Evolutionists agree that you need long periods of time (hunderds of millions of years) for the statistics to play out to produce the proper mutations to produce the many species that we observe today. The article about radiometric dating alone clearly brings into question the age of the universe that is required to hold a belief in evolution. Enough question to require a belief in evolution to be a matter of faith. See URL:.
Taunt on...I can take it.
Slashdot Mirror
I botched the URL in the previous message. See http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/carbon_da ting.asp
That's worth a taunt, isn't it?
Evolutionists agree that you need long periods of time (hunderds of millions of years) for the statistics to play out to produce the proper mutations to produce the many species that we observe today. The article about radiometric dating alone clearly brings into question the age of the universe that is required to hold a belief in evolution. Enough question to require a belief in evolution to be a matter of faith. See URL:. Taunt on...I can take it.
Check out this site: http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/qa.asp. It is a gold mine of alternative information about the "theory" of evolution.