In ECON 101 you should have learned that the Petroleum Industry does not follow "market economy" rules. I don't think anyone in America believes they are paying less than their "willing to pay" price. We pay what they tell us to pay because we don't have a choice. OPEC decides the price per barrel. OPEC decides how many barrels to produce each day (as a way to alter or skew the S&D curve). There is no choice. We *must* drive to work, we must take our kids to the doctor, we must go to the grocery store, etc. Sure, people are cutting down the amount they drive as much as possible, but in many cases you can't cut out a substantial amount of driving (i.e. oil consumption).
I think what the original comment was saying is that due to the 'nature' of this market, the fact that the consumer doesn't have a choice, the Oil companies are not forced (by normal market conditions) to increase efficiencies or compete for the lowest price per barrel. OPEC shields them from being forced to compete for consumers' monies!
If a company makes a widget for $1 and the market is willing to pay $10 for that widget, then yes, the company deserves 90% profit (obviously not taking into account other costs & distrution scenarios). In this case, the consumers have a choice to buy the product and normal 'market economics' takes effect.
There is no 'market economy' in oil. Period. So, do the oil companies still deserve 7% profit? It's debatable.
Btw, how accurate is that 7% number? How much has the price of Oil increased over the last 10 years? Has the cost to produce and distribute oil gone up that much also....why?
I thought iTunes already solved the RIAA's problem. Yet, they continue to throw away money on this crap. But then, I suppose they have to justify their obscene percentage margins taken from the 'artists.'
Why not just wait for the ubiquity of on-demand HD content?
Because that time is far in the future. I have broadband, the fastest I can get where I live is 1.5Mbps. At that rate it would take 37 hours to download a 25GB movie. And I'm sure my ISP would get pissed off and start charging for extra b/w usage. No Thanks! I'll take a disc please and thank you!
Broadband in the U.S. sucks! And it doesn't appear that it will get better anytime soon. For example, I live in CO and Verizon has no plans at all to bring FIOS here. There just aren't many up & coming options for most of the nation for better broadband.
I'm not sure what your argument is. Of the top 25 products, Apple holds 13 of the spots. Plus, looking just at Amazon is not a good indicator because a lot of people buy directly from Apple (like I did).
Slashdot Mirror
In ECON 101 you should have learned that the Petroleum Industry does not follow "market economy" rules. I don't think anyone in America believes they are paying less than their "willing to pay" price. We pay what they tell us to pay because we don't have a choice. OPEC decides the price per barrel. OPEC decides how many barrels to produce each day (as a way to alter or skew the S&D curve). There is no choice. We *must* drive to work, we must take our kids to the doctor, we must go to the grocery store, etc. Sure, people are cutting down the amount they drive as much as possible, but in many cases you can't cut out a substantial amount of driving (i.e. oil consumption). I think what the original comment was saying is that due to the 'nature' of this market, the fact that the consumer doesn't have a choice, the Oil companies are not forced (by normal market conditions) to increase efficiencies or compete for the lowest price per barrel. OPEC shields them from being forced to compete for consumers' monies! If a company makes a widget for $1 and the market is willing to pay $10 for that widget, then yes, the company deserves 90% profit (obviously not taking into account other costs & distrution scenarios). In this case, the consumers have a choice to buy the product and normal 'market economics' takes effect. There is no 'market economy' in oil. Period. So, do the oil companies still deserve 7% profit? It's debatable. Btw, how accurate is that 7% number? How much has the price of Oil increased over the last 10 years? Has the cost to produce and distribute oil gone up that much also....why?
I thought iTunes already solved the RIAA's problem. Yet, they continue to throw away money on this crap. But then, I suppose they have to justify their obscene percentage margins taken from the 'artists.'
Because that time is far in the future. I have broadband, the fastest I can get where I live is 1.5Mbps. At that rate it would take 37 hours to download a 25GB movie. And I'm sure my ISP would get pissed off and start charging for extra b/w usage. No Thanks! I'll take a disc please and thank you!
Broadband in the U.S. sucks! And it doesn't appear that it will get better anytime soon. For example, I live in CO and Verizon has no plans at all to bring FIOS here. There just aren't many up & coming options for most of the nation for better broadband.
I'm not sure what your argument is. Of the top 25 products, Apple holds 13 of the spots. Plus, looking just at Amazon is not a good indicator because a lot of people buy directly from Apple (like I did).