monthly payment on your scrapheap on wheels, you have to endure the boss breathing down your neck.

    So who's freeer???

  11. Yay! Finally!!! on Device Stops Speeders From Inside Car · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Some years ago, at $CANADIAN_UNIVERSITY, I had a computer project management class whose teacher was a moonlighting project manager for the Royal Canadien Maudit Police.

    Over the course of the session, each team had to submit a project outline. The only catch was that it had to be of interest to law enforcement. You can imagine the groans in the classroom when he said that...

    Even though my team would have nothing of it, I proposed to the teacher a black-box that would automagically ticket bad driving.

    When the teacher heard that, his face suddenly blank, and instead of his usually happy answers, he responded an extremely curt "no, anyway it's coming" that was so curt that it drew the air out of me.

    I'm glad that it's finally there.

    * * *

    And now, time to repeat my usual hardass statement about driving:

    Driving performed on **PUBLIC** roads being public, one shall not have any expectation of privacy whilst doing so.

    Driving is a ***PRIVILEGE***, not a right, so your licenses can be pulled at will if you drive like stupid monkeys on drugs.

  12. Re:I RTFA and I still confused. on France Hostile To Open Source Software? · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure if its still the case, but back in the mid 90's French scientists recieving govt funds were required to publish all work in French first (This was a HUGE! issue because nearly all important international journals are in English...
    You have it backwards. What happenned is that some researchers were told by the Pasteur Institute to submit materials to be published by their journal in english. Then, they rose a stink about it, and eventually the Pasteur Institute cancelled their policy.
  13. Circumvent the law! on Researchers Want Right to Bypass Protected Spyware · · Score: 1

    Just don't publish from the USA.

  14. They could sell some. on Laptop Makers Skeptical of $100 Laptop Schedule · · Score: 0
    Lots of people would gladly pay $300 for the same laptop, even if it's sold for at a loss $100 to other governments. Heck, the $300 could come with a charity tax receipt even!

    Lots of penny-pinching croporations would be glad to use those instead of expensive virus-prone employee-issued laptops.

    And if snobbish employees would not be caught dead using one of those, well, let them buy their own fancy-pantsy machines at their own expense.

  15. Re:Why New York? on Consumer Strikes Back at Crooked Online Retailer · · Score: 1
    Just out of curiosity, why are so many of these dealerships located in NY/NJ? Is there something in the laws of these states that makes it easy to do this type of stuff?
    No, it's just that there are a lot of jews in that area.

    Judaism is the oldest still-surviving religion and it carries pretty primitive values, almost as high as cavemen values.

    For example, non-jews are considered shit, and fair-game.

    Having been picked upon throughout most of History, jews have developped the habit of concentrating wealth in order to lose as little as possible when forced to move, hence their reliance on gold, diamonds or, more intelligently, on knowledge (now that's something you can't pry from someone's head).

    Unfortunately, their overreliance on wealth and disregard of ethical rules towards non-jews make that a disproportionate amount of scammers are jewish, thus fueling even more the universal resentment displayed towards the jews throughout the world and History, often escalating to very high level of horrors (the shoah, for example - this did not happen by accident; when some people decide to industrially exterminate another one, there has to be a very good reason, and the fact is that the jews have historically accumulated a lot of bad press).

    By comparison, expatriated chinese (the oldest surviving civilization, by the way) are just as trade savvy as the jews, but as they do not think that non-chinese are only worthy of being screwed, you do not see any universal resentment against the chinese.

    It is unfortunate that the jews have not learned from the lessons of the shoah, and have returned more arrogant than ever by stealing some land in the Middle-East all the while manipulating a nuclear superpower into fraudulently backing them (with the huge expense of international goodwill), thus fueling even more hatred against themselves and towards the superpower.

    As long as this will last, you can expect someone to start yet another shoah eventually if the jews don't learn that their crappy religion is bringing them lots of trouble and they oughta dump it so they can live in peace with others.

    Other people dumped their religion when it gave them trouble before (the french, for example), so they jews can very well do the same.

    (Reposted, account moderated as "troll")

  16. Re:Fear more than greed on RIAA vs Linux and DVDs · · Score: 1
    Net result: fear. Fear of failure, destitution, and the loss of everything they have gained on the work of others. Fear.
    Fear is the path to the dark side. (Or is it the mindkiller???)
  17. Re:Learn to preview.. . on RIAA vs Linux and DVDs · · Score: 2, Funny
    I think you have to read the related article to get the RIAA link. {a href=http://lxer.com/module/newswire/lf/view/48802 />The RIAA - Hollywood - DRM - Linux Suicide Pact
    The RIAA - Hollywood - DRM - Linux Suicide Pact
    How to get twice the karma or whoring without looking like you do.
  18. Re:Why New York? on Consumer Strikes Back at Crooked Online Retailer · · Score: 0, Troll
    Just out of curiosity, why are so many of these dealerships located in NY/NJ? Is there something in the laws of these states that makes it easy to do this type of stuff?
    No, it's just that there are a lot of jews in that area.

    Judaism is the oldest still-surviving religion and it carries pretty primitive values, almost as high as cavemen values.

    For example, non-jews are considered shit, and fair-game.

    Having been picked upon throughout most of History, jews have developped the habit of concentrating wealth in order to lose as little as possible when forced to move, hence their reliance on gold, diamonds or, more intelligently, on knowledge (now that's something you can't pry from someone's head).

    Unfortunately, their overreliance on wealth and disregard of ethical rules towards non-jews make that a disproportionate amount of scammers are jewish, thus fueling even more the universal resentment displayed towards the jews throughout the world and History, often escalating to very high level of horrors (the shoah, for example - this did not happen by accident; when some people decide to industrially exterminate another one, there has to be a very good reason, and the fact is that the jews have historically accumulated a lot of bad press).

    By comparison, expatriated chinese (the oldest surviving civilization, by the way) are just as trade savvy as the jews, but as they do not think that non-chinese are only worthy of being screwed, you do not see any universal resentment against the chinese.

    It is unfortunate that the jews have not learned from the lessons of the shoah, and have returned more arrogant than ever by stealing some land in the Middle-East all the while manipulating a nuclear superpower into fraudulently backing them (with the huge expense of international goodwill), thus fueling even more hatred against themselves and towards the superpower.

    As long as this will last, you can expect someone to start yet another shoah eventually if the jews don't learn that their crappy religion is bringing them lots of trouble and they oughta dump it so they can live in peace with others.

    Other people dumped their religion when it gave them trouble before (the french, for example), so they jews can very well do the same.

  19. Re:Proof? Just the "Target of the Period" on Clinton Introduces Invasive Game Legislation · · Score: 1
    And now we have video games back in the spotlight because of -- HORRORS! -- sex!! You know, that thing that every parent through th the history of man has performed in order to propagate the species?
    Fuck reproduction! We fuck and suck for the orgasms!!!

    Who'd want to bring children to this fucked-up world anyways???? Let's adopt them from the overcrowded turd-world instead. They're waaaaay much cuter then white trash offspring, and they'll diversify our gene pool.

  20. Re:So Much For Bible Video Games ... on Clinton Introduces Invasive Game Legislation · · Score: 1
    If we apply this standard to the Holy Book, we're going to have to put warning labels on any game based on, e.g. "a blessing on anyone who seizes your babies and shatters them against a rock!" (Psalms 137:9)
    I promise that I will give $10,000 to a charity the instant a videogame company will put up a videogame based on the gory details of the Old Testament!!!
  21. Re:just curious... on Clinton Introduces Invasive Game Legislation · · Score: 1
    why something like this only applies to games and not other forms of media. Why does 'Family Entertainment Protection Act' specifically target games when movies, books, and magazines can be just as 'harmful' to children.
    Indeed, when I was a kid, I would masturbate looking at pictures in pornographic magazines. The result now is that I am a raving sex-maniac, and now I masturbate at pictures downloaded from the Internet.
  22. Who cares? on Sony Adds RSS Support to PSP · · Score: 0, Troll

    We're not buying anything from SONY ever again.

  23. Re:No new law needed on Cybercrime More Lucrative Than Drugs · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hey Ma! Look at what the cat dragged-in!!! A libertarian asshole!!!

    Libertarians (in reality, cheap-labour conservatives) only want a government to protect them from their slaves.

    Now, crawl back from that rock you came under.

  24. Re:No new law needed on Cybercrime More Lucrative Than Drugs · · Score: 1
    All kidding aside, I don't personally believe in cybercrime. Some cybercrime victims are merely stupid users, and no law can fix them.
    So, con artists are O.K. because their victims willingly surrender to them whatever they want???
  25. Re:Is it April Fools alreay? on A Look at Windows Server Outselling Linux · · Score: 1
    We demand buggy software!
    Shutup, Vroomfondel!!!