I happen to like Interwoven's Teamsite product which is all run through a browser and has some neat features. Very cool product, and best of all it runs under Solaris, not NT. Unfortunately, no Linux support yet - but I think they're working on that.
That they've put the first bunches of pages online as a PDF file. If more publishers did this, it would go a long way to help you decide whether or not you like a book - or an author. I wouldn't mind seeing more of this...
Yeah, I know who Alan is. So what? He's a representative of Red Hat to their customer(s). That doesn't mean he can be rude or use inappropriate responses in his dealings with same.
"I have installed RedHat 7.0 on over 15 servers all ready. So far it has been rock solid."
Good for you. I hope they're not production boxes. Since you say "servers" it sounds like they are. Congratulations - you are on the boss' official Shit List, and in general - clueless. In a normal production environment, you install and test your software first - then roll it out to the production machines. Since Red Hat 7 hasn't been out all that long, you've apparently done rigorous testing.
"Second, that is not a discussion forum, but a bugzilla database. Bugzilla is for bugs, not user comments. User comments
belong on the mailing lists, on the RedHat newsgroups, in e-mails to the RedHat support addresses, in phone calls, and
in letters, but NOT IN BUGZILLA!"
No problem there. Then just say so in a normal fashion. Implying that one's own product could suck is just bad form - and bad PR as is saying "then return it."
Must be tied into that article about drugs and IT... Red Hat's beta testers must've been on some kind bud to miss all these bugs... Asleep at the wheel!
I'd rather go with slow-and-low without the bugs than fast-and-furious that's useless.
When I put Red Hat on a machine, it is NEVER the latest and greatest. I usually start with the last in the series (4.1, 5.2, 6.2) and then apply all the patches. Forget the.0 altogether!
Slashdot Mirror
I happen to like Interwoven's Teamsite product which is all run through a browser and has some neat features. Very cool product, and best of all it runs under Solaris, not NT. Unfortunately, no Linux support yet - but I think they're working on that.
What they're talking about sounds a lot like content management which is certainly NOT new - and is also not what Zope does.
Just another dumb patent.
"Mann" is correct. But also, not used in the article - which was my point entirely. ;>
Then don't read it, troll boy.
That they've put the first bunches of pages online as a PDF file. If more publishers did this, it would go a long way to help you decide whether or not you like a book - or an author. I wouldn't mind seeing more of this...
...means "humanity" in German. It does not mean "men."
Right... In OLDE English, and a few decades ago.
Oh yeah? Which one would that be again?
Men? What the fuck is that? What about women?
How about just "people" or "humans" or "humanity?"
The guy that made that statement was Jerry Linenger, an astronaut from the USA!
Did you read that story?
Slashdot, did you research that story!?
"I have installed RedHat 7.0 on over 15 servers all ready. So far it has been rock solid."
Good for you. I hope they're not production boxes. Since you say "servers" it sounds like they are. Congratulations - you are on the boss' official Shit List, and in general - clueless. In a normal production environment, you install and test your software first - then roll it out to the production machines. Since Red Hat 7 hasn't been out all that long, you've apparently done rigorous testing.
"Second, that is not a discussion forum, but a bugzilla database. Bugzilla is for bugs, not user comments. User comments belong on the mailing lists, on the RedHat newsgroups, in e-mails to the RedHat support addresses, in phone calls, and in letters, but NOT IN BUGZILLA!"
No problem there. Then just say so in a normal fashion. Implying that one's own product could suck is just bad form - and bad PR as is saying "then return it."
If Slashdot were a print medium, they'd have been out on their collective asses a long time ago!
Anyone from Red Hat out therec are to comment?
Isn't that called install notes and a knowledge base? ;>
Pretty damned cocky!
Must be tied into that article about drugs and IT... Red Hat's beta testers must've been on some kind bud to miss all these bugs... Asleep at the wheel!
...but some of them are closed already!
The CORRECT links are:
www.linuxnewbie.org
www.bugzilla.redhat.com
So maybe QA should be one of the first things that Red Hat bolsters with the newfound resources they've gained, should they drop the SPARC port! ;>
www.linuxnebie.org and www.bugzilla.redhat.com
I'd rather go with slow-and-low without the bugs than fast-and-furious that's useless. When I put Red Hat on a machine, it is NEVER the latest and greatest. I usually start with the last in the series (4.1, 5.2, 6.2) and then apply all the patches. Forget the .0 altogether!
...will NOT be missed this time around! ;>
Place yer bets now on the arrival date of 7.1!
Shoo, troll.
Sorry for the confusion... I figured the title would be enough, even if it were under the wrong post... :|