Except the license in question has no clause for termination due to the author going home in a huff. The GPL only terminates if the terms of the license are violated, and that termination only applies to the violator, not to anyone who has already obtained the code or a binary from the violator.
When is the last time you have heard of a protest that women are just as good at picking up garbage or mining coal as men. Or that a woman can dig a ditch just as well as a man? Where are the complaints that women are just as good at cleaning out sewers as men?
There may well be discrimination in those fields, and there may be individual women who fave a just complaint about it, but if so, they aren't getting a lot of support from other feminists.
That's the crazy part in the U.S. Even though we had a fairly bad outbreak last year, right after the 5 minutes of doom and gloom on the nightly news, they urged everyone to put the fear aside and go to the crowded malls for a few hours of intensive exposure and the all important shopping.
It has gotten much better, but at the same time, resources are limited. During last year's flu season, the largest local hospital here had to bring in a mobile ER unit meant for disaster relief to handle overflow. It's not hard to imagine resources being completely overwhelmed if we get much worse one year.
I'm not a big fan of the way CoCs overreach myself, but that doesn't make the childish take your marbles and go home right or legal.
Meanwhile, who decides, where is the line? Do death threats do it? Racial slurs? Quoting KKK propaganda? Posting telephoto candids of someone's loved ones?
If it is NEVER OK to kick someone out because they contributed some code, all of the above must be A-OK.
Yes, it's perfectly fine. They didn't LOAN the kernel their code, they GAVE it. Just how long do you suppose that gift is supposed to grant you total control of the entirety of the Linux kernel developers?
If by that you mean it won't end the problem 100% for all time then yes. There will still be exploits and so IOT issues.
If you're just griping that it also won't cure athlete's foot and morning breath, so it's useless, you're quite wrong.
The majority of cases today where the black hats get in to IOT devices is because of devices that have no password, or all share a single default factory password, easily looked up on Google.
So, the new law isn't perfect, but it does address one of the leading holes in IoT. The other holes are a bit harder to supply a bright line for.
I wouldn't act as if both sides were equally guilty. I might make a statement to the effect that as heinous as the Nazis are and as galling as their hate speech is, it was wrong to punch them when they weren't being violent.
But then, we know that while there was violence on both sides, one side acted distinctly worse.
Considering that one side had a couple misdemeanor charges filed and the other a few felonies and one felony terrorist action, he did indeed waffle.
Later, with a great deal of guidance to the point that the press practically wrote a statement for him titled "say this to not be a Nazi", he managed to say something approaching the right thing. The next day, he walked that back a bit.
>p>That dosen't necessarily mean he's a Nazi. It could just mean he's dumber than a brain damaged goat.
I'm not the one ignoring them. Even when the press rolled out the red carpet for Trump to say the obvious thing, he waffled on calling actual self-identified Nazis bad. That's not really disputable.
Slashdot Mirror
Except the license in question has no clause for termination due to the author going home in a huff. The GPL only terminates if the terms of the license are violated, and that termination only applies to the violator, not to anyone who has already obtained the code or a binary from the violator.
Where in his presentation did he demonstrate sexism?
He may have demonstrated blindness to sexism, but he did not as far as I can see demonstrate sexism himself.
A better solution to the problem would have been to show him the sexism he wasn't seeing.
Nor was the working class for the most part.
When is the last time you have heard of a protest that women are just as good at picking up garbage or mining coal as men. Or that a woman can dig a ditch just as well as a man? Where are the complaints that women are just as good at cleaning out sewers as men?
There may well be discrimination in those fields, and there may be individual women who fave a just complaint about it, but if so, they aren't getting a lot of support from other feminists.
No, but it is obligated to behave consistently. If yours doesn't, wake up.
That wouldn't be antimatter, it would be something else.
That something else would need to be in addition to antimatter in order for the equations to balance.
That may be something, but it is not antimatter. Antimatter and matter interact quite readily and so certainly do "see" each other.
That's the crazy part in the U.S. Even though we had a fairly bad outbreak last year, right after the 5 minutes of doom and gloom on the nightly news, they urged everyone to put the fear aside and go to the crowded malls for a few hours of intensive exposure and the all important shopping.
You first.
I see what you did there...
It has gotten much better, but at the same time, resources are limited. During last year's flu season, the largest local hospital here had to bring in a mobile ER unit meant for disaster relief to handle overflow. It's not hard to imagine resources being completely overwhelmed if we get much worse one year.
I'm not a big fan of the way CoCs overreach myself, but that doesn't make the childish take your marbles and go home right or legal.
Meanwhile, who decides, where is the line? Do death threats do it? Racial slurs? Quoting KKK propaganda? Posting telephoto candids of someone's loved ones?
If it is NEVER OK to kick someone out because they contributed some code, all of the above must be A-OK.
No consequences for horrible behavior is.
Yes, it's perfectly fine. They didn't LOAN the kernel their code, they GAVE it. Just how long do you suppose that gift is supposed to grant you total control of the entirety of the Linux kernel developers?
Perhaps, but the thing that passes for a government in the U.S. would probably just let the Supreme Court pick a winner.
If by that you mean it won't end the problem 100% for all time then yes. There will still be exploits and so IOT issues.
If you're just griping that it also won't cure athlete's foot and morning breath, so it's useless, you're quite wrong.
The majority of cases today where the black hats get in to IOT devices is because of devices that have no password, or all share a single default factory password, easily looked up on Google.
So, the new law isn't perfect, but it does address one of the leading holes in IoT. The other holes are a bit harder to supply a bright line for.
That is exactly how it works. If you gain access to the signing key (the secret key) then you can sign things yourself.
So, does that mean that if I personally emit only 9 million Kt of CO2, it's cool because it's less than China?
Hectoring people back into a pre-industrial existence was never going to work
Nice strawman you have there. That was never suggested.
Don't worry, Trump is preparing to fix that.
We can't have those upstart Euro people emitting more than US!
No, the first to show up to protest the Nazis and KKK were LITERALLY clergymen.
Yeah, those clergymen are well known for their violent ways (snicker).
I wouldn't act as if both sides were equally guilty. I might make a statement to the effect that as heinous as the Nazis are and as galling as their hate speech is, it was wrong to punch them when they weren't being violent.
But then, we know that while there was violence on both sides, one side acted distinctly worse.
Considering that one side had a couple misdemeanor charges filed and the other a few felonies and one felony terrorist action, he did indeed waffle.
Later, with a great deal of guidance to the point that the press practically wrote a statement for him titled "say this to not be a Nazi", he managed to say something approaching the right thing. The next day, he walked that back a bit.
>p>That dosen't necessarily mean he's a Nazi. It could just mean he's dumber than a brain damaged goat.
I'm not the one ignoring them. Even when the press rolled out the red carpet for Trump to say the obvious thing, he waffled on calling actual self-identified Nazis bad. That's not really disputable.