We're talking about law here. You people keep saying "they made it for illegal downloads" and "look at the name" and blah blah. These are assumptions and opinions, nothing to do with what is legal. IsoHunt and any other torrent search engine, whether it's name be illegalstuffonly.com or totallylegaltorrents.com, is providing a search engine for torrent files. They're not the ones ripping and sharing The Da Vinci Code (as far as we know). They're not the ones creating and sharing the illegal content. It's not practical to assume they can monitor the legality of every torrent that reaches their engine. I can't see how, from a legal stand point, anyone but the sharers can be held responsible.
Slashdot Mirror
We're talking about law here. You people keep saying "they made it for illegal downloads" and "look at the name" and blah blah. These are assumptions and opinions, nothing to do with what is legal. IsoHunt and any other torrent search engine, whether it's name be illegalstuffonly.com or totallylegaltorrents.com, is providing a search engine for torrent files. They're not the ones ripping and sharing The Da Vinci Code (as far as we know). They're not the ones creating and sharing the illegal content. It's not practical to assume they can monitor the legality of every torrent that reaches their engine. I can't see how, from a legal stand point, anyone but the sharers can be held responsible.