I have one computer with discrete graphics, I don't upgrade often. My last card I think ended up going to a local computer recycler. I might have been able to get $30 for it, but I was employed then and didn't want the hassle. Also I purged my inventory of excess equipment when I moved last.
Speaking as someone who primarily uses his computer for gaming, I actually like having the IGP around, that way if my graphics card takes a dump my computer is still viable until I can get a replacement. Also at this point there's not a lot of consumer-level tasks that would benefit much from having 8 cores. Lastly Intel DOES have enthusiast level parts with 6 cores and no IGP.
Problem is that the parent will be blamed for the security failure if it happens. At best he'll have to clean it up, at worst he'll be hung out to dry.
Drones are probably made out of slightly tougher stuff than birds, and as time progresses will likely get larger and tougher. Amazon delivery drones could have significant mass.
I don't agree. A pure research/engineering company that produces ideas and sells them with no intent on actually putting them into production THEMSELVES isn't a bad thing. As long as they are actually, you know, producing rather than just buying unenforced patents and suing people.
76% of the enthusiast market maybe. I'd bet that Intel and AMD have a much larger share of the regular market though. Posted from a laptop with Intel HD graphics.
It's totally fair. The line workers are representing the employer to the customers. The people at the main office aren't. There's literally no reason for them to be held to the same dress code as the line workers.
If it was freely available I'd use public transit more often, but still not terribly often. Portland is just too spread out and public transit takes too long to get places.
Actually I'm not a single issue voter, if I could trade my guns for universal health care I'd do it in a heartbeat. I'm probably voting for Bernie and I don't even know what his stance on guns is because it's not THAT important.
The government has failed to restrict guns, that doesn't mean they don't want to, it just means that the 2nd Amendment is too clear to be overturned as easily as they would like.
The government wants to keep easily made guns out of our hands because they want to know who ha the guns. That's what a lot of proposed legislation is about, forcing us to tell the government exactly who has what.
Wrong. The JUSTIFICATION is the "exporting", they don't actually give any shits if Abdul in Pakistan makes a Liberator, the goal is to prevent US citizens from 3d printing guns, but the only currently legal way to achieve that goal is the export argument.
Slashdot Mirror
I have one computer with discrete graphics, I don't upgrade often. My last card I think ended up going to a local computer recycler. I might have been able to get $30 for it, but I was employed then and didn't want the hassle. Also I purged my inventory of excess equipment when I moved last.
Speaking as someone who primarily uses his computer for gaming, I actually like having the IGP around, that way if my graphics card takes a dump my computer is still viable until I can get a replacement. Also at this point there's not a lot of consumer-level tasks that would benefit much from having 8 cores. Lastly Intel DOES have enthusiast level parts with 6 cores and no IGP.
Problem is that the parent will be blamed for the security failure if it happens. At best he'll have to clean it up, at worst he'll be hung out to dry.
They are sticking with 10 forever, like Apple.
I'd bet money it still saves time in the long run even when you count mistypes.
Precisely. There's almost no reason to dig around in nested menus when you can just tap a couple keys.
Actually you can probably open a program with the search function faster than you can use a shortcut. Unless you're a true hunt-and-peck.
Speed. You can dig through the start menu or tap the first two letters of the program's name.
Because it's better to use the search functions than the start menu. Also, in this context "Start Menu" probably includes the start screen of 8.
Drones are probably made out of slightly tougher stuff than birds, and as time progresses will likely get larger and tougher. Amazon delivery drones could have significant mass.
Or laundered through overseas bank accounts until it can't be traced anymore.
I don't agree. A pure research/engineering company that produces ideas and sells them with no intent on actually putting them into production THEMSELVES isn't a bad thing. As long as they are actually, you know, producing rather than just buying unenforced patents and suing people.
Yep. Zimmerman, soon Bland. When the answer isn't what they want they'll just scream that it's rigged and never accept any argument against it.
76% of the enthusiast market maybe. I'd bet that Intel and AMD have a much larger share of the regular market though. Posted from a laptop with Intel HD graphics.
The last one is the only one I've ever heard of, though the third one makes sense.
Yeah you've worked in the military too much.
The clothes that are sold at Fred Meyer, but you never buy because they're more expensive and less comfortable/useful.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround...
It's totally fair. The line workers are representing the employer to the customers. The people at the main office aren't. There's literally no reason for them to be held to the same dress code as the line workers.
Birds are also usually smart enough to get out of the way when a helicopter is approaching, or a fire is raging for that matter.
Hmmmmm... The Army is dropping all their Kiowas, maybe they can let them go to the fire departments for a steal.
I wish I had all the points to give you.
If it was freely available I'd use public transit more often, but still not terribly often. Portland is just too spread out and public transit takes too long to get places.
Actually I'm not a single issue voter, if I could trade my guns for universal health care I'd do it in a heartbeat. I'm probably voting for Bernie and I don't even know what his stance on guns is because it's not THAT important.
The government has failed to restrict guns, that doesn't mean they don't want to, it just means that the 2nd Amendment is too clear to be overturned as easily as they would like.
The government wants to keep easily made guns out of our hands because they want to know who ha the guns. That's what a lot of proposed legislation is about, forcing us to tell the government exactly who has what.
Wrong. The JUSTIFICATION is the "exporting", they don't actually give any shits if Abdul in Pakistan makes a Liberator, the goal is to prevent US citizens from 3d printing guns, but the only currently legal way to achieve that goal is the export argument.