His comment doesn't imply that all the analysis needs to happen in the next 10ms, just that the useful data needs to be pulled. It's quite common for a scientific test to generate a lot of data, only a small fraction of which is useful.
Consider it 10ms to distill the Gigabyte into the useful 100MB that (you hope) may mean something in a few years.
The whole thing just needs to rest for a while (as was pointed out by one of the preceeding posts).
I more or less grew up during the middle of The Original Series. I think I've still missed a few episodes but they were really tackling current events issues (not that I knew it then). Roddenberry really put himself out on a very long, and very thin branch to produce this series, and it paid off too. Although it's a little dated it's still good stuff.
Next Generation was basically a knock-off, but after 15+ years it was a welcome one. There was a good infusion of neat(tm) ideas that worked pretty well.
The differing perspective of DS9 was good, but no one wants to watch 3+ years (or so it seemed) of War. Terry Farrell must have thought so.
Voyager was initially a neat idea, but except for being way-far-away, there's little really, really new.
Earth Final Conflict (on a slightly different, but paternally related subject) is a decent series, although I haven't watched it as much as I would like. It's a (reasonably) new and neat idea.
Paramount - Take a rest for a while and dream up something really different and unique, then be deliberate in choosing where it goes.
From what I've read, and further extrapolated, even-numbered layers of crypto (2DES, 6DES, 8-Blowfish, etc...) are (or may be) vulnerable to meet-in-the-middle attacks that take only a little more time than (N-1)Algorithm and maybe 2{Algorithm}. I don't know if this makes the risk terribly significant for [468..]DES/Blowfish since I'm not a crypto expert.
I have recently started to question the wisdom of using multiple encryption algorithms over a communications channel.
SSH and HTTPS (for example) have become staples for secure administration and E-commerce. With expanding use of IPSEC for company access from home, what are the dangers behind using SSH over a VPN?
I understand there is a potential for compromise when layering two 3DES channels, one each for SSH and IPSEC; has any analysis been done of the security of a Blowfish (TwoFish/CAST/etc...) and 3DES combination?
Slashdot Mirror
But think about how plentiful ethanol is on an aircraft these days.
"Yes, I'd like a shot of whisky. $3.50? No problem. No, hold the glass and ice. It's for my laptop!"
That'd be a bonus for those First-class flyers but how'd you expense two drinks on that trans-continental flight for your laptop?
Oh, well.
His comment doesn't imply that all the analysis needs to happen in the next 10ms, just that the useful data needs to be pulled. It's quite common for a scientific test to generate a lot of data, only a small fraction of which is useful.
Consider it 10ms to distill the Gigabyte into the useful 100MB that (you hope) may mean something in a few years.
-Paul
The whole thing just needs to rest for a while (as was pointed out by one of the preceeding posts).
I more or less grew up during the middle of The Original Series. I think I've still missed a few episodes but they were really tackling current events issues (not that I knew it then). Roddenberry really put himself out on a very long, and very thin branch to produce this series, and it paid off too. Although it's a little dated it's still good stuff.
Next Generation was basically a knock-off, but after 15+ years it was a welcome one. There was a good infusion of neat(tm) ideas that worked pretty well.
The differing perspective of DS9 was good, but no one wants to watch 3+ years (or so it seemed) of War. Terry Farrell must have thought so.
Voyager was initially a neat idea, but except for being way-far-away, there's little really, really new.
Earth Final Conflict (on a slightly different, but paternally related subject) is a decent series, although I haven't watched it as much as I would like. It's a (reasonably) new and neat idea.
Paramount - Take a rest for a while and dream up something really different and unique, then be deliberate in choosing where it goes.
Just a few $0.0275 (inflation)
From what I've read, and further extrapolated, even-numbered layers of crypto (2DES, 6DES, 8-Blowfish, etc...) are (or may be) vulnerable to meet-in-the-middle attacks that take only a little more time than (N-1)Algorithm and maybe 2{Algorithm}. I don't know if this makes the risk terribly significant for [468..]DES/Blowfish since I'm not a crypto expert.
http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/dir.95.10.25-9 5.10.31/msg00136.html has a little bit about MITM and 2DES.
The FreeS/WAN project has a more explicit explanation: http://www.xs4all.nl/~freeswan/freeswan_trees/free swan-1.00/doc/glossary.html#meet on MITM attacks and what it entails.
-Paul
I won't dispute most of what you've said, only this:
IPSEC can be NAT'd -- The black tunnel endpoints are not encrypted, and most of the time not included in the encrypted data.
I've got an IPSEC client I use for work and a Linux "firewall" that masquerades IPSEC rather nicely.
I have recently started to question the wisdom of using multiple encryption algorithms over a communications channel.
SSH and HTTPS (for example) have become staples for secure administration and E-commerce. With expanding use of IPSEC for company access from home, what are the dangers behind using SSH over a VPN?
I understand there is a potential for compromise when layering two 3DES channels, one each for SSH and IPSEC; has any analysis been done of the security of a Blowfish (TwoFish/CAST/etc...) and 3DES combination?