Slashdot Mirror


Giant Rabbits To Feed North Korea

iamdrscience writes with news of an East German pensioner who breeds rabbits the size of dogs. Karl Szmolinsky won a prize for breeding Germany's largest rabbit, at 23 lbs., in 2006. News photos reached the North Koreans, who asked through their embassy whether Szmolinsky would be willing to sell them some as foodstocks — each rabbit yields about 15 lb. of meat. A deal was struck and Szmolinsky will be traveling to North Korea in April to help them set up a breeding program. (The photos in the article use the most extreme, contrived camera angles to make the rabbits look even more huge.)

421 comments

  1. i for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    welcome our Giant Rabbit Overlords

    1. Re:i for one by roseblood · · Score: 1

      welcome our Giant Rabbit Overlords

      Make that Giant Rabbit protein meals!

      Those photos! How much abuse can one handle? I feel like my eyes have been abused by the over-use of those damned super-wide-angle lenses!

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    2. Re:i for one by Foole · · Score: 3, Funny
      *wipes dust from title*

      "Giant Rabbits To Feed On North Korea"

      --
      This is not a turnip.
    3. Re:i for one by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Funny

      You insensitive clod!

      Regards,

      Jimmy Carter.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    4. Re:i for one by WoLpH · · Score: 1

      A little girl goes into a pet show and asks for a wabbit. The shop keeper looks down at her, smiles and says:

      "Would you like a lovely fluffy little white rabbit, or a cutesy wootesly little brown rabbit?"

      "Actually", says the little girl, "I don't think my python would notice."

    5. Re:i for one by Kongming · · Score: 1

      'Tis no ordinary rabbit!

      --
      (no sig)
    6. Re:i for one by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      i for one welcome our Giant Rabbit Overlords

      You mean this guy, right?

      (I can't believe how well this picture works with this post!)

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    7. Re:i for one by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Just one minute. Those pictures look doctored to me.

      This picture was shot with the rabbit really up close and personal to the camera lens. So the rabbit will look larger than it is.

      Now this looks even more fake. Notice how the hand of the person holding the rabbit is larger than his own head. That was obviously a doctored picture.

      I guess this is the German version of the Giant Canadian cat.

    8. Re:i for one by Sassinak · · Score: 1

      Damn, you took my line..

      that's it... no more being sick.

      --
      God made the Idiot for practice, and then He made the School Board -- Mark Twain Look for http://Thebar.steelbeachca
    9. Re:i for one by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > "Giant Rabbits To Feed North Korea"
      >> *wipes dust from title*
      >> "Giant Rabbits To Feed On North Korea"

      HAHAHA mod parent up!

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  2. Harvey? by ShaunC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that you, Harvey? I can't see... :)

    On the plus side, I don't see anything wrong with eating rabbit meat. Rabbits are well known for their reproductive capabilities, so if it's edible, why not? It beats kimchee...

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    1. Re:Harvey? by Palal · · Score: 1

      Actually the meat tastes better than chicken. Many middle eastern restaurants serve rabbit on the menu and it's delicious, if cooked right.

      --
      -Palal
    2. Re:Harvey? by fabs64 · · Score: 1

      Rabbit cooked properly is one of the nicest meats imo.

  3. First post... etc etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yada yada, first post, you get the idea.

  4. They don't need this German guy by TodMinuit · · Score: 1

    They just need to follow Homer's logic: Expose the rabbits to radiation, thereby making them big.

    --
    I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
    1. Re:They don't need this German guy by gijoel · · Score: 1
      They just need to follow Homer's logic: Expose the rabbits to radiation, thereby making them big.


      Don't get me angry, Doc!
      You wouldn't like me when I get angry.
  5. Yippe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fp?

  6. Roos by HermanAB · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Australia the rabbits are even bigger - I think they call them 'roos'...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Roos by stox · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the US, they're even bigger, we call them "politicians."

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    2. Re:Roos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia most likely wishes they could send all their rabbits to North Korea. Have to wonder if they would have any natural predators in North Korea.

    3. Re:Roos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, Kangaroos are often larger than your average politician; quite a bit more intelligent as well.

    4. Re:Roos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought those were called "Jackasses."

    5. Re:Roos by Anaxagor · · Score: 1
      Australia most likely wishes they could send all their rabbits to North Korea.

      I don't think the North Korean government would accept them. They're still pretty pissed at us after what we did to one of their drug-smuggling vessels...

    6. Re:Roos by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Then there's the almighty Comedian, & they eat Politicians for breakfast.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    7. Re:Roos by Cee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In Australia the rabbits are even bigger - I think they call them 'roos'...

      This reminds me of what happened in Australia when the brought rabbits there in the first place. Granted, I guess there already are native rabbits in North Korea, but it's a very risky business to bring in foreign species into an ecosystem.
      The first episode of the documentary Strange Days on Planet Earth illustrates that quite clearly.

    8. Re:Roos by jack_csk · · Score: 2, Funny

      > In the US, they're even bigger, we call them "politicians." Interesting, I thought they are known as "Rats".
    9. Re:Roos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:Roos by Nanpa · · Score: 1

      A pity both problems can't be solved by sending drugs inside the rabbits inside the boat back to North Korea

    11. Re:Roos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop insulting the rabbits and kangeroos.

    12. Re:Roos by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

      They probably wouldn't release them into the wild (where they would very quickly shed their artificially selected traits like size etc. assuming they'd survive), but grow them like beef cattle instead. Beef. Hmmm, is there a special word for wabbit meat?

    13. Re:Roos by sbben · · Score: 1

      No good for food, I heard these "politicians" are all full of shit.

    14. Re:Roos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure? I thought they are called "lawyers", judging from the rapid population growth and their hobby to fsck other people.

    15. Re:Roos by OceanBarb · · Score: 1

      imagine if these things got loose in the back of beyond..... The horror! The horror!

    16. Re:Roos by tepples · · Score: 1

      Beef. Hmmm, is there a special word for wabbit meat?

      Generally, these are derived from the French (beef < boeuf). The French word for "rabbit" is lapin. The word for the practice of rabbit ranching is cuniculture. I don't know if there's a specific word for rabbit meat recognized by supermarket meat sections.

  7. Seems like a make-work project... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    who breeds rabbits the size of dogs.

    Why don't the North Koreans just continue to eat dogs?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by tilandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because dogs eat protein so that would defeat the purpose.

    2. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dogs don't eat grass like koreans.

    3. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why don't the North Koreans just continue to eat dogs?"

      'Cause they're gone, and so is most livestock.
      There have been many credible reports over the years (from defectors) of NK's eating grass, bark, and even each other.

      Rabbits don't seem like a bad alternative. That is *IF* they can keep them alive long enough to grow to full adulthood.

    4. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why don't the North Koreans just continue to eat dogs?

      Because the fashion industry doesn't like to admit to selling products made out of dog fur.
      really, they don't
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by comradeeroid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why don't the North Koreans just continue to eat dogs?

      A dog must eat meat to grow, which means you have to first feed an animal that you feed to the dog. As you can understand this is wastefull since you'll loose energy in the conversion from vegetables to dogfood.
      The problem is that any conversion from vegetables to meat is a lossy one, so in the end even the rabbits are a stupid (yet so brilliantly communistic) idea. It would be better to grow crops and feed the north Koreans vegetarian food. (though they might want to rebell if forced to eat just carrots)

      --
      If you see a rock violating the law of gravity, then the law is wrong, not the rock!
    6. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't the North Koreans just continue to eat dogs?

      They did, until they ran out of dogs. Then they started eating each other: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A41966-20 03Oct3?language=printer

    7. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      The thing is, though, that rabbits can eat and thrive off of plant matter that will not sustain human beings. So, if the NKs feed that stuff to the rabbits, it's an overall gain, because it's not like humans can eat grass and thrive.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    8. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by strider44 · · Score: 1

      They will also be hugely malnourished. We're omnivores - we need meat as well as vegetables.

    9. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      They'll still be skinny living off vegetables. Rabbits, sheep and cows live off plants that humans can't eat anyway, so it makes more sense to eat beef than grass.

    10. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germans helping communists: is this news?

    11. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      Rabbits, sheep and cows live off plants that humans can't eat anyway, so it makes more sense to eat beef than grass.
      While it's true (in the UK at least) that sheep are raised on land that would be marginal at best for other uses, cows are frequently fed on corn, that people could eat. What's more lots of cattle grazing ground could be used to grow human edible crops.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    12. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they ran out of dogs.

    13. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by trewornan · · Score: 1

      If I was a dog I wouldn't eat the grass like ones either.

    14. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by sydb · · Score: 1

      You're wrong about us being "hugely malnourished" if we don't eat meat, as I can attest, knowing several healthy vegetarians - one of whom has been vegetarian from birth - and having myself been a strong, healthy vegetarian for the last ten years.

      Maybe the Koreans don't have the vegetable crops to support human life but that's a different point.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    15. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right: It is easier to have a healthy diet with meat. But you're also wrong. It is not impossible to get all we need from vegetarian food.

    16. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      Because the fashion industry doesn't like to admit to selling products made out of dog fur.
      It's ok, they can use cat instead.
      Oh wait they already do.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    17. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by comradeeroid · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking that is correct, but a rabbit won't flourish on grass alone and that kind of depends upon the land used for rabbit feed couldn't be cultivated to grow man feed.

      --
      If you see a rock violating the law of gravity, then the law is wrong, not the rock!
    18. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      why should the north koreans (or anyone really) give a shit what the fashion industry thinks?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    19. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      cows are partly fed on offal made from other cows. That's how we managed to get BSE into the food chain.

    20. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by E8086 · · Score: 1

      Not dogs, hot dogs or sausage. Which could be made out of dog or even bunny.
      Along with all the less wanted chemical preservatives they are a decent source of animal fat and protien did help the US through the great depression without that many people starving to death.
      It appears that North Korea's problem, other than the economic embargo encouraged by their great and wise head of state, is the lack of decent land to raise crops and livestock. So they need a animal with a good size, weight to meat ration, food eaten vs meat produced and doesn't need much graising room. KFC chicken is the first that comes to mind, but after thinking of my sister's pet bunny, they may also work. They do have some coast, perhaps some kind of seafood/rice/bunny sausage with a side of potato product, mashed or scalloped or even some freedom fries.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    21. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by toddhisattva · · Score: 1
      Germans helping communists: is this news?
      German philosophy has killed more people than the German military ever has.
    22. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      No we don't, you just have to mix things up your legumes, grains and a bit of diary makes things easier but aren't necessary. Basically eating what we call Mexican food without meat would be pretty good.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    23. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Plants are protein too. What you mean to say is that dogs are carnivores and therefore higher on the food chain. Every time you convert food by feeding it to an animal, you lose 90% of your biomass. So if you grow dog meat by feeding your dogs rabbits which you feed grass, then you have to grow 100 pounds of grass to grow 1 pound of dog meat. Better to eat the 10 pounds of rabbit yourself.

      This is not exactly advanced science: I learned it in sixth grade. If slashdotters don't know know what a food chain is, either schools have declined since my day, or slashdotters don't retain anything that isn't in comic book form.

    24. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Exactly.
      Can North Korea be any more evil? Growing the cutest rabbit stock in quantities never seen even in nature --and then eating it-- is a really good effort, at least from a PR standpoint.

    25. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Fox are canines, just like racoon dogs. It's not like they're skinning Fido.

  8. Rabbit Starvation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Rabbit Starvation by TechnoGuyRob · · Score: 1

      Symptoms include diarrhea, headache, lassitude, a vague discomfort and hunger that can only be satisfied by consumption of fat or carbohydrate. At least Americans won't be the only ones laughed at for being fat.

    2. Re:Rabbit Starvation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading that linked wiki should start you wondering about the dangers of using genetic manipulation or other methods of leaning our beef and pork like the industry has been doing for a while to placate the fat hating nuts.

    3. Re:Rabbit Starvation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Anyone on a standard Western diet will never be in danger of having a protein intake >35% of total caloric intake, which is considered the "danger zone".

      Lean meat is a good thing for Westerners who have a very high fat intake. And genetic modification has little to do with it - most stock are bred conventionally for desirable traits like this (they just use genetic screening to facilitate the breeding to make it as efficient as possible).
      Admittedly, most of the move towards "lean meat" is for economic and "fashion" reasons though. Substituting lean meat for normal meat really doesn't make a huge difference in most diets, and we'd all be better off just increasing fruit and vegetable intake :)

    4. Re:Rabbit Starvation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly every wilderness survival manual will tell you a diet consisting of rabbit will kill you. If your already starving it's the worst meat you can eat as it takes more energy to digest than you recieve from it.

    5. Re:Rabbit Starvation by ArtuRocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Les Stroud talked about this on an episode of Survivorman; what you're supposed to do to avoid rabbit starvation is eat the entire rabbit, from top to bottom, bones, eyes, brains, etc (but not the fur).

    6. Re:Rabbit Starvation by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Before I clicked on the link, I wondered whether this was referring to millions of rabbits starving to death in North Korea. After all, if the government can't feed its people, what's it going to feed to its rabbits?

    7. Re:Rabbit Starvation by budgenator · · Score: 1

      You don't worry about rabbit starvation when you're eating grass and tree bark.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:Rabbit Starvation by wiggle.e · · Score: 1

      The wiki article makes it sound like a good weight loss diet in moderation.

    9. Re:Rabbit Starvation by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Agreed... I'd love to see someone try to market "The Rabbit Diet".

      Health by Hasenfeffer?

  9. Reminds me of.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remind anyone of Night of the Lepus? http://imdb.com/title/tt0069005/

  10. They might be giants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (The photos in the article use the most extreme, contrived camera angles to make the rabbits look even more huge.)

    No doubt there are many internet-dating Slashdotters who have availed themselves of such contrivances to make things look bigger than they really are.

  11. Here is why this is a bad idea by monkeySauce · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can anyone else see next month's headline? ... Giant Rabid Rabbits Wreck Havoc on North Korean Village.

    The giant rabbit thing sounds straight out of a cheesy horror film. I think I would go with micro rabbits instead. You could breed them by the millions and just eat them whole like little snacks. They might be a little furry and a little crunchy, but at least there is less danger they will turn out evil and eat your children.

    1. Re:Here is why this is a bad idea by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Poor reason. This would not be an issue since rabbits taste good. People would just eat them.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:Here is why this is a bad idea by jimicus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's already happened:

      http://imdb.com/title/tt0312004/

    3. Re:Here is why this is a bad idea by MiJiTnz · · Score: 1

      Did someone say "cheesy horror film"?

      Night of the Lepus http://imdb.com/title/tt0069005/ starring the late, great, DeForest Kelly.

      The Agony Booth's in-depth review of this masterpiece of 70's cinema: http://www.agonybooth.com/lepus/.

    4. Re:Here is why this is a bad idea by ozbird · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of this:

      http://imdb.com/title/tt0246578/

    5. Re:Here is why this is a bad idea by ari+wins · · Score: 1

      Have no fear, we'll just round up all the 14year olds who've beaten Rayman Ravin' Rabbids and send them off to N. Korea with a Wii remote.

      --
      Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
    6. Re:Here is why this is a bad idea by TClevenger · · Score: 1
      Waitress, can I substitute DeForest Kelley?

      http://imdb.com/title/tt0069005/

    7. Re:Here is why this is a bad idea by lhbtubajon · · Score: 1

      I really thought you were going to link to this: Night of the Lepus!

    8. Re:Here is why this is a bad idea by kylus · · Score: 1

      The giant rabbit thing sounds straight out of a cheesy horror film. I think I would go with micro rabbits instead. You could breed them by the millions and just eat them whole like little snacks. They might be a little furry and a little crunchy, but at least there is less danger they will turn out evil and eat your children. You're right: http://imdb.com/title/tt0069005/ And it is a very cheesy film ;)
      --
      --Kylus
      Idiot-proof something, and Life will build a better Idiot.
    9. Re:Here is why this is a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and combine large bunnies with radiation of their nuclear test, you get giant mutant bunnies WMD program...

      May be that country is really run by a mad scientist!

  12. Giant rabbits you say? by dj245 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they made of wood?

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Giant rabbits you say? by d12v10 · · Score: 1

      What cartoon is this a reference to again? I seem to remember vague images of a guy with an eyepatch.

    2. Re:Giant rabbits you say? by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      *slap*

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    3. Re:Giant rabbits you say? by LordVader717 · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Giant rabbits you say? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      No. But after having seen the film, North Korea decided that thrown rabbits are an even better weapon than nuclear bombs.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  13. SQUISH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And a beef will rise again, broken machine in his hand. Ten words: snapping bunnies twitching gurgling forget the bombs in your eyes. Roaring with whispers to the tiny bunnies SMASH/SPLAT those fucking bunnies. Send them information in a sensationalist manner, THEY CORRUPT. Heads snapping and misspelling eyes twitching in response to the sound of the words. Red world-like words zooming boiling. Moons in the shallow sky. Roaring with whispers to the tiny bunnies SPLAT/SQUISH those fucking bunnies. Twitching bleeding screaming bring the hammer down. Screaming bunnies bleeding bloody bunnies smeared across the ground. Drool spilling down his chin unto his beard as he screams red words at A blank and pointless sky of mothers. Red words popping and crackling black. Ten words: Snapping bunnies twitching gurgling forget the bombs IN YOUR EYES. Forget the bombs in your eyes. Speak the words to crack open the sky

    1. Re:SQUISH! by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod the parent up

      +2: Really really weird

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    2. Re:SQUISH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slam Poetry night on slashdot.... why do I even bother.

    3. Re:SQUISH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  14. Were's the beef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "iamdrscience writes with news of an East German pensioner who breeds rabbits the size of dogs."

    Pfft. That's nothing. We in the US breed humans the size of Buicks.

    1. Re:Were's the beef? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course, the question is: The size of which dog? After all, there's a huge size difference between dogs and dogs!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Were's the beef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of a breeding a large rabbit is hardly a recent breakthrough...

      "Nyeehhhhh. What's Up Doc?"

  15. Help the poor North Koreans? by argoff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If he thinks that he is going to help the poor starving North Koreans, he will probably be in for the shock of his life. It will probably be for the rich ruling class, or even worse the elite may suffer from poor aim when they go out hunting rabits for sport.

    If Korea is really concerned about starvation, they should look at their neighbor China. China went from a disaster of 10's of millions of starving people to total solution almost immediately. How did they do it? They let the farmers have private property rights.

  16. Why does this bring to mind by Baldrson · · Score: 1
  17. Useful Scientific Facts About Bunnies by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Funny

    DAAAAAAAAAAAA!!

    They may not taste good but they can dance.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    1. Re:Useful Scientific Facts About Bunnies by WindowsIsForArseWipe · · Score: 0

      Sorry,

      I think you were thinking about hamsters dancing because everybody knows white rabbits can't dance!

      http://www.hamsterdance.com

    2. Re:Useful Scientific Facts About Bunnies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's on about Rayman Raving Rabbids. DAAAAAAAA!!

    3. Re:Useful Scientific Facts About Bunnies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always shoot them in the face with toilet plungers if they attack. That, or turn on some music to distract them.

  18. Terrorism by seifried · · Score: 4, Funny

    What happens when (not if) N. Korea weaponizes these giant rabbits? Possibly by irradiating them and turning them into an even larger and more fearsome animal (sort of like African killer bees, but with big floppy death ray shooting ears). Seriously folks. Won't someone think of the children?

    1. Re:Terrorism by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he plans to attach frickin' laser beams to their heads.

    2. Re:Terrorism by urbanradar · · Score: 0
      What happens when (not if) N. Korea weaponizes these giant rabbits? Possibly by irradiating them and turning them into an even larger and more fearsome animal (sort of like African killer bees, but with big floppy death ray shooting ears). Seriously folks. Won't someone think of the children?
      This is modded... insightful? Funny, yeah, okay. But insightful?

      1. We already have tons of big and fearsome animals in this world.
      2. How exactly does one turn a rabbit, even a big one, into a weapon?
      3. North Korea still has more likely things to turn into weapons than rabbits.
      4. Across the globe, humanity is facing global warming, nuclear weapons, social injustice. In many regions, humanity is facing starvation, disease and war. C'mon people, we have bigger things to worry about than communist killer rabbits already.

      Again, kudos to the poster for a funny post, but I'm not sure what to make of the moderation...
    3. Re:Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop it. We can always make more children

    4. Re:Terrorism by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      What happens when (not if) N. Korea weaponizes these giant rabbits? Possibly by irradiating them and turning them into an even larger and more fearsome animal (sort of like African killer bees, but with big floppy death ray shooting ears). Seriously folks. Won't someone think of the children?

      This is modded... insightful? Funny, yeah, okay. But insightful?


      It's because Funny +1 doesn't increase the GP's Karma.

      Either that or the mod knows something we don't know about the uses of Giant Killer Bunnies...
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:Terrorism by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      Seriously folks. Won't someone think of the children?

      The children bunnies or the supporters of the fanatical regime?

      Seriously, one thing the west does not get through our thick skulls is that this North Koreans gets away with it because their people support it. If a Taliban slept in my house, and I fed him would I not be a Taliban supporter?

      The solder in these countries do not always come with uniforms. In fact, rarely do. Let North Korea do a Darwinian things, we do need less of this on this planet.

    6. Re:Terrorism by sokkalf · · Score: 1

      Then only the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch will save us!

    7. Re:Terrorism by jackbird · · Score: 1
      If a Taliban slept in your house while holding you at gunpoint, would you be a Taliban supporter? Would you rather be a dead anti-Taliban or a live Taliban supporter at the price of a meal and a bed for the night?

      Given the degree of oppression in NK, and having seen the footage and other materials smuggled out by the opposition, I can't fault the North Koreans who don't take the absolutely suicidal chances the dissidents do, while I have profound respect and admiration for those that do.

    8. Re:Terrorism by seifried · · Score: 1

      My Karma is excellent (note the low 5 digits UID =).

    9. Re:Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With big sharp pointy teeth!

      That rabbit's a killer!

    10. Re:Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, this is not completely a joke. If you have 30lb rabbits hippity hopping around the DMZ for a few years, you could get rid of a lot of land mines...

  19. Efficiency? by UOZaphod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not a vegetarian myself, but even this raises questions regarding the efficiency of such an operation.

    Is it more efficient to feed these rabbits vegetable matter to be converted to protein (which, according to the article, is what the diet of many N. Koreans is deficient in), or would it be better instead to grow protein-rich plants that can be consumed directly by the people?

    If the rabbits can consume grasses and other things that humans are unable to digest efficiently, and convert that into protein, then I suppose it would make sense.

    --
    "The unicode stuff in the latest version is working fabulously well. My russian mafia friends are ecstatic."
    1. Re:Efficiency? by shmurfect · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In terms of efficiency, it would be most efficient environmentally to have N. Koreans consume protein-rich vegetables directly, as each step through the food chain is about 10% efficient. This is why, if you look down the food chain, the biomass of plants and vegetables is exponentially greater than herbivores, as herbivores are exponentially greater than carnivores. At each step down the line, there is a tremendous waste of energy.

    2. Re:Efficiency? by UOZaphod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I'm wondering, however, is if the situation is such that there are tracts of land that aren't suitable for growing such protein-rich vegetables. The same land, however, may yield grasses and other plants that would make fine rabbit food. The rabbits become a supplement to the protein-deficient diet of the people, because they can convert plant matter that was once non-beneficial to something that is.

      --
      "The unicode stuff in the latest version is working fabulously well. My russian mafia friends are ecstatic."
    3. Re:Efficiency? by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      "I feed them everything -- grain, carrots, a lot of vegetables. At the moment they're getting kale," said Szmolinsky.

      Since I'm sure the Koreans could eat that themselves, I suspect the rabbits are going to get a lot of grass.

    4. Re:Efficiency? by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

      Beans provide the protein but then we deal with the methane issues and global warming. Giant bunnies or global warming take your pick.

    5. Re:Efficiency? by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Short version, yes, they are stupid.
      Long answer, yes, they are really they stupid.

      But then here in the US we're racing to turn all our food into SUV fuel, so at least they aren't THAT stupid. *sigh*

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    6. Re:Efficiency? by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      Some people in NK are already down to eating grass/. I read the testimonies of a cartoonist who went there on a deal from his employer (TV company) to deliver instructions at a cartoon animation studio in Pyongyang: at one point he saw people munching on the grass. Salaries in this country are paid -if at all- directly in rice bags from international aid, when there is any available.

      NK doesn't have enough human work time and resources devoted to growing enough vegetables and cereals for its people, because everyone is enlisted in the military for a decade minimum, spying on everyone, or stamping administrative papers for everything. They won't be able to breed more than a ridiculously low number of rabbits, because the regime simply does not want its people to be fed, it's part of how they keep control.

      I suspect the real plan here is to make a publicity stunt where Kim Jong-Il announces that NK is so far ahead of every other country that it breeds bigger rabbits to feed all its people.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    7. Re:Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a vegetarian.

      In terms of basic calorie count, yes, eating vegetables all the time is more efficient, but people need more than colories to survive, especially growing children. It is really, really hard to get the fats, oils, amino acids, iron and other nutrients that your body needs and a diet with meat provides. The requirements are much higher for very active people, as I am sure the labor-based North Korean economy has. It requires a very ecclectic diet rich in many types of beans, nuts and fresh fruits, which is hard to get if you are poor.

      For them, meat is probably the best way to provide their people with what they need.

    8. Re:Efficiency? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Irrigation is as much as a problem as soil fertility. Grass can get by with quite a lot less water.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Efficiency? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of Vegetarians websites will give stats show how much food animals eat and compare it to how many people they can feed vs 1 serving of the animal. But meat is often less environmental and more economical. First grazing animals (which is are primary meat besides fish) tend to eat easy to grow crops that take rather little water and grow easily in the area. Protein rich crops take more attention they will need to make sure the crops are irrigated (Moving a lot of water a long distance) vs. grazing animals that will walk to the troths or a local pond. So there is a lot more energy growing protein rich crops as well a lot more human interaction, investment, and resources.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:Efficiency? by mblase · · Score: 2, Funny

      At each step down the line, there is a tremendous waste of energy.

      But a tenfold increase in taste.

      Plus you don't get gas from eating an entire plate of chicken protein.

    11. Re:Efficiency? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Waste of energy? That's a funny thing to call the lives of the organisms that populate a tiered food chain. We're talking about biodiversity, here, if you think about it. If you had a monoculture of only the most efficient life forms directly converting energy into their life-cycle, and nothing else, would that "efficiency" in energy use be an improvement?

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    12. Re:Efficiency? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      as each step through the food chain is about 10% efficient.

      That is an extremely narrow view of the food chain, which doesn't take everything into account, and isn't really applicable here.

      First, try and name a plant that is 100% edible. EVERY food crop produces significant ammounts of cellulose, which can't be digested directly by humans, but can certainly be put to good use by herbivores. Goats in particular, REALLY will eat practically anything that biodegrades, and produce both milk and meat for human consumption.

      While only 10% of the calories may be passed-on, much is left in dropping, which can be (and is) used to fertilize the next generation of crops.

      People simply have a much easier time getting nutrition from meat than plants.

      Not to mention the utility of skins and furs.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:Efficiency? by njh · · Score: 1

      Humans are very poor at converting grass into food. Grass is a lot easier to grow than lentils. Hence, eating certain meats is more efficient than trying to feed humans directly.

      Someone worked out that if everyone went vegetarian we would not have enough arable land to support our current population.

    14. Re:Efficiency? by shplorb · · Score: 1

      Rabbits are one of the most efficient farmed animals at converting plant protein to meat - they're right up there with chickens. Apparently they thrive on grasses, which don't pack much punch for poultry and ruminants, who instead make the most gains from eating grains. This is important, because humans eat grains and not grasses.

      Their high conversion efficiency and preference for foods that humans don't eat combined with prolific reproduction rate makes them an ideal, although not primary, meat source. (Apparently rabbit lacks some nutrients found in other meats that the human body can't synthesise)

      Farmed rabbits are typically slaughtered at 12 weeks and will at that point have consumed around 10kg of feed, yielding around 1.5kg of meat. The pelts aren't worth much though because the animal is so young and the skin isn't as developed as in a more mature adult. Heads and guts are apparently good food for composting worms, and the liver can be used for pate.

      Rabbit manure is also a very good fertiliser as it is rich in Nitrogen.

      (Funnily I've been researching rabbit farming for the last few weeks.)

  20. Giant bunnies vs. Just get rid of Kim! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Informative

    North Korea is not like China, not even close. It is very much like Soviet Union under Stalin. It is pretty much a time capsule of the 50s. Google for some blogs or photos from westerners who went there, it is a totally surreal experience.

    Large empty streets, every foreigner is followed by an assigned guide. If a tourist as much as takes a digital photo of one of their leader's statues that is off center or has the head cut-off they are forced to retake the picture. There are stories of children being used to help harvest poppies for heroin production after they get off school. Everything is a show, they use all of their funds to build their military while hundreds of thousands are starving. Their leader is crazy and he has nukes. Iraq was a kindergarten compared to NK. Until the crazy dictators are ruling the country no amount of giant fluffy (and yummy) bunnies will save the people from starvation...

  21. Long term effects? by sinserve · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know the technical name for it, but eating the ultra lean rabbit meat is known to cause malnutrition and eventual poisoning and death. I have seen several "adventure" videos where the survival experts remind viewers not to go very long on rabbit meat alone, for its lack of fat, and augment it with other sources of fat.

    1. Re:Long term effects? by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know the technical name for it, but eating the ultra lean rabbit meat is known to cause malnutrition and eventual poisoning and death.

      But see, the thing is... the average Kim Joe in NK is already starving/malnurished. The place is a culinary hell-hole, that way. The Stalinst way they run their agriculture is having (shocking!) the same results that it did under Stalin: mass starvation and death, unless you're in the military. Eeesh, what a place. And the people there seem to really believe that they're about to be attacked by the rest of the world (or, the US, anyway), and that their current suffering is just part of their war-posture sacrifice. Incredible what the in-house propoganda machine can get away with in the complete absense of a free press, anything like modern media, and anyone who might tell it like it is fearing for their lives.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Long term effects? by replicant108 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Incredible what the in-house propaganda machine can get away with

      Those were exactly my thoughts reading the comments attached to this article.

    3. Re:Long term effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And the people there seem to really believe that they're about to be attacked by the rest of the world (or, the US, anyway)...Incredible what the in-house propoganda machine can get away with

      It wouldn't require a whole lot of propaganda to convince the people. They need only quote George W. Bush's 2002 state of the union address. The President of the US has labeled North Korea part of an "Axis of Evil". He has already invaded one country on the list and is pushing for sanctions against the other two. While pushing for sanctions, he is constantly reiterating that an invasion is not out of the question.

    4. Re:Long term effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The technical name is "rabbit starvation", as someone above said: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbit_starvation

    5. Re:Long term effects? by DeathElk · · Score: 1
      • augment it with other sources of fat
      A tasty fillet burger from KFR perhaps?
    6. Re:Long term effects? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      The term is "Rabbit Starvation", whereas extremely lean meat causes a form of malnutrition.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    7. Re:Long term effects? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      It has absolutely nothing to do with Bush. The North Korean government has been telling its people that the US will be invading any day now for more than 50 years. Increased activity by the Soviets in the Pacific? Coming invasion of North Korea. Troop rotation through Okinawa? Coming invasion of North Korea. New president elected? Coming invasion of North Korea. Redeployment of troops away from the border? Coming invasion of North Korea. Reduction of US troops in South Korea? Coming invasion of North Korea.

      In the meantime, every story is followed by word of how the brave North Korean army either has stiffened its guard, thus heading off an attack, or will gloriously protect North Korea from the imperialist American empire.

      The truth is that the North Korean military would likely crumble in the face of any significant combat. Morale is low, technology outdated, and equipment quality is often questionable. Casualties would probably be high for an invading force due to massive minefields and forces who fight to the death because they would be machine-gunned if they retreated, but it would not be terribly difficult to sever all contact with command and control (C2) sites, thus leaving a military trained only to fight under the command of higher levels in a situation where it cannot work efficiently -- thinking for itself. This is exactly what happened to the Iraqi forces in the first Gulf War, when its units were cut off from C2 sites and forced to fight a mobile war for which it had never trained.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    8. Re:Long term effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the people there seem to really believe that they're about to be attacked by the rest of the world (or, the US, anyway)

      I wonder where they get that idea from.

    9. Re:Long term effects? by toddhisattva · · Score: 1
      he President of the US has labeled North Korea part of an "Axis of Evil". He has already invaded one country on the list and is pushing for sanctions against the other two.
      I keep seeing this tacit assumption: the Axis of Evil consists only and exclusively of those entities mentioned in that SotA address.

      Let's recall,

      States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil
      "States like these" would seem to imply the list given is not exhaustive.
    10. Re:Long term effects? by Nrlll9 · · Score: 1

      thats why you eat it with slices of rabbit liver

  22. May I be the first to say... by PapayaSF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In Soviet North Korea, rabbits eat you!

    Seriously though, how absurd is it that anyone thinks this is going to make any difference: it's a Communist dictatorship. The government runs food production and distribution, so of course they don't have enough food. All the rabbits in the world won't change that. It's sad and absurd that the average North Korean is still paying the price for a government that ignores that basic fact, proven so thoroughly and with so many graves in the 20th century.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:May I be the first to say... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Having grown in Soviet Union, I'll attest to the fact. No matter how many resources the government will have, no matter how much the technology progresses, it will all get mis-managed, wasted and funneled into militarization. The price of the human life is very low.

      But I gotta give them credit, at least they got the right idea about how to properly run a communist country -- fear! Stalin style (yeah, I like the alliteration, just came up with it!) People will obey when they see their neighbors in the evening and by morning the secret police have taken them away because someone made up a lie about them being "enemies of the people." I am not making this up, this happened to families I knew personally, this is how things are in NK.

    2. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stole my line! Well, almost. In Soviet North Korea, Giant Killer Rabbits eat you!

      Hey, it's 3:30am, and I almost wondered if this was a April 1st post of some sort (expecting the foot icon), with a reference to Monty Python, eating North Koreans. Yes, I do need some sleep!

    3. Re:May I be the first to say... by vandan · · Score: 1
      it's a Communist dictatorship

      No. It's just a dictatorship. Do some research on what communism is.
    4. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communist dictatorship rofl
    5. Re:May I be the first to say... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1
      If it were April 1st, the bunnies would be giant pink ponies the size of dogs.

      OMG. Ponies.

      Please, just shoot me now.

    6. Re:May I be the first to say... by pyite · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let me welcome to the Soviet States of America.

      Such comments are really nothing but an insult to people who actually did live in Communist Russia. I know some of them, myself, and likening the United States to Soviet Russia is such a laughable comparison that you should be ashamed. Many of these people used basically all the money they had to move to countries like the US.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    7. Re:May I be the first to say... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It has nothing to do with the price of human life being low. It has to do with the innate inefficiencies of a large bureaucracy. We have the same problem in the U.S. The problem isn't as devastating here because a lot of societal infrastructure isn't nationalized (not necessarily a good thing though). The best way to combat these problems is through decentralization of power.

    8. Re:May I be the first to say... by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      Soviet Russia started out freer than the US is today. My ancestors were German farmers in Russia.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    9. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      You so wrong. You never live in Polska. You would not say that. You denigrate many people with your lies. In 1989 thanks to america we are free. Show respect.

    10. Re:May I be the first to say... by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      Well, at least its not an Anarcho-Cyndiclous Commune.


      Those people are weird.

      Theres some great much over here...

      -Red

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    11. Re:May I be the first to say... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 5, Funny
      My ancestors were German farmers in Russia.
      These days there's a premium for lean meat, so farming Germans isn't profitable any more.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    12. Re:May I be the first to say... by AlHunt · · Score: 1

      Well, by lysergic.acid (845423), your comment: "The best way to combat these problems is through decentralization of power." is correct. However, you must be ingesting large quantities of yourself if you think the government is going to allow that to happen.

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    13. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you're thinking of "anarcho-sydicalist", referring to organization by syndicates; community-based unions of a sort.

    14. Re:May I be the first to say... by deevnil · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Such comments are really nothing but an insult to people who actually did live in ...
      Whenever anybody compares the decline of civil liberty and freedom release patches there's always a whiner saying that comparing Bush to Hitler, or the PATRIOT Act to a country that has patriot act mentality and abuses it( or "losing freedom is like losing a leg" and someone with two legs always says, "that's an insult to people who have lost a leg." )...insults somebody.

      So what would you have people do, wait until it's too late. Wait until they really are being dragged out of their houses, do you honor oppression by waiting until the last minute when it is more appropriate to propose an analogy? I think they would want that.

    15. Re:May I be the first to say... by darjen · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Such comments are really nothing but an insult to people who actually did live in Communist Russia. I know some of them, myself, and likening the United States to Soviet Russia is such a laughable comparison that you should be ashamed. Many of these people used basically all the money they had to move to countries like the US.
      I think the point is that, sadly enough, people in America really aren't as free as they are led to believe. I tend to agree. This is not an insult to anyone who sacrificed to come here. They wanted to be in a more relatively free country. But unfortunately, the US is becoming more and more like the situation they tried to leave. Having the right to oppose the government, though it might be an improvement, still doesn't mean too much if you are forced to fund them.
    16. Re:May I be the first to say... by Heem · · Score: 1

      In North Korea, Only old people eat rabbits

      --
      Don't Tread on Me
    17. Re:May I be the first to say... by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny

      With the increase in vegetarians, maybe a good crop of swedes could make money?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    18. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will you please tell the American government that we don't want universal healthcare?
      I keep telling people that this is how it will turn up - mis-managed and wasted with no incentive to become a healthcare practitioner thereby having an affect to the number of available doctors which will then in turn lower the requirements to become such to which all it take to become a doctor is to finish a 2 years course because health procedures are all documented and studying isn't needed.

      I've heard the "It works in Canada" argument but I've also heard from a Canadain nurse that it's a mess up there.
      Canada also doesn't have the population of the USA and the number of low income.

    19. Re:May I be the first to say... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      These puns are getting out of hand, best turnip it in the bud right now.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    20. Re:May I be the first to say... by spyfrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And here rest of EU thought you where free because of yourself and the courage of the polish people.

      I think you overestimate the United States role and underestimate your own.
      It was the polish people who overthrown the communistic dictatorship, not an american invasion.

    21. Re:May I be the first to say... by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

      Likening the United States to Soviet Russia is such a laughable comparison

      Well, you are right if you mean places like NY. But, Guantanamo is also part of USA just like secret CIA prisons for torturing "terrorists" around the globe. Those places are not much different to North Korea or Soviet Union when it comes to human rights, IMO.

      --
      839*929
    22. Re:May I be the first to say... by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Maybe a better title for this story would be Giant Rabbits to Feed North Korea's Military.

    23. Re:May I be the first to say... by deKernel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your statement is one large contradiction. First you hint that societal infrastructure should be nationalized, and then in the next sentence you think that the inefficiencies could be fixed by decentralizing the power (whatever that would mean).

      You really need to pick a side and stay with it or just come to grips with reality.

      By and large, if you nationalize anything, you are automatically accepting a level of inefficiencies. If you don't agree, you really need to spend some time in economics. If you don't want to spend time going to school then I would suggest that you just look at history.

      There is no perfect solution here. The problem is that (a) they won't accept that people die (b) any form of communism (and to a lesser degree socialism) makes some people lazy and others corrupt (c) you were not born with a single right or privilege in this world. If you want something, you need to work hard and sacrifice for it. Once you realize that, you will then be happy because you can achieve anything you wish. Nationalizing, socializing and such don't help or fix anything little alone enhance the human spirit. If anything, it kills it. Don't believe me, just ask anyone who escaped from those types of regimes. Here is a quick list: Soviet Union, China, North Korea, Cuba, Iraq, Iran and the list goes on. People die trying to either get themselves away from these types of governments or trying to get their family away.

    24. Re:May I be the first to say... by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So what would you have people do...

      How about being accurate? How about if you talk about what's actually happening now instead of saying basically:

      "Everyone knows about this bad thing that happened in the past (Nazis, Killing Fields, slavery, plague, whatever). Without being specific at all we're saying that what's going on now is just as bad."

      - How is it just as bad? We're not telling you that.
      - What's the bad thing that's happening? Nothing specific, but it's really bad, we assure you.
      - What should you do about it? You should do what we tell you to do!
      - Who are the victims? Everyone!
      - Can you give me a few examples? No, just believe us. Are you stupid or something?

      Etc, etc, etc.

      In other words, instead of talking about what happened 60 years ago in WWII, talk about exactly what you don't like that's happening now and actually try to make the case that it's bad in some way. Be specific and reasonable and talk about reality.

      Why should anyone listen to hysterical ravings? Do scaremongers have a good track record for correct predictions of the future?

    25. Re:May I be the first to say... by toddhisattva · · Score: 1
      No. It's just a dictatorship. Do some research on what communism is.
      Communism is a bunch of happy-talk that dictators use.
    26. Re:May I be the first to say... by budgenator · · Score: 3, Informative
      FTA
      "I'm not increasing production and I'm not taking any more orders after this. They cost a lot to feed,"

      OK if North Korea could afford to feed the rabbits, it seems likely they could afford to feed the people
      if the North Koreans find enough food to feed them properly. "I feed them everything -- grain, carrots, a lot of vegetables. At the moment they're getting kale," said Szmolinsky.

      Boy that sounds like people food to me, if I were breeding food rabbits they'd be bred for max production eating things like hay, alfalfa, clover and maybe throw in some field corn and soybeans on occassion; but that's not what's going to happen here, they are going to starve people to free up food for rabbits to feed the starving people, pathetic.
      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    27. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      May I sum up your comment as, "Whenever I engage in hyperbole, someone always calls me on it"? Oh my. What an outrage.

    28. Re:May I be the first to say... by toddhisattva · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The people are in Guantanamo because America is great.

      If we were not such a bunch of great people, they would be dead.

      We don't need to take prisoners. Shoot 'em in the field! No muss, no fuss, no fourth estate or fifth column parading them around as innocents.

      But we took prisoners, and for this we are hated.

    29. Re:May I be the first to say... by toddhisattva · · Score: 1

      Just because you can put words near each other, doesn't mean that you should.

      Things like facts really help. They'll help you be less full of shit.

    30. Re:May I be the first to say... by Lance_Denmark · · Score: 1

      You can see it now. Kim Jong-il travelling around the People's Republic, seeing the massive food shortages crippling his population, resulting in serious knock on economic and social problems and thinking 'If only we had some REALLY big rabbits...'.

    31. Re:May I be the first to say... by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      I congratulate you on correcting my spelling, but it was far and away more of an allusion to Monty Python.


      -Red

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    32. Re:May I be the first to say... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      I think you're confused. Nationalizing infrastructure doesn't necessarily mean federalism. It simply means adopting a more socialist government. Local utilities, healthcare systems, law enforcement, education institutions could still be run through a decentralized structure though they get federal funding. Correctly managed, this kind of system has proven to work quite well.

    33. Re:May I be the first to say... by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 1
      But I gotta give them credit, at least they got the right idea about how to properly run a communist country -- fear! Stalin style (yeah, I like the alliteration, just came up with it!) People will obey when they see their neighbors in the evening and by morning the secret police have taken them away because someone made up a lie about them being "enemies of the people." I am not making this up, this happened to families I knew personally, this is how things are in NK.

      Oderint Dum Metuant
      ("Let them hate so long as they fear.")
      --Lucius Accius

    34. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Holy fuck, I've never seen the broken window fallacy applied to prisoners of war before.

      Tell ya what, Captain Sunshine, How about if I come over and tie you up, rob your family, and maybe rape your dog while I'm at it.. It'll prove I'm a great guy, since hey, I could have just murdered you all!

    35. Re:May I be the first to say... by spike2131 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, all the money these days is in Giant Rabbits.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    36. Re:May I be the first to say... by dbcad7 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ok, when you capture someone or they surrender.. you most certainly do need to take prisoners.. What kind of video game world are you living in ?

      I don't think we are hated for taking prisoners. It might be the treatment of those prisoners. I imagine your assumption is that everyone who was taken prisoner is a "terrorist" and doesn't deserve humane treatment. However many were civilians caught up in the wrong place at the wrong time, some are legitimate solders, and others just fighting on the "wrong side" for whatever beliefs they had. Certainly there are some real terrorists in custody but I think the number is a extremly low one. To lump everyone together is a pretty big mistake.. kind of like lumping Iraq and 911 together.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    37. Re:May I be the first to say... by deKernel · · Score: 1

      What it means is that the government is going to take ownership of a company whether the private company what it or not. This also means that the government sets the price of the buyout. The private companies, you know the ones that took the risk setting up the infrastructure our now all but forced out of the picture.

      This is not like local utilities and healthcare systems. This is not the best thing for the people of Venezuela. This is being done by a dictator who is lying to the people.

    38. Re:May I be the first to say... by deesine · · Score: 1
      However many were civilians caught up in the wrong place at the wrong time

      How do you know that?

      --
      damaged by dogma
    39. Re:May I be the first to say... by deKernel · · Score: 1

      To elaborate further. Think about this. How many times have you heard someone say 'Gee, that local cable company is great. I love it!'.
      Now take that to the next level and that would either be a county or parish. Do you really think that it gets better? Hmmm
      Now take that to the next level and that would be a state. Gee are we getting better?
      Now take that to the final level and that would be the federal government. Should I go further?

      I do think of myself as a half-full person, but history is history. Federalizing or nationalizing anything is a guaranteed receipt for abuses and failures. Again history has a valuable lesson here.

      One last thought here, imagine all of the above in the hands of a dictator.

    40. Re:May I be the first to say... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      You've lost me. First you bring up Venezuela out of the blue without specifying any specific detriments of Hugo Chavez's progressive government, then you've once again equivocated federalism with socialism. Nationalizing infrastructure does not prevent devolution of government. And it's funny that you should bring up Venezuela since Chavez's nationalization of a lot of previously unused land owned by the rich and creating local farming co-ops for poor communities out of them has been praised as a huge success.

    41. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, tell the pole his own history, good one

    42. Re:May I be the first to say... by emilper · · Score: 1

      [not a lawyer disclaimer] I have looked over the Geneva conventions, but could not find anything relevant on how civilians caught bearing arms should be treated. According to older laws of the war, they could have been shot on the spot, with a minimum of formalities. The same conventions are also not very clear on what should or can be done with soldiers that surrender then change their minds.

      I guess imprisoning insurgents instead of executing them on the field is quite merciful.
      [/ not a lawyer disclaimer ]

      back on topic:

      Unless you never raised rabbits, you can still afford to believe that they are cute fluffy things ... I wonder what kind of steel they need to use to make the cages for giant rabbits. This might be a scheme to undermine the NK military industry.

    43. Re:May I be the first to say... by o2sd · · Score: 1

      Why should anyone listen to hysterical ravings? Do scaremongers have a good track record for correct predictions of the future?

      Well ... they tend to have the same future predictive ability as just about anyone else, i.e. close to none. However, for the most part, the best predictors of the future generally fall into two categories.

      1) Those in the process of shaping/inventing/making it and
      2) Those who have studied the past (i.e. Historians)

      Human behaviour doesn't change all that much. About 3000 years ago a man who we know as Zarathustra laid down principles of civil society that were very similar to the Constitution of the United States of America. Today the descendents of Zarathustra's society are living in place the British named Iran(1).

      So it would be foolish to think that the USians have suddenly become history's most enlightened people and consequently will never descend into any kind of facism or totalitarianism. Additionally, one thing history does teach us is that when a society begins to move in a direction that concerns you, the best thing to do is leave that society, as historically societies that begin moving in a certain direction continue to do so until they reach the maximum point on the pendulum.

      (1) The name of that country always reminds me of an eighties band called 'Flock of Seaguls'

      --
      - Nothing to see hear.
    44. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're full of shit. If America did do that, the rest of the world could easily take them down. I bet they are just looking for an excuse.

    45. Re:May I be the first to say... by Tsagadai · · Score: 1
      Why should anyone listen to hysterical ravings? Do scaremongers have a good track record for correct predictions of the future?
      When it's silent, it's time to run.
    46. Re:May I be the first to say... by dbcad7 · · Score: 1
      That's a good question. That you can hold people in jail for years without a hearing to determine exactly what they are being charged with is exactly the problem isn't it ?

      There are many stories of people released. There are also stories of those sent there that were accused by others simply for revenge and even monitary gain. How can you think that everyone arrested is guilty ? Is that true here in the US ? ... just keep thinking on it.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    47. Re:May I be the first to say... by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I was born in the late 70's in "Soviet Russia" and is still living in "New Russia". The stuff I see happening in the States is quite comparable with what we experienced in the 70's and 80's (not under Stalin of course). Intelligence services becoming too powerful, warrantless survelance, secret trials, people disappear, not many but enough to spread the rumors, dissidents accused of being un-patriotic, dissedent scientists supressed, etc.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    48. Re:May I be the first to say... by deesine · · Score: 1

      Where did I say that I believe everyone that was arrested is guilty? You put a quantity ("many") to the figure. I was simply asking how you know that number - many. Could be one, could be two, could be 12: do you have a source that led you to quantify?

      --
      damaged by dogma
    49. Re:May I be the first to say... by smithmc · · Score: 1

        So what would you have people do, wait until it's too late.

      How about just skipping the counterproductive hyperbole? It's entirely possible to say that our liberties and freedoms are being eroded, and that we should be wary of it and do something about it, without resorting to comparisons to the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany. (Like I just did, for instance.)

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    50. Re:May I be the first to say... by Bloody+Troll · · Score: 0
      Having grown in Soviet Union, I'll attest to the fact.
      First, it's not that in your beloved US it isn't the government who control food distribution (ever heard of FDA?). Secondly, it was Reagan's arms race that contributed to the food "deficit" in the Soviet Union in 1982-1991 and not so much the planned economy. The USSR simply didn't have enough economic power to both defend herself and feed her citizens. And yes, she had to defend herself first lest she wanted to share Yugoslavia's or Iraq's fate. Now, DPRK (or whatever the abbreviation is) is another matter: they simply don't have enough resources or arable land and cannot normallu feed themselves without foreign aid - as simple as that.
    51. Re:May I be the first to say... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 0

      The price of animal life is, unfortunately, even lower. If they truly give a damn about the food supply, they would stop mistaking animals for food. Making meat animals bigger isn't going to change anything.

  23. LOL... by JoeLinux · · Score: 1

    Now PETA is going to have to side against North Korea...muwahahahaha. PETA and bush on the same side...never thought I'd see the day...

    1. Re:LOL... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You never seen Peter the Rabbit making out in the bush before? I think you need a course in the birds and the bees.

    2. Re:LOL... by ross.w · · Score: 1

      People Eating Tasty Animals? Aren't rabbits tasty?

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    3. Re:LOL... by Mike89 · · Score: 1
      People Eating Tasty Animals?
      I feel obligated to link to the last.fm group

      To quote from the group's description:
      I have long considered mother nature a precious and intimate friend. As stewards and stewardesses of this beautiful planet and all creatures that rely upon it for survival, we are entitled to the savory and delicious meals we call animals. In my opinion, the ethical treatment of an animal means killing it before you eat it. And I am all for the ethical treatment of animals. In that way, I am all for the eating of tasty animals.
    4. Re:LOL... by toddhisattva · · Score: 1

      You capitalize "PETA" but not "Bush?"

      If Bush was even a tenth the evil overlord he's made out to be, why, why, you'd be drawn and quartered, for this obviously intentional insult.

  24. Military applications... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aren't these giant rabbits subject to military export control laws? An army of killer rabbits is no joking matter. It would be safer let the North Koreans have nukes than an army of killer rabbits.

    1. Re:Military applications... by Joebert · · Score: 1
      An army of killer rabbits is no joking matter.

      Commander: Your excewency, the giant wabbit awmy has been compwetewy wipe out !
      Excellency: Waaat ?! Were machine guns stwapped to backs ?
      Commander: Yes, that pwoblem, wabbit hop, machine gun shoot, wabbit spin around like fiacwacker kill west of giant wabbit awmy !
      Dr. Evil: Shoulda used the friggin lazers.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:Military applications... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as we have holy hand grenades we have nothing to fear...

  25. Is it just me... by TechnoGuyRob · · Score: 1

    Or does that first picture just look wrong?

    1. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Looks wrong, but feels so right...

    2. Re:Is it just me... by X-treme-LLama · · Score: 1

      Wow, thank you. I never would have clicked on the link to see the full first picture if I hadn't read your post.. And yes, it looks very odd. I got a hearty laugh out of it, that's for sure.

      Ahh man-rabbit copulation. Maybe that's how he gets 'em so big. :)

  26. The North Koreans don't want Giant rabbits by rumplet · · Score: 1

    They want animals close up, with a wide angle lens ... wearing hats

  27. Oregon Trail by feld · · Score: 5, Funny

    I disagree. I've made it plenty of times to California being only able to shoot and kill rabbits.

    PS we used a raft to get past the last river.

    PPS my wife died of cholera

  28. You don't understand by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny

    The dogs will have to evolve and get bigger to be able to kill the rabbits. That way they get bigger dogs too!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:You don't understand by evilviper · · Score: 1
      The dogs will have to evolve and get bigger to be able to kill the rabbits.

      Like him: http://gibsondog.com/
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  29. Move along... by TechnoGuyRob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing to see h--Oh. Wow. Nevermind.

  30. N. Korean nuclear test by halex-ab · · Score: 2, Funny

    For those who thought that the North Korean nuclear test was a hoax, take that!

  31. Harvey isn't a rabbit.... by ricree · · Score: 1

    He's a pooka.

  32. Silly rabbit... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
    Karl Szmolinsky won a prize for breeding Germany's largest rabbit, at 23 lbs.

    See, people, this is what happens when you don't heed General Mills' warning:

    TRIX ARE FOR KIDS!!!!!

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  33. Natural predators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. Starving chingers.

  34. If I Were A Thinking Man.. by JohnnyOpcode · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd say that the N.Koreans will be breeding these wabbits to release into the DMZ (detonate the mines) as a response to everyone laughing at their low-yield nuclear capability demonstration. Kim Jong whatever his name is got the idea from Snakes On A Plane. Think of the global (not to mention local) impact of thousands of bunnies being blown-up in the DMZ (and seen on CNN). Only a evil genius would bring the world to the brink this way. F@#king brilliant, I with I had thought of it first!

  35. One step closer by Darth · · Score: 3, Funny

    One step closer to Night of the Lepus. My plans to cause the least likely horror movie to become a reality are almost complete.

    --
    Darth --
    Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    1. Re:One step closer by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      How are the plans going to get utilities to bury electrical transmission lines? Once that's done, there'll be no stopping them!
      "Attention! Attention! Ladies and gentlemen, attention! There is a herd of killer rabbits headed this way and we desperately need your help!"
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  36. rabbits the size of dogs... by timerider · · Score: 1

    well, I used to have a chihuahua and a shi-tsu, so...

    anyways, when I was a kid I used to visit the annual small animal breeders show in our hometown (basically, a show such as where the breeder of those "dog-sized" rabbits won that prize) because there was not much else to do in our little town, and I don't think 23lbs is that much bigger than some of the rabbits I've seen there.

  37. Re: Giant bunnies vs. Just get rid of Kim! by iSeal · · Score: 4, Informative

    North Korea spends %50 of it's expenditures on Military. It is a massive force, as all citizens are required to spend 10 years in it. A massive force which is a consumer of food, and is reputed to steal it at their behest. Kim Il-Sung is credited for pushing forth "revolutionary" agricultural techniques, that in reality were disastrous failures. North Korea's recent public escapades, among other previous activities, have jeopardized vital capital from South Korea (NK = cheap labour.) It has little credibility in the international marketplace, as the regime is notorious for failing to repay debts. At the same time, the regime doesn't want to initiate trade relations, because it goes against it's Juche philosophy. In truth, these are all acts of twisted paranoia for the sake of the regime's self-preservation. The starvation isn't a product of North Korea's poverty or lack of natural resources. It's a product of North Korea's regime.

    A regime that would rather see the misery of all it's citizens than reunifying under the leadership of the south.

  38. North Korea now safe... by kiddailey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, at least we know that North Korea is now safe from Jimmy Carter. ;)

    1. Re:North Korea now safe... by toddhisattva · · Score: 1
      Well, at least we know that North Korea is now safe from Jimmy Carter. ;)


      Unfortunately, the North Koreans are dying because of Jimmy Carter.
  39. It's the end of the world by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the love of God hasn't anyone seen "Night of the Lepus!" Deforest Kelly is dead. Who's gonna save us from the giant rabbits this time? I hope they have a rail system they can electricute the super bunnies on. If people would just watch more cheesy SciFi films we wouldn't have these problems. SciFi Channel is there to inform people! Next thing you know we'll be dealing with giant snakehead fish in our lakes. Watch these films and learn! Giant rabbits turn carnivous. They knew this in the 70s. How soon we forget!

  40. Horse by Somegeek · · Score: 1

    Horse the Band. Wow.

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    1. Re:Horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SMASH THOSE FUCKING BUNNIES

  41. Obligatory Monty Python quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ARTHUR:
    Go on, Bors. Chop his head off!

    BORS:
    Right! Silly little bleeder. One rabbit stew comin' right up!

    TIM:
    Look!
    [squeeeek]

    BORS:
    AAAAAAUGH!

  42. "They cost a lot to feed" by iSeal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did anyone else find this quote amusing, from the original article?
    "I'm not increasing production and I'm not taking any more orders after this. They cost a lot to feed," he [German Farmer] said.

    They're too expensive to feed for the German farmer to continue. By German rabbit-breeding standards. Now if the North Korean regime already (and allegedly) finds it too expensive to feed it's own people on even the lowest standards, how is diverting those much needed foodstuffs to rabbits going to solve anything?

    Usually there's a logic to this. Unfortunately, the same people powering this decision are the same people that had the foresight of building a massive hotel that couldn't be finished (you know what I'm talking about if you're familiar with Pyongyang.)

    1. Re:"They cost a lot to feed" by neongrau · · Score: 1

      they're just too expensive for him as a hobbyist breeder (and a pensioner as well!). he's neither a professional breeder nor a farmer, a farmer doubtlessly would have the ressources to feed them in large numbers. as the article says "12 rabbits so far" so just small scale breeding.

    2. Re:"They cost a lot to feed" by johnjay · · Score: 1

      massive hotel that couldn't be finished...

      That would be the Ryugyong Hotel. You can witness the folly of North Korea yourself via Google Maps. If you look closely you can see the crane stuck at the top of the hotel (it looks like a minute hand pointing to 5 o'clock). More amusing hotel trivia at the expense of fat lil' Kim can be found here.

    3. Re:"They cost a lot to feed" by Aptgetupdate · · Score: 1

      I'm also wondering why, in climates favorable to soy and other complete protein vegetation, they aren't just moving toward a more-efficient form of agriculture. Importing giant, meaty animals seems like a wrong way of doing things, particularly in a place where meat is seen as a luxury.

  43. Swedish rabbits by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    I grew up in America, so, for most of my life, a rabbit was a fuzzy little critter about the size of a football which hops around suburban lawns. In Western Europe, however, that is not the case. The rabbits here are huge--bigger than my first dog--and wander the streets at night like well-armed Turkish hoodlums.

    Seriously, fuck those rabbits.

  44. Fur by pontifier · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that the skins are discarded.

    --
    -John Fenley
  45. Why did you convert the units? by HvitRavn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    TFA uses metric units, but the slashdot machinery has for some reason converted it to imperial units. Why?

  46. Fetch the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch by Elvii · · Score: 1

    O Lord, bless this, Thy hand grenade, that with it, Thou mayest blow Thine enemies to tiny bits... in Thy mercy.

    and remember, Five is right out!

    --
    This sig left intentionally blank.
    1. Re:Fetch the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      beat me to it- I searched for 'fangs' on the page and then 'python' and I didn't find yours. Please excuse what appears to be copying, but was accidental.

  47. oblig. Monty Python by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    But it's got big fangs!

  48. Bad camera angles?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The photos in the article use the most extreme, contrived camera angles to make the rabbits look even more huge.

    I dunno about that, but this shot could get him in a lot of trouble with the law in some places.

    1. Re:Bad camera angles?? by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon, we've been wanting to see a Rabbit Show since we were 12!

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  49. Absolutely crazy, disaster waiting to happen by AlzaF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How many kilograms of food will be needed to feed each rabbit need to produce the 7 kilograms of rabbit meat? There is also a possibility of an ecological disaster waiting to happen in the form of an explosion of the rabbit population due to its large reproductive nature. If they got into the wild, they would strip the land of any agriculture left and the people would be far worse off than there are now. The same thing happened when rabbits were introduced to Australia. The best solution is for North Korea to stop feeding it's military machine and feed it's people.

    1. Re:Absolutely crazy, disaster waiting to happen by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      They could release the rabbits into the DMZ. Or even worse, they could unleash an army of giant rabbits across the border destroying it's neighbour's ecosystem. Truly a weapon of mass destruction!

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  50. I can see it now... by confield · · Score: 3, Funny

    Father Turtle: So you nervous for the race tomorrow, son?
    Turtle Jr: No way, Dad! Us turtles NEVER lose to the rabbit!
    Father Turtle: Riight... but I think you better have a look at the competition.

    * In thunders the giant German Rabbit dwarfing Father Turtle and his son *

    Giant Rabbit: Guten Tag!

    1. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i love slashdot, it makes me amused when i am sad, almost as good as looking up flopped movies and seeing how stupid they were and how much money they lost(another thing i do when im sad)

      yeh, so maybe the NorthK's will make the rabbits fight the SouthK's automated turret system, because it wont recognise the shape??

  51. No need to do much research by TheLink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Communism is just a precursor of Dictatorship.

    This is because Marx had this stupid idea of condoning or even encouraging violence as the way to achieve Communism.

    So when you have a "Communist" Revolution ala Marx, guess who ends up becoming leader of the country?

    The one who was willing AND able to exert the most violence.

    Yeah, that's right, most of the time you get Mr "Silence all Opposition".

    Marx's Communism is severely flawed because of this.

    You basically have to wait till you get taken over by a Benevolent Dictator, or the Evil Dictator hands power to nondictators, or Mr Dictator has a change of heart.

    --
    1. Re:No need to do much research by vandan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Communism is just a precursor of Dictatorship.

      Interesting assertion. You don't back it up with anything though. I say you're way off, and just repeating bullshit that you've heard elsewhere. It's not your fault. You probably don't even realise you're doing it.

      This is because Marx had this stupid idea of condoning or even encouraging violence as the way to achieve Communism.

      Well firstly, Marx didn't condone violence. He provided an analysis of capitalism, and argued that the working class must fight to liberate themselves from the ruling class. The nature of the struggle depends on the nature of the ruling class, and unfortunately the ruling class won't just stand aside and take default gracefully. It is widely recognised that violence is justified if it leads to self-emancipation.

      So when you have a "Communist" Revolution ala Marx, guess who ends up becoming leader of the country?

      Someone else for once?

      The one who was willing AND able to exert the most violence.

      Not necessarily. This is what happens if there is no party able to inspire and lead the masses forward - a power vacuum exists and is filled by violent people. Yes. But it's not the only way things can play out, and you'd like us to believe.

      The rest of your comments don't really deserve comment. You should do some reading on Marxism instead of parroting Fox News and the neo-cons.
    2. Re:No need to do much research by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      You should do some reading on Marxism instead of parroting Fox News and the neo-cons.
      So that /.-ers can finally get educated on one of the fundamental texts on economics, you will find a copy of The Capital here.
      Some may be surprised that there are no instructions on bomb-making or "bourgoisie" mass-hangings in it. It is merely an analytical text on economics. It simply took a different stance from what was published at the time.

      What other people did with it later on doesn't diminish its value. And whether you agree with it or not, it still makes for an interesting read for the questions it raises (if you're into economics that is).
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:No need to do much research by hanssprudel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well firstly, Marx didn't condone violence. He provided an analysis of capitalism, and argued that the working class must fight to liberate themselves from the ruling class.

      An analysis that happened to be dead wrong in every concievable way. From the very start it was un-scientific historcist nonsense, and since its inception it has been completely contradicted by historical facts. In fact capitalist societies provide more opportunity for social movement than any other societies in history (including all the ones that followed Marx pathetic model).

      This is what happens if there is no party able to inspire and lead the masses forward - a power vacuum exists and is filled by violent people. Yes. But it's not the only way things can play out, and you'd like us to believe.

      Oh, really... Care to give us one - one single - example of a large scale Marxist revolution that did not play out in this manner? Come on, let us hear it.

      In fact, the grandparent was only wrong when he claimed that communism is a "precursor" to dictatorship. In fact, communism IS dictatorship. A dictatorship of many or of few (and in practice always of few), but because its very principle is to put the collectivism over individuals, it can be nothing but that. A free society recognizes every individuals to live and work for themselves, and thus keep - and own - the that which they have created with through their own labor. A society that does not do this can only be the horrid distopia that all too many people have suffered under already thanks to the idiot Marx and his followers.

      BTW, I hear North Korea will take immigrants. Your Marxist utopia is becons...

    4. Re:No need to do much research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like you think you know a lot about Marxism.

      Good for you!

    5. Re:No need to do much research by Jeian · · Score: 3

      You can theorize about how plausible and great communism *could* be with the right people running it, and how horrible capitalism is... ... then you should take a look at the real world, which has yet to see *one* workable communist state (with the dubious exception of China), and any number of successful capitalist states.

    6. Re:No need to do much research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep sucking off the corporatist "dictators" bud. Be a good corporate citizen.

      Thanks what they are banking on, FYI....

      Just be sure not to include the "Halliburton" crew in your "analyses" of capitalism, eh?

    7. Re:No need to do much research by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, 'Halliburton' hasn't kept me from making as much money as I could find a way to make. Usually, it's the state or federal gov't that impacts my income flow.

      I agree that corporations have too many rights and too much recognition by the current gov't but that's a function of political corruption on both side of the aisle.

      For instance: Murtha and his "I won't take the cash now. Maybe after we have done business for awhile" or the fact that he funnelled public funds into companies that former campaign hands worked with.

      We need a turnaround. How we accomplish that is the question.

    8. Re:No need to do much research by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Communism is just a precursor of Dictatorship.

      That is a poor conclusion, while this may be true for previous instances, this is not necessarily true for all instances. It should be noted that a dictatorship can any apply to any form of governance, including fascism.

      It should also be noted that non-democratic governments are not automatically against the people and not all democratic governments are for the people. What is important are the people in charge and whether they are working for themselves, and their friends, or whether they are working in the interests of the people.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    9. Re:No need to do much research by TheLink · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of real-life evidence backing my claims.

      Marx didn't condone violence? Wasn't he the one who jointly wrote with Engels "The Communist Manifesto" (sounds familiar?), which near the ending had something to the effect of:

      "The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims.
      They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by
      the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.
      Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution.
      The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains.
      They have a world to win."
      ( Source: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/61/61.txt
      Alternate version: http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifes to.html )

      And there's also the suggestive bit earlier which goes: "and where the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie lays the foundation for the sway of the proletariat.".

      Maybe you should read more Marx yourself. Or are you going to get even more delusional and claim Marx didn't write that, or claim that isn't condoning violence.

      If you want to be pedantic or nitpicky, sure it isn't communism itself that is the precursor, it's Marx's proposed violence-friendly Communism Implementation Plan that's the precursor. But that's a bit more wordy - and the rest of my original post explained the details anyway.

      Basically the violent will just hijack "Marxism Phase 1" to take over the country.

      AKA: "Stupid/violent people of the country unite!" and help a Dictator get into power.

      Now if people actually democratically elected a peaceful Communist Gov things could be different, HOWEVER the problem is Communism has already been tainted with violence because of Marx - too many communists would be thinking "violence = OK, not even last resort". So it is probably better to just do a "rewrite", exclude the violence and call it something else.

      --
    10. Re:No need to do much research by toddhisattva · · Score: 1
      Grandpa says,

      Communism is just a precursor of Dictatorship.


      To which Pa says,

      That is a poor conclusion, while this may be true for previous instances, this is not necessarily true for all instances. It should be noted that a dictatorship can any apply to any form of governance, including fascism.


      To which I say,

      The Grandparent said that communism is a precursor of dictatorship. Not that it is the exclusive, one-and-only way to get a dictatorship.

      The rest of the Parent post is similarly stupid.
    11. Re:No need to do much research by toddhisattva · · Score: 2
      with the dubious exception of China
      Yup, "dubious" indeed! China is best described as,

      "Communist on the outside, Legalist on the inside."

      In other words, Chinese communism is (now) just a garment they wear to endear themselves to the West's Useful Idiots.

      Underneath it's the same despotic legalism as practiced by Shihuang.
    12. Re:No need to do much research by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      Communism is just a precursor of Dictatorship.

      Interesting assertion. You don't back it up with anything though. I say you're way off, and just repeating bullshit that you've heard elsewhere. I would encourage you to read parts 2 and 3 of Arendt's Origins of Totalitarianism or Paxton's Anatomy of Fascism. Paxton's views on fascism map quite easily onto the evolution of a radical agenda into extreme statism. In the Russian revolution, the combination of a vulnerable aristocracy and a virulent political ideology came together in much the manner of the French Revolution, only this time the Central Committee managed to hold on to power for much, much longer.

      Marx didn't condone violence...It is widely recognised that violence is justified if it leads to self-emancipation.

      Please make up your mind. But as long as you're telling us what Marx said, let's cite one of his two major works, the Communist Manifesto:

      The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.

      "Forcible overthrow."

      In Russia, the revolutionaries said they had a better way, Communism. They overthrew the government. As it turns out, though, Communism is sufficiently unnatural way that it needs a full-blown dictatorship to maintain the illusion that it works. Rather than handing over the means of production to the workers, the Party held it on their behalf. Thought on their behalf. Planned their lives on their behalf. Only they never let go: the proletariat were never quite ready, for one reason or another, for the state to wither away.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    13. Re:No need to do much research by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      Calling Das Kapital as a text on economics is one of the most laughable that I hear from time to time. Actually the only economics in it is a rip-off from Ricardo's theory of value, that even on it's original form was totally wrong. Also, most of the Data concerning work conditions that was used by Marx for added effect, was later shown to be manipulated or even plain falsifications. Calling Marx an economist is utterly stupid.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    14. Re:No need to do much research by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
      But Marx is famous for two books, and in The Communist Manifesto he and Engels do advocate violent revolution. In fact is says violent revolution is the only way to achive the movement's aims.

      Das Kapital is interesting, historically, but as as an economic theory it's based on realities nearly a century and a half out of date.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    15. Re:No need to do much research by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure from what I remember of the Communist Manifesto that the violence would have to be physical and not merely political. But then that's something else, I doubt Communism would be feasible given the way humans are and think anyway.

      So regarding Das Kapital, it certainly relies on observations and a historical context that are quite dated, however a number of its considerations remain interesting, notably on the accumulation of capital and its pertinence (or lack thereof). All of the chapters on the exploitation of workers are, at least in western countries (and for the time being), no longer very pertinent.
      And as Marcos Eliziario's teachers apparently pointed out to him, Marx indeed did build up on the works of David Ricardo (the Labour Theory of Value). Oddly enough, ideas are often built on the ones that came before (how about that).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    16. Re:No need to do much research by vandan · · Score: 1
      Interestingly, 'Halliburton' hasn't kept me from making as much money as I could find a way to make. Usually, it's the state or federal gov't that impacts my income flow.

      Well firstly, they have, in a number of ways. A lot of your tax dollars go to Halliburton, supposedly to 'reconstruct' Iraq, but inevitably none of it gets through. So they're a large sponge on the public purse.

      Secondly, Halliburton have a horrible record of being being state persecution of people who are critical of them. Google for 'Scott Parkin'. He was arrested here in Australia on 'terrorist' charges ( all secret stuff, so that's about all we know ), and deported back to the US. He's a UN anti-war, anti-Halliburton activist. He's been constantly persecuted in the US over his criticism of their questionable ( even by US standards ) behaviour.

      Thirdly, Halliburton are obviously strong backers of the neo-cons. Their agenda is to drive down wages to increase profits for big business. They argue for 'free market' economies, which basically means removing all tarrifs and barriers to trade, so that you are competing directly with slave-labour wages in 3rd world countries.

      Of course, Halliburton aren't opposed to you making money the same way that they do. But try to make money the honest way - as a worker - and you'll find it's a different story entirely.
    17. Re:No need to do much research by vandan · · Score: 1

      Try reading his works first, and commenting later ... not the other way around.

    18. Re:No need to do much research by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      Try not assuming things that you don't know just because people don't agree with you.
      I raised surrounded with Marxist and general leftist literature in my house, I started reading it when I was 12-13, starting by the manifesto, then the Gündrisse, other smaller works and articles,and finally, The Capital, that I read more than once.
      But I started to disagree with Marxism even before I started my economics course. By the second year in economics, I had kind of solidified my reasons to consider Marxism a flawed theorethical system.
      Next time, try using true arguments, instead of ad-hominen atacks. If you are so beligerant defending Marxism, you should be able to explain why we should consider it a valid theory and show it to us: As Marx has said, citing Esopo, in Der 18 Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte, "Hic Rhodus! Hic Salta!"

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    19. Re:No need to do much research by vandan · · Score: 1

      If you had read Marx as you've now claimed, you'd see the validity in what he pointed about about the nature of the capitalist system, and how it keeps itself entrenched. For example:

      - capitalists employ workers, but pay them less than their work is worth
      - the difference between what workers are paid and what their work is worth is capitalist profit
      - capitalist profits are used to buy capital ( equipment )
      - increasing cost of capital acts as a barrier to entry
      - private ownership of capital prevents workers from being independent ( locks workers to capitalists )

      When Marx wrote on these topics, he was very much ahead of his time - many say over 100 years. Capitalism was only just beginning to demonstrate these properties. Now, his theories not only still fit with reality, but actually fit more so. Private ownership of the means of production is being concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, and real wages in all industrialised countries is dropping. Barriers to competition are far larger than Marx ever saw ( but not envisioned ).

      None of Marx's works have been 'discredited', despite the one-line, throw-away attacks from the mainstream media. The only 'serious' attack on Marx's theory goes along the line that "it's been tried before and didn't work". But any serious discussion of examples where it's been tried before must also discuss the reaction of the capitalist powers. Take the US attack on the Bolshevik revolution. Or the constant war with the developing South American nations, who are pushing for a socialist society. Or the attack on the Vietnamese revolution. Or the murder of over 1,000,000 communists and supporters in Indonesia as Suharto came to power. Or the current attacks on Somalia ( here the democracy movements are being branded 'Islamists', as if that's some kind of disease ). There are literally hundreds of examples of social upheavals where the capitalist powers step in and crush the movement, in case it forms a stable example of a different kind of society for the world to consider.

      The only reason China, Russia and North Korea are allowed to continue their form of society is precisely because they are not communist.

    20. Re:No need to do much research by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      All your statements depend on the definition of what the value of things, work and money is. It is a know fact in economy that the Ricardo's theory of value (that was used by Marx) is inconsistent with reality, and can't be used to explain simple facts of a monetary economy. So, all your statements can't be incorporated in a realistic model, and are, therefore, untrue. Btw, you are citing what Marx predicts as the results from his theory, and not the underlying theory itself. I majored in economics, and despite what you believe, Marx works are just a historical curiousity in economics. Nobody (except the "alternative science" types) takes it seriously in the field. For China and North Korea not being communist, I will just respect it as coming from a man of faith.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    21. Re:No need to do much research by Tsagadai · · Score: 1

      Wow what a post. Nails have been hit on the head till another floor was added to a house. Finally someone who can read and actually take valid points from something.

    22. Re:No need to do much research by vandan · · Score: 1
      It is a know fact in economy that the Ricardo's theory of value (that was used by Marx) is inconsistent with reality

      Oh come on!
      Marx arrived at his theory independently. And simply saying that it's "inconsistent with reality" is a pretty lame cop-out. What, exactly, doesn't match with your reality? Do you suggest that some money is being created somewhere outside the production process, that the capitalist is somehow tapping into without input from the workers? I responded to your post with a thoughtful reply, and this is all you can muster? I put it to you again that you've never read Marx, and have no idea what you're talking about, other than what you see on Fox News, of course.
    23. Re:No need to do much research by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      Or the current attacks on Somalia ( here the democracy movements are being branded 'Islamists', as if that's some kind of disease ).
      Can you tell the difference between democracy and theocracy?
    24. Re:No need to do much research by vandan · · Score: 1
      Can you tell the difference between democracy and theocracy?

      Yes. But the problem is that this is NOT a group of people pushing for a fundamentalist Islamic state. They're a bunch of people, who happen to be Islamic, yes, who are pushing for democracy. They're secular. Sure their culture etc has an Islamic slant. Why shouldn't it? The mainstream media is all too quick to brand them as "Islamists", when in fact this is not the key defining factor. They are a grass-roots democracy movement. Hence the US backing of Ethiopian attacks on them.
  52. Rabbits as Food by hackershandbook · · Score: 1

    Rabbits are ideal "prey food" for all sorts of mammals and birds - the problem for humans is that (as I have been told) - the fat level of rabbits means that you can eat rabbit all the time and still starve to death because of the low fat levels ...

    Humans invented "rabbit stew" for a reason - it enables the recycling of dead rabbit into food that will sustain humans - the addition of lard (for frying), vegetables (for vitamins and minerals) and flavourings (to stave off boredom) - means that eating rabbit stew might just keep you alive - but you aren't going to get fat on it ...

    If the N.K. govt think they can feed their population with rabbits - there is a very good chance that the people will get thinner .. and smaller over generations .. the link between good nutrition and human height is now well established - humans who have a balanced diet get taller over generations - while those with a minimal diet get shorter

    1. Re:Rabbits as Food by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget there's a genetic component too. Kim Jong-il imports the finest food the West has to offer and he's still a midget without his lifts.

    2. Re:Rabbits as Food by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      I think rabbit stew was invented because rabbit it's a PITA to de-bone the meat due to the small bone sizes. With stew you just skin, remove the head & innards, cut into chunks and chuck in a pot. Deal with the bones later. I know someone who occasionally shoots rabbits and brings me some. Very tasty, a little like chicken with a stronger flavour.

  53. Large by Centurix · · Score: 1

    Pointy teeth!

    --
    Task Mangler
  54. Correction... by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > move to countries like the US.

    Should be: "move to countries like what the US used to be".

    1. Re:Correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The authentic voice of US foreign policy. People are dying to get all kinds of places, but Americans don't know anything about what happens outside their badly protected borders.

      Weirdly, the craptcha for this one was "exodus".

    2. Re:Correction... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      People are dying (literally) to get to most of Europe. Your point?

      Take your over-enthusiastic patriotism for America, Land Of The Free, Justice And Mercy For All, God Bless This Mighty Nation etc etc and shove it.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    3. Re:Correction... by Bertie · · Score: 1

      I see retirement's mellowed you right out, Rummy...

    4. Re:Correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat and proud of it!

    5. Re:Correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Please do not feed the trolls.

    6. Re:Correction... by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      Guess what dumbfuck, it was your boy George H W Bush in 91 who stopped, get this, the French from mounting a direct drive to Baghdad and killing/capturing Saddam then and there. I wonder why...

    7. Re:Correction... by Praseodymn · · Score: 1

      Hey,
      I'm an expatriate because of the government!
      I moved to China!
      I can drink a beer on the street here.

      Long live freedom fries!

      --
      Sometimes, you can, you go to hell for the rest of your life! That's a true thing.
    8. Re:Correction... by Phil06 · · Score: 1

      > ...like the US used to be.
      The one where everything was great if you were a while male?

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
    9. Re:Correction... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Such melodrama!
      Go see REAL poverty (not the fatass so-called "poor" derelicts we have in the US) in areas where annoying the authorities will get you shot, then get back to us.

      Hint: we don't have mechanics making pontoon boats of old trucks to get from the US to Cuba.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know what else is dying?

      "birds are dying!"
      -emogirl

    11. Re:Correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White? Check. Male? Check. Yeah, I could live there.

    12. Re:Correction... by Lance_Denmark · · Score: 1

      I for one am certain that this man genuinely is a millionaire.

    13. Re:Correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admittedly this person's viewpoints do lean towards the extreme but it often seems to me that the most extreme people tend to be the ones that make the most impact. Particular the most financially affluent among us tend to be of this nature. You seem to be implying that he is lying. I would be almost willing to bet that your position on this is in error.

    14. Re:Correction... by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      Hey,
      I'm an expatriate because of the government!
      I moved to China!
      I can drink a beer on the street here.


      You could have moved to Las Vegas. It's much closer and you can drink free drinks on the street.

    15. Re:Correction... by c_forq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you cite this please? I would be interested in reading about it.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    16. Re:Correction... by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only on /. can uninformed political bickering be considered more interesting that GIANT FUCKING RABBITS! For God's sake people are you all insane? There's 23 pound rabbits on the loose and you're arguing over whether refugee would prefer to go to Europe or America? I want to hear about the rabbits and all I get in the comments are references to communism, a lecture on the life and times of Marx, nookular missiles and such trivial things. Seriously guys think of the rabbits!

      --
      I hate printers.
    17. Re:Correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Should be: "move to countries like what the US used to be".


      Like you know what you're talking about, you K5 posting fuckhead.
    18. Re:Correction... by Cstryon · · Score: 1

      So I'm guessing the cute Nursury Rhyme will be changed to 'Bunny fu fu the "GIANT FUCKING RABBIT" Hoping through the Forest...' I'd Replace my dog with one. It's Harmless, but damn scary looking, if someone broke into my house and stumbled upon one of these suckers...awesome! Now, are they going to try and breed it with the Rabbit from Monty Python and the Holy Grail. THAT would be a bad Idea.

      --
      Indoctrinate : to instruct especially in fundamentals or rudiments Educate : to develop mentally, morally, or aestheti
    19. Re:Correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush Sr made it pretty clear in his book why he didn't invade Iraq itself, and the reason was to avoid pretty much exactly what's happening now.

  55. Rush hour in Pyongyang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Large empty streets,


    Those of you who have Google Earth, search up Pyongyang and you can see just how empty the streets are. Almost nothing on the streets there, just the occasional bus or truck. Seoul looks jammed, in places, by comparison. Plus if you look closely at Pyongyang you can see that ugly triangular shaped hotel they tried to build, but never finished. At least I think it was supposed to be a hotel, that's what the reporter on the CBC said.

    1. Re:Rush hour in Pyongyang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be the Ryugyong Hotel. Come for the service, stay for the rabbit stew.

  56. Is it just me or are the pictures off? by Umuri · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or do the pictures look almost fake. I can appreciate that bad camera angles were used but the rabbits seriously looked photoshopped in. The top right eat or the main rabbit always looks about the same and doesn't seem to have discoloration due to the lighting in any of the pictures, along with other parts of the fur. Are rabbits just odd to photograph like that or is this some partial fake?

    --
    You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. colossal by tsjaikdus · · Score: 1

    Nice angles. That's exactly how I make my member stand out on gay profiles.

  59. You got it the wrong way by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dictatorship is a precursor to communism.

    Move specifically, the "dictatorship of the proletariat". It is in the official Marxist road to Communism, a temporary state of dictatorship that should lead to the promised land.

    Just about all self-declared Marxist regimes claimed to be the "dictatorship of the proletariat" state, being bright enough not to claim to the people that the current state of affairs was he best they could hope for. The one exception I know of was Albania, which at some point claimed to have reached "true Communism".

    It has been rough to get there, but those intellectuals that still dream of Communism have mostly reached the conclusion that any kind of dictatorship of temporarily suspension civil rights are *not* acceptable steps on the way. It just took a few (well, rather more than a few) million lives to get to that insight.

    Hopefully it will take less than that for the neo-Conservative to see that torture and other suspension of civil rights are not acceptable means to reach their goals, neither abroad or at home. Unless, of course, that is their goals.

    1. Re:You got it the wrong way by jonasj · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dictatorship of the proletariat simply refers to the idea that the workers, rather than the capitalists, should be in control. It is not intended to be any more of a dictatorship than current capitalist countries, nor to include any temporarily suspension civil rights.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship_of_the_p roletariat

      Do not blame an ideology for the people who believes in it.

      --
      You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
    2. Re:You got it the wrong way by qbzzt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Do not blame an ideology for the people who believes in it.

      You mean, "don't judge it by what it has achieved in practice, almost every single time it was tried" (Kibbutzim worked better, but they are only inhabited by people who want to be there).

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    3. Re:You got it the wrong way by toddhisattva · · Score: 1
      Dictatorship of the proletariat simply refers to the idea that the workers, rather than the capitalists, should be in control.
      So, all the Marxist support of dictatorship is just a case of being too cute by half? Giggle giggle, snicker snicker, lookie he called the capitalists "dictators!" That's soooo funny!

      Oh, and loookie what Marx's stupid followers can do, they can preen and act cute and funny too! "...the workers, rather than the capitalists...." Capitalists don't work! Tee-hee, snicker snicker.

      A very wise man once said, "words mean things." If Marx did not mean "dictatorship," he should not have endorsed the word and later taken it as his own.

      It is too bad Marx wrote before smilies. Hundreds of millions of lives could have been spared if his little dictators knew that he was only joking.

      Do not blame an ideology for the people who believes in it.
      Okay, fine. Why does (innocent for sake of argument) Marxism attract the most stupid and violent people?
    4. Re:You got it the wrong way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not intended to be any more of a dictatorship than current capitalist countries, nor to include any temporarily suspension civil rights.

      That's right! It's not a suspension of civil rights, it's a suspension of property rights. The fact that civil rights always happen to be suspended as well is just a coinidink.

      Hell, just the other day, I was robbing someone at gunpoint, and he started whining about how I was violating his civil rights. I pistol-whipped him and said, "No, I'm violating your property rights, you idiot! What do you think I am, a monster?" Why can't people understand these simple concepts?

    5. Re:You got it the wrong way by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Do not blame an ideology for the people who believes in it. Okay, fine. Why does (innocent for sake of argument) Marxism attract the most stupid and violent people? Actually it doesn't. It often attracts rather intelligent pessimists from intellectual groups and academia. These people seem to be the easiest for stupid and violent people to control. Sort of the grown up version of the bully jock getting the nerd to do his homework. The pen is not always mightier than the sword.
      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:You got it the wrong way by Tsagadai · · Score: 1

      Dictatorship of the Proletariat in the Marxist sense means rule of the masses. Look up the roman meaning of dictator and dictatorship. Words change meaning over time.

  60. Hares by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    Sounds like hares to me, not rabbits.

    1. Re:Hares by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      They are, but where I come from, there's only rabbits, and we just assume a bunny is a bunny is a bunny. To see huge mutant death rabbits is a huge shock.

  61. Night of the Lepus, anybody? by Peet42 · · Score: 1

    "Attention! Attention! Ladies and gentlemen, attention! There is a herd of killer rabbits headed this way and we desperately need your help!"

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069005/

  62. I have seen the movie by skeldoy · · Score: 1

    http://imdb.com/title/tt0312004/ already. It won't be easy.

  63. houseofpolitics.com by hereyago · · Score: 1

    Well, this is a political article. I hope that people can join http://houseofpolitics.com to discuss more of this.

  64. Another hare brained scheme by Marbleless · · Score: 1

    Sorry, couldn't resist it ;)

    --
    --I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
    1. Re:Another hare brained scheme by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      That really isn't very "bunny", you know.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  65. And in January 2008... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    ..."Giant Rabbits To Invade South Korea"...

    ...with FRICKIN' LASER BEAMS ON THEIR HEADS!!!!

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  66. Silly Rabbit by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 1

    Trix are for rabbits, rabbits are for kids.

    --
    "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
    End The FED. -
  67. This can't possibly turn out bad. by clambake · · Score: 1

    There is no possibility, for example, that a couple of these creatures will escape, breed like rabbits, and become a countryside plauge that ravages what little crop harvests remain after years and years of droughts causing mass starvation on a scale that even North Korea is unfamiliar with. Not possibility at all.

    1. Re:This can't possibly turn out bad. by quizzicus · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt these things could survive very well in the wild (they most likely lack the speed to escape predators).

    2. Re:This can't possibly turn out bad. by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

      Maybe. But given rabbits propensity to breed like, well, rabbits, their ability to reproduce themselves is how their species survives. Second, due to the rather wide-spread famine in N.K., I suspect that the North Koreans have pretty much taken care of eliminating predators in the wild as well as every other kind of animal, plant, or tree bark.

  68. 23 lb? How much is that in Kilograms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    European wants to know...

  69. Rabbits can be a worthwhile food source by Marcion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >Seriously though, how absurd is it that anyone thinks this is going to make any difference

    In Roman Britain Rabbits were an important food supplement. A large number could be easily be fed and cared for by the Children while the parents did more arduous agricultural tasks such as attempting to grow crops or maintain larger animals.

    Pretty bad that in 2006 we have come to this though, especially when the US and EU ploughing food back into the soil and African countries would dearly love to be able to have foreign food markets.

    1. Re:Rabbits can be a worthwhile food source by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Children rearing chickens & rabbits for food was quite common in the west up until the 60's.

      Is it just me or does the idea of "big rabbits" remind anyone else of the goodies "transitorised carrot" episode. It was a spoof of clockwork orange with "Big Bunny" directing the evil from a moonbase.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Rabbits can be a worthwhile food source by plopez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something for both you and tapecutter.

      http://www.lileks.com/institute/gallery/othrwhtmea t/2.html

      BTW, if you haven't seen the 'Gallery of Regrettable Food', it's great.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Rabbits can be a worthwhile food source by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      Well, the U.S. and others would like to give North Korea food, but we need assurances that it will be properly distributed. Kim Jong-il apparently has a habit of not feeding people he considers enemies. He may also sell some food on the open market for cash. Since North Korea is reluctant to let supervisors in, the food cannot be given.

    4. Re:Rabbits can be a worthwhile food source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty bad that in 2006 we have come to this though, especially when the US and EU ploughing food back into the soil and African countries would dearly love to be able to have foreign food markets.

      Dude, we are in 2007...
    5. Re:Rabbits can be a worthwhile food source by coredog64 · · Score: 1

      Reading this story I gotta relate a story about my grandfather: My grandfather was, if anything, an "idea" man. And he had this idea that he could stretch his food budget by raising rabbits. He fed them greens and stuff the kids didn't eat. So he raised the rabbits but he'd never actually butchered a rabbit. So there he is in the kitchen, guide book on rabbit butchering open on the counter. And of course he fucks it up the first time -- he didn't exert enough force and the relaxed rabbit's eyes fucking bug out of it's skull. He finally kills the thing but now all the kids have seen what's going on and they're up in arms. He had to give it (and the other living ones) to the neighbors who knew what to do with them.

  70. Breed giant cats instead by extract · · Score: 1

    Giant cats are meatier: A short time ago a 20 lbs kittie was trapped in a dog door trying to steal food from the neighbour (which it had been doing for some times). Besides dogs and cats are very popular delicatesses in Korea.

  71. Just. Plain. Wrong. by inexplicable_monkey · · Score: 1

    Am I the only perverted soul who thinks this http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/0,5538,18473,00. html/ photo is just plain wrong? I suppose you have to do something with a giant rabbit...

  72. Optimal bunny size. by Rufty · · Score: 1

    OK, so I get the idea, rabbits aren't any more efficient than, say, cows, at converting vegetable matter to meat, but they are a lot faster. I think I heard about four times. So you can get 4000lb of rabbit meat in the same time you can get 1000lb of beef. OK, but that's for regular bunnies, don't big bunnies grow quite a bit slowler. So what's the "best bunnie" size???

    --
    Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
  73. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but what happens now when the people get "rabbit madness" Rabbit meat is 99.9% lean, only trace amounts of fat. without fat your brain doesnt work right...

        Its a secret plan to kill them off i tell you

  74. lbs?!? Please write something understandable! by Heddahenrik · · Score: 1

    And what is an lbs? I thought Slashdot was supposed to be an international site, not a neighbourhood backyard magazine.

    If you're going to use that crap, then at least give us a translation!

    1. Re:lbs?!? Please write something understandable! by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

      So helpless are we?

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=23+lbs+in+k g&btnG=Google+Search

    2. Re:lbs?!? Please write something understandable! by Heddahenrik · · Score: 1

      Of course I know how to translate it. But it's very inconvenient and the impression is that someone who is using these obsolete units are just talking bullshit for old baseball fans, so it can't really be anything important or scientific about it. It's as bad as bad spelling.

      But if you want to look everything up, then I can speak Swedish: Bork bork bork!

  75. Brilliant ! by Joebert · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Giant Rabbits To Feed North Korea

    In the future, they'll be able to reuse 97% of that headline.

    Giant Rabbits Feed On North Korea
    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Brilliant ! by cbacba · · Score: 1

      Possible correction of headline.
      It will likely turn out to be
      Giant Rabbits to Feed ON North Korea

      While genetic technology has vastly come around since that grade F scifi movie Night of The Lepas, where 50 ft tall carnivorous rabbits got loose eating people, cattle and everything else in its path, I doubt what occurs will be eating north koreans. However, early great experiments with introducing non native critters (and sometimes plants) has been fraught with disasters.

      If there are no natural predators for 30 + pound rabbits in N. korea, it might be only a matter of time before enough get loose to start multiplying in the wild. And, not much multiplies like rabbits. Just imagine food crops being decimated (that's roughly 'reduced by 10%' for those who don't know the difference between decimated and devastated) by wild rabbits. A country as poor as n. korea might not have the resources to combat such a plague.

      Since communist dictators have been known to use food as a weapon of control, it's possible though that the project may be only to feed the ruling class and not the peasants. In that case, decimation of the peasants food source is probably not that important to the rulers.

    2. Re:Brilliant ! by Joebert · · Score: 1

      In that case, why don't the rulers just start eating the peasants ? :/

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    3. Re:Brilliant ! by cbacba · · Score: 1

      Too boney and tough I guess.

      It seems far more people starve to death rather than go in for direct canibalism and there are few notable exceptions.

      As for the younger generation here, I sometimes wonder if the libs screwed up the food supply, whether they'd wind up on the menu. I use the word 'if' because it's not a foregone conclusion that they will succeed. Of course if they do, people will eventually starve and/or resort to canibalism.

    4. Re:Brilliant ! by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Ok, now I'm really confused, are you saying they should eat the children ? :/

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    5. Re:Brilliant ! by cbacba · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying anyone should eat anyone else.

      I was musing on whether the younger generation will put libs and probably the rest us older generation on the menu if the libs were to screw up food production in the US. Note that the 'if' concerns the possibility of the libs actually gaining power and not to the certainty of screwing up the food supply were they to gain total power.

      Note too that the term canabalism isn't strictly related to the eating of others of the same species. It actually means dismantling something and using the parts for unrelated purposes. That means it is a correct use of the word to say that someone canabalized their TV set and created a color organ. It also means that harvesting stem cells by aborting babies qualifies as well. I suppose though that soylent green probably doesn't qualify as canabalism since the people are being fed to a fungus first.

    6. Re:Brilliant ! by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Put libs & old folks on the menu ?
      You're not saying anyone should eat anyone else ?
      Are you a rabbit ?

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    7. Re:Brilliant ! by cbacba · · Score: 1

      I'm not even a pooka. As for your other questions - they are already answered in the previous post.

      So far as eating rabbits, giant or otherwise, I prefer chicken.

  76. Vitamine deficit by eating rabbits by AllanVanHulst · · Score: 1

    I'm not a dietary expert etc.. But isn't it possible to get some sort of vitamine deficit by (repeatedly) eating rabbit-meat. Not very sure, thought I read about it some time ago.

  77. I can't believe the MP ref was this far down by benhocking · · Score: 1

    I kept looking and looking. Finally, I had to do a search. I was sure it was going to be in the first couple of posts. Well, at least someone finally did it. :)

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  78. How much of the size was diet? by dark-nl · · Score: 1

    I expect the rabbits will turn out to be a lot smaller if they're fed on grass.

  79. "The Aquariums of Pyongyang" by nadanumber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    North Korea uses prisoners in their various prison camps to breed rabbits, which are killed for meat. (not for the prisoners, who must eat bugs, worms, raw rats, etc. in order to survive) Kang Chol-Hwan who was imprisoned with his entire family in the 'redeeemables' area of the Yodok prison camp wrote a book that describes his experiences, "The Aquariums of Pyongyang". For anyone interested in North Korean human rights, its a must read. Kang Chol-Hwan is now a reporter for the South Korean newspaper the Chosun Ilbo on North Korean affairs. He's one of the most successful North Korean refugees living in South Korea.

    Most North Korean refugees who manage to escape into China lead hunted lives in a terrible limbo of exploitation, terrified that they may be returned to North Korea, where people are often executed for the crime of trying to leave the country and bringing shame upon the Dear Leader.

    If you read Aquariums realize that Kang Chol-Hwan's nine years in the Yodok prison camp as a boy were in the least brutal area of the least brutal camp, the only area where people are ever released. Many are sentenced to work on secret underground projects, similar to Hitler's rocket works at Peeneemunde, that only offer death through overwork as an escape, once you go in, you never come out.

    Sun Ok-Lee is a North Korean refugee living in the US who worked as a bookeeper in another slave labor camp and her account to the US House is probably the most realistic account of these camps. She is one of less than five people known to have ever left one and lived.. Thousands die each year in these camps. They work people to death. (Each person, and their fat, represents useful energy to be extracted before killing them, as you will see)

    Her account is at http://ncafe.com/northkorea/SunOkLeeTestimony_w_ll us.pdf

  80. Uh, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Its trivially easy to get everything except vitamin b12 from a vegetarian diet. Fats and oils are the same thing, and you know that "vegetable oil" stuff people fry food in, guess where it comes from? Flax oil is great for omega 3, you don't need fish. Iron isn't an issue, legumes, green leafy vegetables, whole grain products like breads are all high in iron, and just cooking in cast iron cookware provides all the iron you need even if your food had none. Every vitamin and mineral besides b12 has great plant sources. And protein is a non-issue, even the vegetables with the lowest protein content still have plenty enough. If you are eating enough calories to maintain your weight, you will get enough protein too. Oddly enough, protein would be a problem trying to rely too heavily on rabbit meat. The amino acid ratio in rabbit meat is WAY off for people, you will actually die if you try to live off rabbit meat as your sole protein source.

  81. For lazy people by bioglaze · · Score: 2, Interesting

    23 lbs = 10.4 kilograms
    15 lbs = 6.8 kilograms

    --
    Who is John Galt?
  82. I can hear the vendors crying already: by lifebouy · · Score: 1

    "Giant rodents for sale! Get your giant rodents here! Tastes like chicken!"

    Seriously, though, why not simply sell lots of normal sized rabbits? It's not like you'll run out--they breed like, well, rabbits. Is there really a market demanding giant ones?

    --
    Drop me a line at:
    Key ID: 0x54D1D809
  83. Video of the rabbit by Mathness · · Score: 1
    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  84. what's the big deal? by sameeer · · Score: 1

    It seems to me this is a news item since it's north korea, and since it's rabbits? I could see a similar article, consisting of US and cows/chickens. And nobody would read the headline twice. If some breeder comes up with a larger chicken or a meatier cow, wouldn't you want to set up such a breeding system in your country. Yes, the north koreans eat rabbits. and thats the news.

  85. 28 days... 6 hours... 42 minutes... 12 seconds. by negated · · Score: 1

    Maybe we'll get lucky. One of the giant rabbits could start calling itself Frank and drop a jet engine into Kim Jong Il's bedroom.

  86. It might help by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All the rabbits in the world won't change that.

    Maybe not but it certainly might help. Rabbits can survive on grass and crude silage, can be grown in relatively small areas and reproduce reliably. Faster than goats, the most widely eaten animal on the planet.

    Similar husbandry programs with cavia porcellus, guinea pigs to you, have helped many families lift themselves out of poverty in Peru and other areas in South America.

    Rabbits would be better suited to the colder climate of North Korea. The fur would provide a secondary revenue source. It may not sound like much but when you're dirt poor having meat to eat and furs to trade is big deal.

    How is this not a good thing? Why would you want to see the North Korean people starve just because their government is the asshat of the world? That's almost as silly as people hating all Americans because Bush is a douche bag. It's not like they elected that idiot in North Korea and there's growing evidence we didn't elect our idiot, either.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:It might help by wonkavader · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this analysis really depends on whether these hyper-growing rabbits still have the eating requirements of their smaller cousins. If they can still survive (at their growth rate and ultimate size) on what's indigestible to humans, then clearly this is a big win. If they require big nutricious vegtables (the breeder says he currently feeds them kale) that would otherwise be edible by humans, then they aren't going to help -- they'll be less efficient than the humans eating the vegtables.

      If only this could become an export for them. However for both practical and political reasons, I doubt that will happen.

    2. Re:It might help by goldspider · · Score: 1

      "Why would you want to see the North Korean people starve just because their government is the asshat of the world?"

      You're either remarkably naive or willfully ignorant. The DPRK could feed their people if they wanted to. They simply choose not to.

      All the magic giant rabbits in the world isn't going to change that.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    3. Re:It might help by dbIII · · Score: 1
      How is this not a good thing? Why would you want to see the North Korean people starve just because their government is the asshat of the world?

      That was the policy with Cuba, and it didn't work. That was also the policy with Iraq, and although greater levels of starvation were reached it also didn't work. "Oil for food" didn't count for much when the oil pipelines were being bombed - which made it look like the views of various clueless extremists calling for starvation to incide a revolution were being followed.

    4. Re:It might help by istartedi · · Score: 1

      So basicly the North Koreans will be stepping up to the life of that woman with the rabbits in Roger and Me. Except they probably won't be allowed to breed their own.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    5. Re:It might help by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Theses rabbits are specially bred over many generations for maximum size eating high quality feeds and I have doubts about their suitability for the Koreans. A better Idea would have been to find out what exactly the Koreans have to feed the rabbits and then breed a strain that an efficient meat producer on those feeds. Doing this properly would mean actually traveling to Korea and talking to the farmers and looking arround to sepparate reality from government delusions. Bigger doesn't always mean more efficient.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:It might help by modecx · · Score: 1

      If they require big nutricious vegtables (the breeder says he currently feeds them kale) that would otherwise be edible by humans, then they aren't going to help -- they'll be less efficient than the humans eating the vegtables.

      Just wanted to point out that this statement might not be strictly true. Rabbits might be more efficient at digesting different plant materials than humans, since that's what they've evolved to do. I'm not saying that you're wrong, mind you. It'd be an interesting thing to look into.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  87. Because Slashdot is US-centric by aepervius · · Score: 1

    This is not meant as a flame bait but the simple truth : this is the same reason tehre is a political section with an US flag, but there isn't a political section with, let us say a switzerland flag. Or a Korean flag. Or a canadian one. See my drift ? So now having agreed that slashdot is US centric, think of this trivia : what are the last 3 countries to use as standard unit the imperial unit ? Ding-Dong. Since they have pound as standard unit they converted the unit from kg to pound for the majority of their readership : the US (*)


    (*) I am assuming this is the majority. If the US in the mean time has become a minority readership, one could question the legitimency of an US centric news.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  88. It already happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It already happened to Janet Leigh and DeForest Kelley. Night of the Lepus.

  89. Great comedic potential... by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

    Kim Jong Il is known to be a fan of Daffy Duck. Having giant rabbits around can allow him to re-enact one of the funniest cartoons of all time.

  90. The wall is down by NevarMore · · Score: 1

    It is "east German" not "East German". The only ones who make a distinction are the dinosaurs and the communists who can't catch up with the rest of the world. I lived and worked in Dresden and the only ones left who complain about the seperation are 30 and 40 somethings who couldn't adapt and learn how to earn a job instead of being given a job. Anyone older than that learned how to cope during the war and adapted again.

    Its roughly equivalent to Der Spiegel citing "Herr Taco in der Wild West Staat von California..." or "Doktor Merkwerdichliebe von der Confederate Staat Alabama...".

  91. Oolong by WizzardX · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of Oolong the rabbit

  92. Sounds like a good solution . . . by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

    . . . so long as the rabbits aren't only the size of dogs, but also taste like dog.

    --
    I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  93. workers paradise! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    the more i read this the more i want to go live in the workers paradise! man communism is sooo cool. Look at how they care so much about the starving population! thats dedication for you.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  94. Re: Giant bunnies vs. Just get rid of Kim! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    It is pretty much a time capsule of the 50s.

    Which explains Kim Jong-il's hair.

  95. The Size of Dogs! by camperdave · · Score: 1

    news of an East German pensioner who breeds rabbits the size of dogs.

    "Ja. We are starting by having them the size of the Chihuahua. Afterwards, we are having them the size of the... how you say... Maltese. Of course, being German, we are hoping to be reaching the size of the Dachshund, or maybe even the Miniature Schauzer."

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  96. Re:23 lb? How much is that in Kilograms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Divide by two and then subtract 10%. It's not a difficult calculation, I had the reverse down in elementary school.

  97. Correction..."/." is dying from cynicism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "...who is aware of the slope we're headed down..."

    Potential slope. However judging by some of the comments. Some feel we've already achieved that potential. I personally feel that people are suffering from cronic cynicism were the glass is perpetually half-empty. And that's partially because of the way media is set up. Bad news this, and bad news that. Kind of hard to see the good in the world (or nation) when one is forever bombarded by what is bad about it.

    1. Re:Correction..."/." is dying from cynicism. by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 0

      Potential slope? I'm sure all the people in Guantanamo bay will be comforted to know they are only potentially imprisoned without charge or trial.

    2. Re:Correction..."/." is dying from cynicism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOu mean like the Japanese in the 1940's? Or the Indians in the 19th century? Yeah...things have changed so much we should go back to those good old days.

    3. Re:Correction..."/." is dying from cynicism. by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Insightful

      slopes go both ways, we went up a slope, now were going back down one. Returning to the good old days is the problem.

    4. Re:Correction..."/." is dying from cynicism. by c_forq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I remember correctly it was an executive order that create Japanese internment camps. Not legislation, not a federal court, but an order sent out on the sole authority of the President. At least Guantanamo Bay has congressional support.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    5. Re:Correction..."/." is dying from cynicism. by shenanigans · · Score: 1

      We're on the slope. I saw the "potential" in the 90's, and some have seen it much earlier than that. But it's still not steep enough that it is too late to turn back. Slipping into panick and despair won't help anything, but neither will ignoring the problem.

    6. Re:Correction..."/." is dying from cynicism. by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      It that supposed to be a positive thing? Oh, it's not just the president who supports illegally interning people in breach of their human rights, it's the majority of congress too! Yay democracy!

    7. Re:Correction..."/." is dying from cynicism. by c_forq · · Score: 1

      At least we are a democratic republic. I have no doubt that if the USA was founded as a true democracy it would either no longer exist, been Balkanized long ago, be a quasi-theocracy, or some combination of the three.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  98. Thank you, spot on (mod up) by Cheesey · · Score: 1

    Your post is spot on.

    It always scares me to see people speaking in favour of Marxism, considering what has happened every time an actual implementation has been attempted. Capitalism has its faults, but the other extreme makes you a slave with no economic or political power whatsoever. Fans of Marxism might like to read up on the actual history of the USSR or 20th century China before supporting an ideology in which everyone becomes the property of the state.

    --
    >north
    You're an immobile computer, remember?
  99. Don't belong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giant rabbits don't belong in North Korea, and neither does Al Gore (except in Nebraska).

  100. Giant rabiits for food stocks? by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    They need to eat Kim Jong Ill.

    I think he's plenty fat enough.

  101. Whats wrong with millions of tons of excess wheat by unity100 · · Score: 1

    that are grown in developed countries and being left to rot in depots in order not to make the wheat prices fall 'too low' ?

    Why the effort to do something else rather than ship these to the places in need ? Many of those nations are not integrated with world trade association anyways ?

  102. U.S. bureaucracy = North Korea? Yeah, right. by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dude, here's a nickel, buy a clue. Sure, large bureaucracies cause inefficiencies but that is so far from the primary reason for North Korea's current situation it's absurd, in fact offensive, to make the comparison. You are seriously lacking in a sense of perspective.

    Go for it, son, define "large" for me. Give me some numbers. We have plenty of bureaucracies that are as large or far larger than the entire North Korean government, General Motors, for example, and while they may be inefficient, they do not leave millions of their own starving to death or subject to a high likelihood of torture or death. Equating the two is beyond wrong, it's flat out irresponsible.

    Those of us living in reality point, rather, to lack of accountability, lack of transparency, inefficient cross-communications, y'know, the stuff that us actual experts in industrial organization are always willing to explain to those clued enough to pay attention.

    You go out there and talk to some genuine experts in the reasons for North Korea's current state. Read up on, say, rule of law. See what energetically capitalist outlets like the Wall Street Journal have to say about the causes of North Korea's problems.Then come back and we'll have this chat again.

    Oh, and if you're so hyped on decentralization, tell me, what in the real world have you done to bring that about? Personally, I've been working at that for over twenty years, just testified this past week on government procedures to New York's city council. This wasn't so bad since I've been dealing with the senior relevant councilman since, oh, about two months since he was elected, back in '01.

    So, how about you. What have you accomplished?

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
    1. Re:U.S. bureaucracy = North Korea? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      General Motors isn't in charge of providing my food, thankfully.

      Here is a clue for you

    2. Re:U.S. bureaucracy = North Korea? Yeah, right. by Aptgetupdate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      General Motors, for example, and while they may be inefficient, they do not leave millions of their own starving to death or subject to a high likelihood of torture or death. Equating the two is beyond wrong, it's flat out irresponsible.

      Right. Because of decentralization...if GM tortured people, or merely left them to starve, people would go work somewhere else. (Like, for example, because of massive lay-offs for which massive bureaucracies are infamous.) Because they're only one of many corporations, rather than the sole, centralized authority.

      Or are you arguing that if GM were the government, they wouldn't leave people out in the cold? Or that North Koreans should just use their other government? What the hell is your point? Did you read the post you're responding to, or just use it as a launchpad to offer your opinions? Stating that the results are different doesn't mean the initial conditions aren't similar. It only reinforces the original point, in this case.

      Finally, please don't use attending an "open to the public" city council meeting as a credit to your "expertise". Or at least, if that's the extent of your credentials, don't be such a pompous, arrogant, condescending jerk to other /. posters. Humility is a sign of confidence. Having the tone of a self-important and intolerant ass is a sign of uncertainty.

    3. Re:U.S. bureaucracy = North Korea? Yeah, right. by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1
      Hmm. Looks like you didn't read my post, actually. Or maybe you just don't read all that well.

      Let's try this again, shall we?

      The original poster engaged in a serious example of classic Ayn Rand-esque bullshit. He has taken a complex situation, one that those of us who actually study this stuff are well aware has gotten this bad due to quite a few dangerous behaviors, and tried to reduce it down to the all-purpose bugaboo : big organizations = BAD!
      Now, in my experience, this is predictably the first step towards, oh, what a surprise, he got there before me, a clueless screed against ALL big organizations. When you're holding a hammer and all that, except here we have a guy who I suspect is mighty reluctant to ever put that hammer down for so much as a minute, let alone try to find a more useful tool.

      So, moving right along, I then proceeded to list some of those behaviors that one needs to address to actually deal with such problems. Next I made the point that some very Randite approved groups like the WSJ have long since figured this out. IOW, he needs to get a more recent edition of whatever the Randroid Little Red Book is.

      I also pointed out that these kinds of attempts at moral equivalencies are rather offensive to those of us who actually work to address the causes and consequences of totalitarian regimes. Not that I would qualify as such a person. ;->

      Then I pointed out in what was certainly a far from loving fashion that yes, I have reason to know what I'm talking about. Now, as for my general work history, I think that you know how to find Google but as for that hearing, well, hmmm,
      - hearing chaired by Councilmember Gerson
      - Gerson states that Dr. M. Clarke is, IIRC, the inspiration for much of what the hearings are about and the creator and articulator of "the precautionary principle", the best hope for dealing with the problems being addressed.
      -I'm testifying because, oh, what was the reason again? Oh, now I remember, because I'm the one in charge of managing her research papers (among other things) and she guilted me into testifying.

      Or, since yo evidently feel like researching this, you could just look at the transcript and see how many times I was called back to the mike.

      So, no, I didn't just wander in from my job at the popsicle stand.

      Lastly I asked a simple question. So, you talk big; what have you done about it?

      Funny, no response.

      Typical.

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  103. Eat the rich by plehmuffin · · Score: 1
    Why not feed them the corrupt, inept government leaders who are causing the food shortage in the first place?

    That would solve both of their biggest problems.

    I'm dead serious.

  104. Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should feed the trolls -- to the North Koreans. Two problems solved with one troll.

  105. People can eat effecient crops too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are comparing 1st world plant food sources that we spend alot on growing to 3rd world meat food sources. That's obviously not a realistic comparison. We grow expensive crops because we're filthy rich and choose to do whatever we please. We even grow crops in completely moronic areas where they are 10 times more expensive to grow just because we don't care about effeciency. Our meat food sources don't eat grasses, they eat corn, soy, and blood and bone meal. Things that we refuse to eat (they are fed the "crappy" corn people don't want), but people in the 3rd world would kill for.

    You can in fact grow alot of edible plants that are native to whatever 3rd world region you want to point to. These plants will be far more nutritionally effecient than growing grass, feeding it to rabbits and then eating rabbits. People in wealthy nations would just turn up their noses at the thought of eating food purely because its edible and a source of calories, to us food is a luxury, not a necessity.

  106. What kind of idiot still digs Marx?! by toddhisattva · · Score: 2
    The grandparent said,
    Communism is just a precursor of Dictatorship.


    To which the parent said,
    Interesting assertion. You don't back it up with anything though.


    An assertion that is completely obvious needs little or no backing up. But here is some just for fun:

    Russia: Stalin, Lenin
    China: Mao
    Cambodia: Pol Pot

    Perhaps the author of the parent should pull his head out of his ass.

    Perhaps the author of the parent needs to find one case where Marxism did not lead inexorably to dictatorship.

    Then, if he hasn't killed himself over wasting his life believing in fairy tales, he should try to figure out why Marxism leads inevitably to dictatorship.
    1. Re:What kind of idiot still digs Marx?! by vandan · · Score: 1
      Russia: Stalin, Lenin

      Russia under Lenin was actually quite good compared to what it replaced. Lenin delivered many reforms that improved the conditions of millions of people in Russia. Unfortunately every other country then turned around and attacked Russia, undermining the revolution, and eventually killing Lenin.

      What Stalin did with Russia has nothing to do with what Lenin and the early Bolsheviks wanted, and also has nothing to do with what socialists are fighting for now. Stalin was a dictator. The state that he run was much closer to State Capitalism than communism. You can't blame socialists worldwide, and socialist theory generally, for what Stalin did.

      China: Mao

      Also State Capitalism. Just because the West calls China a communist state, doesn't make it so. China is very close to Stalinist Russia. The Chinese 'revolution' didn't involve the working class at all - it was merely a change of the ruling class, with no mass participation at all.

      Cambodia: Pol Pot

      Pol Pot was a lunatic dictator. His rhetoric at the time was strongly anti-capitalist, largely because the US was bombing the Christ of out Cambodia. But apart from criticising capitalism, there was nothing communist about Pol Pot's Cambodia.

      If you want to see some real examples of people working towards a communist society, have a look at the revolution sweeping South America. If you are an American citizen, you will know nothing of it, so search on the internet for alternative media reports. In particular, search for Bolivia and Venusualia. While both countries have their issues, they are at least pushing foward in the right direction - nationalising industries and using the profits to subsidise health care an education, etc.

      Perhaps the author of the parent should pull his head out of his ass.

      I contest that it is YOU who has their head up their arse for this statement. And 'arse' is spelt 'arse', not 'ass'. You're an American, aren't you? Nice education system.

      Perhaps the author of the parent needs to find one case where Marxism did not lead inexorably to dictatorship.

      I just have you 2. And you can't prove that communism leads to dictatorship by induction. It doesn't work like that. If it did, then I could prove that capitalism also leads to dictatorship.

      Then, if he hasn't killed himself over wasting his life believing in fairy tales, he should try to figure out why Marxism leads inevitably to dictatorship.

      You should grow up, hold back on the childish insults, and try to education yourself somewhat. Every time you open your mouth, you demonstrate everything that is wrong with the society you live in. You have no ideas of your own, and no respect for other people's ideas, even in situations where you clearly have no experience. Only in America ...
    2. Re:What kind of idiot still digs Marx?! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      Russia under Lenin was actually quite good compared to what it replaced. Lenin delivered many reforms that improved the conditions of millions of people in Russia. Unfortunately every other country then turned around and attacked Russia, undermining the revolution, and eventually killing Lenin. What Stalin did with Russia has nothing to do with what Lenin and the early Bolsheviks wanted, and also has nothing to do with what socialists are fighting for now. Stalin was a dictator. The state that he run was much closer to State Capitalism than communism. You can't blame socialists worldwide, and socialist theory generally, for what Stalin did.
      Red Terror was started by Lenin, not Stalin. Gulag dates back to 1921 as well.
  107. "bad" communists only come from "power vacuums"? by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily. This is what happens if there is no party able to inspire and lead the masses forward - a power vacuum exists and is filled by violent people. Yes. But it's not the only way things can play out, and you'd like us to believe.

    Hm... violent people get in because of a "power vacuum", do they?

    Russia. Um, no, the Menshiviks were doing better and better until Lenin's goons violently overthrew the closest thing to a legitimately elected government in Russia's history.

    China. Um, no. What was that about a "Long March" again? Sun Yat Sen's people may have had their flaws, but given that it took thirty years of bloody warfare for Mao's forces to take over, not quite a "power vacuum".

    Oh, say, all of Eastern Europe. Hah. Ask anybody from there about power vacuums and legitimacy. Admittedly, communists did more then their share of fighting against the Nazis but they were far from the only players. Without the Russians it would have been a very different ballgame.

    And then we get to countries like Japan, Peru, Italy, Malaysia, and Greece, where communists tried to take power and got their asses kicked. Oh well.

    So, I'm curious, what are your counterexamples?

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  108. silly people by r00t · · Score: 1

    Pigs are smarter than dogs. We roast them whole, and we grind them into sausage.

    Dogs are relatively dumb, yet people get all upset if you eat one. WTF?

    I think it's the eyes. Little beady pig eyes on the sides of the head just don't look as human as big forward-looking doggie eyes. Aw, such a nice doggie! Gross, a pig!

    Really, there's nothing wrong with dog fur or dog meat. The same goes for horses, which are also dumber than pigs.

    It's good to get some variety in your diet. I hate my lame corporate supermarket.

  109. The perfect defense by plopez · · Score: 1

    It's called 'The Holy Hand Grenade'. Let's see those godless commies try to defend against that one! :)

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  110. Re:i for one - Holy Grail by shelterpaw · · Score: 0

    Run away! Run away!

  111. Re:23 lb? How much is that in Kilograms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called the IMPERIAL system. Any idea which empire that refers to? Fucking redneck - get back to fucking your sister you buck-toothed freak.

  112. What about Flemish Giants? by Jaywalk · · Score: 1

    Using rabbits as a meat source is hardly new and this breed isn't unusual. A 23 pound rabbit is certainly hefty, but it's not a record breaker. The Flemish Giant has been documented up to 26 pounds and it's one of the oldest breeds around. Rabbits can survive on grass and thrive if a little grain and vegetables are added to their diets. That makes them a logical choice for countries with limited foodstuffs. The most interesting thing about the article was the writer couldn't seem to get past how the breeder "manages to stay emotionally detached enough to send the furry, innocent-looking, huge-eared creatures to slaughter." When's the last time you saw a farmboy get emotially attached to the meat stock?

    If these guys want big bunnies, they should just show up at the next Topsfield Fair.

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
  113. Chyrnolbunny by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    S/B: I for one welcome our giant fuzzy radioactive mutant long-eared overlords.

    With all the radiation N. Korea now has, why not make their own mutant bunnies? Show the world what they'll do to your pets if you invade them.

  114. Kim loves "Princess Bride" by whatnever · · Score: 1

    Let's see... Fire Swamp (underground nukes, check) Cliffs of Insanity (been there, check) Pit of Despair (in basement, check) Rodents of Unusual Size (... check)

  115. Woah. by amper · · Score: 1

    For a minute there, I thought the title read, "Giant Rabbits to Eat North Korea".

  116. Context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Or, a question of degrees, to which you and others hyperbolically equalize to the highest strata. "Show me your papers!" you claim is the situation. Those whose context is rooted in personal experience know different. And when they take offense, that you would so misunderstand, or ignore, the scale of their plight in order to shore up your argument against one of the largest agents for liberal and progressive values in the world, and you retort along the exact same line, how can the reasonable person come to any other conclusion than that you are not interested in objective analysis?

  117. Guten Tag? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    This is North Korea; wouldn't the rabbit say "an-nyeong-ha-se-yo"?

    1. Re:Guten Tag? by confield · · Score: 1

      The rabbits are German not North Korean. RTFA :-)

  118. Communist != Dictatorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    North Korea might not meet the mark, but the IDEAL has never been tested, has it? There is such a thing as the possibility of a non dictatorial communist government.

    I've heard that Cuba works perfectly well with its communist government. I've heard that there is universal health care in Cuba, that everyone is fed AND they have not erased their land & architectural heritage with parking lots, Targets and Strip Malls.

    My aunt visited the Soviet Union. They performed radial keratotomy on her eye; it was FREE, and she never had to worry about it again. On the other hand, she DID indicate that the people lived in fear. They wouldn't talk to her about anything related to politics.

    I guess what I'm saying is there WERE / ?are? some good things about the Communist / Socialist countries. I don't think it makes much sense railing against them. Look for what was good about them, and learn from their mistakes, but for heaven's sake don't just throw away the beneficial lessons we can learn from them.

    I can't speak much for N. Korea, since I know very little about it, but if you're poor and you need a doctor in Cuba, you're in luck. If you're poor and you need a doctor in the USA..?

    search for cuba health care:
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=cuba+health+c are&btnG=Google+Search
    http://www.cubasolidarity.net/inhealth.html
    A bunch of people trying to help others is what shows up. Their own health is met, AND they have 2000 doctors that THEY SEND TO OTHER COUNTRIES.

    search for usa health care:
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=usa+healt h+care&btnG=Search
    There are probably some good charities, but see what the search brings first?

    Just last year I had to perform surgery on myself in the USA since my own doctor, who works for Kaiser Permanente in northern California, would not help. They had sapped me of approximately $1000-$2000 over the course of several years, and repeatedly failed to identify the problem. One day I called the doctor on the phone to ask him to renew a prescription, and his reply was "don't call and ask. Come in and visit instead, (and I quote him here) since 'we have to get our money.'" Ultimately the doctor just told me to "shove it up my..." since I couldn't afford to pay him for an extra visit just for him to renew a scrip for an antibiotic. I told him he'd have to answer to God one day, and I said "God Bless You", as a Christian is supposed to do in the face of evil. Then he changed his mind and renewed it, but he still asked me not to come back.

    So I just bit the bullet and prayed alot and fixed the problem myself (with a razor blade and shakey hands). I used the antibiotics to make sure I didn't get infected after cutting myself. I was afraid I'd run out, though, since I made the cuts in the wrong places 2 times, and I waited a week in between each failed attempt to let myself heal. The third time worked, though, and finally I could sleep at night without aggrevation.

    That would not have had to happen in Cuba. On the other hand, I'm not sure if it's legal to pray there.

  119. just keep the muthers out of Australia by carl0ski · · Score: 1

    I dont care what they do with the just keep them away from Australian Soil we have enough rabbits already

  120. I sense an evil plot by Vexar · · Score: 1
    Since when did a Communist dictatorship think of its people? Kim Jong Il is up to something... something sinister. I can only imagine what diabolical plot will befall the world when the evil dictator gets ahold of a breeding program for giant rabbits (the likes of which belong in a Teletubbies show), mixes in some radioactive waste, and voila!

    Nothing good can come from this. We should prepare ourselves. What if the evil dictator decides to give them a bloodlust and long, gnashing teeth?

  121. BWAAA!!!!! by AnotherShep · · Score: 1

    Bunnies don't like North Koreans. Bunnies also don't like the lameness filter.

  122. Re: which dog? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    naturally, the dog of the size of a giant rabbit.

  123. Kim has solved his food problem by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    Let the rabbits eat the North Koreans.

    Then, breed them bigger, give them AK-74's and send them to overrun South Korea.

    Hah! Deal with that, Bush!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  124. run away, run away! by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Guess Kim Jung Il hasn't seen Holy Grail.

  125. But what about their gynormous poos? by shomon2 · · Score: 1

    These giant rabbits are going to shit like rodent elephants. Rabbits are known to be very efficient composters, so there's another use for you. I wouldn't recommend it unless it was part of a package of some kind, but maybe if Great Leader Laurence Lessig can infiltrate they can CC-NK them and give every home a free rabbit...

    They could also look elsewhere and see if they can simply add fat, but I hope they've taken this into consideration, but then again who says this isn't just a sci-fi lover's delicacy for those who are more "equal" than others?

    Ale

  126. Steve Jobs can beat this, no problem. by glomph · · Score: 1

    He's brought out all the Fluffy Bunnies with that big fancy ipod-phone thingie! Koreans can have -them- too!

  127. Is it by kirils · · Score: 1

    Giant Rabbits To Eat North Korea

    --
    Do not. Touch. Down.
  128. If... by Imexius · · Score: 1

    If they want more meat why don't they just start up a cow breeding program. I would assume that this would yield a greater amount of meat than simply having large rabbits.

    --
    find / -iname life 2> /dev/null Error: Life could not be found
  129. Rabbits = nothing by Chadhulhu · · Score: 0

    This is lame, Rabbits might taste nice (I personally think it taste like ass), but they have nothing to keep people healthy. vitamin styrofoam.. Poor people of North Korea.

    --
    i do not suffer from Insanity... I revel in it.
  130. Dogs as co-species by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Dogs are relatively dumb, yet people get all upset if you eat one. WTF?

    According to some anthropologists dogs and humans are co-species, that is neither could have evolved to its current state without a symbiotic relationship with each other.

    If we accept this as true, it's likely that there's genetic predisposition to liking dogs - those with this tendency would have reproduced more.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  131. That rabbit's a killer! by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

    Look at the bones!

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  132. Made me think of a quote: by guruevi · · Score: 1

    28 days... six hours... 42 minutes... 12 seconds. That... is when the world... will end.

    Why do you wear that stupid bunny suit?
    Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  133. Too close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I do hope these things don't become sentient and integrate into society. That would fall way too close to this http://antibunny.com/

    Scary close. Then they'd be putting cigarettes out in our eyes, and smoking in our theaters.

  134. Germans and a "final solution" to hunger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expected a rabbit that a German considered worth breeding to have hair that looks more blond.

    Hopefully he will only teach the Koreans how to breed rabbits and not promote another German solution to reducing the number of humans that are hungry.

    And a word of warning to any rabbits out there: it isn't water that will be coming from those shower heads!

  135. Hey Kim by wdr · · Score: 1

    I will take that MacRabbit please!

  136. Attention, class! by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Right, before you all start regurgitating what you have learned from Fox news about things, you should try to actually learn something about them. Ooops, too late.

    Never the less, here are some articles defining the concepts - now there is no excuse for displaying your ignorance:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism>
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leninism
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalinism
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maoism

    - so there!

    Marx didn't 'invent' communism - he had some ideas about why it was the right way to address the social injustice he saw around him everywhere in the world at that time. He didn't particularly lust for bloody revolution, but thought that it was likely to be the only way to remove the huge inequalities in society. Etc etc. Communism is not 'an evil ideology'; in fact, if anything it is a 'good' ideaology - it is what you have if you take the ideas of some of the great religious philosophers and remove the superstition about God. It is of course easy to see who it is, in a capitalistic society, that has most to lose if communism were introduced; and those same people are also the same who, by and large, control what you get to see in the news and what you learn in school.

    As for North Korea, the Soviet Union, China and others: the problem was never communism, but the people in power. A government will always tend to be isolated from the people, and even if they are not mediocre men with too many selfishh interests, they will too easily lose the way and begin to corrupt. This is why democracy is necessary: it is supposed to keep the government in contact with the fact that they are there to SERVE the people and their interests. Unfortunately it doesn't always work, because there are strong powers that are not democratically elected: the big companies, the big newspapers, the big religious institutions, to mention a few, and particularly in the US they have far more influence over the government than the people. This is deeply wrong, in my opinion.

    Ignorant comments about what communism is supposed to be aside, isn't it good, in a small way, what is happening here? Not that people in North Korea get rabbits, which I think may well be a bad idea (since rabbits are noxious vermin), but the fact that apparently somebody in their government at least tries to address one of the real problems the have. It is worth remembering that, with very few exceptions, all humans have both good and evil in them; even in a hopeless country like North Korea, the government is not evil through and through - there are people who actually want to do the right thing. We can't fight evil by being even more evil (like we do in Iraq) - it can never succceed. The only way is to help the good parts grow.

  137. BtVS by sckeener · · Score: 1

    Good thing Anya died in the last episode of Buffy. I don't think she could have handled knowing about giant bunnies.

    --
    "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain