Because I actually secure my computer and run a minimum level of access needed on all applications.
At times I even turn off various settings like colours so I can actually read pages that are pig ugly.
I use whitelist's on everything. It's the same as controlling who can log into your computer, you dont sit with guest open access, you lock it down. Same for client access, I control who can set cookies, I control who can change my browser dimensions, I control who can pop up new windows.
Or do you prefer to let them have control of your computer which is what it sounds like you are doing.
insecure for THEM as I have 100% control over the client:)
Clients should be treated as untrusted, period.
Not that I care since they aren't my bank etc.
Im not paranoid, Im lazy and dont want to have to change my settings for every tom dick and harry website that doesnt need to retain my session on the CLIENT SIDE, which is insecure anyway. Its so hard to save session info on a server isnt it not that there is any session or anything of use to save anyway.
Its just bad design by the gimps in technology today.
In order to read Salon your browser and any security software you may be using must be set to allow Salon's cookies. Can you check to see if you have cookies disabled, or blocked from salon.com?
Our help page can walk you through the steps necessary to enable cookies. Please check this and try again.
If you feel you've received this message in error, please email us.
Where I am I have organic fair trade chocolate.
ITS REAL CHOCOLATE; not American FAKE modified foods.
NO wonder Americans are 1) stupid, 2) fat and 3) stupid.
Explain to me why my 6000 USD mobile workstation is sucking 200 watts when I expect BETTER DESIGN that uses less power, especially when we are trying to REDUCE power usage.
I can tell you why, BAD DESIGNERS that are all high on their laurals saying its not a blue collar job and its a "skilled job", well go show me some skill then, give me powerful mobile workstations that use LESS POWER or talk to the hand.
No but the problem is "speed wars" in GPU's and thats going to ramp up for the GPGPU battlefield thats comming.
My laptops cost me about 6000 USD and they are top end so yeah I have "powerful" laptops. Its unfortunate that a workstation, mobile or stationary, takes more power than my fridge freezer.
I want LOWER POWER CONSUMPTION. This is done by scaling out with more cores.
My laptop is going to MELT for fclucks sakes.
This is why I buy Intel now instad of AMD for my mobile needs. They have BETTER power "management".
Core wars please, not speed wars.
SMARTER DESIGNS not BRUTE FORCE.
All the more reason to leech and not have it doing it 24/7.
I do it "on demand":) Less visibility.
If you run a "sharing" server non stop for the purpose of sharing (I am aware of partial sharing when you download) then tough titty, they are after YOU.
As for "partial" sharers like me and those that leech "on demand", we have less visibility and we usually fall off their radar.
Well use a hacked client that doesnt share, hello.
Also, etc/hosts block their IP's, they are published you know.
Risk mitigation.
It also helps being in a different country:) They have to "liase" with their local counterparts which takes time through beurocracy.
Static IP's not a good idea. No need for them anyway its so 90's.
Doesnt matter, its a valid license which is what the court case is about, THEFT, well if you have a license, then the case is thrown out.
Do this often enough and the RIAA/MPAA lose credability and money.
If you get a letter, if you dont have a copy of the item in question then go out and buy a "license" for it.
When it comes to court, wave your "license" and what can they sue you for?
End of court case.
Everybody should do this.
Slashdot Mirror
Because I actually secure my computer and run a minimum level of access needed on all applications. At times I even turn off various settings like colours so I can actually read pages that are pig ugly. I use whitelist's on everything. It's the same as controlling who can log into your computer, you dont sit with guest open access, you lock it down. Same for client access, I control who can set cookies, I control who can change my browser dimensions, I control who can pop up new windows. Or do you prefer to let them have control of your computer which is what it sounds like you are doing.
insecure for THEM as I have 100% control over the client :)
Clients should be treated as untrusted, period.
Not that I care since they aren't my bank etc.
Im not paranoid, Im lazy and dont want to have to change my settings for every tom dick and harry website that doesnt need to retain my session on the CLIENT SIDE, which is insecure anyway. Its so hard to save session info on a server isnt it not that there is any session or anything of use to save anyway. Its just bad design by the gimps in technology today.
Salon cannot set a cookie on your browser
In order to read Salon your browser and any security software you may be using must be set to allow Salon's cookies. Can you check to see if you have cookies disabled, or blocked from salon.com?
Our help page can walk you through the steps necessary to enable cookies. Please check this and try again.
If you feel you've received this message in error, please email us.
Salon Technical Staff.
Help! I'm being repressed!
Still think 9/11 was not manipulation? You really are so OWNED.
You really trust your media? Enjoy your prechewed doctored spoonfed world. You are a sheep. you are brainwashed.
6 figures in US money, in my money that is peanuts :)
Come back to us when America's finest representative tells the truth. (the president)
If she was good at her job, she should continue doing it.
Where I am I have organic fair trade chocolate. ITS REAL CHOCOLATE; not American FAKE modified foods. NO wonder Americans are 1) stupid, 2) fat and 3) stupid.
They can mirror my SECTOR ENCRYPTED drive all they want :)
Good luck with reading it.
Blame Al Gore for inventing it
Yeah those Ford engines sure do suck.
and what a fucking retarded blue collar worker you really are :)
Explain to me why my 6000 USD mobile workstation is sucking 200 watts when I expect BETTER DESIGN that uses less power, especially when we are trying to REDUCE power usage. I can tell you why, BAD DESIGNERS that are all high on their laurals saying its not a blue collar job and its a "skilled job", well go show me some skill then, give me powerful mobile workstations that use LESS POWER or talk to the hand.
No but the problem is "speed wars" in GPU's and thats going to ramp up for the GPGPU battlefield thats comming. My laptops cost me about 6000 USD and they are top end so yeah I have "powerful" laptops. Its unfortunate that a workstation, mobile or stationary, takes more power than my fridge freezer.
Use the correct implementation and design tools If you stick to C++ then well, good luck with that in the future LOL
I want LOWER POWER CONSUMPTION. This is done by scaling out with more cores. My laptop is going to MELT for fclucks sakes. This is why I buy Intel now instad of AMD for my mobile needs. They have BETTER power "management". Core wars please, not speed wars. SMARTER DESIGNS not BRUTE FORCE.
All the more reason to leech and not have it doing it 24/7. I do it "on demand" :) Less visibility.
If you run a "sharing" server non stop for the purpose of sharing (I am aware of partial sharing when you download) then tough titty, they are after YOU.
As for "partial" sharers like me and those that leech "on demand", we have less visibility and we usually fall off their radar.
Im not in the US so fuck your DMCA :)
With a legal license, you have the RIGHT to have a copy of it.
Well use a hacked client that doesnt share, hello. Also, etc/hosts block their IP's, they are published you know. Risk mitigation. It also helps being in a different country :) They have to "liase" with their local counterparts which takes time through beurocracy.
Static IP's not a good idea. No need for them anyway its so 90's.
Doesnt matter, its a valid license which is what the court case is about, THEFT, well if you have a license, then the case is thrown out. Do this often enough and the RIAA/MPAA lose credability and money.
If you get a letter, if you dont have a copy of the item in question then go out and buy a "license" for it. When it comes to court, wave your "license" and what can they sue you for? End of court case. Everybody should do this.