My laptop is connected to the TV. I use it for playiong videos, audio, and various web videos. I don't want anything terminated unless I explicitly terminate it. So they're wrong even in the case of laptops.
Do that all you want on a desktop. On a server, perhaps nobody cares or perhaps the admin will kill your processes. Keep in mind, if you don't actually touch the pages your allocation only exists in theory. If you do, it'll get swapped out if you don't keep touching it periodically.
Once it becomes obvious you're burning resources for fun, the admin will either drop your ulimits down or terminate access.
I run a few systems where the user is expected to start simulations that may run for weeks. I don't need something to start mysteriously killing those processes off.
No, it wouldn't be. First, if you will contemplate what is involved in saving state, you'll realize what an incredible challenge it would be to do so perfectly every time in every case.
For example, if I start a slow FTP session, how will the magic state saver cope? Remember, the remote server is not taking part in the state saving.
Second, had you done that, wouldn't you be a bit disappointed to find out 24 hours later that the file transfer has made no progress at all?
Screen, nohup, and friends exist explicitly to allow a terminal session to dettach and re-attach as needed. I use screen all the time, especially where a firewall might time out.
It's probably best for the system to work like it's always worked. If they want Potterix to work differently, they should put out a distro.
Incorrect. The headers would be fair game if you wanted to RE-IMPLEMENT the GPL library (in fact, that is the case now), but you still wouldn't be allowed to actually link against it.
Only if that is the only variable. Meanwhile in the U.K. muggings are more common than the U.S.
It wouldn't surprise me if the social safety net figures in to the higher homicide rate in the U.S. as well. The lack makes it harder to leave a violent home situation and in general makes people feel more desperate.
Since handgun bans are recent enough to have good figures, I can say it's a fairly consistent response. Immediately after, homicide goes up and then settles down to about where it was before the ban.
So evidence suggests we need to forget about the whole gun thing and figure out what other variable is actually making the difference.
Net servers assume business rules, not residential.
Access implies permission to download in an anon FTP server. The whole purpose of anon FTP is to distribute data freely to the public (remember, it pre-dates HTTP).
The defendant's "crime" is as follows: He picks up the store manager's wallet off of the tray under the "Please take one" sign, holds it up and calls to the manager "Hey, I don't think you meant to leave this here". Suddenly cops with assault weapons appear behind him and take him away.
The icing on the cake? They completely ignored the muggers openly shaking down elderly customers in front of the store.
Nokia could have easily staged a recovery with Android. They had a strong reputation for great hardware. When the ship is sinking, do not tie yourself to a big rock.
Yes, a contracted pentest would still be legal. However, there are many interests where the company will not contract for a pentest or even agree to a free test but exposing their security weaknesses is in the public interest.
He said a combo bundle. He bought the digital license AND a disc. Why should he not be allowed to sell the disc and continue watching the digital file he ALSO paid for?
Because the source is demanding too much money or perhaps has locked it in the "Disney Vault". Fortunately for the buyer, there exists a seller who legitimately paid for the work and no longer wants it. That second seller is just looking to recover a bit of the cost in order to buy more stuff.
For decades now it has been understood that if the FTP server accepts anon as the user name and an email address as the password, it is an anon FTP server and you are authorized. That is the sign. Much like it is understood that you need not knock to enter a place of business when the door is unlocked.
Slashdot Mirror
On a reasonably POSIX system, yes. Apparently not in POTTERIX.
My laptop is connected to the TV. I use it for playiong videos, audio, and various web videos. I don't want anything terminated unless I explicitly terminate it. So they're wrong even in the case of laptops.
Give Devuan a spin. It is very much like Debian but without systemd.
Do that all you want on a desktop. On a server, perhaps nobody cares or perhaps the admin will kill your processes. Keep in mind, if you don't actually touch the pages your allocation only exists in theory. If you do, it'll get swapped out if you don't keep touching it periodically.
Once it becomes obvious you're burning resources for fun, the admin will either drop your ulimits down or terminate access.
I run a few systems where the user is expected to start simulations that may run for weeks. I don't need something to start mysteriously killing those processes off.
No, it wouldn't be. First, if you will contemplate what is involved in saving state, you'll realize what an incredible challenge it would be to do so perfectly every time in every case.
For example, if I start a slow FTP session, how will the magic state saver cope? Remember, the remote server is not taking part in the state saving.
Second, had you done that, wouldn't you be a bit disappointed to find out 24 hours later that the file transfer has made no progress at all?
Screen, nohup, and friends exist explicitly to allow a terminal session to dettach and re-attach as needed. I use screen all the time, especially where a firewall might time out.
It's probably best for the system to work like it's always worked. If they want Potterix to work differently, they should put out a distro.
Incorrect. The headers would be fair game if you wanted to RE-IMPLEMENT the GPL library (in fact, that is the case now), but you still wouldn't be allowed to actually link against it.
Only if that is the only variable. Meanwhile in the U.K. muggings are more common than the U.S.
It wouldn't surprise me if the social safety net figures in to the higher homicide rate in the U.S. as well. The lack makes it harder to leave a violent home situation and in general makes people feel more desperate.
Since handgun bans are recent enough to have good figures, I can say it's a fairly consistent response. Immediately after, homicide goes up and then settles down to about where it was before the ban.
So evidence suggests we need to forget about the whole gun thing and figure out what other variable is actually making the difference.
Only if she only pretends to mow the lawn or serve lunches.
Yes, she should have a bright future as a con artist.
The more important figure is murder by any means. Dead is dead.
Now that kids not exposed to so much lead as children are reaching adulthood, our crime rates are falling.
Next up, glass bottles. After that, hammers.
Soon enough, we'll see adults using safety scissors and writing with crayons.
Net servers assume business rules, not residential.
Access implies permission to download in an anon FTP server. The whole purpose of anon FTP is to distribute data freely to the public (remember, it pre-dates HTTP).
The defendant's "crime" is as follows: He picks up the store manager's wallet off of the tray under the "Please take one" sign, holds it up and calls to the manager "Hey, I don't think you meant to leave this here". Suddenly cops with assault weapons appear behind him and take him away.
The icing on the cake? They completely ignored the muggers openly shaking down elderly customers in front of the store.
Nokia could have easily staged a recovery with Android. They had a strong reputation for great hardware. When the ship is sinking, do not tie yourself to a big rock.
That used to be part of the social contract in the U.S. As long as you did your job, the job was yours. When you retired, you got a pension.
Now, corporations expect the same loyalty but offer none in return.
Yes, a contracted pentest would still be legal. However, there are many interests where the company will not contract for a pentest or even agree to a free test but exposing their security weaknesses is in the public interest.
The ease of breaking the law is not an excuse to assume the law was broken.
How do I prove I didn't rip a CD or DVD? If I sell a rebound book, where's the proof I didn't run it through the copier at work first?
It's the same thing. I don't have to prove it. If anyone objects, it's on them to prove I did. That has always been the case.
What if I memorized the book?
He said a combo bundle. He bought the digital license AND a disc. Why should he not be allowed to sell the disc and continue watching the digital file he ALSO paid for?
Gee, the website said BUY IT NOW. So I guess I BOUGHT it.
It says that because I would perceive (correctly) a lesser value if it was a limited license and would demand a lower price to match.
Because the source is demanding too much money or perhaps has locked it in the "Disney Vault". Fortunately for the buyer, there exists a seller who legitimately paid for the work and no longer wants it. That second seller is just looking to recover a bit of the cost in order to buy more stuff.
Simple answer, because the tinfoil hat club has been proven right over and over again in the 21st century.
Sad but true.
Naturally it is theft to take the hubcaps off of someone's car, None of the socially agreed upon signs are there that they are being offered to you.
You have a bizarre idea on theft. I guess you gave your birthday presents back unopened when you were a child?
For decades now it has been understood that if the FTP server accepts anon as the user name and an email address as the password, it is an anon FTP server and you are authorized. That is the sign. Much like it is understood that you need not knock to enter a place of business when the door is unlocked.