I couldn't agree more, not only is it odd that we can charge a kid as an adult, but our judicial system has set precedences concerning minors loosing statutory rape charges. If a minor is emotionally capable of handling the impact of having sex, and having children from having sex, why can't the same child choose weather or not he/she can flash us some booty on your average porn site. I as well have blamed this and many other hypocracies of the legal system on organized religion in the US. I know hundreds of underaged prostitutes (some as young as 11) who consistently have sex with some really nasty guys (one in particular nicknamed Smell) for small ($20) quantities of methanphetamines. These prostitutes are not only disallowed from making the decision to pose for pornography, but also can't vote on the legalization of the drug they are addicted to.
In order to produce pornography you need to have the following kept on file for every model
* Video tape of the model consenting to posing for the pornography and having the product distributed, as well as stating her age, etc. etc.
* A copy of her state ID
* A notorized copy of her birth certificate
* Individual state requirements
Pulling up a legal record of the person would show emancipation status. It would be a small step for a producer wishing to make thousands of times as much money producing under aged porn rather than of age porn.
After starting a pornography company and producing a website with lots of questionable content I had to do a lot of legal consulting and studying to avoid ignorant prossecution. I discovered an interesting loophold much more steadfast than the existing nature kid one. In California it is legal for an emancipated minor to pose for child pornography. This is not a loophole by precedence, it is written in the books.
The reason child porn is considered wrong by the US judicial system is because a minor is not capable to make a decision which has such emotionaly impact because he/she is to young to know the consequences. Existing kiddie porn lords have argued that kids on nudist colonies have grown up to view their birthday suits as their (and others') only attire in existance. In addition, a child would bear the same emotional impact as another child (not in a nudist colony) modeling with clothing on. The problem with this loophole is it's focus on the impact the child would face, rather than the child's ability to face impact. The other problem with this loophole is that even though the child's viewpoints and culture are different in a nudist colony, the viewer's of the child's pictures viewpoints are still the same. The California emancipation loophole says that if a child is emancipated he has the same inteligence and maturity as an adult. If this were the case, the child would be able to handle the emotional impact of posing nude the same as an adult would. So the solution to this ISP's problem? Fuck censorship, move the server's down to California and show all the tiny teeters ya want. I (as a determined anti-censorship protestor, not a kiddy porn supporter) and my company, Ubersoft, will donate to this ISP's project if they decide to move this single newsgroup of discusion to servers on Californian soil to put this loophole to the test.
Jack Roehrig
CEO UberSoft Inc.
Please excuse my grammer/spelling, I'm illiterate.
My religious cult has been cloning people for about three years now. These guys are just ripoffs of jackerian fundamentals of human cloning. And humans aren't clones of aliens, we're clones of ancient gophers. This site should be frowned upon as a disgrace to the human cloning religious cults of America.
"The survey was conducted January 20 through January 23, 2000. A total of 1124 registered employees of Microsoft (476 Democrats/417 Republicans/231 Independents) were interviewed nationwide by telephone. All stated they vote regularly in general elections. Those interviewed were selected from a randomly generated list of telephone numbers." It helps to be a careful listener.
350,000 is a big number. How is Ford expecting to benefit from this gift. I think the money could be better spent to generate a stronger work force, and I don't think that the employees really need the computer literacy. And what the hell is with Ford's slogan anyways, "In a perfect world everything would be different?" What does that mean, everything sucks? I think Ford is trying to develop the UberTruck by performing horrible experiments on innocent GM cars. Next thing you know they'll be leading my Pontiac on a train so that she can be enslaved, tortured, and eventually killed.
They're just trying to brainwash us. I smell conspiracy.
Slashdot Mirror
I couldn't agree more, not only is it odd that we can charge a kid as an adult, but our judicial system has set precedences concerning minors loosing statutory rape charges. If a minor is emotionally capable of handling the impact of having sex, and having children from having sex, why can't the same child choose weather or not he/she can flash us some booty on your average porn site. I as well have blamed this and many other hypocracies of the legal system on organized religion in the US. I know hundreds of underaged prostitutes (some as young as 11) who consistently have sex with some really nasty guys (one in particular nicknamed Smell) for small ($20) quantities of methanphetamines. These prostitutes are not only disallowed from making the decision to pose for pornography, but also can't vote on the legalization of the drug they are addicted to.
Oh well, lets all move to Holland (-:
In order to produce pornography you need to have the following kept on file for every model
* Video tape of the model consenting to posing for the pornography and having the product distributed, as well as stating her age, etc. etc.
* A copy of her state ID
* A notorized copy of her birth certificate
* Individual state requirements
Pulling up a legal record of the person would show emancipation status. It would be a small step for a producer wishing to make thousands of times as much money producing under aged porn rather than of age porn.
After starting a pornography company and producing a website with lots of questionable content I had to do a lot of legal consulting and studying to avoid ignorant prossecution. I discovered an interesting loophold much more steadfast than the existing nature kid one. In California it is legal for an emancipated minor to pose for child pornography. This is not a loophole by precedence, it is written in the books.
The reason child porn is considered wrong by the US judicial system is because a minor is not capable to make a decision which has such emotionaly impact because he/she is to young to know the consequences. Existing kiddie porn lords have argued that kids on nudist colonies have grown up to view their birthday suits as their (and others') only attire in existance. In addition, a child would bear the same emotional impact as another child (not in a nudist colony) modeling with clothing on. The problem with this loophole is it's focus on the impact the child would face, rather than the child's ability to face impact. The other problem with this loophole is that even though the child's viewpoints and culture are different in a nudist colony, the viewer's of the child's pictures viewpoints are still the same. The California emancipation loophole says that if a child is emancipated he has the same inteligence and maturity as an adult. If this were the case, the child would be able to handle the emotional impact of posing nude the same as an adult would. So the solution to this ISP's problem? Fuck censorship, move the server's down to California and show all the tiny teeters ya want. I (as a determined anti-censorship protestor, not a kiddy porn supporter) and my company, Ubersoft, will donate to this ISP's project if they decide to move this single newsgroup of discusion to servers on Californian soil to put this loophole to the test.
Jack Roehrig
CEO UberSoft Inc.
Please excuse my grammer/spelling, I'm illiterate.
My religious cult has been cloning people for about three years now. These guys are just ripoffs of jackerian fundamentals of human cloning. And humans aren't clones of aliens, we're clones of ancient gophers. This site should be frowned upon as a disgrace to the human cloning religious cults of America.
I say we boycot this site.
--
Actually, according to the latest polls, %67.9 of people think the same way the Slashdot community does.
--
I personally have never seen hot grits. Nor a person satisfied with Mikrosoft.
--
"The survey was conducted January 20 through January 23, 2000. A total of 1124 registered employees of Microsoft (476 Democrats/417 Republicans /231 Independents) were interviewed nationwide by telephone. All stated they vote regularly in general elections. Those interviewed were selected from a randomly generated list of telephone numbers." It helps to be a careful listener.
--
350,000 is a big number. How is Ford expecting to benefit from this gift. I think the money could be better spent to generate a stronger work force, and I don't think that the employees really need the computer literacy. And what the hell is with Ford's slogan anyways, "In a perfect world everything would be different?" What does that mean, everything sucks? I think Ford is trying to develop the UberTruck by performing horrible experiments on innocent GM cars. Next thing you know they'll be leading my Pontiac on a train so that she can be enslaved, tortured, and eventually killed.
They're just trying to brainwash us. I smell conspiracy.
--
You think if Linux One ports AOL to linux that it would overwrite PPPD? I smell a conspiracy.