Slashdot Mirror


State of Emergency Declared in Washington State Over Measles Outbreak (cbsnews.com)

An anonymous reader quotes CBS News: The governor of Washington state declared a state of emergency Friday over a measles outbreak that has sickened dozens of people in a county with one of the state's lowest vaccination rates. Gov. Jay Inslee said in a statement that the outbreak in Clark County "creates an extreme public health risk" that could spread throughout the state...

Clark County Public Health has confirmed 30 measles cases since January 1 and identified another nine suspected cases. Twenty-six of the confirmed cases were people who were not immunized for measles, the agency said... Only 77.4 percent of all public students there complete their vaccinations, according to state records cited by the Oregonian...Most of the confirmed cases -- 21 -- were with children between 1 and 10 years old. Eight cases involved people 11 to 18 years old, and one case was someone 19 to 29.

Time magazines also reports that authorities in the neighboring states of Oregon and Idaho "have issued warnings to residents."

In November the World Health Organization warned that measles cases worldwide had jumped more than 30% from 2016 to 2017, according to AFP, "in part because of children not being vaccinated."

355 comments

  1. Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:Lets be antivax! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Troll

      Intelligence is heritable, so if they are anti-vaxxers or their direct descendants, we may want to give them an IQ test before we treat them. It may be better to let natural selection run its course. We'll all be better off in the long run.

      Clark County is directly across the Columbia River from Portland, so we may be able to purge the entire metro area of idiots.

    2. Re:Lets be antivax! by jpaine619 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem with your theory is that you can get a disease, that you have been vaccinated for, if you're hit with a huge amount of the infectious agent. i.e. If you sit down next to someone who's leaking measles all over the place (coughing, sneezing, etc) it may overwhelm your immune system and you could get get sick.

      Vaccines work best when everyone gets them.

    3. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad countries are too reluctant to allow large scale life-choice experiments. I used to read a lot of books about when countries were first discovered (mostly by Europeans) and about half a dozen times a native population would split themselves on whether to accept western medicine and foods and things or to not trust them and stay away.

      It would be cool if there was like a region in the USA created like a part of Montana or something and all anti-vaxers can live there. Give it 60 years and see what happens.

    4. Re:Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with your theory is that you can get a disease,

      Allow workplaces and schools to declare a policy, either vaccinated or unvaccinated. Make sure everybody has a choice of where to go. Eventually the anti-vaxxers will be grouped together in one set of schools and when the epidemics come we can just lock them in and isolate them.

    5. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a fucking retard

    6. Re: Lets be antivax! by Saithe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do know that the flu vaccine is efficient, right? It's just not efficient against all three strands of the flu and they try to guess which one will be the dominant one each year. Sometimes they get it right, sometimes not, but at least there's a chance of protection.

    7. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not vaccines themselves or the government for pushing us to have them. Itâ(TM)s the things that go with the whole vaccine culture that are the problem. For example you might say vaccine tongue in cheek to refer to something like a vaccine or you might promulgate a myth by saying people who avoid vaccines are inbred and maybe you will get people thinking that inbreeding (not that anyone knows the definition precisely) is synonymous with vaccine avoidance. You could destroy a whole society in a couple generations with some well placed fallacies that go viral

    8. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing. Here in Australia because of regulations, we'll likely be almost rid of common conditions like cervical cancer in 50 years.

      You hear stories of antivaxxers who regret not having vaccines until it is too late constantly

    9. Re:Lets be antivax! by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Creating educational echo chambers hasn't generally been a good idea - take Upper Padville for an example.

      You'll just get the anti-vaxxers going over and shooting all the others for not being prawpur chrurstyurns.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re: Lets be antivax! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Troll

      You could destroy a whole society in a couple generations with some well placed fallacies that go viral

      Indeed. Look what happened to the Romans. Hardest bastards in the world, then Constantine went all batshit and in next to no time they turned into wops and become a laughing stock.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      HPV vaccine you twat.

    12. Re:Lets be antivax! by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      The problem with your theory is that you can get a disease, that you have been vaccinated for, if you're hit with a huge amount of the infectious agent. i.e. If you sit down next to someone who's leaking measles all over the place

      You've kind of answered your own question here. If the intelligent people refrain from sitting down next to someone who is "leaking measles all over the place" then the Darwinian principle would still hold.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    13. Re:Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course we could just ban Christians from being allowed to be vaccinated, 30 seconds later they would be at the supreme court demanding it claiming religious persecution.

    14. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... After which point your now spoiled and ignorant populace will question its necessity. Same thing happened here.

    15. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go to hell you fucking retarded putin cock sucking russian faggot

    16. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      please forgive them, they're a dumfuk 'merican.

    17. Re:Lets be antivax! by r1348 · · Score: 0

      Intelligence is inheritable? Please prove that. Also, please tell us how you measure intelligence.
      Then, and only then, your eugenetic drivel will be taken under consideration.

      For the record, I strongly support vaccinations.

    18. Re:Lets be antivax! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lets be antivax! What could possibly go wrong?

      VMS sales, for example?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    19. Re:Lets be antivax! by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1, Troll

      Creating educational echo chambers hasn't generally been a good idea - take Upper Padville for an example.

      You'll just get the anti-vaxxers going over and shooting all the others for not being prawpur chrurstyurns.

      Aren't many of the celebrity anti-vaxxers from the left and/or secular side of the political spectrum?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    20. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Mind you, rightie retards hopped on the bandwagon as well, but antivax started on the left and is majority left.

      And then you have the hypocritical remainder, who whine (properly) about antivaxxers while screeching that we need to import more diseased, antivaxxer third worlders.

    21. Re:Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Anne Coulter, total commie.

    22. Re:Lets be antivax! by malkavian · · Score: 2

      You realise that it's infectious in its incubation period, before people get symptomatic, right?

    23. Re:Lets be antivax! by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Aren't many of the celebrity anti-vaxxers from the left and/or secular side of the political spectrum?

      Yeah. Anne Coulter, total commie.

      "Many" doesn't mean "all", it means "many". In fact, the outbreak right now is in the middle of a majority left population.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    24. Re:Lets be antivax! by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      This is just nature weeding out dumb people. Please move along.

      I still remember people in my grandparent's age telling me their horror stories of experiences either they or former (read dead) members of their family had with measles.

    25. Re: Lets be antivax! by cheesybagel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude. The flu vaccine is efficient. Why do you think the doctors and nurses take them themselves every single year? The problem is the flu virus mutates rapidly and there are several strains of the virus, unlike other viruses, so the protection it provides is limited in time until the flu virus mutates again. It also needs to be produced months in advance (it takes time to prepare it).

    26. Re: Lets be antivax! by cheesybagel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't say so. The part of the Empire he personally oversaw managed to last another 500 years. Which is more than the USA has been in existence so far.

    27. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those toxic additives do serve a purpose. They keep the virus preserved and trigger an immune response. That's how your immune systems knows to go fight it. A weakened virus by itself would just fall apart without any help from the immune system, or worse it would just infect the person.

    28. Re:Lets be antivax! by sjames · · Score: 1

      If that condition was visually apparent, it could sort of work, but it isn't.

    29. Re:Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      correct me if i'm wrong, but the only people that will catch it are the unvaccinated, right? so the danger has been there all along. or arethey implying that people who were vaccinated will now catch the Measels because of the people who did not vaccinate against it caught it? how does that work?

    30. Re: Lets be antivax! by Mspangler · · Score: 1, Informative

      Odd, I had the measles, as did my brother. It knocked me on my butt for about five days, and at half-speed for another five. And not even close to life threatening. Niether of us even saw a doctor because it wasn't necessary since they can't cure a virus anyway.

      The caveat I'll admit to is that our ancestors are from the North German Plain. Measles has been endemic there since Caucasians got there. If I was Native American the results might have been worse. I don't know if their genes have been sufficiently selected for for enhanced virus killing functionality.

    31. Re: Lets be antivax! by careysub · · Score: 4, Informative

      This site cites five different pollsters all indicating that antivaxx sentiment rates are evenly split between parties.

      Anyone here trying to make this into a right/left issue is pushing a false agenda.

      So no, not majority left (unless you are pinning your claim on the fact that Republicans are in a minority.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    32. Re: Lets be antivax! by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're describing Clark County, the conservative sinkhole across the river from liberal Portland.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    33. Re: Lets be antivax! by careysub · · Score: 1

      Your father needs to go to a different doctor, who is not an incompetent "pill doctor". He needs to have a "medication reset" wherein only the underlying life or health-threatening medical condition (if any) is treated with medication.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    34. Re:Lets be antivax! by clovis · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem with your theory is that you can get a disease, that you have been vaccinated for, if you're hit with a huge amount of the infectious agent. i.e. If you sit down next to someone who's leaking measles all over the place

      You've kind of answered your own question here. If the intelligent people refrain from sitting down next to someone who is "leaking measles all over the place" then the Darwinian principle would still hold.

      It's not necessary to sit next to a measles infected person, or even be near a measles infected person to get infected.
      https://www.cdc.gov/measles/ab...
      "Also, measles virus can live for up to two hours in an airspace where the infected person coughed or sneezed. If other people breathe the contaminated air or touch the infected surface, then touch their eyes, noses, or mouths, they can become infected. Measles is so contagious that if one person has it, 90% of the people close to that person who are not immune will also become infected.

      Infected people can spread measles to others from four days before through four days after the rash appears."

    35. Re:Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      correct me if i'm wrong, but the only people that will catch it are the unvaccinated, right? so the danger has been there all along. or arethey implying that people who were vaccinated will now catch the Measels because of the people who did not vaccinate against it caught it? how does that work?

      No vaccine is 100% effective because everyone's immune system is different, and some people have a poorly functioning immune system, and some people are very young or old and vaccinations just don't take well in many of those people.

      But by and large, most of the people who were vaccinated will not catch measles if they get exposed to an active infection.

    36. Re: Lets be antivax! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      That's the experience of most people who got measles, which includes myself. There was no vaccine for it in 1956. But because the disease has a number of horrible side effects in some patients, we don't want anyone to catch it now that a vaccine exists.

    37. Re:Lets be antivax! by meglon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. Clark county is fairly split, but is currently leaning republican, with all the elected officials being republicans except their prosecuting attorney and treasurer. At the very least do 20 seconds of research before typing.

      But lets be a bit clearer... when people say anti-vaxxer they immediately think of the dipshits who don't get their kids the measles or TDaP vaccines. They don't think about all the fundamentalist religious freaks who refuse to get the HPV vaccine for their kids... obviously opting to have their kids die in the excruciating agony from several completely preventable diseases, instead of saving their lives because "sex bad, mkay," and they somehow think their kids will all turn into prostitutes and porn stars if they did get the vaccine.... which i think just shows how little they think of their own parenting skills.

      So, no, anti-vaxxers aren't predominately left-wing.... but all of them, left or right, are predominantly stupid.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    38. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because they are FORCED to take them, retard.

    39. Re:Lets be antivax! by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      The problem with your theory is that you can get a disease, that you have been vaccinated for, if you're hit with a huge amount of the infectious agent. i.e. If you sit down next to someone who's leaking measles all over the place (coughing, sneezing, etc) it may overwhelm your immune system and you could get get sick.

      Vaccines work best when everyone gets them.

      Actually, it's typically not an 'overwhelmed your immune system' issue usually as much as 'the vaccine did not take,' or possibly 'guess what was among the germ definitions your immune system has decided to clean out!'

      The only useful thing I know of that we have learned from the antivaxxer movement is that some vaccines we thought provided lifelong protection such as the measles vaccine don't actually do that: they actually provide what, if herd immunity is achieved, is effectively lifelong protection because the immune system 'remembers' long enough to get you through the period where you're most likely to get it. We might not have necessarily needed them to learn this, though, so the only thing they did is make it easier to identify the problem by sacrificing their children's futures.

      However, none of this makes it okay because the morbidity and mortality isn't limited to the antivaxxers themselves, because the odds are low that any of them are personally unvaccinated--I doubt that their kids consented to be victims of a very risky experiment that almost certainly would have never made it past an ethics review anyway.

    40. Re:Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      goose-stepper-incarcerated is proved to be a liar again.

    41. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd, I had the measles, as did my brother. It knocked me on my butt for about five days, and at half-speed for another five. And not even close to life threatening. Niether of us even saw a doctor because it wasn't necessary since they can't cure a virus anyway.

      The caveat I'll admit to is that our ancestors are from the North German Plain. Measles has been endemic there since Caucasians got there. If I was Native American the results might have been worse. I don't know if their genes have been sufficiently selected for for enhanced virus killing functionality.

      Caucasians got to Germany long before measles did because measles did not exist back then. It's believed that measles did not evolve until about 1000 AD.
      The precursor was probably rinderpest, a disease of hoofed animals that was eradicated through a 20th century world-wide vaccination campaign of animals.
      Rinderpest is the second disease to be eradicated from Earth thanks to vaccination.
      We could easily do the same with measles.

    42. Re:Lets be antivax! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I swear the germs do that on purpose. Sneaky little bastards.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    43. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm down.

    44. Re: Lets be antivax! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is an absolutely perfectly example of the adage "the plural of anecdote is not data."

      Measles has a death rate of around 2 per 1000, higher in very young children and adults. The serious complication rate (like permanent hearing damage) is a bit higher. It's absolutely unsurprising that in your sample of two, neither of you died. But if measles was endemic in a country of, say, a third of a billion people... that's a lot of fatalities.

    45. Re:Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is the truth. These outbreaks are almost always due to illegal immigrants bringing the disease in and spreading it amongst their communities.
      The media loves to not report on that.

      Salmonella outbreaks in restaurants? Almost all are ultimately traced back to sick farm workers who shit in the field and don't wash their hands before going back to picking your crops.

    46. Re:Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why worry, evolution will correct the game and remove idiots from gene pool. Unfortunately also the kids who are too young to vaccinate will get harmed too, but antivax helicopter mums do not care anything but their own source of facebook pictures and stories.

    47. Re:Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But because your immune system has already been exposed to a similar strain, it manages to clear that shit up a lot easier than some antivax idiot.

    48. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, most people recover without major problems. Others suffer complications like permanent hearing loss.

      And then there are the really unlucky. They seem to recover fine but 7-10 years down the road they develop Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE). There is no cure, if you get it, it will kill you.

      I take the vaccine, thank you.

    49. Re: Lets be antivax! by rl117 · · Score: 2

      "proven to contain". No. That's a really weird conspiracy-theory stance. No. They are *known* to contain various substances because they have a *purpose*, and were specifically added to serve that purpose. Some are to act as a preservative (e.g. thimerosal--a form or mercury). Others are to act as an adjuvant (e.g. aluminium). Adjuvants stimulate an inflammatory response which causes the immune system to notice and react to the virus part of the vaccine, and develop a proper immune response. Without it, the vaccine would not work, or would work very poorly.

      The tiny amounts of e.g. mercury and aluminium in a vaccine are of little consequence. Most of the mercury will be excreted over weeks-months, and it was only present in microgram quantities in any case.

      As for your father's medication, this has zero bearing on vaccines and it completely irrelevant.

    50. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that the flu vaccine is efficient, right? It's just not efficient against all three strands of the flu and they try to guess which one will be the dominant one each year. Sometimes they get it right, sometimes not, but at least there's a chance of protection.

      So... sometimes it does work, sometimes it doesn't, precisely like GP said?

    51. Re: Lets be antivax! by thsths · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Antivaxers are an anti-intellectual movement (anti-enlightenment, if you want to put it into historical context), mixed in with some anti-authoritarian sentiments, and they come from all parts of the spectrum.

    52. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      must be pushing an agenda

      In Soviet Russia, leftists post on Slashdot

    53. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the summary, 26/30 people who got the disease were not vaccinated. Thus, 87% of the people who would die if nobody got treated would be unvaccinated, meaning that if we were a bit cynical, we would give natural selection a strong helping hand if we didn't offer treatment.

    54. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bible doesn't say that vaccines are permissible, therefore vaccines are not permissible. Period.

    55. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not wrong. I quit Mensa after the first meeting I attended because almost everyone was a complete moron incapable of thinking, even a little.

    56. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The HPV vaccine is not a vaccine for cervical cancer. There is currently no vaccine for cervical cancer.

      Your failure here is that you think HPV infection is the only way to get cervical cancer, and it is not. Please think before you post inaccurate and misleading alternative facts on Slashdot.

      To clear things up, the HPV vaccine is a vaccine for HPV, and only a few strains of HPV at that. It does not immunize the recipient against all strains of HPV, and it is not 100.0% effective against the strains of HPV that it does attempt to immunize against.

      It does not stimulate an immune response to cancer cells. You can still get cervical cancer even if you have had an HPV vaccine.

      Do you understand now?

    57. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't think intelligence is heritable, how do you think Homo Sapiens evolved?

    58. Re: Lets be antivax! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "Why do you think the doctors and nurses take them themselves every single year?"

      Because it is a condition of employment.

      "The problem is the flu virus mutates rapidly and there are several strains of the virus, unlike other viruses, so the protection it provides is limited in time until the flu virus mutates again."

      So close, yet so fail. You started out great, then petered out. The problem is the flu virus mutates rapidly and there are several strains of the virus, and the companies making the vaccines sometimes target the wrong strain(s) ... But when they do, they don't tell you so, and instead they continue marketing the vaccine as if it would be useful. So every year, you have to dig through news articles to find out whether they got it right to determine whether there is actually any point to getting it. It's understandable that they would get it wrong sometimes, but it is outright fraud when they sell you vaccinations targeting the wrong strains under the claims that flu vaccinations save lives. Sure they do, but not those ones! But they advertise them exactly the same as the ones that will. It's crap like that which reduces public faith in vaccination.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    59. Re: Lets be antivax! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      " Most of the mercury will be excreted over weeks-months, and it was only present in microgram quantities in any case."

      Mercury is bioaccumulative, so there is no safe dosage. The argument over thimerosal is whether it breaks down into a form that can be absorbed or not. AFAICT that is still being questioned. In the USA, it is used only in multi-use vials, so you can avoid it by going to the doctor for injections instead of getting them from a queue. It HAS been used in schools, even past the date at which it wasn't meant to have been given to children any more, which reduces public trust in vaccination systems.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    60. Re: Lets be antivax! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because it is a condition of employment.

      And yet I know many formerly employed, retired and career changed doctors and nurses who continue to take them every year. Mind you so do I, so does my wife, so does everyone with half a brain and access to a free medical system.

      But when they do, they don't tell you so, and instead they continue marketing the vaccine as if it would be useful.

      False. Targeting the wrong strain is something that you only find out after the fact. The information is openly published, and people who are extremely late in the season are advised to get the shot anyway simply because it still immunises you against the non-predominant strain of the season.

      Don't go looking for conspiracies where there are none.

      but it is outright fraud when they sell you vaccinations targeting the wrong strains under the claims that flu vaccinations save lives. Sure they do, but not those ones!

      That is a dumb comment. It's like calling fraud the fact that you're dying of lung cancer after getting your HPV vaccine. You have still been vaccinated against a strain of flu, that flu still had the potential to impact you significantly. The fact that you get a different viral infection is a strawman so big it borders on a mental disorder.

      But they advertise them exactly the same as the ones that will.

      These companies have open positions for prophets who can predict the future. Do you wish to apply for the role?

    61. Re: Lets be antivax! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      False. Targeting the wrong strain is something that you only find out after the fact.

      After it's been made, but before flu season hits, actually. Try reading the news.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    62. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doctors and nurses take the flu vaccine every year because it is REQUIRED. You don't get a shot, you lose your job.
      A few lucky ones are allowed to wear a mask 24/7/365.

      Kinda blows a hole into your pathetic argument, eh?

    63. Re:Lets be antivax! by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's typically not an 'overwhelmed your immune system' issue usually as much as 'the vaccine did not take,' or possibly 'guess what was among the germ definitions your immune system has decided to clean out!'

      I'm not going to claim I'm any sort of a vaccine expert, but that seems to conflict with some of the literature I've read. It's certainly not applicable to every disease, but I do recall reading more than one paper which indicated that, even with vaccination, if one receives a viral load that is sufficiently large, it is possible to still get the disease.. One's immune system is simply overwhelmed.

      Without vaccination the world would still have small pox.. More correctly, without very aggressive vaccination the world would still have small pox. If memory serves, in many areas small pox vaccination was absolutely mandatory, at least when cases of the disease had occurred nearby.

      If we had allowed morons to decide, for themselves, the question of vaccination, I have no doubt it would still be present in the world. I do concur with many others that we should be constantly refining vaccinations to ensure that they aren't causing any long term side effects.

    64. Re:Lets be antivax! by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      You've kind of answered your own question here. If the intelligent people refrain from sitting down next to someone who is "leaking measles all over the place" then the Darwinian principle would still hold.

      Really? You think you can always spot people carrying a disease? I suggest you read about Typhoid Mary. That broad infected at least 51 people with Typhus, even though she showed absolutely no symptoms of the disease (she was a carrier). She was a cook and leaked typhus bacteria all over the food she was handling. She was held in isolation for 3 decades to prevent further infections to the public and then she died.

    65. Re:Lets be antivax! by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Measles is so contagious that if one person has it, 90% of the people close to that person who are not immune will also become infected.

      Infected people can spread measles to others from four days before through four days after the rash appears."

      And this is why I don't support the anti-vaxxer movement. I think I'm pretty damn conservative... personal freedom and all that jazz.. But I don't think I support the rights of people to walk through common areas leaking a virus that will persist in the air for hours and hours. Especially something so infectious that the hit rate is 90% (as you mentioned). We have the technology to prevent these infections.. People who deliberately make themselves a haven for the virus/bacteria and then want to spread that shit all over the place... yeah.. NO!.

      I suspect that researchers would classify this as a type of "tragedy of the commons" where anti-vaxxers hope/assume that everyone else is inoculated so they can skate on the defenses of others.. That's bullshit, IMHO.

    66. Re: Lets be antivax! by meglon · · Score: 1

      The bible doesn't say using a computer is permissible, therefore using a computer is not permissible. Yet, here you are..... why do you hate god so much?

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    67. Re: Lets be antivax! by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Don't recall the bible saying the internet is permissible.. Nor electricity.. So.. yeah, you need to get off the interwebs. :)

    68. Re: Lets be antivax! by stealth_finger · · Score: 0

      Even properly regulated " trusted " medication have been proven to contain toxic materials or other additives that have no place to be in there and never been declared. Any pharmaceutical product should be taken with the same dose of mistrust especially that we take these pills and shots for granted yet in a large number of cases they clearly do not work or have severe side effects. My 60 year old father takes 14 pills a day and this increases constantly becouse the ones he takes dont work so the doctor just keeps chucking more and more branded medication onto his prescription unending

      Forget that, the real problem is in the DHMO (Dihydrogen Monoxide). It is a completely unregulated chemical that can be DEADLY in all forms. Liquid, solid and gaseous can all do massive amounts of damage to your body up to and including death. Yet, they put it in absolutely everything from cleaning products to kids juice! Big DHMO has a lot to answer for when the revolution comes, they addicted everyone to it, EVERYONE and if you try to stop you will die within a few days, fact..

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    69. Re: Lets be antivax! by stealth_finger · · Score: 2
      Ask Roald Dahl's daughter about it https://www.indy100.com/articl...

      Olivia, my eldest daughter, caught measles when she was seven years old. As the illness took its usual course I can remember reading to her often in bed and not feeling particularly alarmed about it.

      Then one morning, when she was well on the road to recovery, I was sitting on her bed showing her how to fashion little animals out of coloured pipe-cleaners, and when it came to her turn to make one herself, I noticed that her fingers and her mind were not working together and she couldn’t do anything.

      'Are you feeling all right?' I asked her. 'I feel all sleepy,' she said.

      In an hour, she was unconscious. In twelve hours she was dead.

      The measles had turned into a terrible thing called measles encephalitis and there was nothing the doctors could do to save her.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    70. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, it's not a right/left thing, it's just a fucking stupidity thing!

    71. Re:Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's become a problem of late because millennials, who never had to experience the ravages of these diseases because they were vaccinated, are electing to not vaccinate their kids because of voodoo bullshit foisted on them about autism.

    72. Re:Lets be antivax! by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's typically not an 'overwhelmed your immune system' issue usually as much as 'the vaccine did not take,' or possibly 'guess what was among the germ definitions your immune system has decided to clean out!'

      I'm not going to claim I'm any sort of a vaccine expert, but that seems to conflict with some of the literature I've read. It's certainly not applicable to every disease, but I do recall reading more than one paper which indicated that, even with vaccination, if one receives a viral load that is sufficiently large, it is possible to still get the disease.. One's immune system is simply overwhelmed.

      I was reading through lit from the CDC and medical journals, and been reading relatively recent work as well because while immunology isn't my field, it's close enough to some of what I am interested in that I do keep vaguely up with it. The immune system's also one of the few places where you've got a reasonable chance of making new discoveries of interest to people outside of your tiny niche--which includes the minor fact that its memory cells aren't immortal and all of them will clear out given a sufficiently long period of time (and disuse) & this seems to actually be a no-exceptions thing.

      I didn't run across much talk of sufficient viral load overwhelming--but that given how much that takes, I would expect it unlikely to happen at exposure unless somebody's immune system is has been compromised...or they're doing something incredibly stupid like using a broth culture of the virus as a nasal wash. Or the immunity to the virus in question has already started fading, which is precisely what happens when the immune system is 'forgetting' a pathogen. It's not an all-at-once thing, like deleting a file from a computer, but caused by the memory cells that carry the data dying off...which they all do, if you live long enough. But good news, it'll work as a reminder and you can expect a faster recovery than if you weren't ever vaccinated.

      Anyway. You do not need everybody immune to attain herd immunity...but you pretty much need pretty much all of the population who can be vaccinated to be vaccinated if you want to achieve it, because once you're through the percentage of people who cannot be vaccinated and those in whom the vaccination failed to take...there's very little space for antivaxxers and their woo. I do suspect, though, that morons' poor understanding of the reality of how this all works is a major reason for so little public discussion on duration of immunity and vaccine failures--I know that poor understanding has outright killed several HIV vaccines that had reached the point where they could have gone into human testing. (None of the candidates would have covered all strains, and it was pretty certain that you could expect somebody would manage to catch HIV via risky sex practices conducted under the belief they were majykally protected by the vaccine-talisman and successfully sue you for their own stupidity. I have not seen any good explanations for why, perhaps, we might want to ensure people have a realistic understanding of what vaccines are and aren't instead of ignoring and even occasionally encouraging them being confused with talismans against disease.)

    73. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good ole Vantucky. It's almost lie the Columbia river is a portal to opposite land.

    74. Re: Lets be antivax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      herd immunity can still be a factor on the lesser strains

    75. Re: Lets be antivax! by r1348 · · Score: 1

      By natural selection of the fittest, like other species.
      Yes, higher intelligence gave Homo Sapiens advantages over other Homo species, including the capacity of having culture-driven intelligence instead of genetic intelligence (which would have taken a much longer time to evolve us to where we stand now).
      Now, considering that we're all Homo Sapiens now, and we possess equal biological capacity for intelligence, one must reckon that what we call lack of intelligence is almost universally a lack of education, within the parameters of the human culture one individuals grows in. Therefore the progeny of uneducated individuals are still perfectly capable of being intelligent, if they receive a proper education. So suppressing the possibility to reproduce of "unintelligent" people is not only useless, but potentially damaging to the species at large, as it inevitably restricts the genetic pool.
      Of course, one might be tempted to embrace the easy eugenetical solution (which solves nothing) as tackling the issues that lead to certain individuals (usually poor) to be also uneducated is a much bigger task. One obvious example of those who embraced this theory is the Nazis, but it manages to sneak in even in left-leaning thought circles, take the movie Idiocracy as an example.

    76. Re:Lets be antivax! by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Well, it is possible I'm simply mis-remembering what I read. I don't deny that possibility. It had to have been something I just came across, as most medical stuff isn't particularly interesting to me so I don't actively seek it out. I may read it if it catches me eye...

      A thought did occur to me while reading your response; some vaccines aren't given to children until a certain age, unless things have changed recently. I recall taking my son in for some of his shots around the age of 2 (23 years ago, so....). That's certainly a consideration vis-a-vis the anti-vaxxers who can be dragging that crap around and manage to get babies sick before they even have the chance to be vaccinated.

      Anyways, it seems we both agree that the anti-vaccine crowd are mostly ignorant, mislead, or morons. Take your pick :)

    77. Re: Lets be antivax! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      You do know that the flu vaccine is efficient, right? It's just not efficient against all three strands of the flu and they try to guess which one will be the dominant one each year. Sometimes they get it right, sometimes not, but at least there's a chance of protection.

      It is not even effective against a single major strain, but often only againt the exact mutation it has that year, because the flu is constantly changing to avoid our immune systems to become permanentiy immune to the flu, and the vaccines haven't found a truly effective way of getting around that yet.

  2. Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be a good beginning.
    The bitch has thousands on her conscience.

    1. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh! They neither teach health in school nor make vaccinations available in the entire county so what do you expect?

    2. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was told walls don't work.

    3. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully bunch of those unvaccinated kids will die or be permanently scarred from measles, its a small price to pay for stupidity.

    4. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by guruevi · · Score: 2

      Vaccinations are available in the entire country. The problem is that state schools don't make vaccination a requirement everywhere because 'discrimination'.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    5. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the real problem infrastructure as checking to keep track is often difficult, and there are numbers of people who need exemptions.

    6. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is too busy to take any responsibility for anti-vax, the week it is all about the Masked Singer.

    7. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Gee. You think that measles is minor? How about a little more information for you.
      1990 - 630,000 deaths due to measles
      2011 - 158,000 deaths due to measles
      Due to vaccinations, measles for the first time in 2018 had under 100,000 deaths. In fact, it's possible that we can eradicate measles (smallpox was the first virus to be eradicated). But the anti-vax crowd are to put it politely idiots.

    8. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully my autistic child runs over you and your measles-ridden child :)

    9. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

      Moron AC wrote:

      vaccinated kids getting autism

      It is an unfortunate fact of our society that you need a license to cut hair, and not to be a parent.

    10. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      They work to keep fuckwitted village idiots like Trump, McCarthy and you In

    11. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      True that. My mom wouldn't have been able to get a license for either one.

    12. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most kids are vaccinated (thankfully), so of course most children who develop autism have also been vaccinated. There is no difference in the autism rates of vaccinated and unvaccinated children. There is no correlation. And no medically plausible causal link.

      https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/reference/vaccines-and-autism/

    13. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mortality rate scientifically attributed to measles is generally regarded to be 0.2%, so 1 in 500, within a healthy, well-nourished population. There is zero evidence to suggest that autism is in any way correlated or caused by vaccination.

      https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/reference/vaccines-and-autism/

    14. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Put Jenny McCarthy in jail
      It would be a good beginning.

      Perhaps, but an even better beginning would be to start introducing legislation making certain vaccinations mandatory. Failure to comply should be a heavy fine or tax to help pay for bullshit like this. Continued failure to comply is direct child endangerment and society takes children away from parents for things like that. Oh, and manslaughter charges for any parents whose unvaccinated children are involved in the deaths of someone else, just to make sure the asshats know we're serious.

      We need to stop tolerating irrational stupidity in this country under the guise of "freedom" or "religion". This is a public safety matter.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    15. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where i went to public school (rural minnesota), way back in the 70s and 80s. EVERY STUDENT got vaccines, on the recommended schedules.. these were done IN SCHOOL... during school hours... by the school nurse. there were never objections and i don't recall anyone EVER 'sitting out' (such as with a valid medical reason to) or not having their permission slip or (modest) fee (couple bucks, usually, if any) ready to go on 'shot day'.

    16. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      21 cases out of 30 is over two-thirds of all cases, plus anti-vaxxers are a very small minority of the total population, making the significance of those figures far greater than if they were even just 1% of the total population. There are plenty of anti-vax kids with autism and no shortage of forum posts from stupid anti-vax people who don't understand how their kids got autism despite zero vaccinations. You are a complete moron.

    17. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Rarely is measles fatal.

      Only because people rarely get measles. The mortality rate is between 0.1 and 10%, depending on the country. Maybe 1 in 1000 to 1 in 10 is "rare" to you, but it seems pretty tragic to me when it is so preventable.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    18. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 in 59 get autism? You really need to stop reading that fake shit.

    19. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "being autistic like the 1 in 59 that does get vaccinated"

      And what about the 1 in 59 that does NOT get vaccinated?

      If the rate is the same for both, there is no problem.

      The rate IS the same for both.

      There is NO problem.

    20. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rates of Measles Severity and Complications in the
      U.S.*
      Hospitalization 1 out of 4 cases
      Encephalitis (inflammation of the brain) 1 per 1,000 cases
      Death 1 per 1000 cases.
      Rate of autism in vaccinated kids: 1 per 59, which is 17 per 1000. Compare for yourself.

      rate of autism for anti-vaxxer parents 100%

    21. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Hah. I remember talking with people in my grandparents age. I basically got that like for every 5-8 kid family, 1 or 2 died from measles before they were 5, and like 1 or 2 died from the flu before they were 2. Those do not seem like good numbers for me.

      Especially when you consider both the effects of having measles and the fact that even today there is no actual cure for it. Either your body fights the disease or you die if you get infected. The only good option is vaccination.

    22. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine, so put her ass in jail. Thing is, who the hell is Jenny McCarthy? One of those ignorant anti-vaxxers that deserves a reeeeally good dose of measles, maybe? And no, I'm not gonna DDG her name, the writer should have stated briefly who the hell she is in the post. It's customary.

          If the kids don't get vaccinated, their parents, both of them, should be legally forced to accept an injection of live measles virus. By the time they've recovered, assuming they do, the kids will either be vaccinated or taken from their parents, and given the vaccine anyway.

    23. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah. I remember talking with people in my grandparents age. I basically got that like for every 5-8 kid family, 1 or 2 died from measles before they were 5, and like 1 or 2 died from the flu before they were 2. Those do not seem like good numbers for me.

      Especially when you consider both the effects of having measles and the fact that even today there is no actual cure for it. Either your body fights the disease or you die if you get infected. The only good option is vaccination.

      LOL. 1 or 2 dead out of 5-8? Even wikipedia lists measles death rate at 0.2% of those infected. And people wonder why anti-vaxxers feel like they're being lied to by pro-vaxxers, and distrust their advice.

    24. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by sjames · · Score: 1

      If there was aa causal link between vaxination and autism, you would have a point, but there isn't.

    25. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a dumbfuck.
      The ex-doctor who faked the data to show the vaccines cause autism, is just that a ex-doctor. His license to practice medicine was retracted and he was fired from his position. His paper is a demonstration on how to fake shit. The ex-doctor moved out of the UK to California where he is still a ex-doctor. He is not allowed to practice medicine.
      From Wikipedia
      "An investigation by journalist Brian Deer found that Andrew Wakefield, the author of the original research paper linking the vaccine to autism, had multiple undeclared conflicts of interest,[9][10] had manipulated evidence,[11] and had broken other ethical codes. The Lancet paper was partially retracted in 2004 and fully retracted in 2010, when Lancet's editor-in-chief Richard Horton described it as "utterly false" and said that the journal had been deceived.[12] Wakefield was found guilty by the General Medical Council of serious professional misconduct in May 2010 and was struck off the Medical Register, meaning he could no longer practice as a doctor in the UK.[13] In 2011, Deer provided further information on Wakefield's improper research practices to the British Medical Journal, which in a signed editorial described the original paper as fraudulent.[14][15] The scientific consensus is that there is no link between the MMR vaccine and autism and that the vaccine's benefits greatly outweigh its risks."

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy

      You sir are a absolute shithole.

    26. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      Stating a single statistic doesn't give a full picture. What is the rate of autism in non-vaccinated children? Then we would have something to compare. If the rate is the same then it sort of disproves your point.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    27. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 4, Informative

      The statistic of 1 in 60 is for ALL children, vaccinated or not. A study done on 95,000 children, 15,000 of which were not vaccinated shows no link. There were actually more in the non-vaccinated group, but theorized that is due to parents who notice signs of autism before vaccination begins and then delay vaccinations due to fear that vaccines cause autism.

      https://www.autismspeaks.org/s...

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    28. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by careysub · · Score: 1

      Hah. I remember talking with people in my grandparents age. I basically got that like for every 5-8 kid family, 1 or 2 died from measles before they were 5, and like 1 or 2 died from the flu before they were 2. Those do not seem like good numbers for me.

      Especially when you consider both the effects of having measles and the fact that even today there is no actual cure for it. Either your body fights the disease or you die if you get infected. The only good option is vaccination.

      LOL. 1 or 2 dead out of 5-8? Even wikipedia lists measles death rate at 0.2% of those infected. And people wonder why anti-vaxxers feel like they're being lied to by pro-vaxxers, and distrust their advice.

      He is citing figures from a few generations ago O Ignorant AC.

      A death rate of 1 in 500 is the death rate now with modern medicine, historically it was 10% or greater. But let's take that number which is making you "LOL", 0.2%.

      There are about 4 million babies born in the U.S. each year. Without vaccination about 8,000 would be dying every year even with the best medicine, and tens of thousands would have crippling injuries. Laughing really, really loud now? And among those who can't use the vaccine because they are immune-compromised the death rate is about 1 in 3 even today, and put at risk by anti-vaxxers. Hey, killing 1/3 of the vulnerable because of your conspiracy theories. That's a real knee-slapper! Bet your busting a gut over that!

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    29. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's called survivorship bias. Few, if any, old deaf or blind people are posting on Slashdot.
      I'm an old person, and I remember that measles (and mumps) used to be the main cause for blindness and deafness, as well as poor eyesight and partial hearing loss.

    30. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      ...1 in 60 vaccinated kids getting autism...

      Which is no different from the number of unvaccinated kids who get autism.

      Autism was first described as a medical condition in 1943. Before that, no records were kept on who was autistic. They were simply people who were "eccentric" enough to occupy jobs that nobody else was suited for.

    31. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Rate of autism in vaccinated kids: 1 per 59, which is 17 per 1000. Compare for yourself.

      Rate of autism in unvaccinated kids: 1 in 59.

      Done.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    32. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      The problem with your comparison is that the real issue is needing a license to cut hair, not parenting. The license only exists as a way to reduce competition in hair cutting, transferring resources from people who need haircuts (most everyone) to people who jumped through the hair cutting hoops (a small group with a lot of interest in keeping licensing requirements going), with a sizeable dead-weight loss to the economy from the wasted resources involved in getting the license and in less efficient hair cutting occurring along the way. In some States, the requirements for braiding hair are higher than those for becoming an EMT. How much sense does that make?

      As for parental licenses, allowing the government to have the power to determine who gets to reproduce and who doesn't is quite the totalitarian power grab. Sure you want to put that kind of additional power to run your life in the hands of either local corrupt officials, or federal authorities like Trump and Pelosi? How about we start with something smaller and less important, like licenses to be allowed to speak about political issues, first? (Note, for the record I am opposed to that as well.)

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    33. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Unvaccinated kids get autism, too. At the same rate as vaccinated kids, surprise!

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    34. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      historical death rate in USA from measles
      https://cpi1.files.wordpress.c...

    35. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      We? We?? Or do you mean a government thug doing the dirty work on your behalf? People like you who make these demands do so because you lack the spine to do anything yourself.

      And how exactly would I take this matter into my own hands? Hide in movie theaters and prick kids with vaccination needles in the dark while they watch the latest brain-draining driven from Disney or Marvel?

      And I sicken you? Ha.

      Oh, and if a vaccination causes a reaction and a child is left crippled, or dead, who is going to accept responsibility for that?

      Sorry, but this doesn't happen.. Outside of unhealthy people (immunocompromised or with existing alergies), common vaccines such as MMR and the flu are unequivocally safe. Even in the 0.0002% chance of an unknown allergy causing an anaphylaxis response, it doesn't always result in death or even any permanent condition. You have a better chance of being killed by a seat belt after your car went underwater, and most people are fine with seat belt laws.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    36. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I rarely get the flu, and when I do, I recover in a couple of days

      You have never had the flu.

    37. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Prisons are crowded enough without making it illegal to have dumb opinions.
      Also, people who take medical advice from a playboy playmate over that of their doctor are just as much to blame.

    38. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a correlation, but not like anti-vaxxers think. People on the autistic spectrum are over represented in STEM fields, including medical research.

      Autism causes vaccines!

    39. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a causal link between vaxination and autism. People on the autistic spectrum are over represented in STEM fields, including medical research.

      Clearly autism causes vaccines.

    40. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you get infected, there is no medicine to be applied. You just go through it and come out completely immune to further exposure. There are other diseases where the vaccine truly prevents high probability of death, measles is not one of them.

      The kids that get infected because they have not been vaccinated are likely going to be at risk from other diseases they have not been vaccinated against. Darwinism before our eyes...

    41. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many studies showing unvaccinated kids have much less autoimmune and allergy problems (sometimes factors of 2-3). The JAMA 2015 has perculiar data collection and low significance values on many of its findings.

    42. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you actually understand what you're asking for. Your "ask" also seems to be a thought that is not entirely of your own. I'm not "anti-vaxx" by any stretch of the imagination, but I see what's going on here. People are being conditioned through what is effectively a propaganda campaign to accept and even demand EVERY vaccination that comes down the pipeline without even questioning it. If you do question it, you'll have a mob of programmed zombies assaulting you immediately. It's like some weird cult.

      Pretty soon they're going to be jacking kids so full of vaccines, you'll have them under the needle for whatever the scare of the week is. Any side-effects or reactions, no matter how severe, will be brushed off as acceptable losses, and the pharma industries will not accept any blame whatsoever.

      Polio, mumps, measles, rubella? Those are nasty and worthy of vaccinating against, IMO. Some of these new ones they're pushing, eh, not so much. I won't bother with the flu vaccine. I rarely get the flu, and when I do, I recover in a couple of days. I won't risk an injection for that one right now. If my immune system becomes compromised or when I get older and frail, sure, that one's on the menu for me. But it's my decision. Not yours, and certainly not the government's.

      You need to understand what lies down the road of "forced" anything. You want to help solve the problem? Educate people, don't ridicule and attack, that doesn't work. Push for honesty, transparency, and accountability in government and the pharmaceutical industries. People don't trust these entities because of past actions on their behalf.

      If you really want to throw the forced vaccination idiots for a loop, point out how abstinence and personal responsibility would rid the world of STDs in a generation.

    43. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Those that got measles are certainly going to be at risk for other things...because they have stupid parents.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    44. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Gosh you would make a good scientist because nobody thought to look at that!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    45. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Most likely it is probably higher because such parents would be on the lookout for it above the average. It would be similar to the "Hollywood cluster" of autistic kids...as fed by moneyed people demanding diagnoses that match their expectations of this difficult to diagnose (especially border cases) disease.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    46. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst part is Internet-surfing idiot parents can parrot "The drug companies!" crap, yet this guy was literally working with lawyers to find something to sue over, so he faked this data.

    47. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      She has retracted her position, and the Jenny McCarthy Death Clock has stopped counting needless deaths under her name, but the toll goes on.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    48. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this - it needs to be made law so there's no antivax crap allowed to happen. If this is something that can affect others, then you have a duty to be vaccinated against X Y and Z.

      Once the office for statistics (or whatever you guys suffer with in the US) has a concrete basis for why antivax is stupid then hopefully all this crap can go away, or better yet, because you lot like to sue each other over anything, start suing anyone antivax if your vax kid gets ill from their unvaxxed kid/person/etc

      Starting with McCarthy. There's a great big target for litigation right there. This outbreak will only confirm that vaccinations are good.

    49. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by rl117 · · Score: 1

      Likewise in the UK. For the first ones in primary school, a parent could accompany us. The girl who went in before me screamed her head off at the needle, so I was thankful for that at the time! Later ones like TB were done at secondary school.

      Unless you're going to have a severe reaction to the vaccine, I don't think there are many valid medical reasons to opt out. None of the people my age, from any religious or cultural background were exempted. Everyone just got it routinely, and no one really thought much of it. It seems like it was at least two decades later before vaccines became "controversial" thanks to that idiot Wakefield, and most especially the media for whipping up the storm which followed. I count them all culpable for profiting from the deaths and misery resulting from their poor journalism.

    50. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by rl117 · · Score: 2

      The death rate from measles in an unvaccinated and unchallenged population is just under 1 person in 2 (~48%). This for example would be the Americas or Pacific islands prior to contact with the West. The only reason it's less today is because of two factors. Firstly, evolution. In the West, where measles was endemic, we are genetically selected for tolerance to it. Same as for certain influenza strains, the black death, and other historical nasties. Why? Because all the other people are *dead*. We are the survivors who have the genetics to cope with it. Secondly, vaccination. If you get infected in the West, and you are unvaccinated, you benefit from everyone around you being vaccinated. The disease can't spread as far or as fast. Infections aren't as severe, you aren't being exposed to the same quantity of the virus or as many strains of it. You're in a protective bubble which isn't even visible. It's called "herd immunity", because the population as a whole benefits from the immunity as a result of vaccination, even if the vaccination rate is not 100%.

      Death rates from measles in the West had come down to 1/200 (UK) - 1/500 (US) before the introduction of vaccination programmes. This was largely down to improvements in overall living standards (primarily nutrition) and medical care in the early-mid 20th century. Today, even those numbers are a memory. Today, we are complacent because we have forgotten how awful a killer measles can be. Aside from the deaths, also consider the chance of permanent brain damage, permanent hearing loss or partial loss, or other permanent damage to the body. It's not just a few itchy spots for a week, it's a deadly serious infection.

      "Anti-vaxxers" aren't being lied to. They are simply profoundly ignorant about the disease and the risks involved. They are only safe today to make their stupid choices because everyone else gets vaccinated. Once a critical number opt out of being vaccinated, and herd immunity is compromised, then measles epidemics will return. This story is one of several, and it will continue to get worse until we sort out the issues with people not being vaccinated.

    51. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by rl117 · · Score: 1

      I should also add for the first point that you also get a significant benefit of maternal antibodies, and if your mother had measles you will also gain protection this way as well. If your mother never had it or a related infection, and has no protective antibodies, you'll also be at a very increased risk. This is another factor why the death rate can get up to 1/2 in addition to the genetic aspect, and why the death rate is reduced in Western populations where measles has been historically endemic. We all have measles antibodies, and this typically reduces the severity of any infection.

    52. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop letting into country all those shitty smelly parasites hindu-chimps with all their diseases.

    53. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with your comparison is that the real issue is needing a license to cut hair, not parenting. The license only exists as a way to reduce competition in hair cutting,

      No licence needed to cut hair - unless you want to charge money for it. So you may get an experimental haircut from a friend. Licencing for the pros keeps out the hopeless amateurs, so you can know that a new hairdresser isn't a total loss.

    54. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the rest of the Hollywood and political elite who have walls around their property!

    55. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Rate of autism in vaccinated kids: 1 per 59, which is 17 per 1000. Compare for yourself.

      Yeah but the rate of ACs with severe mental retardation is close to 100% and your comment just pushed that even closer.

    56. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dtwatwood must be much too young to know that generations ago NO ONE HAD AUTISM. You just made up
      your "stat". You lying slimeball.

    57. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't happen?! Have you ever heard of vaccine court? The tax payers have paid millions for damages AND death that occured from vaccines because pharma companies aren't held liable.

      In case you don't believe me, here's the ".gov" link to the database

      https://vaers.hhs.gov

    58. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      ROFL. Keep telling yourself that. Although the term autism did not exist until the early 20th century, there are records of autistic children in Russia back to the 16th century.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    59. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by houghi · · Score: 1

      Also: If they do not understand the science part, why do parents rather have a dead kid than an autistic one?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    60. Re:Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. That's why 500,000 HIV+ gaffots were sent to the Utah barb-wire gulag. Slammed them right away from decent folks! Bread + water & dead like they otter ... treated with poppers. Shit all over their right-to-infect ... but saved a million American lives. You mean treat measles like that ... eh ...?

    61. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      It takes 372 days of training on average to get a hair cutting license, compared to 33 days for an EMT.

      You're really arguing that's needed? You could also just not go back to anyone who gives you a bad haircut, or even just read their reviews online....

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    62. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it seems pretty tragic to me when it is so preventable.

      And it seems pretty tragic to me that "medical science" is so dumb that they just keep rejiggering the same approach (vaccines) instead of looking into why some people have mild reactions while others die. Might actually be way easier ways to prevent this if they'd actually do some real science and not make money science.

    63. Re: Put Jenny McCarthy in jail by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      MMR is out of patent and is not particularly profitable, so you'll need to do better in the "motive" department.

      A vaccine is superior to a treatment because it can prevent the disease altogether.

      Your proposal would mean deliberately withholding vaccine and exposing people to disease for experimentation - this would be unethical.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. quarantine and exterminate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Round up these anti vaxxers and dump them in a mass grave with all the mad cows.

  4. Darwinism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are stupid enough to be antivax, then nature will take your children away.

    1. Re:Darwinism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only about 1% of those who get measles are killed. This is considered "a lot", and therefore vaccination programs.

      Now there is an outbreak, but why worry? It will only be anti-vaxxers dying. Who cares about them - measles is a death tax on stupidity. Definitely refuse them at hospitals, so they won't infect the elderly or others with a weak immune system. And let stuppid parents know that they made their choice years ago - it is now too late. Make new kids if the current ones dies - that is what people did before modern medicine - that is the reality anti-vaxxers have retreated to.

    2. Re: Darwinism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.001 percent. Get your fucking numbers right

    3. Re: Darwinism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is about 1 in 1000, which is a probability of 0.001, which is 0.1%. So neither of you are right.

  5. Re:30 in 7.4 million by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    30 cases in 26 days in a State of 7.4 million people is a state of emergency?

    Exactly. It would make so much more sense to wait, and let the situation spiral out of control before acting.

  6. Impetus by jargonburn · · Score: 2

    Hopefully, the energy from this outcry can be harnessed to push for better education about vaccines in areas where superstition and ignorance have lead to such a circumstance.

    1. Re: Impetus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect being plagued by snake oil and homeopathy salesmen is a lot worse overall than the impact of the flu

    2. Re:Impetus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better education about vaccines in areas where superstition and ignorance

      Anti-Vax is NOT about ignorance or education. Illiterate, poverty striken rural Americans accepted the polio vaccine decades ago.
      Anti-Vax is about TRUST. These people do not TRUST medical professionals or public institutions.
      We are living though a crisis of public trust, caused by endless incompetance, corruption, and breach of trust across the public sphere.

      If you think public trust can be divorced from declining vaccination rates then it is you who are ignorant. Dangerously so.

  7. Re:Right wing religious nuts by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, Clark County is in the middle of Washington's opium country. Don't trust those vaccinations made by 'the man'. But hand me the needle with some unknown mixture of heroin and Fentanyl.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  8. Re:Vaccinations are bad by mspohr · · Score: 5, Informative

    Vaccines haven't contained mercury for many years. Fake news.
    Vaccines don't cause autism. This has been extensively studies and debunked. Fake news.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  9. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by mspohr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Immigrants are much more likely to have been vaccinated than the ignorant antivaxers in Washington state.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  10. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

    the 10's of thousands of medical unknowns flowing across our open southern border and it is no wonder measles, tb and such are making a real come back

    Measles vaccination rate in America: 92%
    Measles vaccination rate in Mexico: 96%

    Measles vaccination rates by country

    Also, you may want to look at a map. Clark County, Washington is a long way from the southern border.

    Clark County is a prosperous suburb of Portland, and not many poor Mexicans can afford to live there. It is only 4% Hispanic, and they are not causing this problem.

  11. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are an idiot.

  12. Re:30 in 7.4 million by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Informative

    Regarding your supposition that those ill were unimmunized... yep, spot on.

      Age
                    1 to 10 years: 21 cases
                    11 to 18 years: nine cases
                    19 to 29 years: one case

      Immunization status
                    Unverified: four cases
                    Unimmunized: 27 cases

    Souce: Clark County website.

    TL;DR: The whole outbreak appears to have been rather preventable, but you apparently can't immunize against stupidity and willful ignorance.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  13. Re: Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ha ha
    I read a study where they compared the efficacy across the board of any medicine that was not immediately acting (like Tylenol) to positive thinking and placebos - medicine finished dead last.

  14. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See what ShanghaiBill did within a minute of your sanctimonious response? It's called a "citation" and it's what you do if you don't want people to think you're a shill.

  15. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by coastwalker · · Score: 1

    Migration across that boarder has not been this low since 1971. The measles outbreak is clearly due to low takeup of vacination.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  16. Re:Right wing religious nuts by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This outbreak is happening in liberal suburbs of Portland.

    Anti-vaxxers do not follow the normal pattern of political polarization. Instead, it is common among extremists in either direction. Left-wing anti-vaxxers believe vaccinations are a corporate conspiracy. Right-wing anti-vaxxers believe vaccinations are a government conspiracy. Moderates on both sides vaccinate their kids.

  17. Science for Thee, But Not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This general area is also a hotbed for anti-fluoridation idiots.

  18. Want to Ignore It by crow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just want to ignore the whole thing. If someone who chose not to get vaccinated gets sick, just give them some healing crystals and leave them alone.

    But unfortunately, not everyone who gets sick will be by choice. The vaccines aren't 100%, so some people may get sick even with immunization. Some infants are too young to get vaccinated, and they can easily die if they get sick. Some people have medical conditions that prevent immunization, and they are also at serious risk.

    So much as I would like to ignore the sick and tell them "I told you so," we just can't do that. Also, it's not fair to not take care of kids just because their parents are stupid.

    It's time to say get a vaccine or don't go to public schools. The only exceptions should be kids with compromised immune systems that can't be vaccinated. If parents don't like it, they can save the schools money and homeschool.

    1. Re:Want to Ignore It by crow · · Score: 1

      What do California, West Virginia, and Mississippi have in common? They're the states that do not give any non-medical exemptions for vaccination. So it's well-established that we don't have to grant exemptions. It's time to stop.

    2. Re:Want to Ignore It by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "If someone who chose not to get vaccinated gets sick,"

      The kids who will get sick didn't get to chose whether they get vaccinated. Their parents, on the other hand, were vaccinated years ago and are fine other than being homicidal maniacs.

    3. Re:Want to Ignore It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to ignore the whole thing. If someone who chose not to get vaccinated gets sick, just give them some healing crystals and leave them alone.

      But unfortunately, not everyone who gets sick will be by choice. The vaccines aren't 100%, so some people may get sick even with immunization. Some infants are too young to get vaccinated, and they can easily die if they get sick. Some people have medical conditions that prevent immunization, and they are also at serious risk.

      So much as I would like to ignore the sick and tell them "I told you so," we just can't do that. Also, it's not fair to not take care of kids just because their parents are stupid.

      It's time to say get a vaccine or don't go to public schools. The only exceptions should be kids with compromised immune systems that can't be vaccinated. If parents don't like it, they can save the schools money and homeschool.

      Treat a group of people with disdain, then act all suprised and outraged when they are suspicious of your advice that you're giving out supposedly "for their good". We have antivaxxers precisely because of people like you.

    4. Re:Want to Ignore It by bsolar · · Score: 2

      It's time to say get a vaccine or don't go to public schools. The only exceptions should be kids with compromised immune systems that can't be vaccinated. If parents don't like it, they can save the schools money and homeschool.

      School is not the only place where children interact, not to mention vaccination is not only relevant to children.

      The question is whether unvaccinated people are a serious danger to the public health. The scientific consensus is yes, so vaccination has to be mandatory (except for medical reasons of course). Public health considerations must trump any personal freedom considerations.

    5. Re:Want to Ignore It by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >But unfortunately, not everyone who gets sick will be by choice. The vaccines aren't 100%, so some people may get sick even with immunization

      If this happens, it happens.

      from the other hand, I googled this:

      > What percentage of the population should be vaccinated to avoid outbreaks?

      >In order to prevent an outbreak, at least four out of those five people, or 80 percent of the population in general, should be immune

      Interesting that 80% is just slightly above 77%.

      The whole thing is about nothing. Let the people be.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    6. Re:Want to Ignore It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be in favor of "it's time to say get a vaccine or don't go out in public."

    7. Re:Want to Ignore It by DethLok · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      No jab no play.

      https://www2.health.vic.gov.au...

      And that's just one of the six states of Australia, most others have a similar scheme.

    8. Re:Want to Ignore It by DethLok · · Score: 1

      and there is this, also:

      https://www.mydr.com.au/kids-t...

      Strayan's understand vaccination.

      And if you don't, well, your kids die.

    9. Re:Want to Ignore It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only exceptions should be kids with compromised immune systems that can't be vaccinated.

      Then what is the point? These kids with compromised immune systems that can't be vaccinated attending school completely and utterly destroy the whole "herd immunity" concept. Perhaps we should simply terminate these untermensch at birth so that your poor little johnny doesn't get a temperature and some sniffles?

    10. Re:Want to Ignore It by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      It's time to say get a vaccine or don't go to public schools. The only exceptions should be kids with compromised immune systems that can't be vaccinated. If parents don't like it, they can save the schools money and homeschool.

      It's very likely that the same population that chooses not to vaccinate their kids also tends to home school.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  19. Re:Right wing religious nuts by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    It's fine when people on the wings agree for the same reasons: some things are just obvious. If people on the wings agree with each other for radically different reasons (and disagree with the middle) that's a pretty good indication they're being massive dumbasses.

    See also Brexit.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  20. Re: Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was it a Russian study? By the discredited folk-science department of Moscow-on-Shit?

  21. Re:Right wing religious nuts by guruevi · · Score: 2

    >50% of people voted for Brexit. Calling people stupid because they have a certain political view, is in itself stupid.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  22. Please consider the immuno-compromised. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative

    A family we're friendly with have the most wonderful daughter, who went through a brain tumor and had chemotherapy until her brain was developed enough to use focused radiation to get rid of the thing. She's fine now, but for years she was immuno-compromised. An un-vaccinated child in school could have been a disease vector leading to her death.

    People all around you have chemo, get autologous bone marrow transplants and spend a week with no immune system, etc. During that, your unwillingness to vaccinate can kill them. Not that killing your own kid is any nicer. Please get your family all of their shots.

    1. Re:Please consider the immuno-compromised. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I'm fine with people not getting vaccines but then the State should also not be required to admit them to a school unless there is a valid reason and a panel of independent doctors can provide proof to that effect.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Please consider the immuno-compromised. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful

      School is one thing, but there are many venues where two children can come into contact. There isn't really a legitimate reason not to vaccinate. Not any substantial religious reason - people are smart enough to make them kosher and halal, not that you are eating them in the first place. And the various conspiracy theorists have blood on their hands.

    3. Re:Please consider the immuno-compromised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't stop at schools. "You can't force us" to let you into grocery stores, banks, laundromats, libraries, bakeries, offices, bowling alleys, restaurants, Taco Bell, you name it.

      No shirts.
      No shoes.
      No service.
      *NO LEPERS

    4. Re:Please consider the immuno-compromised. by mhotchin · · Score: 2

      You have to remember that the people deciding not to vaccinate are, in fact, complete sociopaths. A common 'rebuttal' to your line of reasoning is "I will not set my child on fire in order to keep your child warm." Yep, they actually think that the vanishingly small chance of an adverse reaction outweighs the substantial chance that measles would be a *death sentence* for cancer patients - the death rate among cancer patients catching measles is about 50%.

    5. Re:Please consider the immuno-compromised. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      No no, he's on to something. People have a right to choose.

      People who choose not to get vaccinated should just forfeit the right to use public resources. Like schools and hospitals. And streets, sidewalks, public right of ways, etc. Maybe put up some plastic sheeting to keep their germs contained too. You could even have some kind of sign to indicate the situation. This one is kind of pretty: https://goo.gl/images/iV5tXV

    6. Re:Please consider the immuno-compromised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A family we're friendly with have the most wonderful daughter, who went through a brain tumor and had chemotherapy until her brain was developed enough to use focused radiation to get rid of the thing. She's fine now, but for years she was immuno-compromised. An un-vaccinated child in school could have been a disease vector leading to her death.

      And for that family's daughter, I'm sure that would have been tragic. However, the biggest problem here is our perception on humanity. Why do people have children? To further the human race. Our biggest problem is that we value the lives of individual humans far too much. What we should be focusing on is the value of the human race as a whole. Once we're able to shift our thinking in this manner, we're able to acknowledge that some weaker individuals will have to die in order that stronger individuals will survive and the human race as a whole will be much better off.

      Don't the needs of the many (stronger humans) outweigh the needs of the few (weaker ones)?

    7. Re: Please consider the immuno-compromised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By your logic those not vaccinated should not pay taxes for those public infrastructures that are banned from using.

    8. Re: Please consider the immuno-compromised. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Seems reasonable, yes. I don't know how Americans work it, but in Canada famers who can show a vehicle is for use mostly on their own property don't have to pay fuel tax, which supports road infrastructure. You could arrange something similar for the unvaccinated. They'd only have to pay for things like water, sewer, defence... nothing that they wouldn't use as they were confined to their own property.

    9. Re:Please consider the immuno-compromised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the Halal rules, but Kosher literally means "fit", as in "fit for human consumption". By definition most pharmaceuticals are not kosher because they are not things you would (or should) normally eat or drink. So things like vitamins or cough syrup need to be kosher, but not things like eye drops, topical creams, or medications you inject.

      Maybe you could argue that a drug containing porcine ingredients isn't fit for human use regardless of how it enters the body, but if it's not something you eat or drink then "kosher" rules don't apply.

      dom

  23. 30 cases among 474,643 people by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    There are 474,643 people in Clark County.

    The governor is not communicating perfectly, but he is helping people understand the need for immunization.

  24. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you a troll or just an idiot? The US is a world leader in the anti-vax fad...

  25. Will someone let these parents know that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    they are lucky that their kids weren't hit with some really nasty...like polio.

    Why some people doubt the 200+ years of science and technology behind vaccinations is beyond me. In two centuries, vaccines have been successfully used on numerous occasions to eradicate diseases (like polio) from the US and to limit or control other diseases (like measles).

    Frankly, if these parents do not trust vaccinations, then why bother sending their children to make use of other modern medical facilities?

    1. Re:Will someone let these parents know that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will be lucky if their kids aren't blinded by measles.

    2. Re:Will someone let these parents know that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because they haven't seen a case of polio in their lifetime.
      So they don't even know about the hellish times we had before with all these diseases.
      All they think is "some pornstar said my kid has autism because of vaccines".
      That means they can blame someone else instead of their own eggs being past their sell by date.

  26. Use single-dose vaccines. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Only multi-dose vaccines contain Mercury. You can use single-dose vaccines.

    1. Re:Use single-dose vaccines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NONE of the vaccines have enough mercury to hurt you.

      You get more mercury from a can of tuna than what is in several hundred doses of vaccienes.

    2. Re: Use single-dose vaccines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldnt feed that can of tuna to a 1 year old exactly for the same reason. That kid needs ZERO mercury or aluminium or formaldehyde or MF59 ( a simple google search first two results one says it was designed to enhance immunoresponse then right after the second result says it clearly does not do that ) or thimerosal ( mercury based preservative )

    3. Re:Use single-dose vaccines. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Further, the form in thimerosal is eliminated in urine. The forms that are concerning bio-accumulate.

    4. Re:Use single-dose vaccines. by meglon · · Score: 1
      https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesaf...

      Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines do not and never did contain thimerosal.
      Varicella (chickenpox), inactivated polio (IPV), and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have also never contained thimerosal.
      Influenza (flu) vaccines are currently available in both thimerosal-containing (for multi-dose vaccine vials) and thimerosal-free versions.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  27. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean granola and transgenderism isn't stopping this?

  28. Re: Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm left wing as all hell and sometimes I contemplate getting vaccinated for diseases I have little chance of ever being exposed to just in case.

  29. Re:Vaccine and Autism Link Is Rare But Does Happen by Shikaku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first word of that URL after the domain completely invalidates what you just said. Also, frankly, fuck you because you are hurting people indirectly by trying to convince them that vaccines are bad when they save a lot more lives then they could ever hurt, in all of history, ever possible.

  30. Not just debunked - **PROVEN** to be fraudulent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Andrew Wakefield et al concocted a scheme based on "litigation based testing":

    Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this damaging vaccine scare ... Who perpetrated this fraud? There is no doubt that it was Wakefield. Is it possible that he was wrong, but not dishonest: that he was so incompetent that he was unable to fairly describe the project, or to report even one of the 12 children's cases accurately? No. A great deal of thought and effort must have gone into drafting the paper to achieve the results he wanted: the discrepancies all led in one direction; misreporting was gross. Moreover, although the scale of the GMC's 217 day hearing precluded additional charges focused directly on the fraud, the panel found him guilty of dishonesty concerning the study's admissions criteria, its funding by the Legal Aid Board, and his statements about it afterwards.

    and

    In a BMJ follow-up article on 11 January 2011,[24] Deer said that based upon documents he obtained under Freedom of information legislation, Wakefield—in partnership with the father of one of the boys in the study—had planned to launch a venture on the back of an MMR vaccination scare that would profit from new medical tests and "litigation driven testing"

    Yep - the "father" of the "vaccines cause autism" HOAX seems to have agreed to split the profits with the families of the children in his "study".

    How much were those projected profits?

    Well, now that you asked:

    the $43 million predicted yearly profits would come from marketing kits for "diagnosing patients with autism" and that "the initial market for the diagnostic will be litigation-driven testing of patients with AE [autistic enterocolitis, an unproven condition concocted by Wakefield] from both the UK and the US"

    Finally:

    In October 2012, research published in PNAS, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, identified Wakefield's 1998 paper as the most cited retracted scientific paper, with 758 citations, and gave the "reason for retraction" as "fraud".

    The Lancet article that Wakefield used to start this scam has been retracted.

    1. Re:Not just debunked - **PROVEN** to be fraudulent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly sure bringing facts to a crazy fight won't help, you are failing to not apply logic.

  31. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    god damn you are a fucking idiot

  32. Better suggestion by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A more fitting action would be to send her to the affected county to care for the infected where she can see firsthand how bad measles really is. I'd offer her the vaccine before she goes too - it's amazing how many people actually believe in science when their survival is on the line regardless of what they may say publicly.

    Ultimately that might undo some of the damage she has caused, far more so than simply putting her in jail.

  33. Re: Right wing religious nuts by PPH · · Score: 1

    positive thinking

    I'm allergic to that.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  34. Re: So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll be giving an order of magnitude more money to "big pharma" for medications to treat symptoms of any disease than to get a vaccine against one.

  35. Willful ignorance, not stupidity by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    you apparently can't immunize against stupidity and willful ignorance

    We immunize against stupidity through education. Like any immunization, it's not 100% effective but it provides herd immunity since educated friends and family also help you avoid stupid mistakes. Willful ignorance is the real problem.

    1. Re:Willful ignorance, not stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We immunize against stupidity through education."

      NO. We do NOT. Stupidity is for EVER.

      We can immunize against IGNORANCE through education.

    2. Re:Willful ignorance, not stupidity by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      No, we cure ignorance through education. Education cannot cure stupidity but, by learning from others what to do in certain situations, you can be immunized against its effects in those situations.

  36. Re:30 in 7.4 million by radarskiy · · Score: 2

    "30 cases in 26 days in a State of 7.4 million people is a state of emergency?"

    In 2017, there were 120 recorded cases in USA.
    In 2018, there were 349 recorded cases in USA.

    So yes, 30 cases in 26 days in one county is a dramatic increase.

  37. Re:Vaccinations are bad by quantaman · · Score: 5, Informative

    They contain mercury which is a neurotoxin.

    Water contains hydrogen, which is an explosive.

    Fortunately, chemistry doesn't work like that or smokers would die of explosions instead of lung cancer.

    They also cause autism.

    There is zero evidence to this.

    And thiomersal was removed from most vaccines, not because there was any evidence it was harmful, it's just what the conspiracy theorists and antivax con-artists latched onto so the CDC asked manufactures to remove them. Of course the CDC missed the point, the antivaxxers went after thiomersal not because they have any evidence, they were just against vaccines and it was the easiest target.

    Removing thiomersal didn't cause them to trust vaccines, it just caused them to switch to a harder to remove target.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  38. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by quantaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the 10's of thousands of medical unknowns flowing across our open southern border and it is no wonder measles, tb and such are making a real come back

    Measles vaccination rate in America: 92%
    Measles vaccination rate in Mexico: 96%

    Measles vaccination rates by country

    Also, you may want to look at a map. Clark County, Washington is a long way from the southern border.

    Clark County is a prosperous suburb of Portland, and not many poor Mexicans can afford to live there. It is only 4% Hispanic, and they are not causing this problem.

    LOL, Mexicans literally have to worry about sick Americans bringing diseases into their country!

    --
    I stole this Sig
  39. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut your mouth before you fill the room with diarrhea.

  40. Scared of Mercury? Okay, avoid Mercury in vaccines by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    What you said seems correct to me. But...

    People who are scared of Mercury can have vaccines without Mercury.

    Maybe we should not eat tuna.

  41. Re:30 in 7.4 million by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    "you apparently can't immunize against stupidity and willful ignorance"

    The worst of it is the stupid parents are all immunized; it's the kids that are going to die.

  42. Illegals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how are all those illegal aliens working out for you on the west coast? Standby for more diseases, lots more of diseases.

    1. Re:Illegals by NerdENerd · · Score: 1

      It is the anti vaxxer tards, not the illegals.

  43. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, thimerosol was completely removed from all routinely scheduled childhood vaccinations by 2002. Only some flu shots may still contain some. Even counting that, the total dosage is far below what it was in 1990, before the autism "epidemic" began. Even more convincing, rates of autism diagnosis have continued to rise even as timerosol has been removed. There is no causal link and certainly no dose-response curve.

    https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/reference/vaccines-and-autism/

  44. Re:Vaccine and Autism Link Is Rare But Does Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd have a better time with the argument that cooked meat contains carcinogens and "could cause cancer", if you feel like an AKSHUALLY.

    Or instead of mongering you could pick an argument that tries to demonstrate negative societal effect. That supporting a pound of beef consumes land or water or has a carbon footprint of whatever meters. Or even that farms pump their cows with antibacterials, and is helping groom superdisease.

    It wouldn't stop me from eating meat. But at least you'd have consequences society should listen to.

    As opposed to pedantic masturbation.

  45. Re:Vaccine and Autism Link Is Rare But Does Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dude. A little research, please. Like, check it out on Snopes at least:

    "Zimmerman, a scientist with serious credentials who was once a government expert on vaccines, believes that narrow circumstances might exist in which the combination of pre-existing mitochondrial dysfunction and vaccination could trigger ASD. This view is not held by many scientists, and from a scientific-evidence standpoint it remains speculative. The 2018 deposition given by Zimmerman regarding the 2007 sequence of events during omnibus proceedings was compelled by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., an anti-vaccine activist with a dubious commitment to scientific accuracy, and Rolf Hazlehurst, a litigant in one of the omnibus cases.

    "Finally, it bears mentioning that Dr. Zimmerman supports vaccination. “As a pediatric neurologist and member of the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Child Neurology Society, the American Academy of Neurology and the American Neurological Association, I strongly support the importance of vaccines for all children,” he wrote in his statement:"

    https://www.snopes.com/news/2019/01/21/witness-view-vaccines-autism/

  46. Re: So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Viruses actually bring DNA to our body and make us stronger and evolve

    I wish you best of luck in catching the disease of your choice and evolving into compost.

  47. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're already big pharma's bitch every time you collect a paycheck.

    We're eager to line up, hands outstretched. Particularly when we reach The World Owes Me Because Reasons age. As though healthcare grows on trees. Rest assured, that oxygen tank was paid for somehow and the money came from you, pleb.

    But yeah, that's only 99.999999% of their revenue. Gotta get you on those ripoff flu shots. But the foot surgery, that's fine, there's no racket there, it was covered by insurance or something therefore the money didn't come from you. Dumbass.

  48. Re:Vaccinations are bad by malkavian · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. I think the flu shots still contain thiomersal, which has an organic derivative of mercury in it, but that's no problem. If you worried about the individual atoms that comprised a molecule, instead of its molecular traits, you'd never have salt (which is essential to humans), as it would both explode and poison you with the sodium and the chlorine that makes it up.
    Thiomersal is safe as a molecule.

  49. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, "big pharma" makes practically nothing on vaccines. One estimate shows that they might make 0.25% of their profit from vaccines.
    https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/the-myth-of-big-pharma-vaccine-profits-updated/

    Second, measles can be quite damaging and even fatal. Granted, in a well-nourished population, we're talking about a 0.2% mortality rate. But there are higher rates of other complications. And flu killed 80,000 people in the US in the 2017-2018 season!

    Third, a certain percentage of the population are immuno-compromised and CANNOT be vaccinated. (See earlier poster's story of a child with cancer.) We rely on herd immunity to keep these people safe.

    Fourth, vaccines for diseases like measles with low mutation rates work EXTREMELY well. Yes, you may need a booster after 5-10 years for something like tetanus, but is that really so awful?

    Flu is trickier, of course, because there are so many strains in the wild and they mutate so fast. Virologists have to guess which 3-4 strains are most likely to spread in the next season and manufacturers set up production based on that prediction. If they guess wrong or the virus mutates too much, well, then the vaccine may ineffective or only partially effective against that strain. And again, you may only get the sniffles from your flu, but if you give it to Grandma, it may just kill her.

  50. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you're poor vaccines are cheap (with lots of agencies doing their best to help you) and realize that not accepting them is one of the ways your life will take a horrible turn where you or your kids will be permanently damaged, scarred, crippled, etc.

    When you're solidly upper middle class with health insurance...suddenly you turn into soccer mom listening to Jenny McCarthy and worrying that your precious ones might get the autism.

  51. Make it a criminal offense by stevent1965 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The best I can say about so-called anti-vaxxers is that they are ignorant and uneducated. But I'll give them the benefit of doubt. Perhaps some do hold religious or moral objections to vaccinations. Well and good. But there should be consequences associated with behavior that affects society in general. Think of drunk driving laws. If a child who has not been vaccinated contracts a disease the vaccine could prevent, the parent(s) should be prosecuted for criminal endangerment. In fact, it should be as automatic as failing a sobriety test. If your kid gets measles and has not been vaccinated, you should face fines and possible jail time, increasing with successive occurrences. Please don't toss out the red herring of health care access. Lack of it does not apply to early childhood vaccines.

    1. Re:Make it a criminal offense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps some do hold religious or moral objections to vaccinations. Well and good.

      No, that's not "well and good". One's religious or moral view does not give a free pass to endangering public health.

      Think of drunk driving laws.

      Exactly, religious or moral objections won't give you a free pass to drunk driving.

      You cannot claim "my religion calls for drinking before driving" and get away with it. Anyone refusing to have their children vaccinated without medical reason should be prosecuted for endangering public health.

    2. Re:Make it a criminal offense by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some do hold religious or moral objections to vaccinations.

      That doesn't make it any better. Freedom of religion doesn't include the right of human sacrafice. In general personal freedom does not extend to causing harm to others.

      Well and good. But there should be consequences associated with behavior that affects society in general. Think of drunk driving laws. If a child who has not been vaccinated contracts a disease the vaccine could prevent, the parent(s) should be prosecuted for criminal endangerment. In fact, it should be as automatic as failing a sobriety test.

      That would be a start but it doesn't cover all the cases where the idiots infect some poor sod and it's impossible to figure out who was the particular vector.

      It's illegal to shoot into a crowd even if you manage ot not hit anyone, after all. I don't think religios or moral values should get people off the hook of reckless endangerment even if you can't prove a specific instance of harm beyond reasonable doubt.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Make it a criminal offense by stevent1965 · · Score: 1

      I agree it's almost impossible to prove who was infectious and spread the disease. But it's incontrovertible that if someone has not been vaccinated and does contract the disease, they are culpable. If they've been vaccinated and still get sick, that's just bad luck, but not criminally irresponsible.

  52. Re:Right wing religious nuts by malkavian · · Score: 1

    34% of people voted for Brexit. About 32% voted against it. The rest hadn't a clue what it actually was they were supposed to be voting for (the options given were no change, or magical unicorns that crap gold and make all your problems disappear).
    That's why lots are disgruntled, as it's not really a representative number, considering abstentions. Certainly not a good figure to base changing the direction of an entire nation on.

    And some people have political views that make absolutely no rational sense (which is how politicians get in that make no rational sense). I heartily approve calling them out on that and saying bluntly that they make no rational sense.
    All sides of the political spectrum have these kinds of people in, because they can be charming at times.

  53. Re:30 in 7.4 million by burtosis · · Score: 1

    You can't immunize babies for measles under one year of age, and a very small subset of the population with compromised immune systems. Further not every last person who gets the mmr vaccine develops the same level of immunity. All of these people have thier lives riding on the people who have no valid excuse to help prevent them from becoming ill and suffering possible permemant damage or death. Even people who survive, especially children, can be affected years later called subacute sclerosing panencephalitis or SSPE. You get an incurable brain infection, seizures, deteriorating function, and then (so far) a 100% chance of death. It's not even as uncommon as once thought. So even survivors don't have a rosy future.

  54. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop ruining the narrative for people who only feel and don't think!

  55. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To set the record straight... Clark County, the epicenter of said outbreak, is in another fucking state (Washington), on the other side of the Columbia River from Portland, Oregon.

  56. Re:Vaccine and Autism Link Is Rare But Does Happen by jouassou · · Score: 1

    If you want a real way to prevent autism: make sure pregnant mothers get enough vitamin D. Seriously.

  57. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where did the measles come from? Ex-nihilo?

  58. Remember the good old days by NerdENerd · · Score: 1

    when child mortality was 66%, only one in three children got to see their 5th birthday? The problem is that these idiots are not old enough to remember polo and iron lungs.

  59. Out of sight out of mind... by burtosis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Americans have it easy today. Women don't die in child birth in any significant numbers. You don't need to have 6 babies to see 3 reach thier teenage years. Almost no one gets horrible diseases that kill, cripple, disfigure, and often cause unending pain for the remainder of your life. When every person either had family or friends that they watched contract horrible diseases like polio, they were scared shitless of suffering the same fate. When the first vaccines came out, people lined up around the block and people fought shortages to keep up with demand. It was hailed as a miracle, and people couldn't believe they might finally be free of these unimaginable afflictions plaguing humanity.

    Nowadays, with vaccinations keeping these diseases under control, very few have had a family member who has been crippled, had a lifelong friend die, or even seen the afflicted in person. They lack the imagination necessary to place themselves in this world lost to medical progress and have become complacent, ignorant, and lazy with regard to the seriousness of the situation. It's absolutely disgusting.

    1. Re:Out of sight out of mind... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. As one antibiotic after another is rendered useless by overuse, we'll be back in a situation similar to the in a few decades.

      Well, that is a worst case projection...no, a worst case projection has it next year, but that one's really unlikely. But the best case of we keep coming up with working antibiotics that don't have horrendous side effects, isn't very likely either.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Out of sight out of mind... by burtosis · · Score: 1

      This is a different but serious problem to antivaxxers. The majority of antibiotic resistance comes from agricultural practices. Animals are fed antibiotics even when healthy so that even more can be crammed into smaller spaces, and increase yields slightly. Short of a weapons grade bioengineering lab, this ranks among the fastest ways to reduce the effectiveness of antibiotics. If you want to help the best ways are to let your politicans know, and to purchase meats that are antibiotic free. Oftentimes these antibiotic free meats don't even cost more at the grocery store.

    3. Re:Out of sight out of mind... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      When the first vaccines came out, people lined up around the block and people fought shortages to keep up with demand. It was hailed as a miracle, and people couldn't believe they might finally be free of these unimaginable afflictions plaguing humanity.

      Unsurprisingly, there were anti-vaxers at the beginning, too. They were afraid they would actually get the disease from the vaccine.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Out of sight out of mind... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Whether it's a different problem or a part of the same problem depends on how you frame the problem. If you frame it as "People believing fakes and frauds rather than actual experts in the field" then it's the same problem. I.e. people are afraid that their kids aren't being treated correctly, so they get worried and look for an answer outside of the officially correct channels. If the officially correct channels lied less often this would be more unreasonable.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Out of sight out of mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Americans have it easy today.

      Its easy to see from the extensive data on disease/death occurrence that the major drop in childhood mortality and crippling disease is *not* caused by vaccines. Its the miracles of plumbing, refridgeration, trucking (distributing food) that does most of the work.

    6. Re:Out of sight out of mind... by rl117 · · Score: 1

      And, to be fair, they aren't entirely wrong about that. Since the vaccine *is* the virus, in an inert or attenuated form, there is a small possibility of that happening. You are getting a low grade infection, or at the very least a response to something mimicking an infection. So if your immune system is compromised, or there's a problem with a particular vaccine batch, you could be put at risk.

      Overall, the benefits outweigh the risks, and today we have very good quality control, so the argument is not very convincing. But I wouldn't dismiss it out of hand; there is some valid science behind it.

  60. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heaven forbid people want sovereignty and prefer not to be ruled from abroad by people they can't elect or kick out. If I recall, a major country had a war over that a couple hundred years ago in order to claim their independence.

    Yep, gotta smear those people so that we can show our globalist owners how well we lick their jackboots.

  61. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    34% of people voted for Brexit. About 32% voted against it. The rest, by not voting, agreed to accept whatever decision is made by those who did.

    FTFY.

  62. Re:30 in 7.4 million by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    It is an easily transmittable virus. That is the problem if you don't control it early on.

  63. Re:30 in 7.4 million by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    Also those WHO stats include vaccinated people that's why the rates are so low. But try telling anti-vaxxers that.

  64. You can totally immunize against stupidity by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Informative

    that's what compulsory education is for. What's hard to immunize against is propaganda. There's a big anti-science movement in America being pushed by corporate interests that don't want to pay for things like public health.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  65. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "like a lot of other non life threatening decease (flu!)"

    Tell that to the 50-100 million people killed by the Spanish Flu in 1918-1920

  66. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sodium is an alkali metal - by itself it will burst into flames or explode on contact with water and produce noxious gasses.
    Chlorine by itself is a liquid or gas - by itself it's extremely toxic and will kill you pretty quickly.

    Mix them and you get sodium chloride, otherwise known as common table salt. Which is tasty on fries.

    Just because atom X is dangerous doesn't mean it's always dangerous in a compound. Mercury included.

    More dangerous than Mercury is ignorance...

  67. Overreacting? But... by HiThere · · Score: 1

    To me this seems like overreacting, as measles did me no permanent harm. My ancestors were exposed to measles from way back. Other groups of people have found it fatal. Even in my group (North-Western Europeans) measles has been associated with massive increases in still-births and deformed births. And I'm not sure just how non-fatal it was. That I lived through it and my ancestors did, doesn't say how many didn't, even as recently as one generation back.

    I suspect what should be done is strict quarantine with strong enforcement and forbidding any non-vaccinated child from going to school. But perhaps the governor didn't have an option to do that, and *could* declare a state of emergency.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  68. Re:Right wing religious nuts by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    >50% of people voted for Brexit.

    No, 50% of those who voted. Thing is there's quite a few people now who were ineleligible to vote at the time who are now of voting age and they're not happy.

    And you know, the referendum wasn't binding. Binding referendums have much tighter rules and if it was binding it would have to be rerun because of fraud by the leave side. Trying to claim there's some sort of mandate is a real subversion of democracy.

    There's a reason that binding referendums have tight rules. The leave camp blatantly lied and they're trying to pretend that's OK.

    Calling people stupid because they have a certain political view, is in itself stupid.

    Some people have the "political view" that I should be murdered, so yeah fuck you.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  69. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mercury is not a neurotoxin, but is the smallest and inner-most planet in the Solar System, named after the Roman deity and messenger of the gods, and could never fit in a vaccination. This is just another fake comment to attack people who never knew 5 simple ways to save money in bed.

  70. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like most foreign statistics, the Mexican numbers are made up, and those that do get vaccinated vary widely in age because of the chaotic nature of their "program", hence immigrants are very iffy. Good chance that the illegals have not aged into the program yet. Same and worse applies the the Central American countries.

  71. Vaccination programs kill persons in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the US, vaccination programs kill a few persons per decade, mostly by allergic reaction to eggs, the medium used to grow the vaccine. Each year tens of persons are permanently injured. As a result of legal suits resulting from such deaths and injuries, makers and administrators of vaccines were abandoning the business so in 1986 Congress created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. You cannot sue anybody at all alleging an adverse outcome from vaccination. Instead you must file a claim that is judged by the Board. The delay is years, about 3/5 of the claims are denied, there is no appeal, the average successful claim pays about 3/4 * $1M.

    I promote vaccines as by far the best choice for anyone (except in case of known immunosuppression.) My children received all the recommended doses. I myself got the measles as a young child, just like almost everyone born before 1957. I remember the epidemics in a suburb of a large city: thousands of children with the rash. Tens of them died each year. Then the vaccine came, and the measles vanished.

    Nevertheless, I can understand why someone who is informed may decide that the risk to their child from the vaccine is unacceptable, especially if enforced by government edict. In 1976 the US Center for Disease Control [that was the name then] deliberately lied to the public about their scientific and medical errors connected to the swine flu vaccination program. As long as I live, I will never trust what CDC says without independent verification.

  72. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Alright, you fucking moron, Thimerosal contains mercury, but guess what? Table salt contains chlorine! And it's even worse than that: water contains the extremely explosive gas HYDROGEN! Why are you worried about Thimerosal when salt and water contain chemicals that can LITERALLY KILL YOU?

    Besides, if you actually read the shit you linked to, you'd find out that all of the standard vaccines for kids in the US and EU haven't contained Thimerosal for 14+ years now. How do you explain the autism now, bitch?

  73. Re:Vaccinations are bad by jythie · · Score: 1

    Ahm.. that very link states that Thiomersal was removed from childhood vaccines decades ago.

  74. Thanks, anti-vaxx shitheads by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Lets have a big round of applause for the anti-vaxx shitheads who've managed to help bring back a dreadful and deadly disease through their own ignorance and stupidity.

    So yeah, don't listen to 99.99999999% of all epidemiologists, doctors, and researchers, instead listen to a known genius like Jenny McCarthy, a washed up MTV dating game hostess.

    Her film 'career' (cough) in such amazing works such as Diamonds, Scream 3, and Santa Baby means that she surely knows better than all those egghead scientists. I mean really, have you seen the way they dress? Lab coats are soooo utilitarian.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Thanks, anti-vaxx shitheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So yeah, don't listen to 99.99999999% of all epidemiologists, doctors, and researchers,

      Much less.

      Most GPs and pediatricians are little more than ignorant since they may have done a few hour training session mostly focusing on the schedule.

      The vaccine schedule is set by committees with very elite members, and the majority of the medical profession follows orders and collects very nice incentives ($10k's) for keeping most of their patients uptodate.

      Some elite members members such as Paul Offit are on record as saying, more or less, "yes, we know vaccines have risks, but we never admit it to the general public because we want everyone receiving their vaccines".

      The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which does everything in their power to prevent successful claims, including keeping large numbers of GPs etc. ignorant about vaccine injury, when you adjust for known under-reporting, should probably be paying out $3 billion year in injury claims, including for autism caused by vaccines ... yes ... courts have said that vaccines can cause autism.

  75. LOL? by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    What's so funny, dude?

    Yes, the people of Mexico should have a proper level of concern if there is an outbreak of illness among their northern neighbors that could affect them.

    1. Re:LOL? by quantaman · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's so funny, dude?

      Yes, the people of Mexico should have a proper level of concern if there is an outbreak of illness among their northern neighbors that could affect them.

      It's funny because of all the racist rhetoric in the US about "dirty Mexicans" bringing in diseases.

      And yes, it's perfectly appropriate to "LOL" about serious issues.

      What's inappropriate is laughing at the suffering of others or using humour to disguise offensive views.

      But using humour to point out a particular racist argument is flawed? That's perfectly legit.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  76. Get Child protective services on the case by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    I would like to see refusing to vaccinate your kids defined as child abuse. CPS rates you as an unfit parent and takes your kids away.

  77. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BZZT! WRONG! Mercury is a glorious god, not a mere "planet!" You new age plebs need to get with the program! He is not a hot rock, he only delivers them!

  78. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 3, Informative

    Those aren't mutually exclusive. Clark County is SW Washington's conservative sinkhole.

    --
    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
  79. Re:30 in 7.4 million by careysub · · Score: 2

    30 cases in 26 days in a State of 7.4 million people is a state of emergency?

    Well the fire was confined initially to just a pot on the stove, but that was very localized, so we didn't feel it required any immediate action. Then once the cabinets above the stove caught fire, it still seemed really localized, do we thought we should just wait and see. Once we forced out of the kitchen entirely we decided to call the fire department, if it still continued to spread. Well once the living room drapes went up, we thought that emergency action probably was needed, and we did call the fire department, after we finished eating lunch on the lawn.

    What couldn't they save our house? Effing gubbmint incompetents.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  80. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 2

    The outbreak is in Clark County, the conservative sinkhole of SW Washington and the Portland Metro area. It is across the Columbia River, in a different state. They are also responsible for not allowing a new bridge to be built across the Columbia because there would be tolls on the bridge to pay for it, just like there were for the original bridge.

    --
    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
  81. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by careysub · · Score: 1

    And most vague unsupported general claims about statistics are just BS.

    Your move.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  82. I just noticed something by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    All of the antivax cranks in this thread are ACs. What does this say about their willingness to debate?

    1. Re:I just noticed something by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      I think they are paid informants trying to stir the pot by putting out propaganda that is ultimately harmful. It works because, well, look at the article, it won't even touch 99% of the people but if it kills 1% it's still a victory because the targeted people died to that propaganda.

    2. Re:I just noticed something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No ... what does it say about the climate of fear amongst health professionals who want to speak out?

    3. Re:I just noticed something by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "No ... what does it say about the climate of fear amongst health professionals who want to speak out?"

      Literally nothing, since you can retain your anonymity on slashdot by using a throwaway email account, and a pseudonym.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I just noticed something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says that ACs are not pathetic dweebs with nothing better to do than spend all day on Slashdot pontificating
      like some ignorant jerk. You sign up to make you feel important. But, you millennials are so incredibly stupid,
      just parroting each-other's mindless, liberal, group think. Your herd mentality is what needs to be weeded out.
      Too bad there's no vaccine for dumb. No. It's all of your vaccines that made you stupid.

    5. Re:I just noticed something by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Spotted the antivaxer! If I were a millennial, how could I have had measles in 1956? In actual fact, my fiftieth birthday was the exact day that Hale-Bopp reached its maximum brightness.

  83. Re:30 in 7.4 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't claim it's preventable without knowing the social class of those families. Perhaps most of them are too poor for non-emergency medical care and that's why they weren't immunized.

  84. Re:Right wing religious nuts by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

    Well, since nobody in the UK was allowed to join the EU as presently constituted (as opposed to a much more limited precursor institution), it seems that it's a one vote for not being in it compared to 0 to be in it.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  85. Re:Right wing religious nuts by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

    Sheesh... "allowed to vote to join"....

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  86. Re:Right wing religious nuts by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but Clark County is populated mostly by people who prefer Democrats, including voting for Democrats 52% to 48% in the last election. You are misinformed, probably because they may not be quite as left-wing progressive as other nearby urban areas, although that doesn't make them a conservative bastion.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  87. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking Whoooosh

  88. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Itâ(TM)s likely they believe(d) measles was eradicated, that vaccination is evil, and that they were too superior to catch anything - disease is for others.

  89. Re:Vaccinations are bad by meglon · · Score: 1

    .... you'd never have salt .... as it would both explode and poison you....

    My doctor sure as hell makes it seem that that's going to be the end result of my salt consumption.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  90. Re:Vaccinations are bad by meglon · · Score: 1

    I can't tell if you're attempting sarcasm,or just being really, really, fucking stupid. I say this only because there are some people that fucking stupid out there.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  91. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by meglon · · Score: 1

    Well sure, 73.2% of the time they're only 47.1% true.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  92. Re:Right wing religious nuts by meglon · · Score: 1

    Well, not exactly.... Franklin county is over on east side of the state, Clark county is on the west side. I had to go look up your reference, i honestly didn't think opium poppies would grow in this climate.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  93. Re:Right wing religious nuts by meglon · · Score: 2

    Nope, again. Clark county is a lean republican county currently....not by a large amount, but definitely a lean.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  94. Re:Right wing religious nuts by meglon · · Score: 1

    Barely conservative. It's a lot nicer there than a number of other counties in the state.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  95. Re:Right wing religious nuts by meglon · · Score: 1

    It's not a conservative sinkhole, but it is a right leaning county. Only their treasurer and attorney are democrats, while all the rest of their elected officials are republican. Calling the county an urban area is also a problematic description.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  96. from Twitter by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I saw a comment, probably from twitter that said:

    "If my kid is not allowed to bring a peanut butter sandwich to school, your kid should not be allowed to bring an easily preventable disease to school."

    That pretty much covers it.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    1. Re:from Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that sums it up.

      Bring the peanut butter and unvaccinated kids back in.
      We cannot run a world where we cater to the weakest members of the species.

    2. Re:from Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a comment, probably from twitter that said:
      "If my kid is not allowed to bring a peanut butter sandwich to school, your kid should not be allowed to bring an easily preventable disease to school."
      That pretty much covers it.

      But kids should be allowed to bring a peanut butter sandwich to school because the world does not need weak snowflakes who will keel over and almost die at the sight of a fucking peanut butter sandwich!

      This is "won't you think of the children" bullshit of the highest order. By trying to immunize against every possible little disease we're raising an entire nation of weaklings, and as these diseases mutate (which they will do - just look at how bugs in hospitals mutate after the use of disinfectant) they'll re-attack us and we'll have no fucking immunity to fight it off.

      Let your kids get these diseases. Whatever doesn't kill them will most certainly make them stronger. THAT is how your immune system works!

  97. And yet they wont declare an emergency over illega by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess they want to wage a genocidal war on the measels virus. Will they blame the brown invaders who are entering the country illegally and bringing in the disease. No they blame white people for not vacinating.

    No matter what happens in the world, it is all the fault of white people. The only solution to white privelege is to give the kindly government and the multibillion dollar corporate media more and more granular controll over everyones life.

  98. Kurzgesagt - Measles Explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://youtu.be/y0opgc1WoS4

  99. Start arresting anti-vaxxers by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Shit like this is their damned fault. You may not be able to legislate morality or religion, but you can for damned sure legislate criminal stupidity.
    Give people one last chance to voluntarily vaccinate their kids, and after that, jail time, a fine, and you vaccinate the kid(s) anyway, by court order.

  100. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you have the brainpower to use the internet effectively enough to make that post when you've clearly got a room-temperature IQ?

  101. Re:Right wing religious nuts by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Both "Leave" and "Remain" campaigns have been fined for lying during the campaign. There's quite a few people that have died since, they're also not happy, there's also a growing number of people that have grown up beyond age 26 and find out that once the EU starts taking more than it gives, it isn't all that it's cut out to be, they're also not happy, you will never make everyone happy and people will change their mind.

    Off course the ones that voted the other way aren't happy, but if you go straight democracy, that's what you get. Trying to change the rules after the game didn't turn out the way you wanted isn't fair.

    Brexit in the end is a "no confidence" vote for both Brussels/Merkel and Cameron/May. Cameron was voted in with the promise he was going to make changes to the EU-UK relationship, the EU insisted on it's continued "members have no sovereignty" platform. The fact that major political voices in The Netherlands, Belgium, France etc are getting more steam with like "leave" platforms goes to say that the people are sick of EU transferring wealth and power at the cost of its middle class. Even Macron conceded recently that if the French were proposed with the question, they would vote to leave (polls show 61% in France and 59% in Netherlands vs UK's 48%).

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  102. State of ermergency by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 0

    They appear to be overreacting. A measles outbreak does not warrant such a hysterical response.

  103. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thing is there's quite a few people now who were ineleligible to vote at the time who are now of voting age and they're not happy.

    So fucking what? That happens every time TIME PASSES you fucking shitbrain.

    People voted to LEAVE the EU. They didn't vote for some fucking deal. They weren't fucking tricked. They voted to fucking LEAVE. The media and the government is doing everything it can to ignore that and stay in the EU (or get in deeper, as the UK wasn't actually fully in). It's fucking absurd, toddler-level logic to try to claim the original vote was invalid, or another vote needs to be taken, just because some whiny little retard shits don't understand that the older generation is trying to SAVE what little chance if left for the younger generation to not be snuffed out.

  104. Re:Right wing religious nuts by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

    Sorry I wasn't clear. I wasn't calling the county an urban area, I was comparing it to nearby urban areas and excluding nearby rural areas, which have a different leaning.

    The County officials do seem to lean R overall, but the County did vote for Democratic Politicians at the State and higher levels by 3-5% in the most recent election, so I suppose they're relatively in the middle compared to the country as a whole, which would make them leaning right in comparison to the nearby cities.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  105. Re:30 in 7.4 million by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    30 cases in 26 days in a State of 7.4 million people is a state of emergency?

    Exactly. It would make so much more sense to wait, and let the situation spiral out of control before acting.

    Exactly. For the same reason western countries should ignore Ebola outbreaks in Africa and not get practice helping contain it...until someone with it gets off a plane...two weeks ago.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  106. Re:30 in 7.4 million by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    And it's about more than measles, too. Some thought parents who don't want to immunize should watch a video of kids with whooping cough.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  107. Re:30 in 7.4 million by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I guess some think a drastic increase of spreading disease isn't an emergency until it jumps from 50,000 to 100,000 in a year?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  108. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    1. Autism continued climbing after thimerosol was removed.

    2. The thimerosol link (i.e. mercury link) was hypothisized by that disgraced doctor to cause intestinal inflamation of some kind, which caused autism. This turned out to not be true.

    So neither mercury, nor the mercury path, turned out to be true.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  109. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Although the mercury meme remains, official antivaxx crap (if there is an official one) has dropped the mercury issue and is now just anti-vaxx for autism.

    It's a study in how memes evolve to keep spreading.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  110. Re:30 in 7.4 million by rl117 · · Score: 1

    Diseases can spread exponentially. If you don't immediately contain them then it ceases to be an emergency, and becomes an out of control disaster. An epidemic, with fatalities.

    So, no, emergency is exactly the correct name for it. The reason we don't suffer from the worst effects of diseases like this in the Western world is precisely *because* our health authorities are monitoring these situations, ready to act quickly if the situation demands it. We should be thankful we get to live in such a safe situation, rather than minimising and undermining the true value in what we have created for ourselves.

  111. Re:Vaccinations are bad by rl117 · · Score: 1

    It's not "safe", it's still pretty toxic if you read the MSDS for it. However a typical vaccine would contain a huge 50 micrograms of the stuff. Most of which would be excreted by the body over the following weeks-months. It has a relatively large biological half-life of several weeks, but of the tiny amount present originally, there would only be a tiny fraction left a year later. It was never a huge cause for concern, and was only dropped due to the irrational hysteria. Not entirely a bad thing that it was dropped--just a bit pointless given the risk/benefit tradeoffs.

  112. Re:Right wing religious nuts by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Both "Leave" and "Remain" campaigns have been fined for lying during the campaign.

    That just strengthens my argument. When it comes to election fraud, two wrongs do not make a right. A binding referendum would have to be rerun due to the fraud. Claiming a mandate from a non binding one is trying to subvert referendum rules that are there for a really good reason.

    There's quite a few people that have died since, they're also not happy

    They're not human any more either. Non humans don't generally get a say in democracies.

    there's also a growing number of people that have grown up beyond age 26 and find out that once the EU starts taking more than it gives

    No there are none. Literaly none, because the EU doesn't take more than it gives. Maybe some people have grown up beyond 26 and started believing that.

    it isn't all that it's cut out to be, they're also not happy, you will never make everyone happy and people will change their mind.

    Not all it's cut out to be? I mean yes. People get weird ideas about wnat it's supposed to be get angry that it isn't and vote for something worse. What's good about that?

    Trying to change the rules after the game didn't turn out the way you wanted isn't fair.

    The rules on binding referendums are clear and well established. I'm quoting the rules as they are. You are trying to change and weaken them by treating a nonbinding referendum as binding.

    Brexit in the end is a "no confidence" vote for both Brussels/Merkel and Cameron/May.

    Well that's incredibly stupid then. Why on earth are we deciding to leave the EU based on a local no confidence vote?

    the EU insisted on it's continued "members have no sovereignty" platform.

    That's an outright falsehood and always has been. The EU members have always have absolute sovereignty as Article 50 proves. For every EU law there is always the choice: adopt the law or leave the EU. Alabama (etc) by contrast is not a sovereign state. When they decided to leave, people from the government started shooting at them until they stopped.

    It's just like any other club. You can pay the dues and abide by the rules or you can leave. If the club is so increadibly amazing that leaving is really shit that doesn't make you less free to leave.

    he fact that major political voices in The Netherlands, Belgium, France etc are getting more steam with like "leave"

    Were. Not are, were. It has been said that David Cameron single handedly saved the EU. Even Front National has had second thought about leaving after seeing quite how much benefit from the EU that we're having to give up.

    that the people are sick of EU transferring wealth and power at the cost of its middle class.

    Well that just goes to show how fucking stupid people are. That's a global problem right now in every country in the EU or out. Leaving the EU isn't going to magically solve it.

    It's the same illogic that makes people hate on gay marriage.

    Life appear worse now than it was. Between then and now thing X also happened. Therefore it we make thing X unhappen, then life will get better.

    In this case X is the EU. Except it doesn't work like that. Globalisation and the destruction of the middle class is a separate problem. It's certainly there in the EU and it's definitely there outside the EU. Little Britain is not going to somehow magically find a way to reverse the trend all on its own OR have the will to do so if that means putting a crimp on growth and the economy.

    Even Macron conceded recently that if the French were proposed with the question, they would vote to leave (polls show 61% in France and 59% in Netherlands vs UK's 48%).

    Well that shows his wisdom in not running the referendum then. Why would a sane politician ask the country if they want to hurt themselves severely when they'd vote differently in a few years time but be unable to nudo the hurt?

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  113. Re:Right wing religious nuts by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    one vote for not being in it compared to 0 to be in it.

    That's one of the most inane distortions of reality I've seen today. Well done!

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  114. Re:Mix the anti vax idiots with by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Migration across that boarder has not been this low since 1971.

    Well there's your problem. Mexicans have a higher immunisation rate then Americans, so mexicans coming in increase the average immunisation rate.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  115. if they dont want measles maybe they could trythis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check this out, novel concept here

    maybe you can turn over some of those antivaxers out there if you package the vaccines in simpler ways ( you know like they used to do in the past), like one at a time, and not 34 at a time in one shot, heck, if you would prioritize some of them, like, the most common things you might get, maybe you could convert even more

    theres no reason for those single vaccine shots against 54 different things, including turning into a patriots fan. No reason at all

  116. This seems strange to me... by actnJksn · · Score: 0

    Something seems kind of off here, I'm not quite sure what though.

    1) I get Idaho warning it's citizens, it's around six hours via I-84 and US-97 and I doubt there is much air travel between the area affected and Idaho but why is Oregon not taking this more seriously if Washington is - given Clark county is part of the Portland Oregon Metro area (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portland_metropolitan_area)? This seems strange to me.

    2) Basic science tells me that causation does not prove there is correlation so I'm wondering if there could be something else going on here and not just the vaccination rate of Clark County? It seems like all of the evidence, while it points at the vaccinations is a bit circumstantial. Also, to be clear I'm not disputing that vaccination is good I'm just wondering if there is something else going on in addition as the vaccination rate seems to be a simplistic explanation and it doesn't take into account the rest of the Portland metro area.

  117. I Have A Better Punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just put her in my bed. After one night with me, she'll wonder what she did wrong in the entirety of her life to be forced to sleep with me. And I get laid. Win/win for everyone involved.

  118. Re:30 in 7.4 million by aquabat · · Score: 1

    ...but you apparently can't immunize against stupidity and willful ignorance.

    Nature is immunizing us against those things, with measles. Unfortunately, it's taking down some of the rest of us too.

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  119. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And your post is a perfect example for why people believe the antivaxxers, not doctors. Observe:

    Vaccines haven't contained mercury for many years. Fake news.

    Demonstrably false: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal In short: many don't, but some still do.

    Vaccines don't cause autism. This has been extensively studies and debunked. Fake news.

    Considering that you've already been proven a liar above, are you suprised that people disbelieve also that statement? Get caught lying once, none will trust you anymore. That's exactly the problem with mainstream talking about vaccines: mainstream doctors have no problems using lies such as "vaccines don't contain mercury" in support of vaccines. That ruins their credibility and makes people mistrustful of them. And then they act surprised when anti-vaxxers with their message of "doctors are lying to you" get people's attention.

    You were dropped on your head at birth, weren't you?

  120. Re:Vaccinations are bad by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    They contain mercury which is a neurotoxin.

    Water contains hydrogen, which is an explosive.

    Fortunately, chemistry doesn't work like that or smokers would die of explosions instead of lung cancer.

    You're missing something far more fundamental. The MMR vaccine hasn't contained mercury for 2 decades (in any form since as you quipped ethylmercury and elemental mercury are not the same thing).

  121. Re:Vaccinations are bad by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    And by saying "Missing something" I meant from the argument itself. It's useless arguing advanced chemistry with someone who doesn't even understand that the very base of their argument is wrong.

    I didn't mean that you didn't address it, which you did. I wish slashdot had a Preview button :-)

  122. Darwinism literally in action by overlook77 · · Score: 1

    Enough said.

  123. FORCING YOUR MORALITY ON ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't matter what the bible says. You're trying to FORCE RELIGION ON ME. You don't get to. This is 'murika. Go back to Europe where that kind of shit is acceptable, and where it started.

  124. Paul Offit's book is excellent, and fascinating by Karl+J.+Smith · · Score: 1

    https://smile.amazon.com/Deadl...

    The title is terrible. Pretend instead it's "A history of the science and politics of vaccines."

    I started reading it and ended up staying up late into the night until I finished.

    It explains in detail all those things about vaccines that you'd vaguely heard of including things like the "vaccine court." and the vaccine panic in the 1880's is also interesting to read about.

    Buy a copy, read it, then pass it to a friend.

  125. juxtaposition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those Opposed To Scientific Consensus Bolstered By 'Illusion of Knowledge'"

    and

    "State of Emergency Declared in Washington State Over Measles Outbreak "

    on the same page, says it all I think.

  126. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Clark County is in the middle of Washington's opium country. Don't trust those vaccinations made by 'the man'. But hand me the needle with some unknown mixture of heroin and Fentanyl.

    Like my vegan friend who is quite happy smoking weed and snorting coke she found on the dark web =>

  127. Re:Lets be antivax! Yes, Let's! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is the parent "Insightful". He said nothing put a moronic mainstream TROPE. Look at the figures, at
    least 4 people WERE vaccinated. So, vaccines are not 100%. And they carry side effects. You might
    be just some moronic tween in his bedroom, but your grandparents got measles and survived just fine. And
    they had BETTER all around immunity for it. The problem is when too many people get vaccinated, there's
    not enough better, NATURAL immunity left in the "herd".

    You slashdotters, always so quick to pipe up on a subject that you've obviously never studied. News for
    pretend wanna be nerds is more like it.

  128. Re:30 in 7.4 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. There's this concept "exponential growth".

  129. Re:Right wing religious nuts by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

    Dude, heroin is natural.

  130. Re:Vaccine and Autism Link Is Rare But Does Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Communist Russia is calling you back home to the land of the gulag.

  131. Re:Vaccinations are bad by mangastudent · · Score: 1

    Vaccines haven't contained mercury for many years.

    While looking up the details of the flu vaccine I was administered last fall in the US, Fluarix Quad, I saw that multi-dose bottles, I think it was 10 per, had thimerosal in them, they're obviously vulnerable to bacteria getting in when a dose is withdrawn. Single dose handily packed in a syringe like I received doesn't have it.

  132. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clark County is SW Washington's conservative sinkhole.

    Which should make it a haven for meth users.

  133. Boundless egoism! by schweini · · Score: 1

    In a expat facebook group here where in Costa Rica, where child vaccination is thankfully mandatory, a woman actually asked for tips and tricks on how she could fake the paperwork so that her kids wouldn't be vaccinated (because shes sooooo informed), but could still go to public kindergartens and schools.
    I'd just like to point out that general anti-vaxers are bad enough - but many of them at least proudly announce it, and homeschool their kids and all that.
    But now they actually seem to be trying to smuggle their risky kids with fake papers into the vaccinated population. This is a nother level of egoistical BS.

  134. Re: Lets be antivax! Yes, Let's! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, ACTUAL herd immunity refers to immunity from those who had measles and ended up with a lifelong immunity not from false immunity from a vaccine. It actually was more effective because if 62% of a population caught measles, it was found to have stopped spreading and provided immunity for the other 38%. Meanwhile, these precious vaccines need multiple doses through your whole life and must have a 95% vaccinate rate to only protect 5% of the population.

  135. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The flu vaccine in Canada has mercury (thimerosal). At least as recently as a few years ago. Not sure if it was in the 2018 batch.

  136. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >50% of people voted for Brexit.

    Pretty sure that right after the vote, there was a massive increase in people Googling it, trying to figure out what the hell they just voted on.

    Captcha: viruses
    Pretty applicable to the story. Not so much for this Brexit derailing of the thread.

  137. What measles does to you by fox171171 · · Score: 1

    Kurzgesagt has a good explanation of what measles does to you.

    https://youtu.be/y0opgc1WoS4

  138. Re:Right wing religious nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This outbreak is happening in liberal suburbs of Portland.

    Anti-vaxxers do not follow the normal pattern of political polarization. Instead, it is common among extremists in either direction. Left-wing anti-vaxxers believe vaccinations are a corporate conspiracy. Right-wing anti-vaxxers believe vaccinations are a government conspiracy. Moderates on both sides vaccinate their kids.

    So, what you are essentially saying is that measles is possibly one of the many cures for the extremist disease that has gripped the United States? There is some irony.

  139. Re:Vaccinations are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you worried about the individual atoms that comprised a molecule, instead of its molecular traits, you'd never have salt (which is essential to humans), as it would both explode and poison you with the sodium and the chlorine that makes it up.

    That just proves how little you know about biology. The body needs sodium precisely because it is highly reactive. It also regularly peels off sodium atoms from sodium chloride and sodium bicarbonate. Newsflash: we also need potassium the same way, which is another highly reactive metal. And oxygen is highly reactive as well. The potassium and the sodium are used to mediate ions from the blood through cellular walls.

    The fact that these atoms are all highly reactive is the reason why our bodies produce so much heat while we are just sitting there. Think about how little heat a single candle produces. Now think how many candles it would take to make human body heat. There is a furnace going on inside us and it is catalyzing carbohydrates with oxygen, sodium and potassium.