Except carriers typically subsidize a phone, so selling you a phone costs them money. They'd be much happier if you just keep using your old phone or buy second-hand phones.
That law is stupid, though. A browser could easily implement the same by asking you at every new domain it encounters. It would even get rid of 3rd party cookies from ad companies, which the EU law would not stop. The reason no browser is set up like that is that people don't want to be asked, just like always when it comes to security or technical questions.
Fine the operator, but make the fine transferable to the next operator in line.
If you get a robocall, your operator is fined. Your operator gets your phone number and the exact time of the call, so they can see which of their operators / peers the call came from. The fine gets passed further in the system until some operator loses track or the culprit is found.
You could do this without canceling orders, although a bit less optimal and with some risk: Just place low amount buy orders (buy one stock at 24.98, one at 24.96, 24.94 etc until you learned the lowest price. Other algorithms may increase profits).
And I feel like someone should be free to stand up their own e-mail server and have complete freedom from ads at some expense to themselves and some work if they so desire.
You can have freedom from ads. Gmail is not sending ads to non-users.
If I made a deal with some ad-seller that I'd forward all my mail to him, and he'd send me back some ads, how would you conclude that the ad-seller infringed? Shouldn't you be mad at me, not the ad-seller?
Yes, receiving bitcoins reveals nothing about you whatsoever. But when you transfer bitcoin to another account, your IP is recorded. And all transfers are public. That means that if you use your freshly extorted bitcoin to buy stuff on Amazon (assuming they accepted it), you are traceable. You could shuffle your bitcoins around a bit on your various accounts and spend only a bit at a time, but that in itself devalues your money.
No. Bitcoin accounts are a created on your local computer; a normal desktop can create ~100k/sec. They consist of a public and a private part, like async crypto. You use the public part to transfer funds to the account, and the private part to transfer funds from it.
Why can't it scale? There are about 10T microBTC in existence. And having a lot of money ending up in a pyramid scheme is hardly the fault of the currency.
the CRC is not just a bit more complex to generate, it forces you to read the entire file. Reading 5 TB data takes quite a lot more time than reading a filesystem with 4M files. So yes, delay the CRC, play with filesizes first.
"Not shitty" is entirely up to the programmer. You bitch and bitch, but you provide no reason. Where does "the UI" fall short? Why is WORE not working?
Slashdot Mirror
The reason for using a machine is to help blind and illiterate people.
Except carriers typically subsidize a phone, so selling you a phone costs them money. They'd be much happier if you just keep using your old phone or buy second-hand phones.
That law is stupid, though. A browser could easily implement the same by asking you at every new domain it encounters. It would even get rid of 3rd party cookies from ad companies, which the EU law would not stop.
The reason no browser is set up like that is that people don't want to be asked, just like always when it comes to security or technical questions.
So you've just switched in preparation for something you think will happen?
Fine the operator, but make the fine transferable to the next operator in line.
If you get a robocall, your operator is fined. Your operator gets your phone number and the exact time of the call, so they can see which of their operators / peers the call came from. The fine gets passed further in the system until some operator loses track or the culprit is found.
The shipper normally takes quite an extra fee. Last time I tried, the duty was $10 and the extra shipping fee was $30
You could do this without canceling orders, although a bit less optimal and with some risk:
Just place low amount buy orders (buy one stock at 24.98, one at 24.96, 24.94 etc until you learned the lowest price. Other algorithms may increase profits).
And I feel like someone should be free to stand up their own e-mail server and have complete freedom from ads at some expense to themselves and some work if they so desire.
You can have freedom from ads. Gmail is not sending ads to non-users.
If I made a deal with some ad-seller that I'd forward all my mail to him, and he'd send me back some ads, how would you conclude that the ad-seller infringed? Shouldn't you be mad at me, not the ad-seller?
It still works somehow.
In case SHA3 is broken: whatever, we'll make a new one.
In case SHA2 is broken: whatever, we have SHA3.
It makes it somewhat more impressive when the vulnerabilities of SHA-2 are not known yet.
Well, there's encryption egg sausage and encryption, that's not got much encryption in it.
No distance is safe.
How about png? All modern OSes has png support, right?
Because compression artifacts look terrible on most CGI
Also, whoever decided that screenshots should be saved as jpeg by default (assuming it is default) should be fired.
I can't see any reason that the share of trusted people in a population should change with population.
Well it's not really the problem with going anon, it's the problem with getting your traceable money from crime.
Thanks for the clarification. I figured it would happen like that, but my google-fu was too weak.
Yes, receiving bitcoins reveals nothing about you whatsoever. But when you transfer bitcoin to another account, your IP is recorded. And all transfers are public.
That means that if you use your freshly extorted bitcoin to buy stuff on Amazon (assuming they accepted it), you are traceable.
You could shuffle your bitcoins around a bit on your various accounts and spend only a bit at a time, but that in itself devalues your money.
No. Bitcoin accounts are a created on your local computer; a normal desktop can create ~100k/sec. They consist of a public and a private part, like async crypto. You use the public part to transfer funds to the account, and the private part to transfer funds from it.
Why can't it scale? There are about 10T microBTC in existence.
And having a lot of money ending up in a pyramid scheme is hardly the fault of the currency.
Ew, that Cnet article reads like a gossip magazine, or a script from Glenn Beck. Isn't there anything more... credible?
the CRC is not just a bit more complex to generate, it forces you to read the entire file. Reading 5 TB data takes quite a lot more time than reading a filesystem with 4M files. So yes, delay the CRC, play with filesizes first.
On Android, you just fast-switch back to the browser app, which displays the same as when you left it.
"Not shitty" is entirely up to the programmer. You bitch and bitch, but you provide no reason. Where does "the UI" fall short? Why is WORE not working?