Or maybe they could continue to 'work' and read about them whilst standing around the coffee machine, in-between bouts of chit-chat ? multi-tasking for the win:D
Well, as you put it like that, probably not but as I'm not in "the land of the free (muhahaha off to the side, discreetly)", it's not in the forefront of my mind that everything is indirectly related to *parp*.
One form of taxation is as good as another. Measured as the net cash flowing from a business, it matters little what the nominal reason for taking the cash were.
So, you expect the same system that permitted this injustice to correct it? Not only that, you expect that same system to outlaw the injustice it committed?
What to do when everyone else suffering from the same issue is being used as a tool to persist this same system?
It's just as right as stealing part of the reward someone receives when exchanging their time for money.
Or when, on their deathbed, transfer ownership of their assets to their children, after part is stolen in tax.
Or when a company shows great creativity and generates profits in the same economic climate in which others are failing - to have an increased portion stolen in taxation.
I don't see the problem, in a climate where EVERY aspect of a non-super-rich individual's life is taxed, for a tiny portion of that mindset to be trickled upwards.
Unless you're saying that feeding off've others' efforts is somehow wrong?
Let's not forget that a large portion of those workers are in an occupation whose sole purpose is to prevent expression of legitimate grievance against those creating the situation.
Divide and conquer and reward those who work against their own interests in favour of ours with toroidal sugar treats.
You can introduce derogatory terms for the hard-working foreign robots which satisfy a demand that American robots cannot fill due to low battery capacity, processing power and and an expectation to recover artificially high development costs.
if (customersWantOurProducts) {
while (true) {
waitForNewOrder();
processCustomerOrder();
} } else {
for (var c in customers) {
for (var p in products) {
sendEmail (c.email, "Although we recognise that this is a longshot, do you " + c.name + ", at this exact instant in time, require our product '" + p.name + "', for the currently reduced price of " + (0.9 * (p.price * 12 - 20)) + "?\r\nKind regards, spammer.-corp");
}
} }
by signing up, you've agreed to receive the newsletter
the ability to remove yourself from their list, after agreeing to receive their emails, is why they don't get fined
Agreed, because it was likely clearly stated in a document linked ten levels deep, right near the middle in white-on-white text, "by purchasing products from xyz store, you agree to receive spam; that our unsubscribe link goes to a page which will crash in a manner which appears accidental and that we will not respond to your emails relating to our broken unsubscribe page."
Slashdot Mirror
Or maybe they could continue to 'work' and read about them whilst standing around the coffee machine, in-between bouts of chit-chat ? multi-tasking for the win :D
Well, as you put it like that, probably not but as I'm not in "the land of the free (muhahaha off to the side, discreetly)", it's not in the forefront of my mind that everything is indirectly related to *parp*.
*slow motion double-take*
lol what?
OK, so efficiency should be taxed too because it puts people out of 'work.'
and if they collude and decide to keep the profits for themselves ?
As you've been so kind - I'll do the same.
One form of taxation is as good as another. Measured as the net cash flowing from a business, it matters little what the nominal reason for taking the cash were.
Well spotted. What else isn't it the same as?
What to do when everyone else suffering from the same issue is being used as a tool to persist this same system?
Nope, his golf swing would be awful - how would that look?
It's almost as if the terms are nothing but a distraction from the issues deployed by those with an interest in the issues being free from scrutiny.
Exactly the kind of thing a liberal would say! :P
It's just as right as stealing part of the reward someone receives when exchanging their time for money.
Or when, on their deathbed, transfer ownership of their assets to their children, after part is stolen in tax.
Or when a company shows great creativity and generates profits in the same economic climate in which others are failing - to have an increased portion stolen in taxation.
I don't see the problem, in a climate where EVERY aspect of a non-super-rich individual's life is taxed, for a tiny portion of that mindset to be trickled upwards.
Unless you're saying that feeding off've others' efforts is somehow wrong?
The answer is to fund it all with ad revenue from the ads below the five-pixel close bar on this page.
Let's not forget that a large portion of those workers are in an occupation whose sole purpose is to prevent expression of legitimate grievance against those creating the situation.
Divide and conquer and reward those who work against their own interests in favour of ours with toroidal sugar treats.
Yes? Presumably the increased profits were taxed.
You can introduce derogatory terms for the hard-working foreign robots which satisfy a demand that American robots cannot fill due to low battery capacity, processing power and and an expectation to recover artificially high development costs.
And so they should be applauded to have shown us the way?
Anyone who's serious about competing for their jobs against robots should have robotic implants to help level the playing field? :P
Please do go on a little more - we're entering useful-tip territory.
if (javaScript === python) {
console.log ('my bad');
}
else {
console.log ('huh?');
}
It's just so pointless;
if (customersWantOurProducts) {
while (true) {
waitForNewOrder();
processCustomerOrder();
}
} else {
for (var c in customers) {
for (var p in products) {
sendEmail (c.email, "Although we recognise that this is a longshot, do you " + c.name + ", at this exact instant in time, require our product '" + p.name + "', for the currently reduced price of " + (0.9 * (p.price * 12 - 20)) + "?\r\nKind regards, spammer.-corp");
}
}
}
Agreed, because it was likely clearly stated in a document linked ten levels deep, right near the middle in white-on-white text, "by purchasing products from xyz store, you agree to receive spam; that our unsubscribe link goes to a page which will crash in a manner which appears accidental and that we will not respond to your emails relating to our broken unsubscribe page."
Attacks the man not the ideas.
Because their windows store app is unstable?
Disclaimer: I've not read the standard.
Does the move also standardise a platform for DeCSS-type unlocking of content?