What really gets me is that in the story there is a little thing about the finacial costs that can be figured against the guilty party. The eye catcher is "costs to patch the system". Does this mean that the accused now has to pay MS so that a victim company can get a patch for their "Highly secure and stable" OS?
My experience seems to be a little different from the rest. I joined the Navy and became an Intel analyst. The command that I got sent to did not need an Intel guy, they needed a Solaris admin so I got the job. With no training I had to jump right in and I have been doing this job for over 19 years. I got out after being in the Navy for 9 years and have not looked back.
"The software was designed for those people, not for the 1 percent who are going to take the lock cutters and cut the lock off and steal music in an unauthorized way."
OK, Has anyone heard of 'Authorized Stealing'? Media company lingo for fair-use maybe?
Slashdot Mirror
What really gets me is that in the story there is a little thing about the finacial costs that can be figured against the guilty party. The eye catcher is "costs to patch the system". Does this mean that the accused now has to pay MS so that a victim company can get a patch for their "Highly secure and stable" OS?
My experience seems to be a little different from the rest. I joined the Navy and became an Intel analyst. The command that I got sent to did not need an Intel guy, they needed a Solaris admin so I got the job. With no training I had to jump right in and I have been doing this job for over 19 years. I got out after being in the Navy for 9 years and have not looked back.
"The software was designed for those people, not for the 1 percent who are going to take the lock cutters and cut the lock off and steal music in an unauthorized way."
OK, Has anyone heard of 'Authorized Stealing'? Media company lingo for fair-use maybe?