"If it was really better someone would have already invented this "new" method."
Um, what? So, unless something isn't better, it can't be invented? Um, what? Nothing better gets invented? I'm having a really hard time with this. Um, what?
"The text is certainly easier to follow (which makes it better, even though I just claimed otherwise)"
Fixed that for you.
"The formatting implies certain cues such as tone, volume, and emphasis. By reformatting the text, the software loses the original cues and accidentally adds new ones. The new cues may change the overall meaning of the text resulting in a failure to communicate."
And that makes it different. Which is not a synonym for "worse". You see we do this thing called learning, where we find a new way to do things, and even though it's kind of hard at first, in the long run it's more effective.
"Florida violated the Democratic party rules blah blah blah..."
Um, so what? I'm not beholden to the Democratic party, they are beholden to me. They work for me. If my duly elected representatives choose to exercise their ability to change an election date, what the fuck makes you think the Democratic party, which is not duly elected, has ANY say whatsoever?
They don't like it? Fuck them. It's not a state's responsibility to give a shit about them.
I really don't know why you think what the Democratic party wants means two shits, but you're wrong.
Mostly because it's wrong, and goes against what is considered good driving habits.
I think you think that you should care what happens behind you. That's why you're making these terrible assumptions, and that's why you don't understand why you're wrong.
"Then let them. I'd much rather have a dangerous driver in front of me so that I am in control of the gap"
You're not in control of anything, you're anticipating and reacting to a "dangerous driver" who has the ability to behave erratically and cause you to deal with a situation that is both unfamiliar and unsafe. Oh and if he does something stupid, but you run into him? Your fault.
I fail to see why this is better in any way than being in front of him happily ignoring his stupid driving.
I don't what's better though, that you're a liar, or that you finally admitted I was right, or that you got so owned that you only had insults left. Oh I forgot that you posted AC too, that was the cherry. I out debated you, out cited you, out thought you, and then after had nothing left but insults, you couldn't even post in your own name because you'd lied three times already.
"You're a cunt, but I'll let you go ahead and get the last word"
Yeah, you've told that lie three times now, and then once you followed up your own post with another post (what kind of no life having loser does that? Wait you did...). Why lie liar?
"If it was really better someone would have already invented this "new" method."
Um, what? So, unless something isn't better, it can't be invented? Um, what? Nothing better gets invented? I'm having a really hard time with this. Um, what?
"The text is certainly easier to follow (which makes it better, even though I just claimed otherwise)"
Fixed that for you.
"The formatting implies certain cues such as tone, volume, and emphasis. By reformatting the text, the software loses the original cues and accidentally adds new ones. The new cues may change the overall meaning of the text resulting in a failure to communicate."
And that makes it different. Which is not a synonym for "worse". You see we do this thing called learning, where we find a new way to do things, and even though it's kind of hard at first, in the long run it's more effective.
"When it's holding elections for political party nominations, of course."
Source that please. I'd like to see the legislation that requires a state to base it's elections on rules of an unelected group of lobbyists.
I'll wait.
"Florida violated the Democratic party rules blah blah blah..."
Um, so what? I'm not beholden to the Democratic party, they are beholden to me. They work for me. If my duly elected representatives choose to exercise their ability to change an election date, what the fuck makes you think the Democratic party, which is not duly elected, has ANY say whatsoever?
They don't like it? Fuck them. It's not a state's responsibility to give a shit about them.
I really don't know why you think what the Democratic party wants means two shits, but you're wrong.
"It's not that complicated."
No, it's just wrong. I understand why you think it's better, but it's not. Focusing on what's behind you like you do causes accidents.
"Why is this so hard to understand?"
Mostly because it's wrong, and goes against what is considered good driving habits.
I think you think that you should care what happens behind you. That's why you're making these terrible assumptions, and that's why you don't understand why you're wrong.
"Then let them. I'd much rather have a dangerous driver in front of me so that I am in control of the gap"
You're not in control of anything, you're anticipating and reacting to a "dangerous driver" who has the ability to behave erratically and cause you to deal with a situation that is both unfamiliar and unsafe. Oh and if he does something stupid, but you run into him? Your fault.
I fail to see why this is better in any way than being in front of him happily ignoring his stupid driving.
x20 and still counting
x19, counting
x18 and counting
Why are you introducing yourself?
x17 and counting
x16 and counting
No. Not even close.
X15 and counting.
And my dog is female, so whatever dog you fucked wasn't mine. Have fun with that.
Did I mention x15 and counting?
x14 and counting
x13 and still going
x12 and counting
x11 and counting
x10 and counting...
x9 and still wrong.
x8 and counting.
Still wrong, still lying.
x7 and counting.
"I was am still right about the grammar thing. "
Uh huh.
x6 and counting.
Is this typical when you're wrong? Never mind you'll lie about that too...
Lie x5 and counting.
Lie x4 and counting.
I don't what's better though, that you're a liar, or that you finally admitted I was right, or that you got so owned that you only had insults left. Oh I forgot that you posted AC too, that was the cherry. I out debated you, out cited you, out thought you, and then after had nothing left but insults, you couldn't even post in your own name because you'd lied three times already.
I win. Again. And you made is SO easy...
"You're a cunt, but I'll let you go ahead and get the last word"
Yeah, you've told that lie three times now, and then once you followed up your own post with another post (what kind of no life having loser does that? Wait you did...). Why lie liar?
Oh wait I forgot who I was talking to...
"No, I disagree because parents who have diabetes (or any other weird genetic defect) and choose to reproduce..."
I read this nonsense and had to reply. Diabetes doesn't work that way. I suggest you look into the matter before posting tripe like this again.