His server seems to be/.ed
The blog entry is:
The
iTunes Music Store recently stopped supporting iTunes versions below
4.7 in an attempt to shut out 3rd party clients. I have reverse
engineered the iTMS 4.7 crypto which will once again enable 3rd party clients to communicate with the iTMS.
That's it, Slashdot is officially a left wing news site. What does this have to do with my rights online? Why is a technology site posting stories from ultra-left Mother Jones?
Why is slashdot turning into a political site? I don't what to read about left or right politics when I'm trying to read about technology.
Yes I do think police should be able to watch public spaces for possible crimes at all times.
No, the article is at Boston.Com The orginal post is "1984 Comes to Boston" and it just happens to be on the front page.
Re: Amish - I have no person's word to trust. If I did it would be ON THE RECORD which I asked for. And not Bush ON THE RECORD but someone who heard it ON THE RECORD. You don't even have that.
You didn't reply to "1984 Comes to Boston". You replyed to my post and I had replyed to "1984 Comes to Boston". You should have done the same and made your point about the mix of techonolgies. It was not a good reply to my post.
Get it?
Probably not.
P.S. Still waiting on the audio, video or someone on the record about that sig.
Anonymity is off topic! So you please stay on topic. My post was not about police questioning.
RE: your sig. I did do a search. I asked to hear it, see it or have the quoter identify themselves on record. "Bush reportedly told the group" is NONE of the three.
Re:Your Rights Online? What a joke.
on
1984 Comes To Boston
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
The difference that you are missing is that "government monitoring" and "using public spaces to track, monitor and database the movements of 'free' citizens" has been going on since law married order, its just the method that changed. It's that difference thay seems to scare everyone and I have a hard time understanding why as today's methods are fairer and better.
For Example:
Old Way- Cops Parked in a Stake Out, Tail citizens car and log movements on paper.
New Way- Camera's wait for person to enter street, track car by licence plate recognition, log movements to database.
Don't take it this the wrong way but I care more about what the law says than what you may think. And in PUBLIC places they do have that right and you do too. If you don't like it, vote for those who agree with you.
"The state power to conduct surveillance of citizens" is very vague and a large leap from the post. The state and everyone else has the power to record public places. At this level it is a policy not rights issue.
Are you an idiot? I doubt it. So why do you lie in such ways? My post said, "This is NOT 1984!" and it is not. Don't attribute other issues not raised in my post as your reply as to why I am wrong. It's intellectually dishonest.
Re:assumptions are bad for you, but so is oppositi
on
1984 Comes To Boston
·
· Score: 1
If you can see into a persons home from the street because they have the drapes or blinds open they cannot have an expectation of privacy in that room.
I'm more worried about my tax dollars on the Big Dig than this in Boston.
I see your point, public money and all. But it doesn't work that way. Try to stage a protest inside your city clerks office or even the subway. You paid for it, but they will kick you out.
What you personally expect is all well and great but it doesn't mean that someone CANNOT follow you around with a camera on public streets. If that did happen you'd have a much better chance getting them to stop via some sort of stalking laws than clamming right of privacy.
Slashdot Mirror
I believe that the judge's order has been stayed and PS2's can be sold. More Bad News for Sony
The hacks are already starting to role in. A web browser has been found in the PSP game Wipeout Pure.
More info here: http://www.pspondering.com/
It's your move now Google! HAHAHAHA
His server seems to be /.ed
The blog entry is:
The
iTunes Music Store recently stopped supporting iTunes versions below
4.7 in an attempt to shut out 3rd party clients. I have reverse
engineered the iTMS 4.7 crypto which will once again enable 3rd party clients to communicate with the iTMS.
Finally a way to spread the wisdom in my home movies to the whole world.
Now I'm off to register PSPorn.com
Link on the main site is malformed...why it goes to MS? No idea.
http://www.news.wisc.edu/newsphotos/hamers.html
and John Ashcroft couldn't make it because he was busy whiting out the orignal copies of the Bill of Rights.
God your pathetic. I'm sure the rest of the world thanks you for keeping your whining ass at home.
Most, if not all, airlines will not let you take an O2 tank on the flight.
That's it, Slashdot is officially a left wing news site. What does this have to do with my rights online? Why is a technology site posting stories from ultra-left Mother Jones?
Why is slashdot turning into a political site? I don't what to read about left or right politics when I'm trying to read about technology.
Yes I do think police should be able to watch public spaces for possible crimes at all times.
No, the article is at Boston.Com The orginal post is "1984 Comes to Boston" and it just happens to be on the front page.
Re: Amish - I have no person's word to trust. If I did it would be ON THE RECORD which I asked for. And not Bush ON THE RECORD but someone who heard it ON THE RECORD. You don't even have that.
Dir Sir,
You didn't reply to "1984 Comes to Boston". You replyed to my post and I had replyed to "1984 Comes to Boston". You should have done the same and made your point about the mix of techonolgies. It was not a good reply to my post.
Get it?
Probably not.
P.S. Still waiting on the audio, video or someone on the record about that sig.
With some FOIA rules I bet you could watch it.
Anonymity is off topic! So you please stay on topic. My post was not about police questioning.
RE: your sig. I did do a search. I asked to hear it, see it or have the quoter identify themselves on record. "Bush reportedly told the group" is NONE of the three.
The difference that you are missing is that "government monitoring" and "using public spaces to track, monitor and database the movements of 'free' citizens" has been going on since law married order, its just the method that changed. It's that difference thay seems to scare everyone and I have a hard time understanding why as today's methods are fairer and better.
For Example:
Old Way-
Cops Parked in a Stake Out, Tail citizens car and log movements on paper.
New Way-
Camera's wait for person to enter street, track car by licence plate recognition, log movements to database.
Nothing has changed but the methods.
Don't take it this the wrong way but I care more about what the law says than what you may think. And in PUBLIC places they do have that right and you do too. If you don't like it, vote for those who agree with you.
"The state power to conduct surveillance of citizens" is very vague and a large leap from the post. The state and everyone else has the power to record public places. At this level it is a policy not rights issue.
Are you an idiot? I doubt it. So why do you lie in such ways? My post said, "This is NOT 1984!" and it is not. Don't attribute other issues not raised in my post as your reply as to why I am wrong. It's intellectually dishonest.
If you can see into a persons home from the street because they have the drapes or blinds open they cannot have an expectation of privacy in that room.
I'm more worried about my tax dollars on the Big Dig than this in Boston.
I see your point, public money and all. But it doesn't work that way. Try to stage a protest inside your city clerks office or even the subway. You paid for it, but they will kick you out.
If you could do that (in public places) then the paparazzi wouldn't have a job.
Yes...so. That doesn't mean the laws are new. In fact even for police use it all depends on what you think new menas? 1 Year, 5 Years, 10 Years?
P.S. I love your sig, do you have a link were I can see or hear him saying that? Or maybe a person quoting him on the record?
What you personally expect is all well and great but it doesn't mean that someone CANNOT follow you around with a camera on public streets. If that did happen you'd have a much better chance getting them to stop via some sort of stalking laws than clamming right of privacy.
The Boston subway system is not a public space. The fact that you have to pay to get in is the first tip.