They may have managed to increase performance, but the real question is have they increased the actual output quality (without having to tweak the crap out of it): http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/377
Also, I thought we've determined that PSNR is NOT a very good measure on the quality of a codec...
It could be SCO vs Linux all over again. I doubt it, since SCO vs Linux was regarding exact lines of source code, directly copied and pasted IIRC. If, however, a company did purchase the protocol license, and leaked it out to an open source project, they could implement it, without being able to be sued for copyright.
[...]
4. Novell releases patented information for Office translator
[...] Isn't OOXML (Office Open XML) supposedly open? How is an open interface in any way patented?
Those patents expired about two years ago, fortunately.
Typical human selfishness trying to hog all the life on the planet.
Morbo agrees.
They may have managed to increase performance, but the real question is have they increased the actual output quality (without having to tweak the crap out of it):
http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/377
Also, I thought we've determined that PSNR is NOT a very good measure on the quality of a codec...
Patents? That's another story.
For those who thought that the North Korean nuclear test was a hoax, take that!