It would make some sense to me to use Coke(TM) to refer to the beverage and coke to refer to everything BUT Coke(TM), e.g., cocaine. In the end, it's only really about company exposure, thence $$$.
Yeah, but it is P. Eaton (principal investigator of the Chicago group) that got credit in 1964 for synthesizing cubane. Don't know whether Eaton had cited Veinluhg, though. --Posting Nonanonymously
Promoting voting via the internet would be the "correct" thing to do, as it allows more people to participate conveniently in their Constitutional right. Hey, this could be a slick campaign....
Of course, for those political groups that don't want people to have easy access to the polls, this would be a bad idea.
The G3s seem to be not the only problem. Their sheepshaver product for PPC seems to have been in private testing for a year or so. They are not a profitable company, and I think they are a struggling company and have just focused on what they have working. BTW, they have announced considering filing for another public stock offering.
Absolutely. On the surface they are protecting their main interest: the rights of the starving artists^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H making money. But it's really a supply and demand issue. When internet access is user-friendly enough for your average couch potato, streaming video will probably solve this problem. You pay your fee and get access via some sort of pnm URL, like RealPlayer uses, and voila!
Reminds me of that romantic storyline starting here.
Re:Katz is onto something...
on
AOL Nation
·
· Score: 1
AOL users would get high-speed access to a content-controlled portal. AOL/Time-Warner can then force users not only to subscribe to broadband access but also to seize control of delivery of the content in an unprecedented way. Sort of your one-stop window to the world(TM).
This bodes poorly for netizens getting entertainment in general. Hey, wanna watch that episode of Gilligan's Island where his molar becomes a radio? That will be $4.99 plus tax plus access fee plus Internet surcharge, please. AOL/Time-Warner is to your computer like Blockbuster is for your VCR. (Still doesn't explain why the entertainment industry is shooting themselves in the foot over DVD.)
My guess is that things will go the way of satellite dishes: linux users can have their own software and OS, but they will eventually have to pay to join the rest of the world. If this makes sense, then I would like to see the gov't at least make AOL/Time-Warner fund free ISPs.
(The story wouldn't load for me in Netscape;)) Anyhoo, was MSNBC or Microsoft using the term "store-within-a-store"? Just wondering, since it seemed to me that Apple coined that term for selling computers in CompUSA. Lawsuit?
Makes sense to let them have some benefit from their work. There's already a precedent in biochemical research in US universities. Research groups are allowed to keep proprietary their DNA or protein sequences for a certain amount of time, after which it must be made available to the public. I believe the quiet period is 6 months long nowdays.
Slashdot Mirror
It would make some sense to me to use Coke(TM) to refer to the beverage and coke to refer to everything BUT Coke(TM), e.g., cocaine. In the end, it's only really about company exposure, thence $$$.
here's a start:
Compound Heat of formation per CH2(kcal/mol)
----------------------------------------------
cyclobutane 1.65
cyclopropane 4.25
cycloethane 6.25
(aka ethylene)
BTW, cyclopropene is relatively stable as a cation (is aromatic!).
Yeah, but it is P. Eaton (principal investigator of the Chicago group) that got credit in 1964 for synthesizing cubane. Don't know whether Eaton had cited Veinluhg, though.
--Posting Nonanonymously
Promoting voting via the internet would be the "correct" thing to do, as it allows more people to participate conveniently in their Constitutional right. Hey, this could be a slick campaign....
Of course, for those political groups that don't want people to have easy access to the polls, this would be a bad idea.
The G3s seem to be not the only problem. Their sheepshaver product for PPC seems to have been in private testing for a year or so. They are not a profitable company, and I think they are a struggling company and have just focused on what they have working. BTW, they have announced considering filing for another public stock offering.
Absolutely. On the surface they are protecting their main interest: the rights of the starving artists^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H making money. But it's really a supply and demand issue. When internet access is user-friendly enough for your average couch potato, streaming video will probably solve this problem. You pay your fee and get access via some sort of pnm URL, like RealPlayer uses, and voila!
Reminds me of that romantic storyline starting here.
AOL users would get high-speed access to a content-controlled portal. AOL/Time-Warner can then force users not only to subscribe to broadband access but also to seize control of delivery of the content in an unprecedented way. Sort of your one-stop window to the world(TM).
This bodes poorly for netizens getting entertainment in general. Hey, wanna watch that episode of Gilligan's Island where his molar becomes a radio? That will be $4.99 plus tax plus access fee plus Internet surcharge, please. AOL/Time-Warner is to your computer like Blockbuster is for your VCR. (Still doesn't explain why the entertainment industry is shooting themselves in the foot over DVD.)
My guess is that things will go the way of satellite dishes: linux users can have their own software and OS, but they will eventually have to pay to join the rest of the world. If this makes sense, then I would like to see the gov't at least make AOL/Time-Warner fund free ISPs.
Yeah, I had similar thoughts watching Contact when the religious martyr was willing to blow up the launch pad.
The article didn't mention any frequencies on which the interference might occur.
My multisync monitor causes AM interference in my house, but my guess would be that the incoming ADSL signal would be much stronger in comparison.
Mmmmm...a Trash-80 running windoze. Now _there's_ a product ;)
(The story wouldn't load for me in Netscape ;)) Anyhoo, was MSNBC or Microsoft using the term "store-within-a-store"? Just wondering, since it seemed to me that Apple coined that term for selling computers in CompUSA. Lawsuit?
Makes sense to let them have some benefit from their work. There's already a precedent in biochemical research in US universities. Research groups are allowed to keep proprietary their DNA or protein sequences for a certain amount of time, after which it must be made available to the public. I believe the quiet period is 6 months long nowdays.