I think the sheer stress applied to tectonic plates kind of ruins the cookie analogy.
If it were true that 2 types of sheer stress caused a fracture in a given plate, the first fracture may not mitigate the stress of the second if the stress vectors were sufficiently orthogonal. Therefore, its entirely feasible 1 plate could become 4.
Unlike cookies, tectonic plates don't move very far when they fracture.
The easiest way to a 2 password wall is not to use sudo, of course this is unix and you can add any extra layers you care to.
Obnoxious shade of red ? its mostly transparent and red, but since it has a separate history for possibly dangerous operations - its better for my protection.
Well, you have created a 2 password wall, many admins just give a user sudo access saying its more secure to do it this way, which it isn't - just protects them a little from executing a typo.
When I login as root, I want to have the power to do things as root unhindered, I just want access to it limited. At some point I am responsible for what I type, and for me, I don't make big mistakes as root anymore because I learned how to follow a process of backing up and checking a dangerous line before executing it. It also helps to have separate xterms, because all possibly dangerous operations are kept in a separate shell history and I have CTRL-P setup to do a search history backwards, which I use frequently in all shells.
Close, but the frequency removal occurs at specific points across the entire range, so, if a particular crap speaker happens to perform well even at 2.4 KHz, you might be able to detect a low rate encoding.
Only on some occasions have I been able to distinguish 192Kbps mp3 from anything higher, so I use Extreme setting Mp3 and I am happy - I love good sound, I have very decent headphone rig and there are so many things that can go wrong before the difference between 192 Kbps and anything higher become perceptible.
The odds are only in your favor if you stop before the 50/50 point swings their way. Once it does swing their way, thats it - it doesn't return.
from a declarative point of view, the odds are always in their favor, but by playing double down withs odds around 50/50 for only 3 rounds, the odds are are in your favor of winning a small amount by risking a large amount.
If you choose to keep playing, the pattern would be many wins followed by a large loss, and in an unbiased game, the house will win more of your money the more you play.
As far as I can tell, there is only 1 way to gamble with the odds in your favor - its possible to bend the odds if you play just a few rounds or roulette and never play again.
Playing a game of double down for 3 rounds choosing a single color each time will give you a high chance of making a small profit and a small chance of losing all with a double 0 on the last round - of course you must quit whilst you are ahead as soon as it happens, then quit gambling for good.
This will work for 1 player, but the house will still profit since the chance of getting a double 0 on the last round is disproportionate to the amount you will lose if it happens.
I've considered walking in willing to risk 7 grand on this just to make 1, but I haven't had the guts to try yet, despite the odds being well in my favor.
Its like "Funniest home videos", only now its more than just break your dogs spine to get the prize, now you can break someone elses dog's spine in streetview!
What a crass, badly thought out cop out. As if schadenfreude needed more promotion!
You are supposed to read into it. The intention was to point out that Sony's attempt to increase sales by reducing the price of 1 item, correlated with reduced sales of another item. By referring to it as irony, there is an implied causation as well as correlation.
The irony being Sonys efforts had an opposite in meaning effect for them.
That holds up with your definition as well - just have to read backwards from the irony, rather than imply a mistake was made when it isn't spelled out for you.
Oh... if the comment *was* intended to be parched, bereft of moisture and hence brilliantly crafted humour, please own up now whilst its still definitely way too late.
Google want HTML5 support, they don't want to wait for Windows to decide its too late for them.
My site is Wordpress with some nice plugins - I spent some time making it compatible with IE - then gave up when I ran into a paradox with images in hrefs with css.
Many developers don't have the luxury of demanding a specific client - but Google devs do - they are on the bleeding edge and are not waiting for Microsoft to join the party, they are dragging them in with a plugin that in the end, if their standards compliant app gains popularity, they will force Microsoft to pull their socks up.
Supporting IE costs time and money to do, when your amazing app runs easily in a standards compliant browser, and there is more than one of those to choose from.
Many of us know our time can be better used advising users to install this plugin.
Yeah, I was concerned about this briefly, but then I realised it takes one kid to hack it and do something with it they are all dying to do probably something like instant switch virtual secure social networking or such and bang - they all want it fixed that way.
In my mind, CHAP or PAP are only there to say you actually have an account with us, once past this stage, the billing account login should be handled with something else, something secure with an SQL backend.
I think that's generally good advice, but then again I can think of a counter example where following my own logical world view against the tide has made me a rich man, and I'm not talking money.
Slashdot Mirror
I think the sheer stress applied to tectonic plates kind of ruins the cookie analogy.
If it were true that 2 types of sheer stress caused a fracture in a given plate, the first fracture may not mitigate the stress of the second if the stress vectors were sufficiently orthogonal. Therefore, its entirely feasible 1 plate could become 4.
Unlike cookies, tectonic plates don't move very far when they fracture.
Come on moderators, its a joke - Yes, I realise its both funny and not funny at the same time.
I like the extension because it shows that possessing a higher or lower IQ says nothing really about how much your mind comprehends.
RAM and computer displays also have to be refreshed quite often, this could be an RIAA style victory for Apple!
Bastards!
The easiest way to a 2 password wall is not to use sudo, of course this is unix and you can add any extra layers you care to.
Obnoxious shade of red ? its mostly transparent and red, but since it has a separate history for possibly dangerous operations - its better for my protection.
Well, you have created a 2 password wall, many admins just give a user sudo access saying its more secure to do it this way, which it isn't - just protects them a little from executing a typo.
When I login as root, I want to have the power to do things as root unhindered, I just want access to it limited. At some point I am responsible for what I type, and for me, I don't make big mistakes as root anymore because I learned how to follow a process of backing up and checking a dangerous line before executing it. It also helps to have separate xterms, because all possibly dangerous operations are kept in a separate shell history and I have CTRL-P setup to do a search history backwards, which I use frequently in all shells.
They say you learn something new each day. This method of analysing a linux binary is now installed in my brain.
Thanks.
I just use more than 1 xterm, or screen - sudo itself is a security risk if you want to protect remote root by a 2 password wall.
Close, but the frequency removal occurs at specific points across the entire range, so, if a particular crap speaker happens to perform well even at 2.4 KHz, you might be able to detect a low rate encoding.
Only on some occasions have I been able to distinguish 192Kbps mp3 from anything higher, so I use Extreme setting Mp3 and I am happy - I love good sound, I have very decent headphone rig and there are so many things that can go wrong before the difference between 192 Kbps and anything higher become perceptible.
Yes.
The odds are only in your favor if you stop before the 50/50 point swings their way. Once it does swing their way, thats it - it doesn't return.
from a declarative point of view, the odds are always in their favor, but by playing double down withs odds around 50/50 for only 3 rounds, the odds are are in your favor of winning a small amount by risking a large amount.
If you choose to keep playing, the pattern would be many wins followed by a large loss, and in an unbiased game, the house will win more of your money the more you play.
As far as I can tell, there is only 1 way to gamble with the odds in your favor - its possible to bend the odds if you play just a few rounds or roulette and never play again.
Playing a game of double down for 3 rounds choosing a single color each time will give you a high chance of making a small profit and a small chance of losing all with a double 0 on the last round - of course you must quit whilst you are ahead as soon as it happens, then quit gambling for good.
This will work for 1 player, but the house will still profit since the chance of getting a double 0 on the last round is disproportionate to the amount you will lose if it happens.
I've considered walking in willing to risk 7 grand on this just to make 1, but I haven't had the guts to try yet, despite the odds being well in my favor.
Its like "Funniest home videos", only now its more than just break your dogs spine to get the prize, now you can break someone elses dog's spine in streetview!
What a crass, badly thought out cop out. As if schadenfreude needed more promotion!
Not only that, but he practically runs Ebay.
I don't really see how you can jail an abstract legal entity like a corporation.
Which is precisely why they exist.
You are supposed to read into it. The intention was to point out that Sony's attempt to increase sales by reducing the price of 1 item, correlated with reduced sales of another item. By referring to it as irony, there is an implied causation as well as correlation.
The irony being Sonys efforts had an opposite in meaning effect for them.
That holds up with your definition as well - just have to read backwards from the irony, rather than imply a mistake was made when it isn't spelled out for you.
Oh... if the comment *was* intended to be parched, bereft of moisture and hence brilliantly crafted humour, please own up now whilst its still definitely way too late.
I'm not sure if this response is intended to be this dry - could well be a whoosh!!
Lemon Curry ?
Google want HTML5 support, they don't want to wait for Windows to decide its too late for them.
My site is Wordpress with some nice plugins - I spent some time making it compatible with IE - then gave up when I ran into a paradox with images in hrefs with css.
Many developers don't have the luxury of demanding a specific client - but Google devs do - they are on the bleeding edge and are not waiting for Microsoft to join the party, they are dragging them in with a plugin that in the end, if their standards compliant app gains popularity, they will force Microsoft to pull their socks up.
Supporting IE costs time and money to do, when your amazing app runs easily in a standards compliant browser, and there is more than one of those to choose from.
Many of us know our time can be better used advising users to install this plugin.
Yeah, I was concerned about this briefly, but then I realised it takes one kid to hack it and do something with it they are all dying to do probably something like instant switch virtual secure social networking or such and bang - they all want it fixed that way.
One kid, or even one kid's parent.
Tell it to the judge..
I used Three in Australia, the PAP login was a dummy - set by them, the user doesn't need to know this one.
It may be true that most ISPs do use this as the only password - that's their risk.
Which is why a CHAP password is not a unified billing password.
In my mind, CHAP or PAP are only there to say you actually have an account with us, once past this stage, the billing account login should be handled with something else, something secure with an SQL backend.
I think that's generally good advice, but then again I can think of a counter example where following my own logical world view against the tide has made me a rich man, and I'm not talking money.
Linux.