Seriously, SpaceX just launched 64 on one launch, several other launched have been multiple satellites on one launch too. Pretty standard for the new iridium satellites.
It is not the Autistic people that are causing the issue. Autistic people lack social skills and tend to be looked upon as lacking empathy, this is not true but it appears that way. What they are good at is working with objective systems on objective data.
Technology as they are referring to is all computer based, computers are Mathematics engines, Mathematics engines are purely objective working on purely objective principles. Yet feminist humanities crowd keep trying to push subjective principle into STEM all of it, said principles are incompatible, or irrelevant by definition yet these idiots have been at it for years.
Sorry, but Ford can't hold you to that too. Benchmark performance data is critique and comes under fair use in the US. In places like the UK there is an equivalent exceptions to things like copyright laws to specifically allow such data distribution as it is critique for the consumer. An EULA or other contract of adhesion (where one party drafts it and has it in a take it or leave it way) can just stomp on ones consumer rights, such terms are often thrown out by the judge when they come up in a court. Ultimately no contract can be used to force someone to break the law.
In this particular case, the wording had them holding third parties to the same standard without those third parties ever agreeing to it, that is a big no no. It is more like Ford issuing a recall and providing terms when sending the parts to the dealership that third parties (the customers) using those parts can not publish gas mileage data when they get their cars back and the dealership is responsible if they do.
As for data, several including Redhat and Microsoft have published benchmarking data anyway. The big issue is the recommendation hyper-threading is disabled, new microcode or not. Depending on workload that can cause a major performance hit, or in some rare circumstances a performance boost.
Law always trumps contract. EULA is a one sided contract and therefore very limited in comparison anyway. Publishing benchmarks is a form of critique and is specifically allowed under fair use or a copyright exception in most countries, this makes the term invalid and will not be held up in any court.
Speak to your government lawyers, they wrote such laws.
That and said terms are illegal. Seriously, very illegal.
If Intel tried to enforce such a term in a court the court will throw it out.
One can not ever just write a EULA that stamps on statutory rights and force it on people. And benchmarks are covered under rights to give fair criticism meanwhile some countries also have a right to reverse engineer for compatibility reasons.
Well that is the problem, Apple has not been able to engineer its way out of a wet paper bag for some time now. It is a common problem that has existed a lot longer than just the keyboard issues. We have fuses on the back-light circuitry that do not protect the circuitry they are there to protect. We have you are holding it wrong cause they can't engineer a few traces for an antenna correctly. We have will fry itself cause we want silent in as small a case as we can and so no proper thermal management.... And the list goes on.
Not only that is not precisely what the US Supreme Court said, the supreme court still has you consider it as a contract of adhesion which does not have nearly the same protections as other contracts do. Please speak to a lawyer before spreading rumours.
Didn't we try to teach them with metro that having everything running as full screen Windows is bad, that sometimes we want to be able to display multiple windows side by side at once? Even Android has the ability to show two apps at once now. MS please stop trying to go backwards.
You already have the same issues in your non nationalised healthcare, there was a whole track at DEF CON this year on security in the healthcare sector, there was one by a US penetration tester who found many of these same issues. "We thought the vendor was responsible for supporting that out of date machine", but it is on your network, and have you have also not maintained any oversight of the vendor.
1) There are good technical reasons to log everything from debugging to intrusion detection. 2) The warrant wasn't for logs from the website owners but for connection logs from the server host provider.
Yes there are laws against frivolous litigation in many jurisdictions including the US:
'In a noncriminal case in a U.S. District Court, a litigant (or a litigant's attorney) who presents any pleading, written motion or other paper to the court is required, under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to certify that, to the best of the presenter's knowledge and belief, the legal contentions "are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law". Monetary civil penalties for violation of this rule may in some cases be imposed on the litigant or the attorney under Rule 11.'
I was wondering what if a lot of people who legitimately wanted get some piece of information filed freedom of information act requests all within a very short amount of time. That would be a lot of lawsuits very quickly and a lot spent on filing fees with the courts.
Finally I would point out, it is possible the Judge threw out all prior art evidence or similar, if something like that happened, I'm sure Nintendo would appeal.
Actually, I read the patent several days ago, and I like how you missed the rest of that line that specifically mentions it in regards to 2-axis accelerometer as if that makes any fucking difference to using a 3-axis accelerometer the clearly invalid patent. There is nothing novel about the patent, if we are going to say the novelty is in the data processing, then sorry to tell you software/algorithms can not be patented as per a recent Supreme court case that finally struck down that one;) the patent does cover using 3-axis accelerometer in conjunction with some form of data processing of said data this whole second point is a moot point..
Is iLife a patent troll: no they actually made a product and released it using the patent.
Is the patent valid? Well according to this judge and jury yes, according to most of us probably not. The patent covers using a 3-axis accelerometer and some sort of data processing to detect motion of a body. Well in physics a body is any cohesive group of matter that moves, for example the earth is a planetary body. The V2 missile in WW2 used 2 gyros and an accelerometer in its inertial navigation system, I wonder how many missiles since? More recently the year before filing date on the patent the Amida Simputer was commercialy released in India, a handheld Linux based computer with an accelerometer based gesture interface. Even if these were not using a 3-axis accelerometer is using a 3-axis accelerometer instead of a 1 axis of 2 axis or multiple accelerometers a novel application?
By Intel partners they mean intelligence partners;) You know, foreign intelligence agencies, private intelligence agencies, other US intelligence agencies, contractors they use to build their own door biometric authentication systems...
Yes! These damning leaks need to stop, how can we commit abuses against our own citizens otherwise. Don't worry, I'm sure the CIA only used this on foreign Intel partners in this case. We are already trying to work out who is responsible for leaking the document do we can charge them with espionage and treason.
Getting root on DJI drones seems trivial usually having SSH open with a default password, unfortunately the firmware is signed so full modification of firmware is problematic without the key, though I have an idea about that. Unfortunately I don't have a DJI drone accessible to test my theory at the moment.
I have one that adds things like a tab key so I can do things in terminals and text editors. That said I use the default Google one (gboard) on my android devices. However the iOS keyboard is terrible in comparison, especially on tablets. Being able to press and hold for numbers and special characters is great rather than switching the whole layout, and on tablet with gboard you get a row of dedicated numbers given there is room for it.
Well, you have it very cheap, here in the UK my local cinema is £9.50 for an adult ticket, which is approximately $12.35 US at today's exchange rate. Oh and the pound has been going down for the last couple of years, so £9.50 two year ago was worth a hell of a lot more at approximately $14.80 US.
And then I have a darkened room with a full sound system and a nice screen to use at home without popcorn in the carpet and others talking over it or flashing their phones.
Slashdot Mirror
Seriously, SpaceX just launched 64 on one launch, several other launched have been multiple satellites on one launch too. Pretty standard for the new iridium satellites.
It is not the Autistic people that are causing the issue. Autistic people lack social skills and tend to be looked upon as lacking empathy, this is not true but it appears that way. What they are good at is working with objective systems on objective data.
Technology as they are referring to is all computer based, computers are Mathematics engines, Mathematics engines are purely objective working on purely objective principles. Yet feminist humanities crowd keep trying to push subjective principle into STEM all of it, said principles are incompatible, or irrelevant by definition yet these idiots have been at it for years.
Here is a good video going through the core of it:
The New Lysenkoists
Sorry, but Ford can't hold you to that too. Benchmark performance data is critique and comes under fair use in the US. In places like the UK there is an equivalent exceptions to things like copyright laws to specifically allow such data distribution as it is critique for the consumer. An EULA or other contract of adhesion (where one party drafts it and has it in a take it or leave it way) can just stomp on ones consumer rights, such terms are often thrown out by the judge when they come up in a court. Ultimately no contract can be used to force someone to break the law.
In this particular case, the wording had them holding third parties to the same standard without those third parties ever agreeing to it, that is a big no no. It is more like Ford issuing a recall and providing terms when sending the parts to the dealership that third parties (the customers) using those parts can not publish gas mileage data when they get their cars back and the dealership is responsible if they do.
As for data, several including Redhat and Microsoft have published benchmarking data anyway. The big issue is the recommendation hyper-threading is disabled, new microcode or not. Depending on workload that can cause a major performance hit, or in some rare circumstances a performance boost.
Law always trumps contract. EULA is a one sided contract and therefore very limited in comparison anyway. Publishing benchmarks is a form of critique and is specifically allowed under fair use or a copyright exception in most countries, this makes the term invalid and will not be held up in any court.
Speak to your government lawyers, they wrote such laws.
That and said terms are illegal. Seriously, very illegal.
If Intel tried to enforce such a term in a court the court will throw it out.
One can not ever just write a EULA that stamps on statutory rights and force it on people. And benchmarks are covered under rights to give fair criticism meanwhile some countries also have a right to reverse engineer for compatibility reasons.
Well that is the problem, Apple has not been able to engineer its way out of a wet paper bag for some time now. It is a common problem that has existed a lot longer than just the keyboard issues. We have fuses on the back-light circuitry that do not protect the circuitry they are there to protect. We have you are holding it wrong cause they can't engineer a few traces for an antenna correctly. We have will fry itself cause we want silent in as small a case as we can and so no proper thermal management.... And the list goes on.
Open developer tools, click storage.
Not only that is not precisely what the US Supreme Court said, the supreme court still has you consider it as a contract of adhesion which does not have nearly the same protections as other contracts do. Please speak to a lawyer before spreading rumours.
Didn't we try to teach them with metro that having everything running as full screen Windows is bad, that sometimes we want to be able to display multiple windows side by side at once? Even Android has the ability to show two apps at once now. MS please stop trying to go backwards.
I haven't trusted blackberry since 2012. They already sold out back then.
Blackberry sold out to governments giving them access back in 2012
Samba 3.6 added basic support for SMB2.0. This support was essentially complete except for one big item:
durable file handles (Added in Samba 4.0.0).
Release Notes for Samba 3.6.0
August 9, 2011
So more unpatched software is what you are saying?
You already have the same issues in your non nationalised healthcare, there was a whole track at DEF CON this year on security in the healthcare sector, there was one by a US penetration tester who found many of these same issues. "We thought the vendor was responsible for supporting that out of date machine", but it is on your network, and have you have also not maintained any oversight of the vendor.
1) There are good technical reasons to log everything from debugging to intrusion detection.
2) The warrant wasn't for logs from the website owners but for connection logs from the server host provider.
Yes there are laws against frivolous litigation in many jurisdictions including the US:
'In a noncriminal case in a U.S. District Court, a litigant (or a litigant's attorney) who presents any pleading, written motion or other paper to the court is required, under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to certify that, to the best of the presenter's knowledge and belief, the legal contentions "are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law". Monetary civil penalties for violation of this rule may in some cases be imposed on the litigant or the attorney under Rule 11.'
I was wondering what if a lot of people who legitimately wanted get some piece of information filed freedom of information act requests all within a very short amount of time. That would be a lot of lawsuits very quickly and a lot spent on filing fees with the courts.
Finally I would point out, it is possible the Judge threw out all prior art evidence or similar, if something like that happened, I'm sure Nintendo would appeal.
Actually, I read the patent several days ago, and I like how you missed the rest of that line that specifically mentions it in regards to 2-axis accelerometer as if that makes any fucking difference to using a 3-axis accelerometer the clearly invalid patent. There is nothing novel about the patent, if we are going to say the novelty is in the data processing, then sorry to tell you software/algorithms can not be patented as per a recent Supreme court case that finally struck down that one ;) the patent does cover using 3-axis accelerometer in conjunction with some form of data processing of said data this whole second point is a moot point..
Is iLife a patent troll: no they actually made a product and released it using the patent.
Is the patent valid? Well according to this judge and jury yes, according to most of us probably not. The patent covers using a 3-axis accelerometer and some sort of data processing to detect motion of a body. Well in physics a body is any cohesive group of matter that moves, for example the earth is a planetary body. The V2 missile in WW2 used 2 gyros and an accelerometer in its inertial navigation system, I wonder how many missiles since? More recently the year before filing date on the patent the Amida Simputer was commercialy released in India, a handheld Linux based computer with an accelerometer based gesture interface. Even if these were not using a 3-axis accelerometer is using a 3-axis accelerometer instead of a 1 axis of 2 axis or multiple accelerometers a novel application?
By Intel partners they mean intelligence partners ;) You know, foreign intelligence agencies, private intelligence agencies, other US intelligence agencies, contractors they use to build their own door biometric authentication systems...
Yes! These damning leaks need to stop, how can we commit abuses against our own citizens otherwise. Don't worry, I'm sure the CIA only used this on foreign Intel partners in this case. We are already trying to work out who is responsible for leaking the document do we can charge them with espionage and treason.
Getting root on DJI drones seems trivial usually having SSH open with a default password, unfortunately the firmware is signed so full modification of firmware is problematic without the key, though I have an idea about that. Unfortunately I don't have a DJI drone accessible to test my theory at the moment.
So, iOS still doesn't have simple features that I have used regularly for years.
I have one that adds things like a tab key so I can do things in terminals and text editors. That said I use the default Google one (gboard) on my android devices. However the iOS keyboard is terrible in comparison, especially on tablets. Being able to press and hold for numbers and special characters is great rather than switching the whole layout, and on tablet with gboard you get a row of dedicated numbers given there is room for it.
Well, you have it very cheap, here in the UK my local cinema is £9.50 for an adult ticket, which is approximately $12.35 US at today's exchange rate. Oh and the pound has been going down for the last couple of years, so £9.50 two year ago was worth a hell of a lot more at approximately $14.80 US.
And then I have a darkened room with a full sound system and a nice screen to use at home without popcorn in the carpet and others talking over it or flashing their phones.