Good for you! Pin a rose on your nose! A lot of otherwise reasonable people got sucked in to this by trusting that the person who is supposed to be constrained by ethics was actually constrained by ethics.
It was bad loans that financially naive people accepted on the knowingly bad advice of mortgage brokers who needed fodder to fraudulently sell off as AAA investments.
I hope these clowns bankrupt themselves one day with their stupidity.
Sadly, all that would mean is that you'll be 'asked' to tighten your belt so their constant stream of hookers and blow can continue through a massive bailout.
At the same time, good luck getting a doctor to suggest a $5 jar of salve over a $200 tube of prescription salve, even if it's the very same stuff.
That's a real problem. Many doctors default to the new name brand X rather than the tried and true generic Y even when just the co-pay for X will cost more than Y. Often, X will be no better than Y for the majority of patients. As a result, some people pay WAY too much and some end up not getting X or Y. A tiny handful avoid mild itching that could have been fixed by switching them to X if they cared to.
Actually, since this is a salve to be used externally, internal use isn't a consideration for this formulation. People regularly get that amount of copper on their skin from jewelry (including copper bracelets) Some get a minor rash from it or a green skin discoloration, both much better than MRSA.
What people need is medications they can actually afford. The cost of drugs in the U.S. is shameful.
It should be marketed as a cologne of lotion. That way the rules flip-flop and pretty much if the user's skin doesn't actually come off while applying it, it's A-OK with regulators.
I'm not saying the research shouldn't be done, an internal use form would be good. A concentrated form would be good. But none of that should stand in the way of the known effective salve.
We don't need any amazingly complex and fantastically expensive research here. We have a substance known to work. It would be helpful to isolate the active ingredients, but that's not the crazy expensive part.
Of course these days, aspirin is cheap enough in generic form that it makes sense to just use it, but even otherwise, why would I need to grow my own willow tree? (unless I just want one)
Then there's marinol. They extracted the THC from pot in some mis-guided effort to get the medicinal effects without admitting they screwed up with the war on drugs. And of course, it was to be far more expensive than even the black market herb it replaced. It failed since they lost at least half of the beneficial effects and potentiated the tendency to cause psychosis. Turns out the CBD is as important as the THC.
Recently, it was discovered that nicotine can be very effective against the negative symptoms of schizophrenia and started a mad dash to come up with something based on it that isn't nicotine. Nobody seems to have considered passing out gum and patches.
Garlic is known to have antiseptic properties. Leeks are related to garlic but may have different compounds with antiseptic properties. No idea what the bile does.
Sure, but there are a few differences. For one, a manned plane will have at least one person (the pilot) with a serious interest in it not being one of those that crashes and kills people. Even if his employer is willing to risk it, he has the final say and it's his ass on the line.
The little hobbyist craft are small and light weight, There is a serious limit to the amount of damage they might cause. Not so much for a 50 pound commercial drone.
Yes, it is always unreasonable because it happens without the owner being found guilty in a court of law. In fact, it happens without any sort of due process.
I have seen a few of those. Just highlight a relevant bit of text and search it on google. It's rare that a page will have exclusive information anymore.
Given the amount of malware served up by ad networks these days, I'd have to say better than they have now. I haven't really considered the question any further since that determination was all I needed to enable ad-blocking.
Let's just say it'll be up to them to make the case to me that they are now free and clear of malware. Since I have no actual desire to consume their content, the burden of proof will be quite high.
What I find interesting is that an un-regulated market is indistinguishable from 100% regulatory capture. So those who oppose regulations are essentially proposing 100% regulatory capture in order to avoid regulatory capture.
Let's start with has effective controls to prevent ever serving malware. Add in no history of serving malware.
Much like the food industry, I don't care how the grocery store avoids selling arsenic as flour, only that they do. If they claim that they can't, they shouldn't expect to sell much flour.
Slashdot Mirror
Good for you! Pin a rose on your nose! A lot of otherwise reasonable people got sucked in to this by trusting that the person who is supposed to be constrained by ethics was actually constrained by ethics.
Who says it wasn't one of 20 sign here's somewhere in the middle. Did I mention these brokers were fraudsters?
Analogy, overly pedantic kid in middle school who starts every sentence with "Well technically..."
It was bad loans that financially naive people accepted on the knowingly bad advice of mortgage brokers who needed fodder to fraudulently sell off as AAA investments.
Try looking beyond the gates sometime.
I hope these clowns bankrupt themselves one day with their stupidity.
Sadly, all that would mean is that you'll be 'asked' to tighten your belt so their constant stream of hookers and blow can continue through a massive bailout.
These people are truly the scum of the Earth.
It goes a long way to putting the lie to any claims of the market being anything but a casino driven by random fluctuations.
At the same time, good luck getting a doctor to suggest a $5 jar of salve over a $200 tube of prescription salve, even if it's the very same stuff.
That's a real problem. Many doctors default to the new name brand X rather than the tried and true generic Y even when just the co-pay for X will cost more than Y. Often, X will be no better than Y for the majority of patients. As a result, some people pay WAY too much and some end up not getting X or Y. A tiny handful avoid mild itching that could have been fixed by switching them to X if they cared to.
Actually, since this is a salve to be used externally, internal use isn't a consideration for this formulation. People regularly get that amount of copper on their skin from jewelry (including copper bracelets) Some get a minor rash from it or a green skin discoloration, both much better than MRSA.
What people need is medications they can actually afford. The cost of drugs in the U.S. is shameful.
It should be marketed as a cologne of lotion. That way the rules flip-flop and pretty much if the user's skin doesn't actually come off while applying it, it's A-OK with regulators.
I'm not saying the research shouldn't be done, an internal use form would be good. A concentrated form would be good. But none of that should stand in the way of the known effective salve.
That's what brownies and oil are for.
But the point stands even moreso since it was synthetic and still cost more than the black market herb.
We don't need any amazingly complex and fantastically expensive research here. We have a substance known to work. It would be helpful to isolate the active ingredients, but that's not the crazy expensive part.
Of course these days, aspirin is cheap enough in generic form that it makes sense to just use it, but even otherwise, why would I need to grow my own willow tree? (unless I just want one)
Then there's marinol. They extracted the THC from pot in some mis-guided effort to get the medicinal effects without admitting they screwed up with the war on drugs. And of course, it was to be far more expensive than even the black market herb it replaced. It failed since they lost at least half of the beneficial effects and potentiated the tendency to cause psychosis. Turns out the CBD is as important as the THC.
Recently, it was discovered that nicotine can be very effective against the negative symptoms of schizophrenia and started a mad dash to come up with something based on it that isn't nicotine. Nobody seems to have considered passing out gum and patches.
Garlic is known to have antiseptic properties. Leeks are related to garlic but may have different compounds with antiseptic properties. No idea what the bile does.
Looks like the tribbles^W chickens have come home to roost.
Sure, but there are a few differences. For one, a manned plane will have at least one person (the pilot) with a serious interest in it not being one of those that crashes and kills people. Even if his employer is willing to risk it, he has the final say and it's his ass on the line.
The little hobbyist craft are small and light weight, There is a serious limit to the amount of damage they might cause. Not so much for a 50 pound commercial drone.
Yes, it is always unreasonable because it happens without the owner being found guilty in a court of law. In fact, it happens without any sort of due process.
THIS!
MS has a vbery long history of stabbing 'partners' in the back.
No true Scotsman?
I have seen a few of those. Just highlight a relevant bit of text and search it on google. It's rare that a page will have exclusive information anymore.
Given the amount of malware served up by ad networks these days, I'd have to say better than they have now. I haven't really considered the question any further since that determination was all I needed to enable ad-blocking.
Let's just say it'll be up to them to make the case to me that they are now free and clear of malware. Since I have no actual desire to consume their content, the burden of proof will be quite high.
Consider, in the last court case the judge pretty much spelled the current regulatory changes as a winning move.
History suggests otherwise, especially in a market with significant barriers to entry.
What I find interesting is that an un-regulated market is indistinguishable from 100% regulatory capture. So those who oppose regulations are essentially proposing 100% regulatory capture in order to avoid regulatory capture.
To be fair, most of systemd has sounded like an April Fools joke to me. For that matter, most of freedesktop has read that way lately.
I swear the first time I glanced at your post I read it as 'media shites'. I may have been right the first time in light of the end of your sentence.
Let's start with has effective controls to prevent ever serving malware. Add in no history of serving malware.
Much like the food industry, I don't care how the grocery store avoids selling arsenic as flour, only that they do. If they claim that they can't, they shouldn't expect to sell much flour.