I had Rogers@Home, then with the Rogers/Shaw swap, Shaw@Home. Speeds were very erratic. At times, I could download 400KB+/s, then at times, it'd be slower than dialup. This happened much more frequently with Rogers@Home. I truly experienced the shared bandwidth issue with overloaded nodes. When Shaw took over for the West, things improved a bit, but I still made the switch over to ADSL. I get consistantly good speeds (usually 100KB+/s to the point of saturating the 1.5Mbps downstream).
Slashdot Mirror
I had Rogers@Home, then with the Rogers/Shaw swap, Shaw@Home. Speeds were very erratic. At times, I could download 400KB+/s, then at times, it'd be slower than dialup. This happened much more frequently with Rogers@Home. I truly experienced the shared bandwidth issue with overloaded nodes. When Shaw took over for the West, things improved a bit, but I still made the switch over to ADSL. I get consistantly good speeds (usually 100KB+/s to the point of saturating the 1.5Mbps downstream).
This would include the XP OS, no?
no java -- no thing.
Thanx. I just didn't think it was so HTML, so I was thinking there must be some escape keys or something.
Looks like kernel.org has updated their main page and their 100Mbps connection looks pretty maxed.
/. Also surprised my first submission got accepted :)
http://www.kernel.org/mirrors/
Sorry, seldom post, so don't know how to make a link on