It may not be considered a violation since the lawyer is acting as her legal agent in this matter. That means that for the purposes of the TOS, she is the one accessing Facebook using her login.
Yes, but we live in an age of expediency. The courts will be happy to assume you totally should have seen that notice taped to the 3rd elm to the left in the nice little park you've never been to and then insist that your ignorance is no excuse.
In many cases it is allowed to post it in the section of the newspaper that nobody reads or even subscribes to anymore.
In this particular case though, I don't know what else the court could do. He has no known physical address, employer or even phone number.
Same reason the old "turbo" PCs had a button to drop it back to 4.77 MHz. Now that things are so much faster, code depends on timers and counters rather than loops so it's much easier.
I contend that it is not at all off-topic. It is exactly the topic of the RFC. In one shot they demonstrate the ineffectiveness of the new guidelines and the high potential for harm.
At the same time, it perfectly illustrates that the new guidelines are inadequate since they approved a patent that is almost identical to one the courts specifically ruled invalid.
It's more along the lines that the USPTO made up it's mind and then asked for comments because they had to. Then yelling SHUT UP! should anyone offer an opinion they don't share.
Some of the vodka out there has taken the next logical step. They bring in tanker trucks full of food grade ethanol, add distilled water ant POOF! Vodka.
It's sad how they've turned out. They started with a perfectly reasonable goal of curbing drunk driving. But then they succeeded too well and so they had to lobby for lower BAC limits so there would be enough DUIs to rail against.
As for advertising to children, Sorry, any form of advertising at all or even no advertising will not make teens stop wanting alcohol.
That may be what it means NOW, but that was not what it meant when the Constitution was written. If you want to understand it properly, you'll need to do some learning.
Likewise, the militia was every able bodies citizen with a gun.
I didn't claim it was rape. I said he victimized them. Specifically he blackmailed them. Don't even try to tell me he thought those people were fine with their pictures being posted, the fact that he charged hundreds to take them down suggests he was well aware that their posting wasn't wanted by the subjects.
I believe that nearly became a national sport in the late '70s. Only they went further, you could get a kit to allow you to easily swap back and forth between a strait pipe and the catalytic converter.
Slashdot Mirror
The AVR is a fine microcontroller. It isn't meant to be a CPU for a PC.
As an example of where the new guidelines fail in general.
It may not be considered a violation since the lawyer is acting as her legal agent in this matter. That means that for the purposes of the TOS, she is the one accessing Facebook using her login.
Yes, but we live in an age of expediency. The courts will be happy to assume you totally should have seen that notice taped to the 3rd elm to the left in the nice little park you've never been to and then insist that your ignorance is no excuse.
In many cases it is allowed to post it in the section of the newspaper that nobody reads or even subscribes to anymore.
In this particular case though, I don't know what else the court could do. He has no known physical address, employer or even phone number.
Same reason the old "turbo" PCs had a button to drop it back to 4.77 MHz. Now that things are so much faster, code depends on timers and counters rather than loops so it's much easier.
Read my posting history and feel your shame.
That's an orthogonal point. Agreed on your distinction, but there are people who do paint the former as the latter to shut down discussion.
I contend that it is not at all off-topic. It is exactly the topic of the RFC. In one shot they demonstrate the ineffectiveness of the new guidelines and the high potential for harm.
At the same time, it perfectly illustrates that the new guidelines are inadequate since they approved a patent that is almost identical to one the courts specifically ruled invalid.
It's more along the lines that the USPTO made up it's mind and then asked for comments because they had to. Then yelling SHUT UP! should anyone offer an opinion they don't share.
I doubt you would get enough to out gas in anything like a practical amount of time, it doesn't take much ammonia to create a foul taste.
Some of the vodka out there has taken the next logical step. They bring in tanker trucks full of food grade ethanol, add distilled water ant POOF! Vodka.
It's sad how they've turned out. They started with a perfectly reasonable goal of curbing drunk driving. But then they succeeded too well and so they had to lobby for lower BAC limits so there would be enough DUIs to rail against.
As for advertising to children, Sorry, any form of advertising at all or even no advertising will not make teens stop wanting alcohol.
Alas, I suspect the ammonia would form ammonium hydroxide with excess water in the mix.
You'd have to call the resulting drink a Mr. Clean.
That may be what it means NOW, but that was not what it meant when the Constitution was written. If you want to understand it properly, you'll need to do some learning.
Likewise, the militia was every able bodies citizen with a gun.
BTW, I'm not a Libertarian.
They really did mean well practiced much as a clock of the time would be called 'well regulated' if it kept accurate time.
That would include the ability to work in groups without shooting each other but need not mean government regulated.
No, it isn't, but it does allow one to consider the potential fairness or not of a sentence.
Try to recover a mechanical mod from a broken shard of metal.
Many crashes do not cause a fire. The flash chips will easily survive a mechanical shock that would obliterate all evidence of a mechanical mod.
I didn't claim it was rape. I said he victimized them. Specifically he blackmailed them. Don't even try to tell me he thought those people were fine with their pictures being posted, the fact that he charged hundreds to take them down suggests he was well aware that their posting wasn't wanted by the subjects.
To make the comparison fair, try finding a drunk driver who caused thousands of accidents in multiple incidents.
Since he blackmailed over 10,000 people that means he is serving less than 15 hours per instance. That's a substantial "bulk discount".
He also victimized more people than even the most dedicated rapist ever could.
Got source code for your coffee maker?
Yes. The microcontroller isn't protected in any way.
The code is far more likely to be recoverable than many mechanical mods.
I believe that nearly became a national sport in the late '70s. Only they went further, you could get a kit to allow you to easily swap back and forth between a strait pipe and the catalytic converter.