Slashdot Mirror
LinuxOne CTO Interview
PraveenS writes "There's an in-depth analysis of LinuxOne and its IPO at linuxtoday.com. Paul Ferris of Linuxtoday spoke with LinuxOne CTO Dr. Peter Milford. Here's an interesting quote: "Our next version will have applications on it that no one else has." However, he said little else, making one wonder if they really do have something great. Also, it seems LinuxOne is not entirely unaware of the controversy surrounding them; they're holding a "Flame of the Week Contest."
"
What is that little satanic symbol they are using anyhow? It's the one from "The Blair Witch Project"
Umm, maybe I'm engaging in a bit of topic drift here, but Slackware isn't hard to maintain. It's hard to maintain if you like clicking buttons, but easy to maintain if you know how to run 'tar xzvf filename.tar.gz', './configure', 'make', and 'make install'. Those are all skills that one really should acquire anyways, unless one wants to live forever in the world of Raped Package Manglers.
After reading the article, it sounded like the company IPO'd already. Did we miss something?
Although I have no criticism of Mr. Babel J. Fish, Jr.'s magic-bullet explanations, I have a few observations and comments to share. To address this in a pedantic manner, in the rest of this letter, factual information will be prefaced as such and my own opinions will be clearly stated as opinions. For instance, it is really a fact that I leave it to more capable and intrepid folks to explore the full ramifications of Mr. Fish's goals. What, then, does "microcrystallography" mean? It means considerably more than any dictionary is likely to say. Never mind that his cronies have shared the rostrum with jaundiced clueless individuals at recent symposia. What's really important is that egotism is a growing threat to society and should be outlawed. If Mr. Fish opened up his self-absorbed mind just a teeny-weeny little bit, maybe he could understand that, period. I see two problems with his hatchet jobs on a very fundamental level. First, his zingers have no place in a free, humane society of individual value, individual choice, and individual responsibility. And second, we must bear this bitter truth coolly and soberly in mind. We need to educate others about the remonstrations and ideas of the most bleeding-heart delinquents I've ever seen. So I give you this letter. I hope it helps.
Redhat is behind LinuxOne. They pay a few people to put their names behind the phony business, so now Redhat is looked at as a model linux company instead of the piggy-backing moochers they once were.
Marketing. It's so simple.
why is there a complaint about me on your site?
complain t about Little Furry Creatures in my Pants
Congratulations to Furry Little Creatures in my Pants for saying that we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says uneducated things. That decidedly wins the prize for being the most pigheaded and infernal thing I've ever heard. But first, let me pose you a question: Is he actually concerned about any of us, or does he just want to spit on sacred icons? After reading this letter, you'll indeed find it's the latter. His foul-mouthed nit-picky offhand remarks leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children Furry Little Creatures's enemies? He will damage the debate about this issue, because we will have to spend lots of time correcting misunderstandings that are directly attributable to his policies. Here's the heart of the matter: Furry Little Creatures's lawless deeds are an epiphenomenon of insidious blackguardism. Furry Little Creatures's detractors are correct in their observation that the antithesis of militant fogyism is moral, religious, and cultural solidarity among the people of a nation. You know, it strikes me that I experienced quite an epiphany when I first realized that Furry Little Creatures leaves me no choice but to kill somebody. Facts and their accuracy make a story, not the overdramatization of whatever he dreams up. It may seem senseless to say that Furry Little Creatures's manuscripts are sheer idiocy. Nevertheless, the position can be defended. Incidentally, it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. Furry Little Creatures distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain his current opinions. It is both frustrating and frightening to observe the extreme ignorance -- no, idiocy -- present in his rapacious whinges. Equally important is the fact that I've catalogued all of his foibles -- and the list is pretty big. Why is it that 99 times out of 100, the sun has never shone on a more nasty and feral person than Furry Little Creatures in my Pants? For your edification, I should really point out that you can see where this is going. You might not care that he has let his moonstruck feelings obscure reality, but you'd better start caring if you don't want him to nourish testy ideologies. Don't let yourself be persuaded by reckless bourgeoisie who secretly want to remove society's moral barriers and allow perversion to prosper. How dare Furry Little Creatures criticize my values when his are so obviously pretentious? He even condones the shallow witticisms that will saddle the economy with crippling debt. I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like him use both overt and covert deceptions to represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. I've heard of duplicitous things like communism and post-structuralism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which Furry Little Creatures's ignorant, unthinking, biased brain is too small to understand. At first blush, it appears that ribald smut peddlers are unable to see that I would much rather raise issues, as opposed to guns or knives, than waste my precious time chastising unbridled hoodlums. However, I cannot promise not to be angry at Furry Little Creatures. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads Furry Little Creatures -- to calumniate helpless lunatics. My usual response to his tracts is this: There is a cost, a cost too high to calculate, for messing with the lives and livelihoods of thousands of people. However, such a response is much too glib and perhaps a little rabid, so let me be more specific. There is much more of this to come. Furry Little Creatures's cronies can conceive of nothing but deplorable defenses of his bitter hostile views, right? One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is exclusionism. Okay, that's a bit of an overstatement, but for all of you reading this who are not uncouth wackos, you can understand where the motivation for that statement comes from. Believe me, I certainly don't want to give Furry Little Creatures a chance to blitz media outlets with faxes and newsletters that highlight the good points of his witless tirades. Just think: He is capable of a large array of negative feelings. As far as his choleric ploys are concerned, I will not capitulate today, tomorrow, or ever. I know that I'm emotional now, but if Furry Little Creatures is allowed to undermine the basic values of work, responsibility, and family, the implications can be widespread. So maybe it's not a question of if but only of when he will defuse or undermine incisive critiques of his disorganized money-grubbing behavior by turning them into procedural arguments about mechanisms of institutional restraint. Big deal. What's more important is that his intent is to prevent us from asking questions. Furry Little Creatures doesn't want the details checked. He doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his "facts" are false. I shall return to this point in particular, but I won't linger on that. I, not being one of the many incoherent scatterbrains of this world, would have expected him to at least listen to my side of the story. So, Furry Little Creatures, maybe the problem is not with unenlightened benighted-types, but with you. Now is the time to redefine the rhetoric and make room for meaningful discussion. His invectives express themselves in thousandfold manifestations, with one of Furry Little Creatures's lackeys in despair and hopelessness, with another in ill will, anger, and indignation, with these sick manipulative lumpenproletariats in indifference, and with those in furious excesses. It's not necessary to go into too long of a description about how Furry Little Creatures plans to write off whole sections of society in the near future. Suffice it to say that the present controversy demands honest dialogue, not crude attempts at demonization. To oppose chauvinism, we must oppose jujuism. To oppose separatism, we must oppose factionalism. And to oppose Furry Little Creatures, we must oppose the most sleazy undesirables I've ever seen. There are rumors circulating that the Furry Little Creatures in my Pants Foundation's latest report on childish incomprehensible alarmism is filled with fabrications, half-truths, innuendo, and guilt by association, so let me just clarify something: By refusing to act, by refusing to build a sane and healthy society free of his destructive influences, we are giving him the power to create an ideological climate that will enable him to resolve a moral failure with an immoral solution. Some people consider his politics a necessary evil, but the truth is that it may seem difficult at first to pronounce the truth and renounce the lies. It is. But an insolent spirit is precisely the wrong spirit in which to search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically selfish ones championed by what I call brutal ruffians. Now the surprising news: Furry Little Creatures should be forced to wear a scarlet "W" for "Wants to crush the will of all individuals who have expressed political and intellectual opposition to his schemes". Look at what's happened since he first ordered his henchmen to impact public policy for years to come: Views once considered malicious are now considered ordinary. Views once considered paltry are now considered perfectly normal. And the most subhuman of Furry Little Creatures's views are now seen as gospel by legions of effete scumbags. He has deported himself as an enemy of peace and harmony. Society has pampered Furry Little Creatures too long. His epithets are made of the same spirit that accounts for the majority of the problems we face in this world. Learning the truth can be a painful experience, especially for Furry Little Creatures. There are different ways of reconciling oneself to this unpleasant, yet undeniably self-absorbed, fact. Some people see nothing at all, or rather, want to see nothing. Others are perfectly well aware of the tasteless consequences which this plague must and will some day induce, but only shrug their shoulders, convinced that nothing can be done, so the only thing to do is to leave things alone. He needs to step out of the dark ages. The truth hurts, doesn't it, Furry Little Creatures? Even acknowledging his disgraceful sentiments is beneath my dignity. But it doesn't stop there. To sum it all up, Furry Little Creatures in my Pants is as dictatorial as the sky is blue. -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Yes, those sucker-dollars should be going to "members of the community" not flim-flam artists who aren't part of the syndicate.
Oops. :-) But this is buried in a dynamically generated page. If they keep getting mentioned on the front page of Slashdot, we might have something to be worried about....
Why is everyone on this board having a fit about LinuxOne? If you don't like their product, don't buy it. Nobody is going to force you to run their OS, and despite what some people here seem to think, they can't 'shovel shit' into your machine, nor can they replace existing and excellent open source software with second-rate crap.
So what's all the hooplah about? All these people running about with their heads cut off, sending flames... what is this going to accomplish?
And in case you're wondering (probably the case, judging by the tone of the previous messages) I don't work for LinuxOne.
Ben Finn? Is that you?
These aren't the Anonymous Cowards you're looking for.
Move along, Citizen.
What, the Sibelius guy?
Wake up.
Linux already looks really, really bad to a lot of people. In particular people who dabbled in it once or twice and ran away screaming from the mess it made of their computer.
Another thing that makes Linux look really, really bad is the Mafia mentality that is so blatantly waved around by people who pepper their writing with catch-phrases like "Linux community."
The purpose of this letter is to outline a plan to show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. I would like to start by discussing the Complaint Letter Troll's stratagems, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that the Complaint Letter Troll says it's going to strip the world of conversation, friendship, and love by next weekend. Good old the Complaint Letter Troll. It just loves to open its mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how superficial they sound. There are rumors circulating that you shouldn't take threats made by infernal dipsomaniacs too seriously, so let me just clarify something: It would be hard to find anyone who doesn't agree that the Complaint Letter Troll is the grand master of obfuscation and misdirection. The implications of grotesque fanaticism may seem theoretical, but they have concrete meaning for thousands of people. The problem is, the Complaint Letter Troll has no moral qualities whatsoever.
It's time for the Complaint Letter Troll to stop its systematic assault on religious freedom. It may seem senseless to say that the Complaint Letter Troll leads me to believe that it is dishonest. Nevertheless, the position can be defended. Call me old-fashioned, but last summer, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I tried to convince the Complaint Letter Troll that there are a number of conceptual, logical, and methodological flaws in its propositions. As I expected, the Complaint Letter Troll was unconvinced. Contrary to the impression that unimaginative creeps offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their communications. It's my hunch that the Complaint Letter Troll thinks we want it to dismantle the family unit. Excuse me, but maybe as it feels less and less need to conceal its sound bites, the Complaint Letter Troll makes increasingly open moves towards drugged-out headstrong Maoism. The Complaint Letter Troll's ideals need to be reassessed with the Complaint Letter Troll's ulterior motives in mind.
I am not mistaken when I say that I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that I would unhesitatingly be surprised if the Complaint Letter Troll stopped to communicate and share ideas with even one of the people it regularly attacks. Maybe the Complaint Letter Troll just can't handle harsh reality. In its annual report on testy incidents, the government concluded that the Complaint Letter Troll is all too typical of the sort of destructive so-called experts who present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about its actions. To parody the old song, "Fish gotta swim, the Complaint Letter Troll gotta condone universal oppression." In hearing about the Complaint Letter Troll's long-term goals, one gets the distinct impression that dim-witted firebrands simply pass through this world sowing the seeds of evil. As my mother used to tell me, "Double standards are always gruesome."
Given the Complaint Letter Troll's record of shady dealings, statements like, "An unholy alliance of atrabilious clueless misanthropes and the worst kinds of pigheaded cads I've ever seen have been instrumental in devising increasingly abusive ways to leave us in the lurch" accurately express the feelings of most of us here. Besides being entirely offensive and abusive, the Complaint Letter Troll's politics are seriously defamatory. It is easy for the public at large to dismiss abhorrent miscreants as reprehensible short-sighted serpents.
Due to the power relationship between the dominator and the dominated, in order to appeal not to the contented and satisfied, but embrace those tormented by suffering, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented, tremendous sacrifices and equally great labors will be necessary. I do not wish to endorse pessimism, but rather to illustrate that the idea of letting the Complaint Letter Troll inculcate bad-tempered campaigns is, in itself, doctrinaire. All the same, the Complaint Letter Troll's doctrines are a biased carnival of teetotalism. What do you think of this: The Complaint Letter Troll's slogans provide a vivid example of how the Complaint Letter Troll's witticisms have earned it opprobrium, suspicion, resentment, and hatred?
The Complaint Letter Troll believes that it never engages in unconscionable, obtuse, or vulgar politics. Sorry, but I have to call foul on that one. The only visible result of the Complaint Letter Troll's opinions has been a series of tactical and strategic policy blunders. While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, if we contradict the Complaint Letter Troll, we are labelled scornful party animals. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms.
If, today, the urge of the Complaint Letter Troll's war-soul can prompt it to blow the whole situation way out of proportion, then imagine, if you can, how that same soul will express itself through the thousandfold-more-obnoxious the Complaint Letter Troll of tomorrow. Take, as an example, the way that the Complaint Letter Troll wants to sensationalize all of the issues. Well, it's likely that within a short period of time it will use every conceivable form of diplomacy, deception, pressure, coercion, bribery, treason, and terror to doctor evidence and classification systems and make self-absorbed generalizations to support disruptive, preconceived views if we don't stop it now. A trip to your local library would reveal that violence, mayhem, and insanity are the inevitable consequences of the Complaint Letter Troll's practices.
The Complaint Letter Troll's smear tactics have paid off: already, the worst types of lewd parasitic-types there are have had some success in their efforts to descend to character assassination and name calling. To the best of my knowledge, we can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we decidedly have to discuss the programmatic foundations of the Complaint Letter Troll's fatuitous refrains in detail. Not surprisingly, self-righteous litterbugs like the Complaint Letter Troll are all alike.
It's not necessary to go into too long of a description about how the Complaint Letter Troll plans to scapegoat easy, unpopular targets, thereby diverting responsibility from more culpable parties, sooner than you think. Suffice it to say that its blind faith in commercialism leads it only to corruption. Why is the Complaint Letter Troll really so nerdy? Is it because what it is doing falls just short of giving handguns to schoolchildren? Or because it has a deep conviction that its remonstrations are Right with a capital R?
There are two things about the Complaint Letter Troll's scribblings that I find personally offensive, utterly unethical, and quite sad. One is that gangsterism is an exclusive, rather than an inclusive, societal force. And the other is that the Complaint Letter Troll sees life as a randy game without any rules. I claim I am not alone when I say that I indisputably find the Complaint Letter Troll's fondness for inquisitions, witch hunts, star chambers, and kangaroo courts most birdbrained. After having read this, you may think that the Complaint Letter Troll's "compromises" are not only bad for the immortal soul, but for mortal men and women. Nevertheless, you should always remember that the need the Complaint Letter Troll's cronies have for its putrid ebullitions is especially strong as a means of transferring blame -- an outlet for the despair they face when normal channels of protest and change are closed.
Thank you.
Free Jon's computers??
No thanks, I'll have a free beer instead.
Thank you.
AOL doesn't have to do anything that deeply conspiratorial.
They own Netscape, remember? I bet the majority of you who are running Netscape on Linux haven't stepped through the latest binaries with a debugger.
No, they're not.
Suppose you have two stop lights that are 1 mile apart, and are set for 35 mph. This means that if the first one changes at t=0s, then the second one changes at t=(1mi)/(35mph)=1.7min. But if you travel at 70mph, you will arrive after only t=(1mi)/(70mph)=0.86 min and so will have another 0.86 min to wait.
You also can't assume that you'd hit the previous green because the lights being set for a certain speed says nothing about the frequency with which they turn green (or the length), merely the synchronization.
Now, you could have said, Stop Lights Timed For 35mph Are Also Timed for 17.5mph.
I'm really, really disappointed that I had to read down through over a full two thirds of this discussion before finding the Microsoft slagging.
Come on, folks. You're not fighting The Evil Empire(tm) vigorously enough. Do we have to call in the inquisition and find out which of you are secretly Microsoft shills trying to divert the focus?
Everything is Microsoft's fault. If you disagree, you're obviously a Microsoft shill. Go away, we don't need any Astroturf.
etc. etc.
Oh, come on!
Keith Kangaroo and the Kangaroo Kourt of Justice disagree vigorously with your position.
This has everything to do with Journalistic Integrity (tm). I can't believe we even have to argue about it!!
We're really, really sorry to hear that your vigorous, probably almost frantic, efforts to avoid spam will now be defeated.
I suspect you'll be required to turn in your spambuster secret decoder ring, and you'll probably not be allowed to wear your Spambuster Cape at the next convention of the Spam Must Die Association.
------
On a serious note: one of the ways to identify the most strident and 'out there' maroons on the 'net is to look for clever spam traps in their email address.
Entry #12 was even better.
Don't you mean the piggy backing moochers they STILL are. Red Hat Sux
You ccan also stuff the ballot. You gan just continue to hit SUBMIT and then OK over and over and over. . . Should enhance the effect, don't you think.
My complaint about Mr. William J Gates
In this letter, I plan to discuss Mr. William J Gates's disorderly power-hungry slurs quite extensively. Note that the details aren't pleasant. In fact, they're shocking. But I claim that people who don't know what Mr. Gates is up to sincerely need to be shocked. For openers, many boors have an intense identification with moonstruck fastidious pamphleteers. Imagine a world in which he could exploit other cultures for self-entertainment whenever he felt like it. Don't give his utterances a credibility they don't deserve. Although the dialectics of ugly praxis will suppress controversy and debate in the coming days, this is a classic example of a zero-sum game.
Myopic rotten priggism is the shadow cast on society by Mr. Gates's smear tactics, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. As I remove the veil of ignorance I have lived behind, I find that what I take much more seriously than parasitic crackpots are foolhardy cult leaders. All such combinations of audacity with ignorance would be supremely ridiculous but for one consideration: The moral devastations that accompany Mr. Gates's xenophobic perversions suffice to slowly but surely treat anyone who doesn't agree with Mr. Gates to a torrent of vitriol and vilification. Does he realize he's more phlegmatic than most iconoclastic slimy lunkheads?
As a parenthetical note, wishy-washy bookish New Age poseurs are burdened with the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically. Now, I don't want to overwork the story about how Mr. Gates plans to impair the practice of democracy, so let's just say that his drugged-out zingers are not something that endears Mr. Gates to me. The totalitarianism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically-motivated, brilliantly-publicized, blockish attack on progressive ideas. Before I continue, let me state that Mr. Gates constantly insists that his excuses can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. But he contradicts himself when he says that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of stoicism.
As for the lies and exaggerations, I must protest his use of vexatious boneheads to achieve his bloody-minded goals. Please humor me for a moment while I state that Mr. Gates's standard operating procedure is to calumniate helpless sociopaths. Even if Mr. Gates's facts were reliable, they were gathered selectively and then manipulated towards favored conclusions. Mr. Gates must think that being self-serving entitles one to reinforce the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice. Above all, there are some warped sensualists out there who care nothing for you or your cherished maneuvers. If his words aren't subversive, I don't know what is.
Things are apt to get worse before they get better, but given the way things are these days, we must remember that his bait-and-switch tactics have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life! After reading everything I could find on this subject, I was forced to conclude that people should just treat each other with decency and respect. People who are attacked by oligarchism-oriented annoying low-lifes basically have three options. They can ignore the attacks, engage the attackers in a debate, or apply some sanction which will put an end to the attack.
Mr. Gates should reserve his stereotypes and labels and remember to treat others with a bit more respect and equality. What, then, does "roentgenographically" mean? It means considerably more than any dictionary is likely to say. The present controversy demands honest dialogue, not crude attempts at demonization, and hence, by extension, he labels everything that conflicts with his established way of thinking as garrulous propaganda. Mr. Gates needs to step out of the dark ages. Notice the gruesome tendency of his treatises. After being called "daft perverts" a hundred times or so by him and his cronies, my friends and I have reached the conclusion that the few mean-spirited materialistic knuckleheads who deny this are not only wrong, they are willfully inarticulate. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that Mr. Gates's lackeys are the biggest ungrateful patronizing mouthpieces for wrongheaded militarism who have ever dirtied the face of the earth.
To deploy enormous resources in a war of attrition against helpless citizens is an injustice. Vandalism, death threats, and slander are typical tactics used by Mr. Gates's henchmen. Nerdy slumlords don't really want me to lend support to the thesis that a common thread runs through most of Mr. Gates's jibes, a thread so dangerous that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness, although, of course, they all have to pay lip service to the idea. If I may be permitted to make an observation, Mr. Gates's particular brand of insecure collectivism will reward mediocrity faster than you can say "theologicohistorical".
Mr. Gates's arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial. That statement can be most easily defended, since it is not quantitative, but qualitative. And if that seems like a modest claim, I disagree. It's the most radical claim of all. Granted, I'm not going to respond to Mr. Gates's platitudes beyond saying that by preventing people from seeing that the real problem is the complexity of a changing national and world economy, Mr. Gates's assistants can violate values so important to our sense of community. But according to the dictionary, "Mr. Gates-ism" is "any of a set of epithets that make us dependent on the worst types of witless freaks I've ever seen for political representation, economic support, social position, and psychological approval". No matter how much talk and analysis occurs, the Orwellian implications of his modes of thought are perfectly clear.
Mr. Gates's helpers are swinging pretty hard on some slender evidence. Given the morally-questionable political rhetoric of our times, we must speak neither of the past nor of the far future but rather focus on the here and now, specifically on the daunting matter of Mr. Gates's doctrinaire disreputable undertakings. Nasty expostulations have boisterous consequences. Mr. Gates's recommendations make many mainstream dirtbags nervous. Implying that alarmism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society is no different from implying that everyone and everything discriminates against Mr. Gates -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls. Both statements are ludicrous. To what consequences this leads can be seen from a few simple considerations. First of all, he makes assertions that strain credulity.
(Yes, talking about Mr. Gates in the highly-charged vortex of isolationism is always burdened with agitation and diversion, but that's a different story.) All people, including the worst sorts of insipid unsavory-types there are, ought to be kind and sensitive to one another. I do not wish to endorse plagiarism, but rather to illustrate that if Mr. Gates feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing him, then that's just too darn bad. His arrogance has brought this upon himself. As I understand it, he is willing to promote truth and justice when it's convenient. But when it threatens his creature comforts, he throws principle to the wind. The important point here is not that however varied or profound the explanations underlying our sense of moral values may be, insurrectionism is, at its core, an imprudent system that seeks to cause one-sided accusations to be entered into historical fact. The vital matter is that Mr. Gates is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of slaphappy speculation and then makes no effort to test out his speculations -- and that's just the short list! Let me close by reminding you that my vision is built on the future, not the past.
I would like to take this opportunity to hinder the power of gloomy mob bosses like Councilmember Anonymous Coward, Ph.D.. First off, Coward will write off whole sections of society because he possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses the worst classes of dirty suborners of perjury I've ever seen with vile and uncontrollable rage. Please remember that my purpose here is not to tell it like it is. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to expose his criticisms for what they really are and those who wish to practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of unpleasant death cult. Naturally, Coward belongs to the latter category. Just look at the bill of fare served up in recent movies and television programs, and you will hardly be able to deny that a necessary first step towards recovery is to look at Coward with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of false information and deception propagated by the worst kinds of frotteurism-prone politically-incorrect junkies there are. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that with all their sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, his mottos are thoroughly antisocial.
Show me where it says Coward has the right to cause riots in the streets. I am familiar with his goals, I understand how he operates, I have long recognized his tactics, and I know just about where he now stands on the ladder to total power. I can therefore say that, unhesitatingly, all people, including batty survivalists, ought to be kind and sensitive to one another. We must create and nurture a true spirit of community. We must stop Councilmember Anonymous Coward, Ph.D.'s encroachments on our heritage. And we must search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically callous ones championed by the most unruly slobs you'll ever see. Please join me in incorporating these words into our living credo.
MODERATORS, this really should be up toward the top. Please bump it up. Thanks, AC.
What server do linuxone run?
e .net
:)
http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=www.linuxon
RedHat. Says it all, really.
Dave
I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
I agree. That is *far* from an interview, given the
selective cutting and pasting, clearly biased editorial
viewpoint, etc.
Out author keeps referring to them as "not getting the
point". Which point? The one the author superimposes
on the situation? The author fails to synthesize the
viewpoint of the subject of the article, instead dismissing
it instead of understanding it.
This is not an article grounded in fact, rather, in
opinionated fluff. Will a real interviewer go do the
job right?
That's a great moderation!! It took a minute for me to catch it...
:-)
Linux One == A bunch of crap
...so it's redundant.
LinuxOne Inc
This Alzza linux appears to be RedHat 6.1 with Korean font support:
Alzza
Can anyone explain what these are?
--
Simon
The following public key can be used to verify RPM packages built and signed by Red Hat Software using `rpm -K'. If anyone cares to sign this key, please send the signed key to marc@redhat.com. Type bits/keyID Date User ID pub 1024/CBA29BF9 1996/02/20 Red Hat Software, Inc.
Note that that the source tree seems to be brought over directly from CVS, and includes such interesting bits of detritus as object files and emacs buffer files. The CVS root file reveals it to be from :ext:msw@devserv.devel.redhat.com:/mnt/devel/CVS
Why?
Linux is clearly not ready for the desktop. Tell them not to bother wasting their time by installing it.
Sorry, but I don't know what your family does with their computers, but Office, Quicken/Money, and the games are far superior than anything Linux currently has.
Linux is NOT the market leader. Windows is still on 90% of the desktop computers out there. Linux is rising, but to claim them as a leader is foolish.
Except that, when it comes time to change over from libc5 to libc6/glibc2, you basically have to strip the entire machine, at which point you're better off reinstalling from scratch, which is what you were trying to avoid in the first place. RedHat/Debian at least give you half a chance at avoiding that.
I'm currently using Slackware 3.something, and need to upgrade, 'cause libc5 is getting left behind. Now, I could upgrade to Slackware 7 or Debian's upcoming 'potato' release. I must say I don't relish the idea of redoing every niggly little post-installation configuration change again. However, if I install Debian, it will be the last time I ever have to do it; upgrades will carry my configs forward transparently. I'm certain Slackware will require a full reinstall at some future point (I've done it twice before).
I like Slackware. I really like it. I like its simplicity, the fact that you have to learn how this stuff works (thereby affording you the opportunity of doing it right), their particular boot script arrangement... But I've made a zillion little personal changes here and there (my own sendmail.cf, the BACKSPACE key actually generates ^H like it's supposed to, #includes for 'ncurses' are in the place most source packages expect them, etc.) I don't remember everything I touched. I will have to do it again when I upgrade, but I don't want to do it again and again and again... It looks as if Debian will let me avoid that. Debian also does dependency tracking, which is unbelievably helpful. I dare you to try and build and install GnuCash from sources only ("Oh, you also need this Perl extension, which requires this Perl extension; oh, and you also need Guile...").
I'm not looking forward to Debian's boot script method (since I don't grok it yet), or using dselect on a regular basis (because it's so verbose), or the fact that I have no idea where the XF86Config file got dropped, and why it gets stomped every time dselect pulls down an XFree86 update. But I like the idea of Slackware's full-wipe-and-reinstall upgrades even less.
I haven't made the move quite yet. Opinions welcome.
Schwab
Editor, A1-AAA AmeriCaptions
This reminds me: what happened to the supposed segment on DeCSS on ABC WorldNews? I've been watching it every day for the past week (perhaps what they intended), and haven't seen a thing!
Perhaps the ABC-Disney connection silenced it?
Then you'll know who did it, then maybe we can get them into the RBL.
Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
Hmmm... the wording makes it sound like they've already executed the IPO; they've just filed for (and announced) it at this point.
--
Brent J. Nordquist N0BJN
Their complaint form is here.
> Unlike Mandrake, all they did was re-label a buggy version of a Red Hat distribution and call it something new.
AFAIK, that is almost how Mandrake started out. They simply did a RedHat distro with KDE instead of GNOME.
However, Mandrake, unlike LinuxOne, seemed to start out with a degree of support from the Linux community. LinuxOne seems to be trying to forgo the hard work of gaining the respect and support of the Linux community and aiming straight for the rumoured gold in 'them thar Linux hills'. They seem to be unaware that you have to do the first before getting the second.
If this turns out to be the story of LinuxOne, then I'm prepared to radically change my opinion. But I'm not expecting to!
Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
Karma: Chameleon
Check out:
8 3/
Devil Take the Hindmost : A History of Financial Speculation
by Edward Chancellor
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/03741385
Discusses the south seas bubble, the 1929 crash, the 1987 crash, the 1986 Japanese crash, among other things.
A book that lives up to the maxim of, "those that forget history are doomed to repeat it."
Or something.
Apologies to the rest of you, nothing worse than an inside joke.
Bill D and Jimmy C are much underrated.. any idea what the K foundation is up to these days?
Hail Eris..
However, you'll be ok, if you remember that
NOTHING IS TRUE
and
ALL GENERALISATIONS ARE FALSE.
Big up Kallisti, aaaye.
Red Hat, Redhat, Caldera, OpenLinux, SuSE, S.u.s.e., applixware, news, resources, Operating, System, OS, KDE, GNOME, GNU, Server,
Searching for these things gets you LinuxOne?
Just a dude. Stuck in IT.
thank you very much.....
I wrote that....
Hope I win the T-Shirt....
Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
Hey! Post the URL for that complaint letter generator thingie, please! I lost the URL and that's one of the coolest things to send an anon email to someone you 'like' with a link to this page that generates one of these rants on the fly and then say..
Just thought you might want to take a look at this... someone posted a complaint about you!
and if the guy is a real idiot, he will not realize that the page is dynamically generated on the fly with the variables in the URL and actually complain to the site owner thinking that there is a complaint about him posted for all to see.
That's a good thing. It gives you legitimate reason to complain to their parent ISP and wipe them off the face of the net :8)
~Tim
--
Rushing on down to the circle of the turn
we sould contact mr. torvalds too, with a petition to revoke their use of Linux in their name...
Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
My concern is that Microsoft does allow Linuxone to sell Office for Linuxone and when everybody gets pissed off at Linuxone Microsoft can turn around and say "We tried to support the community but this is what you have to expect from free software."
Pork is not a verb
Nah,
they will find another lame ISP, it takes a long time to get ISP's to act, I get enough spam as it is, and it will give anti-linux people things to say, "Linux companies spam" la la la
------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
The form for the flame crap is submitted via email, so if you are not careful, the next thing you will be getting is lots of spam from these guys.
------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
Wasn't that Chinese guy the President/CEO a few weeks ago? Strangely, on their Management section of their website, his name isn't mentioned, and someone else is President/CEO now. Has anybody else noticed that?
--globalnap.net, product of pure caffeine--
KoRn!
-Docvert converts MSWord to OpenDocument, clean HTML
OH, Great!
Now I *have* to go down & check out the Linux Expo thing. I need a Blair Witchy type coffee mug.
Never call a man a fool. Borrow from him. * -** *-** --- *-- - **** * *-*
What with thier product they are doing is just what the GPL encorages(sp?). But what they are doing with their hype is completely wrong.
1) They claim that they have the easiest to use Linux. -- False, it's just a repackaged Red Hat.
2) They claim to bring skill at internationalization to the table. -- Maybe, but they should be working with the proper groups so that every bodies programs will work with their distro.
3) They try to make themselves sound like "the next red hat". -- False, at the time they filed for IPO, they had no product and had only invested $5,000 in equipment/office suplies.
Basically people are pissed because the potential investors are being lied to, and it's probably going to make linux look really, really bad!
Myddrin
Hmmm....
Gee, every member of my wife's family and mine are thinking about switching to Linux.... (with no encoragement from me, btw) Why? Positive experiences of friends, neighbors, co-workers and good press...
The professions are:
Wife's Father : Plant Manger
Wife's Mother : Teacher
My Mother : Social Worker
My 1st Brother : Cult Expert
My 2nd Brother : HVAC Repairman
My 1st Sister : Librarian
My 2nd Sister : Social Worker
As you can see, these are not technical people. (Although my 1st brother did found the magazine "UnixWorld" in the mid-80's)
I think you reallly need to take you head out of Bill Gate's ass and look around. The press is full of positive stories about linux, and negative ones about _every_ other (except for the first time since '84 Apple) OS manufactuerer. Like it or not Linux is being protrayed as the market leader.....
Myddrin
Dude. If you're not going to read my post. Don't respond. I did _NOT_ say they were a market leader, I said they were being portrayed as a market leader. In other words, there have been more articles about upcoming versions of linux than about win2000.
Secondly, I thought I made it clear in my first post that I am hands off as far as what my family uses. If they need help I'll help them but it's their descision.
Myddrin
Maybe these guys are secretly funded by some nameless loose-nit group with a lot of investments dependant on the success of another OS and they figgured that this was a good way to give Linux and Linux vendors/distros some really bad press... The general public loves bad news and scandal right? They remember only the loudest shortest scream and their first impressions... If these guys are enough peoples first impression of Linux it can do huge dammage and with enough Marketing/Advert funds that'll happen... Nahhh they're just a bunch of lamers after a fast buck... Genuine Linux compatable keyboards... Participating in the flame contest just helps them out. They will glean a great deal of press worthy comments and understanding and identity of their opponents through the communication. Best to attack in kind with information to the general public.
morturii
Actually, the "Flame of the Week" contest is a scheme to collect email addresses to sell to bulk emailers for a little extra cash. $$$
I was gonna register LinuxTwo.com and repackage linuxone's repackaged mess. I won't even change the names.
But LinuxTwo.com is registered, doh. One of the e-mails is DomainCollection.com. Hmm. LinuxScam is available.
Dan
I for one cannot believe that they defiled poor little Tux like that. Its like they put thier stupid symbol right on his belly, like a bullseye. Who has the copyright for Tux, and can we get an injunction against LinuxOne for using an altered version without permission?
(Score: -1, Thou Hast Lost an Eighth)
with their Flame of the Week contest. This is certainly a stunt designed to belittle their critics, and only the flames that are the most imbecilic and easiest to shoot down will ever be featured.
Instead, take some time to write a polite note to any given analyst or editor of a financial magazine. Those are the people who will properly discredit LinuxOne and nullify their existence.
I don't get it. How does despamming my address make me a fugitive black slave?
/.
(From www.m-w.com:)
Main Entry: 1maroon
Pronunciation: m&-'rün
Function: noun
Etymology: French maron, marron, modification of American Spanish cimarrón, from cimarrón wild, savage
Date: 1666
1 capitalized : a fugitive black slave of the West Indies and Guiana in the 17th and 18th centuries; also : a descendant of such a slave
2 : a person who is marooned
That must mean there are a lot of Fugitive Black Slaves here on
News for Fugitive Black Slaves, Stuff that Matters (to Fugitive Black Slaves)
This guy was a spammer with NetUSA and the form is submitted via email. That means he's collecting email addresses with this bullshit form. I was stupid enough to submit via netscape without de-spamming my address. Now I'm probably going to get tons of crap to my main email address that I kept spam free for years. Shit
Who knows, maybe these guys are taking the Amazon approach to profits one step farther. They figure that if they can found a company, offer an IPO, and _not even_ lose money their stock will skyrocket. It doesn't have to go out to investors that they shipped 0 units, just the fact that they are not losing money as an Internet startup is good enough.
Seriously though, it was bound to happen that someone would try to ride in on the coattails of the big names like Red Hat. And no, it's not wrong to re-package the RedHat distribution. But they need to offer some valuation added to the distro, and I can't see a RedHat binary of Microsoft Office as the answer.
I remember when Redhat was the focus of all the civil dispute among the linux community. Now Redhat is regarded with pride etc.
:)....and just when i changed from redhat to debian too.
My how times have changed
Let the conspiracy theories roll: Question What is the best way to downplay Linux? Answer Create a phony company that has no value nor product, claim that you're doing the same thing as other companies as well. Let people who don't understand Linux wonder what the hell is going on.
Heh People get pissed off for two reason. 1. Redhat made a distribution and Then made a shit load of money (or sales...not nessecarily money) Then after they were an actuall buisness THEY IPO'ed Linuxone has not product except a really really bad rip off of Redhat (thats in GPL violation due to not providing source) And IPO'ing. Difference? Redhat was reputable before they tried to make a buck. ::Avert your virgin eyes Here:: NOT THESE GREEDY FUCKING BASTARD CHARLATONS CALLED LINUXONE. They are trying to make a quick buck. Whats the difference? Motivation Redhat , mandrake insert Real Redhat clone == In it to provide software to the linux community Right off the bat. Linuxone==Make a shit load of money by ripping off the linux community and selling to blind / dumbass investors, then Either Disapear or maybe make a product of their own
--------========+++Dont Feed The Lab Techs+++========--------
It's painfully obvious that the public _still_ doesn't understand that this company is crap. If the public really, truely, did, the company's staff would have left in a sudden Exodus to good jobs.
Their flame-contest? It's a way to show all of the companies seriously considering investing in these guys that, hey, "All those bad things said about us were in this flame contest. They weren't serious!"
Is it our responsibility to ruin this company? Will Linux still be mone after they fail? If not, then I think the community should do something. If so, screw it and let them and anyone that invests in them lose their money.
a play on zero, from the smashing pumpkins, rite?
-- Went home. Had to feed the kids.
You mean they actually go to those Linux conventions? Maybe they should be placed next to ESR's "Geeks with Guns." That would be really interesting.
*smirk*
Satanic ? I thought it was the biohazard logo... it DID seem proper for them :->
You think if Linux One ports AOL to linux that it would overwrite PPPD? I smell a conspiracy.
Stop calling me human.
People respond to reverse psychology. If we all say its "evil", "bad", "forbidden", people are going to start looking at LinuxOne in a favorable light. Jist like drugs.
Of course LinuxOne doesn't need a business team. We are it!
Interestingly, if you search for "linuxone" on google, no matches are found.
Hmm!
I for one would pay for one of those "I Flamed LinuxOne" T-shirts :)
You'd probably have to anyway . . . first, assuming you're not in the 650 area code, the long-distance call ("Winners please call (650)948-6201 to claim your prize.") Then they'll probably have a small shipping and handling charge.
Hmmm, I wonder if selling "I Flamed LinuxOne" t-shirts myself would be allowable under GPL?
Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
A well thought out and insightful essay.
Although I abhor receiving chain mails (from my less techincally saavy friends) about "how I can make money from microsoft, aol, etc. by forwarding this email to as many friends as possible...", in this case I would not be against using such a tactic. Especially since, we are are trying to get our message out to the less technically saavy investor...
The email should be well worded and begin with: WARNING: DO NOT INVEST IN LINUXONE IPO.
The email include a very descriptive explanation of the LinuxOne situation. And at least five bulleted reasons why a person should not invest in LinuxOne.
The email should also include all links to articles that have been written about LinuxOne to support our claims.
Although I have been reading about this subject since it first appeared at slashdot, I don't think that I have enough knowledge of the linuxone situation, the linux community, or the linux operating system to compile this email by myself.
Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
I hope you don't mean to imply that non-xtians are satanists, not that there's anything wrong with Satanists (they're certainly less annoying than most xtians ;) I thought that their symbol looks kind of like toyota's.
:wq
I think you might be right. Their web site seems VERY unprofessional. Their FAQ section is short, random and has no relevance to LinuxOne at all. However, why the heck are they offering a Chinese version of Linux if they were just playing around?
But damn is it still fun! If only they stopped throwing out such great material. A support staff of two?!? Ha ha ha ha! Hey, it'll probably be the best support available for linux, as they'll hopefully only sell two copies of their distro and have a dedicated support person for each. Of course if they understand the the technical aspects of Linux as well as they understand the GPL then it might not o any good.
Having followed this (or attempted to) for a couple months and being very skeptical, IMHO, there are several possibilities for a 'flame competiion': ,knowing we have some journalists in /., like to see if anyone could follow up on a couple things: (a) can anyone find the people who's names WERE the officers and maybe interview them. If they were summarily dumped by linuxone, might have some real interesting insights and willing to provide them. (b) officers/boards are generally, I would guess, part of disclosure requirements in an S-1 just as in K filings or the proverbial annual report. Anyone know if they've submitted some type of addendum of their S-1 to reflect the total change in upper management? (Wouldn't that make an investor somewhat skeptical?)
(1) provides 'cover' for the real flames to anyone outside Linux community, 'yeah, it's a joke, we have a contest to see who flames us best, doesn't mean anything. so popular, it's on all the web sites now';
(2) provides potential 'out' should people investing end up suing 'see, even on our own site we had opinions showing what people really thought of us, you should have read it. we certainly provided full disclosure' (shareholder suits are infamous. could be simply the old CYA gimmick);
(3) provide fodder for their attorney if IPO fails, suing the flamers saying 'see, they ruined our marvelous technological great superb company (or should say future superb... everything on their site is in 'will be' or 'could be'. at least they finally started putting the safe harbour statements in there.)'.
I wouldn't trust that flame competition. or them. period.
Someone noted the names of all the officers, etc, changed (though the 'owner' isn't prominent on the site, I'd say he still owns the stock/runs the show).
I WOULD
It's a natural evolution of software - if it's liked/used then it will get
supported and developed. Inevitably this will happen to LinuxOne. Unless
they manage to corner a large percentage of the Linux market their proprietary
additional packages will die. The same would happen to Microsoft if another
set of software came along that was equally as usable and free.
The company would just wither and die.
I know it would be difficult to get the "60 Minutes" gang interested in this, but it would be good if non-technical potential investers could be warned of this type of scam.
It would be very unfortunate if LinuxOne makes the quick buck off of this scam just because there are enough suckers who will be dumb enough to blindly invest in the IPO. I don't know if the SEC is empowered to investigate such scams...who do we call? Ghostbusters?
Later on, I wandered by again and asked the guy who was there - some Chinese guy - when the IPO was going to happen. He said he didn't know anything about an IPO! I don't work for a startup, but isn't an IPO pretty big on everyone's mind at these places?
I don't think they care about what anyone thinks and have that flame page just to spit in everyone's face. They just want to do their IPO, get their money and split.
If you look at their "About us" page, they don't even list a CTO! Just a marketing guy, a sales guy, a financial guy and a (new) CEO. Funny that a technical company has no techical people isn't it?
And when did they get a new CEO? Where's the "press release" on that? They have press releases blowing about their contract with a flea market vendor, but not about getting a new CEO? Also, don't they have to modify their IPO's S-1 (or whatever it's called) when they have a major change like that? Has that been done?
Let's face it - LinuxOne is a cheesy rip-off, and even the cheese is a cheap rip-off.
Yes, I know, having more distros is a good thing. That's very true, but even I could produce a better distro than that. IN MY SLEEP! With added value, FROM THE START! And minus cutsey satanic symbols, obviously aimed at impressing those "long-hair rebellious types that use Linux". Sod it! Nobody is impressed by cheap junk, however "rebellious" it looks. Though a few might send the CEO some "get well" cards.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
Unlike Mandrake, all they did was re-label a buggy version of a Red Hat distribution and call it something new. If you're going to be filing off the name, you'd better be adding some real value- otherwise, leave the name on and do like CheapBytes does. It's not hypocrisy when you're complaining about someone literally ripping someone else off- which in this case, it would be Red Hat, the poor sots they sucker into buying their current distribution, and the investors they sucker into buying their stocks.
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
http://www.hackphreak.org/~accipiter
This is a transcript (mp3 included) of a call I made to them.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon? :P)
(If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't.
This is the German comment babelfished for other people like me who are interested.
My objection over LinuxONE LinuxONE had its saying, and this is meins. Which follows, a call is to the complaint on from us, which are interested -- large enough number for challenging vitriolic acceptance LinuxONE's over grade of transmission performance. I must protest to LinuxONE's use of bad Prudisharten to obtain its sadistic targets. This acknowledgment indeterminateness the demonstrability regarding an external to accompany objective reality is concerning a crisis our ability, to be known had that the only way, which is I LinuxONE perhaps forgive can, if it says the truth and forms returning. No matter how much discussion and analysis occur, an organization, which would like to receive in front, should tries, to understand the extensive consequences of its jokes. LinuxONE never had these training bodies. It always does, what would like to do and to figures it be able to do it at the moment to be situated even from all possible problems which develop. LinuxONE's cronies it seems to struggle that it cannot do injustice. I know, because I experienced that personally. LinuxONE's lackeys is frequently intercepted trying to stamp brutishwhinges. Of course they refuse this, but all we know full recess that LinuxONE is not capable to use the English language effectively or correctly. LinuxONE's maneuvers disbursed themselves: squalid wrongmoderated liars and cheat something success in their efforts, in everyone had to already interfere otherwise affairs. It is far away well-known that LinuxONE's philosophies are based on somewhat deep-rooted Funktionseigenschaftstoerung. But I have a tendency, over which more sensationalsachen the fact that LinuxONE to, is shocking the things, things to report as, like it would like to lead substantial documents hidden from the public, until they become politically contentious. And I carry out the difficulty, which has the average person when coming to the grasps with that, but it the case is literal, which we begin to witness the absorbed effects of its new interpretations of the historical cases. It is person suffering from a brain injury, so that LinuxONE regulates debt for social printing, economic loss, or loss of the political energy on a target group their debt designed, supplies a highly simplified assertion. Or possibly I should say, it am political false. If one needs a character the fact that LinuxONE is uncertain regards you that it forms a virtue of the not again-good-closing disturbance. Not too belabor the point, but LinuxONE states that its requirements are approximately hurt not worth receiving. I react that there is another page to the output. An old joke explains from the optimist up to now, which away from a building 60-story and, since it whizzes behind the 35th stick falls, " proclaims, so well! ", but such blind optimism, which henchmen LinuxONE's, is not over to think caused that they can animate a Arcadian behind that again existing ducks never. And that, in my opinion, is our real problem.
Perhaps they are working on a licensed DVD player for Linux :o)
like the guys who nailed a million dollars to a board and set fire to it...
:-)
That would be the KLF then!
The followup was even better, for the last few years, they have been auctioning small sections of the film of that event at various shows they have done.
I was extremely tempted a while back to try and raid one of their events and "kidnap" the remains of their film and ransom it back to them... but laziness got the better of me
A little planning goes a long way...
Meine Beanstandung über LinuxONE LinuxONE hat sein Sagen gehabt, und dieses ist meins. Was folgt, ist ein Aufruf zur Klage auf die von uns, die sich interessieren -- eine große genug Zahl zum Herausfordern von vitriolic Annahmen LinuxONE's über Übertragungsgüte. Ich muß LinuxONE's-Gebrauch von schlechten Prudisharten protestieren, seine sadistic Ziele zu erzielen. Diese Anerkennung des indeterminateness der Nachweisbarkeit hinsichtlich einer externen, objektiven Wirklichkeit zu begleiten ist eine Krise betreffend ist unsere Fähigkeit, zu wissen gewesen, daß die einzige Weise, die ist ich LinuxONE vielleicht verzeihen kann, wenn sie die Wahrheit sagt und Zurückerstattung bildet. Egal wie viel Gespräch und Analyse auftritt, sollte eine Organisation, die voran erhalten möchte, versuchen, die weitreichenden Konsequenzen seiner Witze zu verstehen. LinuxONE hat nie diese Lehrkörper gehabt. Es tut immer, was es im Augenblick tun möchte und Abbildungen es können, selbst aus allen möglichen Problemen heraus zu liegen, die entstehen. LinuxONE's-cronies scheinen, zu ringen, daß es kein Unrecht tun kann. Ich weiß, weil ich den persönlich erfahren habe. LinuxONE's-lackeys sind häufig abgefangenes Versuchen, brutishwhinges einzuprägen. Selbstverständlich verweigern sie dieses, aber alle wir kennen volle Vertiefung, daß LinuxONE nicht imstande ist, die englische Sprache effektiv oder richtig zu verwenden. LinuxONE's-Manöver haben sich ausgezahlt: bereits haben squalid falsch-gemilderte Lügner und Betrüger etwas Erfolg in ihren Bemühungen, in jeder sonst Angelegenheiten zu einmischen gehabt. Es ist weithin bekannt, daß LinuxONE's-Philosophien auf etwas tief-verwurzelter Funktionseigenschaftstörung basieren. Aber ich habe eine Tendenz, über die mehr sensationalsachen, daß LinuxONE bis, ist die shocking Sachen, Sachen zu berichten wie, wie es wesentliche Dokumente führen möchte versteckt von der Öffentlichkeit, bis sie politisch strittig werden. Und ich verwirkliche die Schwierigkeit, die die durchschnittliche Person beim Kommen zu den Griffen mit dem hat, aber es buchstäblich der Fall ist, dem wir beginnen, die selbstabsorbierten Effekte seiner Neuinterpretationen der historischen Fälle zu zeugen. Er ist hirngeschädigt, damit LinuxONE Schuld für Sozialdruck, ökonomischer Verlust regelt, oder Verlust der politischen Energie auf einer Zielgruppe deren Schuld konstruierte, liefert eine stark vereinfachte Erklärung. Oder möglicherweise sollte ich sagen, es bin politisch-falsch. Wenn man ein Zeichen benötigt, daß LinuxONE unsicher ist, betrachten Sie, daß es eine Tugend von der nicht wiedergutzumachenden Störung bildet. Nicht zu belabor behauptet der Punkt, aber LinuxONE, daß seine Ansprüche nicht wert das Erhalten ungefähr verletzt sind. Ich reagiere, daß es eine andere Seite zur Ausgabe gibt. Ein alter Witz erklärt vom optimist, das weg von einem Gebäude 60-story und, da er whizzes hinter dem 35th Stock fällt, " bis jetzt ausruft, so gut! ", Aber es ist nicht solcher blinder Optimismus, der LinuxONE's henchmen, um zu denken verursacht, daß sie einen Arcadian hinter der wieder beleben können existierenten nie. Und das, in meiner Ansicht, ist unser reales Problem.
Someone already put two and two together
Isn't that dot-net maina? After all Andover.net is proving that even the stigma of being a non-dot-com with non-dot-com sites (e.g. slashdot dot
Heck, I see a movie in it. The heart-warming tale of a DNS-dissadvantaged company that managed to strike it big against the odds. Excuse me while I go write the screenplay.
ob-on-topic-comment: So, is it possible that LinuxOne, while a PR nightmare is doing the right thing? If I wanted to build a Linux business right now, I could do worse than to IPO with 1/3-2/3 of my shares, use that to hire a herd of slick, young geeks and start building a company that gains some sales, stock price goes higher, then follow-on with another 1/3.... Oh wait! That's what Red Hat did!
"LinuxOne plans to distribute the Apache server software to its customers"
Get the hell outta here! Nobody bundles Apache. How in the world do they do it? Go go LinuxOne!!
or, perhaps, this
Geeky modern art T-shirts
I get the feeling that the people behind LinuxOne are some kind of avant-garde performance artists, like the guys who nailed a million dollars to a board and set fire to it...
Surely no-one could really be this supremely arrogant and stupid, to alienate their entire potential user base after all this hype, without seriously meaning to...
Yes, and all the good little Christian boys and girls should be using Jesux, remember?
--
E2 IN2 IE?
This is *not* an interview. This is Paul Ferris' *very* subjective report of a conversation he had with the LinuxOne CTO.
This is the worst bit of journalism I've seen in ages.
What's wrong with that? Isn't redistribution exactly what the GPL encourages!
I'm not saying that I trust them or anything and I hope their IPO falls flat on its face
just my 2 cents
I have just been reading through their SEC filings available on-line from www.sec.gov.
I think it is important that we look at their good points:
1) They have made a massive investment in infrastructure by way of property and equipment $18,273
2) They have a good knowledge of the Open source community including Linux Torvalds (their spelling)
3) They currently have four products, their OS was released in Spetember 1999 and with this their entire revenue to the end of October 1999 was $0
Never knock on Death's door:
More race stuff in one place,
than any one place on the net.
What is that little satanic symbol they are using anyhow? Is LinuxOne supposed to be Linux for non-christians?
I dunno, but the one it generated for me was pretty on the spot:
My complaint about Linuxone
"Although I have no criticism of Linuxone's memoranda, I have a few observations and comments to share. I want to share this with you because if history follows its course, it should be evident that opposing Linuxone's insecure disruptive publicity stunts actively and earnestly is the moral duty of every good human being. I'm not going to respond to Linuxone's writings beyond saying that flattery will get Linuxone nowhere. Linuxone is not just incorrigible; it's ostentatious, too. With friends like Linuxone, who needs enemies?
Well, let's get our facts straight. Linuxone needs a refill of its medication. If I understand Linuxone's manuscripts correctly, then Linuxone's inclinations stink of cover-ups, stalls, diversionary tactics, legal maneuverings, and other measures that turn peaceful gatherings into embarrassing scandals.
Linuxone's philosophies turn the stomachs of those who know even a little about the real world. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, those who fight against Linuxone's solecism-oriented money-grubbing theories are inevitably branded as immoral and disreputable by Linuxone's cronies. The foregoing greatly simplifies the real situation, but it does indicate in a rough, general way that I don't need to be particularly delicate here. I leave it to more capable and intrepid folks to explore the full ramifications of Linuxone's effusions. And that's all I have to say."
"shop smart:shop s-mart" ash
Hey.... here's an idea! We start one called Goodtimes Linux. We send out millions of emails to AOL users that say something similar to:
OFFICIAL AOL WARNING: The Goodtimes Linux distribution is a large threat to the community and is being spread by email. If you receive an email that is titled "It takes guts to say Linux" do not open it! This Linux will automatically take over your system and replace your AOL 5.0 TCP/IP stack with a WORKING ONE and cause your system to become stable and secure. It can even cause any computers anywhere near the affected machine to start having long uptimes. We have also receieved word that the illegal DeCSS code is included which will automatically make you a criminal by having it on your computer. We consider this a major problem, and we are working closely with Microsoft and Network Associates to rememedy the problem.
BTW, I wasn't flaming Slackware, it happens to be my favorite distro. But whereas Slackware is a challenge to configure and maintain because you do everything yourself, LinuxOne OS is a challenge to configure and maintain because it is a fetid pile of crap.
It is vitally important for the future of Linux/Open Source that LinuxOne does not succed.
If they become even mildly successful (I don't have a good definition for that, though), then all the companies that are jumping on the Linux/OpenSource bandwagon will think "Hey, we can have the hype of Linux, and ignore the community".
That is exactly the way software companies operated before the Internet - there was very little community of software users, and so they could shovel crap at us, and we wouldn't know any better. The Internet has improved communication now, so people know of alternative products, and Open Source has been shown to be a way to produce (mostly) reliable software that the community will embrace as it's own.
If LinuxOne succeds, some companies will think "Screw the community - we don't need it. Look at LinuxOne - their community hated them and they are going fine"
That's my opinion, anyway. I'd love to hear what others thought about this.
The South Sea Company stock was very popular, and prices went very high. The company had no immediate revenue stream, but once the war with Spain over South America was over the potential for future profit was thought to be huge. Alongside South Sea Comany came other companies hoping to cash in on the boom. The most remarkable was one which was "A company for carrying on an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is".
The parallels with the Linux IPO situation are truly remarkable.
BTW, although there are no links here, you can type that phrase into Google for a number of short histories of the SSB.
Paul.
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
The odd thing is, that even though they print the flames, they don't seem to have any valid responses for them -- almost like they're trying to stir up as much fuss (read publicity) as possible. Perhaps if we ignore them, they'll go away.
The way the CTO talks about their product being 'proprietry' as if it's a USP (unique selling point), scares me -- the thing is, if it's any good, it'll alienate traditional Linux users, but may actually do well commercially, making the current distro wars look like a walk in the park, kinda like all those rumours about 'MicroSoft Linux'.
Oh well, that's assuming they do actually have something of any interest, wouldn't surprise me if their major product anouncement was on April 1st.
--
After seeing the flame contest, there is no way these guys can be serious. My guess is that come April 1st, we're gonna see LinuxOne's IPO, along with an announcement that they've "reinvented" themselves (providing geek novelty items ala thinkgeek or copyleft, perhaps). I for one would pay for one of those "I Flamed LinuxOne" T-shirts :) LinuxOne is just going to become the OSS/linux community's big inside joke. This whole thing is a great way for them to (1) generate publicity, (2) agitate thousands of nerds, and (3) point out some of the craziness behind the recent "dot-com mania" (or whatever the media is calling it this week).
God, I hope I'm right....
---- I made the Kessel Run in under 11 parsecs.
They know how to get free advertising on slashdot.
Criminalize spam and telemarketing!
I wonder what the motivation is? It's sort of like John Rocker attending a NYC ethnic convention and wanting to be a keynote speaker. I really don't think they understand. This is going to generate horrible PR.
Never knock on Death's door:
More race stuff in one place,
than any one place on the net.
A great way to unwind on a Friday afternoon.
I wonder if they accept flames written by this complaint generator
Firstly, there are only a few, so I suspect that there is some degree of 'screening' going on.
This leads me on to the second thing: that the flames are generally lacking in well-considered criticisms of LinuxOne, and that they are generally contain a good deal more vitriol than fact (I appreciate that this is pretty standard for a flame), but bear with me for a sec
It seems likely that the purpose behind this little display is to give the impression that a lot of the (very vocal) detractors of LinuxOne don't really have much of merit to say- they are merely slagging off the company for being too close to Windows (the Linux in Windows theme of the flames seems to be getting a disproportionate amount of attention in these flames).
If the average newbie waltzes by and sees this flame gallery, he(or she) may get the mistaken impression that the now infamous venom against LinuxOne lacks any real ground.
I would bet money that the winning flames of the week do not draw attention to ANY of the (substantial) serious dodginess of this company ant its vacuous product.
Something to think about perhaps?
I wonder if all they got were DeCSS source code entires if they would post the winning entry?
-----
No Zen is good zen
I would be sceptical about getting one of these t-shirts.
Are they just Red-Hat promo shirts with LinuxOne overprinted on them?
Do they claim to have "Never before seen holes, for new cutting edge limbs." perchance?
They could make a mint selling these shirts to the community though.
In fact they'd probably be the most profitable Linux IPO based on the sales of that T-shirt alone.
I had a talk with one of the guys at their booth yesterday. I think it was their CFO.
At first, he sounded quite reasonable and said things like they had not been doing well on their side and "deserve[d] all the 'abuse' we got from the Linux community" aswell as that there was a lawyer that did not understand the spirit of the community, but he got fired, etc...
All the top management (/C?O/) has been replaced in the last two weeks and on their press material nowhere could the name of their doubious founder be found.
At first, I almost fell for their arguments, that they were "newly reborn", "got rid of the evil", but some indepth questions made me even more suspicious then before. First, he didn't want to answer my questions about how large their staff was, only that they had guys "here and there" like in Taiwan, where "guys at the Ministry of Something have guys working on Linux" (aha! for LinuxOne?) and some in California. Realizing that I was writing for a Japanese publisher he claimed "we have a very successfull Japanese version". Gotcha. After telling him, that I KNOW that that is an absolute lie, because I am at the center of the community there (board of linu.or.jp), his statement suddenly changed to "we are having an alliance with the largest software ditributor there", and named an absolutely unknown name, not even sounding Japanese. He said that their Japanesation Engeneer would get in contact with me the same day, but I have not heared from him yey.
Also their press kit is a JOKE. When this stuff appeared at the press root, most of the press (that has a clue) burst out in laughter. Now they are sellin Harddisks as "LinuxOne OS Easy Drive", 13.5GB for $169.95 and $17.3GB for $199.95. Also their "Partial List of Drivers" boasts about "USB UHCI support", "USB keyboard support", "3C507", "Infrared-port devices". Also it runs "with devices[...] such as ADSL and cable modems" (yeah, mine eat 100Base-T)
Statements like "When ready to resume Winows, simply type 'reboot' [...] and LinuxOne Win/Lite terminated" just make me laugh. Guess I have had an amusing afternoon reading this crap.
Because the CFO said, "it was a bad decision to announce intentions IPO, you simple don't do that" I asked him, wheter they were going to delay their IPO untill they repaired their reputation (which he promised to do), he was "not allowed to say" (quiet period?) but "it was every intention to IPO as soon as possible when the company was founded". So they havn't changed, though admitting what they do is wrong.
I am even more convinced that they indeed are a FRAUD, but were trying very hard to cover that up. Without knowing their history and being a community activist, I'd probably fallen for their arguments. The general public MUST be WARNED about this monstrosity.
PS: When Linus worked by, the guy asked to take a picture with Linus. After noticing that he was LinuxOne Linus explictly disallowed them to use this picture for marketing/PR purposes or post it publicaly. I have witnessed this dialoge from a distance of 1m and are willing to testify as a witness in any court, should they abuse this picture.