← Back to Users
Jansingal's activity in the archive.
dude, i agree with you 100000%.but, this will neva eva happen.no one can build such a system that is secure and the world will accept.imaging a real secure Operating system. u think the nascar idiots who use PC's could figure out how to use security?
u makinbg me sick :)I need a pill!
no, its the adults to read these books who are :)
ok, fine, but why does this have to be stated in a NOVEL.Slashdot books should be non-fiction!!!!!
I have seen such firwewalls, great!yeah, but they stay in that state for about a week :(
>>>>Well-defined and documented security policies are practically useless if they are not technically enforced.actually, they are 100% useless is there aint no enforcement.
mistake many firms make is that they think they can just cut and paste policy.it ain't that simply.in fact, that is the worst approach.
no idea why not.
u raise a very good point, this is perhaps the best postingon this topic.
yes, but even an enduser can obviate a lot of so called secure systems
link is broken.but then again, what is the post of your posting?supposed to mean what??>>>
whats ISO 27001/002 got to do with this?very different.
So silly.like no other publisher is under litigation.with this logic, you could never buy another book, ever!
Excellent point!works all the time.
>>If you break the security polices you should be fired. Ithat is sooooo stupid.Not every policy violation deserves the worker to be fired.What's next? Kill the jaywalkers?
no idea what your question is... please explain
so why not then say 'bests regards'?
why the obsession over an acronym?
Look for a Joomla 2.0 soon!
i have no idea what your point is.
just got the book, free overnight shipping, yeah!!at the very beginning of the book, he give different definitions of terrorism from differnt US and foreign agencies. and he even gives his own unique definition.
nah, your commment is poor.you don't know about the book by your comment.it is not that simplistic.
Al-queda is now in Iraq. in fact, they rule it.So Bush was correct retroactively about Al-queda. Damn good logic :)
precisely the problem here!!!some of these people posting obsess on the little things, make big things out of tiny things, and forget about the subject at hand.
that punch of buzz is just awesome... never saw it. and yes, that idiot deserved it.
Slashdot Mirror
dude, i agree with you 100000%.
but, this will neva eva happen.
no one can build such a system that is secure and the world will accept.
imaging a real secure Operating system. u think the nascar idiots who use PC's could figure out how to use security?
u makinbg me sick :)
I need a pill!
no, its the adults to read these books who are :)
ok, fine, but why does this have to be stated in a NOVEL.
Slashdot books should be non-fiction!!!!!
I have seen such firwewalls, great! :(
yeah, but they stay in that state for about a week
>>>>Well-defined and documented security policies are practically useless if they are not technically enforced.
actually, they are 100% useless is there aint no enforcement.
mistake many firms make is that they think they can just cut and paste policy.
it ain't that simply.
in fact, that is the worst approach.
no idea why not.
u raise a very good point, this is perhaps the best postingon this topic.
yes, but even an enduser can obviate a lot of so called secure systems
link is broken.
but then again, what is the post of your posting?
supposed to mean what??>>>
whats ISO 27001/002 got to do with this?
very different.
So silly.
like no other publisher is under litigation.
with this logic, you could never buy another book, ever!
Excellent point!
works all the time.
>>If you break the security polices you should be fired. I
that is sooooo stupid.
Not every policy violation deserves the worker to be fired.
What's next? Kill the jaywalkers?
no idea what your question is... please explain
so why not then say 'bests regards'?
why the obsession over an acronym?
Look for a Joomla 2.0 soon!
i have no idea what your point is.
just got the book, free overnight shipping, yeah!!
at the very beginning of the book, he give different definitions of terrorism from differnt US and foreign agencies. and he even gives his own unique definition.
nah, your commment is poor.
you don't know about the book by your comment.
it is not that simplistic.
Al-queda is now in Iraq. in fact, they rule it.
:)
So Bush was correct retroactively about Al-queda. Damn good logic
precisely the problem here!!!
some of these people posting obsess on the little things, make big things out of tiny things, and forget about the subject at hand.
that punch of buzz is just awesome... never saw it. and yes, that idiot deserved it.