Yes, a judge would likely toss that information, but might not recognize "parallel construction". Further, depending on the nature of the statement, there could be non-court related damage from the information getting out.
Apple was informed at least a week before by the teen who discovered the bug, complete with a video of the exploit in action. They took no action until after the bug and trivial exploit went viral.
I seriously doubt this had anything to do with a law enforcement back door.
See the "if they know what they're doing" part. I have seen many web pages where I could easily replace a massive bulk of included javascript + framework with under 100 lines of well written Javascript. In the most extreme case, 5 lines would have done the job. It was actually more work to do it within the framework not even including the time it would take to learn how to use the framework.
Part of the problem is that there are too many "web developers" who ONLY know how to use the framework, mostly cargo-cult style.
It's also notable that e-cigs don't include a MAO inhibitor along with the nicotine. The MAOI in tobacco smoke potentiates the addictive properties of nicotine. After vaping for a while, the former smoker finds that the nicotine craving becomes a lot less urgent than it was while smoking.
Actually, no. Vaping is not smoking. Would you rather the teens vape or smoke? I ask because history has long proven that your preferred option of neither one just doesn't happen in the real world.
It would be, but it isn't the case today. These days the plaintiff just says "you know, it's totally understandable that we mistook a robin singing for our latest death metal track!" and they get away with it. But is as a defendant you lose, you get the financial death penalty.
Javascript doesn't actually NEED a framework if your developers know what they're doing. Use it as glue between the server side and the HTML displayed by the browser. I have some Javascript that was written before Node.js even existed that still works today with no changes
That would be because the next step is a trip to court with the lawyer you can't afford during the vacation time you don't have and very little chance you'll get any of that money back and a fair chance you'll be saddled with penalties exceeding your annual income even if you're in the right.
You seem to have lost the thread, perhaps if you read it again, you'll remember. It's OK if you have to move your lips while you read, nobody's watching.
And since you are not only ignorant but insulting as well, kindly cram that up your syphilitic asshole you rancid pus ridden blob of dog shit. Then go slap your mother for not flushing fast enough when you were born.
Since I have friends who are on Facebook, they have data on me even though I don't have an account. Show me where I granted them any sort of permission to sell that data or even maintain it?
I remember the "crackpot conspiracies" like the FBI is keeping dossiers on social activists like MLK and John Lennon, or the CIA is testing LSD as an interrogation tool by slipping it to unsuspecting subjects, or the NSA has a secret room where they tap into the phone system and monitor whatever calls they think are interesting,
The truth of all of those is now a matter of public record along with testing radioactive substances on mentally handicapped children and poor pregnant women, and providing sham treatment for syphilis in order to see how it progresses without treatment.
Sure, flat Earth and fake Moon landing are bunk, but while I don't necessarily believe any mass shootings are conspiracies, I have to admit it wouldn't be so far out of line with the ones above that are established fact.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, a judge would likely toss that information, but might not recognize "parallel construction". Further, depending on the nature of the statement, there could be non-court related damage from the information getting out.
That part really is questionable. I don't doubt there was damage, but it wasn't likely that much damage.
Apple was informed at least a week before by the teen who discovered the bug, complete with a video of the exploit in action. They took no action until after the bug and trivial exploit went viral.
I seriously doubt this had anything to do with a law enforcement back door.
See the "if they know what they're doing" part. I have seen many web pages where I could easily replace a massive bulk of included javascript + framework with under 100 lines of well written Javascript. In the most extreme case, 5 lines would have done the job. It was actually more work to do it within the framework not even including the time it would take to learn how to use the framework.
Part of the problem is that there are too many "web developers" who ONLY know how to use the framework, mostly cargo-cult style.
Some thought that the US wouldn't do such a thing as it was immoral, and no hard evidence to show that they did. This is a very dependable position.
Apparently it is not a very dependable position since the fact that they actually DID do it is a matter of public record.
Do you get an irritated red spot when you thump your chest that much?
It's also notable that e-cigs don't include a MAO inhibitor along with the nicotine. The MAOI in tobacco smoke potentiates the addictive properties of nicotine. After vaping for a while, the former smoker finds that the nicotine craving becomes a lot less urgent than it was while smoking.
Actually, no. Vaping is not smoking. Would you rather the teens vape or smoke? I ask because history has long proven that your preferred option of neither one just doesn't happen in the real world.
Unlike extreme consumers of microwave popcorn (yes really!), no vaper has ever been diagnosed with popcorn lung.
So by your logic, we should ban microwave popcorn?
It would be, but it isn't the case today. These days the plaintiff just says "you know, it's totally understandable that we mistook a robin singing for our latest death metal track!" and they get away with it. But is as a defendant you lose, you get the financial death penalty.
Avoid frameworks at all cost.
Javascript doesn't actually NEED a framework if your developers know what they're doing. Use it as glue between the server side and the HTML displayed by the browser. I have some Javascript that was written before Node.js even existed that still works today with no changes
That would be because the next step is a trip to court with the lawyer you can't afford during the vacation time you don't have and very little chance you'll get any of that money back and a fair chance you'll be saddled with penalties exceeding your annual income even if you're in the right.
No, they send the email or phone number of the targeted phone to a 'targeting system'. That system then performs the exploit that grants access.
Keeping Google honest-ish.
What makes you think Facebook told them they would grab and sell contact info?
You seem to have lost the thread, perhaps if you read it again, you'll remember. It's OK if you have to move your lips while you read, nobody's watching.
I'll post this again.
And since you are not only ignorant but insulting as well, kindly cram that up your syphilitic asshole you rancid pus ridden blob of dog shit. Then go slap your mother for not flushing fast enough when you were born.
Since I have friends who are on Facebook, they have data on me even though I don't have an account. Show me where I granted them any sort of permission to sell that data or even maintain it?
Even if you don't use it, they may have data on you.
Further, the form in thimerosal is eliminated in urine. The forms that are concerning bio-accumulate.
If there was aa causal link between vaxination and autism, you would have a point, but there isn't.
If that condition was visually apparent, it could sort of work, but it isn't.
I remember the "crackpot conspiracies" like the FBI is keeping dossiers on social activists like MLK and John Lennon, or the CIA is testing LSD as an interrogation tool by slipping it to unsuspecting subjects, or the NSA has a secret room where they tap into the phone system and monitor whatever calls they think are interesting,
The truth of all of those is now a matter of public record along with testing radioactive substances on mentally handicapped children and poor pregnant women, and providing sham treatment for syphilis in order to see how it progresses without treatment.
Sure, flat Earth and fake Moon landing are bunk, but while I don't necessarily believe any mass shootings are conspiracies, I have to admit it wouldn't be so far out of line with the ones above that are established fact.
My bad, I looked at it but didn't see that video chat is there, just a different way to get to it.
They might still run into trouble if a 16 year old gets a driver's license.