Although to be frank, they are already being labelled "sore losers" despite conceding the election and explicitly instructing their supporters to accept the results, so I doubt it would make any difference in how they are perceived.
I personally believe that Clinton accepted the results with grace and dignity and the Democratic POLITICIANS have been pretty reasonable throughout. Their supporters on the other hand have been complete shitheels. For the record I say this as someone who's voted blue through all their presidential races so far, until this one.
Indeed. The best part is that after the people on my FB feed cooled down on shrieking that everyone that voted for Trump was racist they segued into "OK, maybe you're not racist, but you voted for racism." The obvious implication being that that's just as bad.
Clinton even barely beat Romney, and she was going against Trump. It should have been a complete blowout, and would have been with pretty much any other Democratic candidate.
Yeah, I do it too sometimes, but occasionally I'll catch myself and make an effort to look at conflicting information. People don't want to think, they just want to have information spoon fed to them.
It's not entirely fair to put that solely on her. The Left in general has become so hyper-focused on "social justice" that she didn't really even need to play the card, it was played for her, and she would have had to be stupid not to try and use it to her advantage.
Yep. I'm a liberal and I could see over and over the media distorting his statements. Still a terrible candidate mind you, and I voted Johnson in the end, but Trump wasn't nearly as bad as he was being portrayed.
Indeed. And it's one of the reasons I can't support the libertarian ideology wholesale despite liking parts of it. We're rapidly approaching a period where employing everyone will be difficult or impossible.
Perhaps Marx (I think) was right and capitalism will inevitably lead to Communism, it's just the countries that tried to make the switch did so too early.
On the other hand most developed nations are looking at a DECREASE in native population. The growth in population is largely driven by developing countries. Once they reach their peak we will likely be looking at a general decline of population across the globe.
Clinton didn't lose because she's a woman, she lost because she was an astoundingly weak candidate for a number of reasons. She should never have been nominated, the DNC should have recognized what the Republicans were doing for the last 8 years, pulled her aside and quietly offered her a nice posting to fuck off for the election.
The solution is obviously government regulation paying women to play chess and artificially punishing men for doing so until it's 60-40 in women's favor. It's the only way to be fair.
Actually that's a lie spread by both sides. It's just far more prominent on the right. On the left it usually manifests as "My feeling are more important than your facts."
...up for replacement soon. It's not just the manual laborers that are on the chopping block. We need to be preparing for a world where there is literally not enough work to go around.
A lot of them put you name and photo in prominent places on search results then blackmail you if you want it removed. Essentially the idea is that if a potential employer searches for your name they'll get a mugshot unless you pay exorbitant amounts of money.
Slashdot Mirror
Although to be frank, they are already being labelled "sore losers" despite conceding the election and explicitly instructing their supporters to accept the results, so I doubt it would make any difference in how they are perceived.
I personally believe that Clinton accepted the results with grace and dignity and the Democratic POLITICIANS have been pretty reasonable throughout. Their supporters on the other hand have been complete shitheels. For the record I say this as someone who's voted blue through all their presidential races so far, until this one.
Indeed. The best part is that after the people on my FB feed cooled down on shrieking that everyone that voted for Trump was racist they segued into "OK, maybe you're not racist, but you voted for racism." The obvious implication being that that's just as bad.
Clinton even barely beat Romney, and she was going against Trump. It should have been a complete blowout, and would have been with pretty much any other Democratic candidate.
Yeah, I do it too sometimes, but occasionally I'll catch myself and make an effort to look at conflicting information. People don't want to think, they just want to have information spoon fed to them.
It's not entirely fair to put that solely on her. The Left in general has become so hyper-focused on "social justice" that she didn't really even need to play the card, it was played for her, and she would have had to be stupid not to try and use it to her advantage.
Yep. I'm a liberal and I could see over and over the media distorting his statements. Still a terrible candidate mind you, and I voted Johnson in the end, but Trump wasn't nearly as bad as he was being portrayed.
The WORLD does not need more of it.
Most people don't. Most people find single opinion and then only look at things that back that opinion up.
Why do you think that most governments are so obsessed with gun control?
Indeed. And it's one of the reasons I can't support the libertarian ideology wholesale despite liking parts of it. We're rapidly approaching a period where employing everyone will be difficult or impossible.
Perhaps Marx (I think) was right and capitalism will inevitably lead to Communism, it's just the countries that tried to make the switch did so too early.
On the other hand most developed nations are looking at a DECREASE in native population. The growth in population is largely driven by developing countries. Once they reach their peak we will likely be looking at a general decline of population across the globe.
It's why I've left the Left. I'm still mostly liberal (come at me bros) but I no longer stand with Democrats.
Clinton didn't lose because she's a woman, she lost because she was an astoundingly weak candidate for a number of reasons. She should never have been nominated, the DNC should have recognized what the Republicans were doing for the last 8 years, pulled her aside and quietly offered her a nice posting to fuck off for the election.
They didn't, so now we have Trump.
The solution is obviously government regulation paying women to play chess and artificially punishing men for doing so until it's 60-40 in women's favor. It's the only way to be fair.
Actually that's a lie spread by both sides. It's just far more prominent on the right. On the left it usually manifests as "My feeling are more important than your facts."
Really, is everyone here nuts?
Welcome to 2016.
They believe they have the moral high ground. Righteous indignation is a hell of a drug.
Yep. Nothing to see here, move along.
Though to be fair that's the total cost, and they built a hell of a lot more B-29s. I wonder where the Essex class carriers fall on that list...
...up for replacement soon. It's not just the manual laborers that are on the chopping block. We need to be preparing for a world where there is literally not enough work to go around.
You're implying that I haven't already downloaded a car. I've downloaded hundreds of cars.
...when I can 3D print an entire plane for myself.
A lot of them put you name and photo in prominent places on search results then blackmail you if you want it removed. Essentially the idea is that if a potential employer searches for your name they'll get a mugshot unless you pay exorbitant amounts of money.
I believe we do. I read a thing recently about how those places operate.
Well with Gawker dying SOMEONE has to pick up the slack!