User: jessjesseeee

Re:trolling trolling trolling

On: Desktop Linux Is Dead

I like where you're going with this but I have to say I prefer this version better

What about NZ?

On: Left 4 Dead 2 Approved In Australia After Edits

I just hope us here in NZ don't get stuck with the watered down version.

Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe

On: Comedy Central Confirms 26 New Futurama Episodes

I still see the L shapes.

Re:And in the Linux world ...

On: Mozilla To Launch "Build Your Own Browser"

Doesn't Debian already do this with Iceweasel..err I mean IceCat?

Re:Suggesting nightlies to regular users?!

On: Minefield Shows the (Really) Fast Future of Firefox

Nightlies shouldn't be used by those that want to use extensions or avoid crashes

I dunno. I use the nightlies at work... I don't use any extensions though.

+1 Missed the point but still sounded vaguely insightful?

You missed out the 'or' operator. The original statement was that IF (you want to use extensions OR you want to avoid crashes) THEN you shouldn't use nightlies. The followup said that he used the nightlies and avoided crashes just as well as with the stable release, although he didn't use extensions. So: wants to use extensions FALSE, wants to avoid crashes TRUE, and as it turns out nightlies work just fine. Hence OP's theorem is disproved by counterexample.

Really, this is basic Boolean logic. Anyone reading /. ought to understand this stuff...

I think you might mean the 'xor' operator.