You are correct sir. But we can still eat raw food just fine. It does require a great deal less laziness and much more effort.
Also see my other discussions about cats+food+human-analogs. No we were not cats, yes, it does matter and makes a difference. Particularly for some. Cats show how it can make a difference.
Humans are not cats, but there is an analog. The abstract is "diet is more complex then b12 and the food pyramid" its not something you can easily explain. I like Pottenger's Cat study because it shows that there is an effect, that is not obvious that someone, discovered as far as the cats+food goes. I think it has a lesser analog to human diet. My next paragraph will explain some.
There is allot of further research that raw food is healthy, much better then Pottenger's cat study. People with access to varied diets, that include raw foods, are in my humble opinion most likely way healthier then people who eat food consisting entirely of SYSCO products. 90 yr old Eskimo women, yet they die at 40 from heart disease in suburbia. That kind of thing. Every individual is different to. Some people need vastly different diets then others to be happy and healthy and not dieing a horrible industrialized death sentence.
Of course there's exceptions on both ends of the statistical curve were people die from completely uncorrelated issues and illnesses not caused by their diet. But were talking about a normalization and generalization. I trust my intuition pretty good on this one.
Try and explain the missing enzymes there to the first 100 results on google, its not a fad. Its scientific fact that humans can eat raw-anything.
My personal favorite is salmon and if I could eat copious amounts of that on a daily basis cheaply I would cream my pants and love life. (a little over dramatic, but you get the abstract point I hope).
And uncooked, fruits and vegetables are generally healthier. Hence people who juice to get more nutrition from them, rather then boiling them and canning them.
I will not argue that we cant feed more people with canned, processed, and cheaply produced food. Thats a pro of the way we do it now. But it does not necessarily provide an increase in an individuals quality of life.
Uma Thurman does. She also looks like a creepy skeleton in my opinion.
Its incredibly hard to eat raw meat safely in an industrialized society. But raw meat is digestible and perfectly safe. Fresh killed poultry that is free roaming and well taken care of, is more or less safe. We at some time in the 1900's have started overcooking foods and running pig slaughter mills that have infested our food chain with crap.
Also there's fermented fish that is un-cooked that has been left to rot, its a rare cuisine.
You think you can fool this insane luddite with your scientific doublespeak? Its a shame people write so many papers that end in a "Maybe, with so many percents of probability".
The paper says there's crap in the food. Most smart people understand this is not necessarily going to kill you.
But there's still crap in the food. Even if the next step in the scientific process hasn't been taken yet to determine what probability it has of killing you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_M._Pottenger,_Jr.#Meat_study While I agree that cats are not humans and the effects don't scale neccissarily because we've gone through some natural selection process with cooked foods. I think there is a lesser negative effect. The more bad shit we eat the more potentially bad end results. Industrializing the world has increased the population, but its created a proportional effect of suffering and death and B.S.
I'm not going to tell you to get back to nature and live like predator from the aliens movies. But I am going to laugh my ass off while you and your descendants get cancer infested, sterile, and retarded and enslaved by Monsanto.
Smart Luddites know slightly better and try not to consist on a diet consisting entirely of GMO produced corn chips. There's a reason for the story. You can't stop progress, but it can be tempered with some intelligent, intuitive, common sense.
-your quaint/. luddite, at least since 2000 I know there's probably a few older ones out there.
Fact: Feeding cooked food to cats causes disease and sterility after generations, proven during the mid 1900's. Cats fed raw fresh food were healthier over more generations. Fact: Eating raw and unprocessed foods is healthy. Fact: Nature has achieved balance over the course of millions of years, a fine tuned perfected balance. Fact: White man has way to much fucking hubris to think they can outsmart the universe all in one go, in one century. Fact: Humans invented greed, poverty, and in-balance of power, in nature, and in their culture. Fact: Monsanto doesn't care about feeding anyone. They do care, and have a fiduciary responsibility to control over the market. Fact: Science is imperfect and can be fallible, it has been fooled in the past. Its only as good as our scientists are. We are far from a thorough, well thought, slow moving race. Particularly when employed for the big bucks. Fact: Science only provides a limited model of what we understand about the universe. Fact: You motherfuckers are retarded as shit, insane, and suck for believing this shit can only end in a good, charitable, humanitarian, philanthropic way.
More facts, I'm in a trollin (not really, epic trolls require more subtley and finess), flamewarrioring mood. Sometimes polite discourse isn't as effective and fun as being an ass. You won't be able to convince me, a reasonably well educated middle aged white boy that GMO is perfectly safe. Because I know better. But I wan't you to know that I thoroughly disapprove of the god-damn bullshit arguments I see that say GMO perfectly is safe. Thats like attributing safety to the scientific method. It has no morals or ethical concern about safety. Its a process. Mr. Wizard does not give a shit about little Timmy.
This is Kim spinning his own side of the battle. I think it covers your interview. And he has done no more or no less really then youtube, and people like youporn or redtube have.
Most of the conspiracies out there blame Clinton and prior administration for allot of the original corruption, just W for legitimizing it with the war on terror.
Well they have not shut down any emulator for Everquest (SOE), and they were fairly decent about letting people install Linux on PS3's. I don't have a money trail to follow to see how much they have lobbied for as for draconian protection for their business model. I think Disney and some of the major US TV networks may be worse in the long run or overall terms. Could the rootkit be construed as a direct violation of internet cracking laws, yeah.
I honestly don't know, I would need to do some serious research to find out how evil Sony is compared to some of the others.
I am sorry. I lived staunchly in keep it simple stupid land. But I can see your point. In my defense I never looked at it from your perspective. Look at Adobe's updater software which gets installed alongside their pdf viewer which would automatically install McAffee unless you unchecked it. This actually required software to be installed to view pdf's. But experiences like that make users suspicious of anything that has been done via-web based java in the past and now all of a sudden requires MSI installation.
Slashdot Mirror
You are correct sir. But we can still eat raw food just fine. It does require a great deal less laziness and much more effort.
Also see my other discussions about cats+food+human-analogs. No we were not cats, yes, it does matter and makes a difference. Particularly for some. Cats show how it can make a difference.
Humans are not cats, but there is an analog. The abstract is "diet is more complex then b12 and the food pyramid" its not something you can easily explain. I like Pottenger's Cat study because it shows that there is an effect, that is not obvious that someone, discovered as far as the cats+food goes. I think it has a lesser analog to human diet. My next paragraph will explain some.
There is allot of further research that raw food is healthy, much better then Pottenger's cat study. People with access to varied diets, that include raw foods, are in my humble opinion most likely way healthier then people who eat food consisting entirely of SYSCO products. 90 yr old Eskimo women, yet they die at 40 from heart disease in suburbia. That kind of thing. Every individual is different to. Some people need vastly different diets then others to be happy and healthy and not dieing a horrible industrialized death sentence.
Of course there's exceptions on both ends of the statistical curve were people die from completely uncorrelated issues and illnesses not caused by their diet. But were talking about a normalization and generalization. I trust my intuition pretty good on this one.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=raw+food+diet
Try and explain the missing enzymes there to the first 100 results on google, its not a fad. Its scientific fact that humans can eat raw-anything.
My personal favorite is salmon and if I could eat copious amounts of that on a daily basis cheaply I would cream my pants and love life. (a little over dramatic, but you get the abstract point I hope).
Holy crap Freudian typing frenzy tonight.. *cloud=proud
6/10, above average, god its nice when you can just barely make it to the finish line eh?
Mr. Wizard does not give a shit about little Timmy.
I was particularly cloud about this witty cultural reference. Oh well. Thanks for the rating.
And uncooked, fruits and vegetables are generally healthier. Hence people who juice to get more nutrition from them, rather then boiling them and canning them.
I will not argue that we cant feed more people with canned, processed, and cheaply produced food. Thats a pro of the way we do it now. But it does not necessarily provide an increase in an individuals quality of life.
Uma Thurman does. She also looks like a creepy skeleton in my opinion.
Its incredibly hard to eat raw meat safely in an industrialized society. But raw meat is digestible and perfectly safe. Fresh killed poultry that is free roaming and well taken care of, is more or less safe. We at some time in the 1900's have started overcooking foods and running pig slaughter mills that have infested our food chain with crap.
Also there's fermented fish that is un-cooked that has been left to rot, its a rare cuisine.
And sushi.
You think you can fool this insane luddite with your scientific doublespeak? Its a shame people write so many papers that end in a "Maybe, with so many percents of probability".
The paper says there's crap in the food. Most smart people understand this is not necessarily going to kill you.
But there's still crap in the food. Even if the next step in the scientific process hasn't been taken yet to determine what probability it has of killing you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_M._Pottenger,_Jr.#Meat_study
While I agree that cats are not humans and the effects don't scale neccissarily because we've gone through some natural selection process with cooked foods. I think there is a lesser negative effect. The more bad shit we eat the more potentially bad end results. Industrializing the world has increased the population, but its created a proportional effect of suffering and death and B.S.
I'm not going to tell you to get back to nature and live like predator from the aliens movies. But I am going to laugh my ass off while you and your descendants get cancer infested, sterile, and retarded and enslaved by Monsanto.
Smart Luddites know slightly better and try not to consist on a diet consisting entirely of GMO produced corn chips. There's a reason for the story. You can't stop progress, but it can be tempered with some intelligent, intuitive, common sense.
-your quaint /. luddite, at least since 2000 I know there's probably a few older ones out there.
And please I know I have many more grammatical errors. - Much love your famous annoyed internet troll.
*replace in-balance with imbalance.
Fact: Feeding cooked food to cats causes disease and sterility after generations, proven during the mid 1900's. Cats fed raw fresh food were healthier over more generations.
Fact: Eating raw and unprocessed foods is healthy.
Fact: Nature has achieved balance over the course of millions of years, a fine tuned perfected balance.
Fact: White man has way to much fucking hubris to think they can outsmart the universe all in one go, in one century.
Fact: Humans invented greed, poverty, and in-balance of power, in nature, and in their culture.
Fact: Monsanto doesn't care about feeding anyone. They do care, and have a fiduciary responsibility to control over the market.
Fact: Science is imperfect and can be fallible, it has been fooled in the past. Its only as good as our scientists are. We are far from a thorough, well thought, slow moving race. Particularly when employed for the big bucks.
Fact: Science only provides a limited model of what we understand about the universe.
Fact: You motherfuckers are retarded as shit, insane, and suck for believing this shit can only end in a good, charitable, humanitarian, philanthropic way.
More facts, I'm in a trollin (not really, epic trolls require more subtley and finess), flamewarrioring mood. Sometimes polite discourse isn't as effective and fun as being an ass. You won't be able to convince me, a reasonably well educated middle aged white boy that GMO is perfectly safe. Because I know better. But I wan't you to know that I thoroughly disapprove of the god-damn bullshit arguments I see that say GMO perfectly is safe. Thats like attributing safety to the scientific method. It has no morals or ethical concern about safety. Its a process. Mr. Wizard does not give a shit about little Timmy.
Suck it you Monsanto loving Nazi bitches. FUCK YOU.
Yes, ban this pseudonym for speaking the truth and rubbing it in your fucking faces.
-Q'plah my fellow luddites.
The Hindu's beat you to it, see Hanuman.
And this may be one of the first cases for the Great Firewall of the USA to go up.
Speedy object goes in, speedy object comes out. -G.L.A.D.O.S.
Where did you learn science?
His problem is he is not syndicated. He picked the wrong last name.
This is Kim spinning his own side of the battle. I think it covers your interview. And he has done no more or no less really then youtube, and people like youporn or redtube have.
http://www.3news.co.nz/Kim-Dotcoms-first-TV-interview-Im-no-piracy-king/tabid/367/articleID/244830/Default.aspx
Most of the conspiracies out there blame Clinton and prior administration for allot of the original corruption, just W for legitimizing it with the war on terror.
You will get no argument from me. I'm just not sure I would class them as #1.
Corretion, BDSM
Opus Dei BSDM erotica fetish.
Simply put, they may be like the Sauroman, rather then the Sauron of the evil guys.
Well they have not shut down any emulator for Everquest (SOE), and they were fairly decent about letting people install Linux on PS3's. I don't have a money trail to follow to see how much they have lobbied for as for draconian protection for their business model. I think Disney and some of the major US TV networks may be worse in the long run or overall terms. Could the rootkit be construed as a direct violation of internet cracking laws, yeah.
I honestly don't know, I would need to do some serious research to find out how evil Sony is compared to some of the others.
I am sorry. I lived staunchly in keep it simple stupid land. But I can see your point. In my defense I never looked at it from your perspective. Look at Adobe's updater software which gets installed alongside their pdf viewer which would automatically install McAffee unless you unchecked it. This actually required software to be installed to view pdf's. But experiences like that make users suspicious of anything that has been done via-web based java in the past and now all of a sudden requires MSI installation.
At the Vatican!