Look at what is going on here... the Pipes into was only parenthetical to the review. The reviewer says that this is a most important book on terrorism. So what are all the comments about? NOT THE BOOK, NOT THE REVIEW... rather a silly side comment. Come on, get real!!!
Slashdot Mirror
well put!!! u r the voice of reason here!
Pipes... BLAH BLAH BLAH
that was one tiny part of a big review.
get over it and focus on the review, the book, not a silly pithy intro.
best posting yet!!!! :)
Excellent point!!!!
nah....he is a moderate :)
as per my previous comment:
Focus on the book!
Focus on the book review!
Forget a silly intro sentence!
they don't have to read it, this is ABC's for most CIA analysts. just listen to them!
well... had Bush listened to the Israeli's, he would have not invaded Iraq.
They told him that it would never work.
Look at what is going on here... the Pipes into was only parenthetical to the review. The reviewer says that this is a most important book on terrorism. So what are all the comments about? NOT THE BOOK, NOT THE REVIEW... rather a silly side comment. Come on, get real!!!
My guess that his error was a problem with autocorrect in ms word.
I just tried it and it did change knowledgeable to knowledge two times in the test paragraph I wrote.
It is not the TSA agents who need to read this book...rather TSA mgmt!
Has Pipes made mistakes, yup!
Does EVERY analyst makes mistakes, yup!
Is Pipes correct where it matters? YUP!!!
I love gaffes! please point out all of them.
in the spirit of the book review...
4000+ dead
over a trillion $ spent,
all u got to say is about gaffes?
>>>>is that the TSA is 100% ineffective
such hyperbole!!!! Everyone knows that the TSA is 94% ineffective
if you can't read, your english teacher won't respect you anyhow.
just made the same point. let me second this point.... jay
WIKIPEDIA IS A SOURCE!!!
But depending on the topic, use a grain of salt.
For movie plots, basic info, wikipedia is fine and adequate.
For debateable issues, politics, history, etc., use a few grains of salt.
what article r u referring to?
you just did!!!
Not necessarily "mistakenly" ...
puleeeze!!!!!
at ease private :)
So you are a writer???
please provide a link to your writings.
>>>All Drupal evangelists are coincidentally Drupal consultants
And that makes it a cult?
So what does that make scientology then?
A steep learning curve means it is easy to learn.
People mistakenly use the term to mean it is hard.
>>>Initial learning curve would be way too much
well, a high learning curve, sloping up quickly, means it is EASY to learn!