A computer driving worse than me is already available for the past 50 years. A computer driving better than me in difficult conditions has yet to prove itself in the wild for a million miles.
In the future, one can decide on the basis of available evidence.
Why should taking the sane and safe action of lettting a computer drive
If the "modest proposal" is accepted, would you still call lettting[sic] a computer drive a sane and safe action ? Or are you imagining this "modest proposal" will be accepted after someone decides to travel in a computer driven car without giving them an option to disembark ?
OK, Apple guys, if you are reading this, the fake Tim Cook guy is a dedicated shill. Please don't fire him. In this instance he has admitted his illiteracy and hence, nullified the Apple narrative : but I am sure the best of shills have their off days - especially when faced with a formidable logician like me. Give him a chance : he is still effective in brainwashing idiots.
Thanks for proving your mental retardation. It could be blown away by the wind, burnt up due to chemical processes, repelled by electric forces. To say nothing about the vagueness of the word "fallen".
Though, if your corporate masters want you to not admit that it is not "fallen", you might make some other irrelevant statement like this rather than address the actual issue.
No, it is not "obviously". Obviously : the number of failures when there are connectors , is more than or equal to the number of failures when there are no connectors.
Nothing to take away from your original point, but giving a google.../amp/... link for an arstechnica article is not much farther from Stockholm Syndrome, don't you think ?
do you REALLY want to be treated to a nice, fat KERNEL PANIC screen because your RAM or SSD socket glitched when someone bumped the table your laptop was sitting on
Does that happen for well-made laptops with un-soldered RAM or SSD ? Prove it.
OK, you need things more clearly spelt out. The scenario also told about technical reality in addition to the Act . Specifically, do you agree this is wrong:
You get a non-Apple keyboard to try to fix the damage you caused. The keyboard works fine. You're happy.
? FYI , "Keyboard works fine" is written n nowhere in the Act.
Vague words like decent, good, brilliant, "sucks", etc. need to be defined specifically for every context. Clearly you never understood the dynamics of conversing with non idiots.
Your assumption about scenario C is no more valid after this story. At least for the components on which this software lock applies, it is no more true:
The keyboard works fine. You're happy
None of these scenarios directly cover what you said earlier:
people who wrote that might wish that they had written "also, you can't arrange for the product to stop working when unauthorized parts are installed",
In all your scenarios - if you replaced the keyboard and it stopped working in non-keyboardey ways : Apple has to make it work again. Now whether you replaced the keyboard because it broke due to your mistake, or you simply like some other keyboard on your laptop.
If you replaced the keyboard and it stops working due to the keyboard being bad / incompatible with your laptop - Apple does not have to fix it. But nobody said that they have to, and that is not relevant here. Just stated for completeness.
When stating things without meaning, you could at least have been technically correct.
Everyone --- obviously except you --- calls SUSE or UBUNTU simply Linux.
Their mistake can be overlooked if their statement have something else of meaning. It remains a mistake, but not worth pointing out in deference to the real points they are making.
So: neither the kernel nor any distribution comes in my eyes with a decent eMail client...
"decent" as yet undefined. So no content yet in your statements.
Since you didn't even define "decent", your statement actually was without content. Non-falsifiable - so to speak. Even in that without content statement, you managed to make a mistake.
Or since when does Windows, BSD, MacOS/OS X come as a kernel alone?
A kernel coming alone is not necessary for the kernel having an application for reading emails.
If warranty applies, Apple has to fix this custom-repaired laptop that is not working due to this software lock, for free. At least during the explicit / implied warranty period.
So warranty applies is essentially the same as product can not stop working, right ?
Slashdot Mirror
You know the good ideas ? Let's see how many billion devices run the operating system based on your policies.
If being the only one in harm's way is a safe and sane idea for you, why are you making plans where everyone lives ? That would be insane !
A computer driving worse than me is already available for the past 50 years. A computer driving better than me in difficult conditions has yet to prove itself in the wild for a million miles.
In the future, one can decide on the basis of available evidence.
Why should taking the sane and safe action of lettting a computer drive
If the "modest proposal" is accepted, would you still call lettting[sic] a computer drive a sane and safe action ? Or are you imagining this "modest proposal" will be accepted after someone decides to travel in a computer driven car without giving them an option to disembark ?
OK, Apple guys, if you are reading this, the fake Tim Cook guy is a dedicated shill. Please don't fire him. In this instance he has admitted his illiteracy and hence, nullified the Apple narrative : but I am sure the best of shills have their off days - especially when faced with a formidable logician like me. Give him a chance : he is still effective in brainwashing idiots.
Yes, as you demonstrate here, wrong understanding is certainly possible without looking.
So you don't understand the difference between "more than " and "more than or equal to" ?
Looking is a prerequisite for understanding. More often than you might want.
Thanks for proving your mental retardation. It could be blown away by the wind, burnt up due to chemical processes, repelled by electric forces. To say nothing about the vagueness of the word "fallen".
Though, if your corporate masters want you to not admit that it is not "fallen", you might make some other irrelevant statement like this rather than address the actual issue.
You clearly did not understand anything here.
Why do you ask others to "prove it" then ?
https://slashdot.org/comments....
No, it is not "obviously". Obviously : the number of failures when there are connectors , is more than or equal to the number of failures when there are no connectors.
No, it has around 3000 : https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=n...
Nothing to take away from your original point, but giving a google.../amp/... link for an arstechnica article is not much farther from Stockholm Syndrome, don't you think ?
do you REALLY want to be treated to a nice, fat KERNEL PANIC screen because your RAM or SSD socket glitched when someone bumped the table your laptop was sitting on
Does that happen for well-made laptops with un-soldered RAM or SSD ?
Prove it.
"Keyboard works fine" is from scenario C. Which is what I quoted. The voices in your head are misleading you.
OK, you need things more clearly spelt out. The scenario also told about technical reality in addition to the Act . Specifically, do you agree this is wrong :
You get a non-Apple keyboard to try to fix the damage you caused. The keyboard works fine. You're happy.
?
FYI , "Keyboard works fine" is written n nowhere in the Act.
OK, one by one. Do you agree with my statement :
Your assumption about scenario C is no more valid after this story
?
Vague words like decent, good, brilliant, "sucks", etc. need to be defined specifically for every context. Clearly you never understood the dynamics of conversing with non idiots.
Your assumption about scenario C is no more valid after this story. At least for the components on which this software lock applies, it is no more true :
The keyboard works fine. You're happy
None of these scenarios directly cover what you said earlier :
people who wrote that might wish that they had written "also, you can't arrange for the product to stop working when unauthorized parts are installed",
In all your scenarios - if you replaced the keyboard and it stopped working in non-keyboardey ways : Apple has to make it work again. Now whether you replaced the keyboard because it broke due to your mistake, or you simply like some other keyboard on your laptop.
If you replaced the keyboard and it stops working due to the keyboard being bad / incompatible with your laptop - Apple does not have to fix it. But nobody said that they have to, and that is not relevant here. Just stated for completeness.
I did not make a mistake.
When stating things without meaning, you could at least have been technically correct.
Everyone --- obviously except you --- calls SUSE or UBUNTU simply Linux.
Their mistake can be overlooked if their statement have something else of meaning. It remains a mistake, but not worth pointing out in deference to the real points they are making.
So: neither the kernel nor any distribution comes in my eyes with a decent eMail client ...
"decent" as yet undefined. So no content yet in your statements.
OK, that's good news. I remember a time when Google was sitting on its patches - probably for lack of time to make them ready for mainlining.
Since you didn't even define "decent", your statement actually was without content. Non-falsifiable - so to speak. Even in that without content statement, you managed to make a mistake.
Or since when does Windows, BSD, MacOS/OS X come as a kernel alone?
A kernel coming alone is not necessary for the kernel having an application for reading emails.
The original point is this : https://slashdot.org/comments....
It is not only lost on you, you seem to never have found it. The whole idea of UI is irrelevant here. Which is why I explained "going with" Linux.
If warranty applies, Apple has to fix this custom-repaired laptop that is not working due to this software lock, for free. At least during the explicit / implied warranty period.
So warranty applies is essentially the same as product can not stop working, right ?
Which kernel has a decent application for reading emails ?