Slashdot Mirror


User: ucla74

ucla74's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
62
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 62

  1. Re:WTF??? How do you take down? on NASA Contractors Censoring Saturn V Info · · Score: 1

    Just a few factual corrections here: ALL American ICBMs are based in the United States--the locations are quite public. There used to be MRBMs (medium-ranged) in Europe (Pershing I & II, Ground-Launched Cruise Missile (GLCM)); however, they were removed between 1988 and 1990 in accordance with the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.

    And while submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) have near-intercontinental range, they aren't considered "ICBMs"--although they may well be on subs that patrol within range of the Korean peninsula, among other places.

  2. Re:Bill Maher had it right on Schneier Talks to the Head of TSA · · Score: 1
    The airlines don't want to do security screening. They object to the "9/11 tax" added to each ticket, because they have to collect it and then remit it to the government. They want the government to subsidize all the changes they've had to make since 9/11, which are a direct hit to what has been, for the past 6 years (and even longer in some cases), a very thin bottom line.

    But Joe Pax doesn't see that: He sees a higher airline ticket. The airlines want the lowest fares they can sell, generally (don't get me started on the convoluted fare structures of the airlines!). That way, they can add $10/ticket and (hopefully) add some value for that $10. But there's no value-added (from the airlines' point of view, of course) of the 9/11 security tax.

  3. Wait a sec... on New Carbon-based Paper Stronger Than Nanotubes · · Score: 1

    isn't most real paper, carbon-based? You know...the stuff that comes from trees?

  4. What's the difference? on Wikipedia Infiltrated by Intelligence Agents? · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Someone explain to me (or to all of us) why it's perceived worse to have a purported "intelligence agent" (isn't that what a Google spider is?) write some BS on Wikipedia, than it is for some anonymous bozo with a personal bias to write the same BS?

    After all, if someone's relying on Wikipedia as an unimpeachable source (and way too many "netizens"--most of whom should know a helluva lot better, do so) then they do so at their peril.

  5. Re:Monopoly: AMD can't even give chips away. on EU Slaps Intel With Formal Antitrust Charges · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Ruiz would be willing to repeat that, word for word, in court, under oath. (Hint: Look up "dumping.")

  6. Re:VCR on The Trouble With TiVo · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention it's a Betamax.

  7. Re:I Know Nothing of WoW, but... on World of Warcraft Hits 9 Million Users · · Score: 1
    Be careful what you wish for. Before monthly billing plans were introduced, games WERE billed hourly--but not at US$0.04/hr. No...try, $1-$5/hour, depending on the game. Or you could, for example, pay $1.95/hour, or $12/5 hours.

    At $12-15 a month, WoW and other games are just about the biggest bargain you can find--even if you only play an hour or two per week: That's still less expensive than going to a theater for the same amount of time.

  8. And here I thought this was a public rant... on The Real Problem With Alexa · · Score: 1

    about your S.O.!

  9. Re:Robotic? on First Robotic Drone Squadron Deployed · · Score: 1

    Then this whole discussion is rather moot, isn't it? When is a robot, not a robot? It sounds as though people want to have their cake, and eat it, too. (Not that I totally buy your argument, incidentally.)

  10. Re:Robotic? on First Robotic Drone Squadron Deployed · · Score: 1

    I submit that your inference of what "robotic" means is strictly the stuff of sci-fi B-movies, and not reality. "Robots" as used throughout the world today, have no more autonomy than my battery-powered alarm clock: I tell it when to wake me, or not to wake me. It does so, every day at the same time, until and unless I direct it otherwise.

    Similarly, robots--whether on a Toyota assembly line, or a flying drone with a laser-guided munition--do what they're told, when they're told. No less, and no more.

  11. Re:bait and switch on Aussies Sue Over Misleading Google Ads · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interestingly, I just replicated this "test." I typed "free undelete utility" into my Google search box in Firefox. The first result (shaded, and clearly marked as a "sponsored link" was pctools.com, for their trialware product "File Recovery." However, the trial version, as plainly indicated on the resulting page http://www.pctools.com/file-recover/?ref=google_fr &gclid=CMu0-tmMo40CFQlQWAodI1nZ6g does NOT recover deleted files.

  12. Re:Where does goolge say anything about "do no evi on Google Loses Gmail Trademark Case · · Score: 1

    That's because, as was pointed out very early on in these comments, Google, Inc.'s motto is "Don't do evil."

    Unfortunately, most trolls can't read, and those who can, lack comprehension.