Slashdot Mirror


User: monxrtr

monxrtr's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
702
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 702

  1. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    I don't think they like your question.

  2. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    Well, then I declare a law against personal masturbation! Impure thoughts = Sin. Still selling ignorance for the enemy?

  3. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    No more shared bedtime stories. Stop being such a fucking pussy. Repeat any lines from any works you've read one way or another at any time you so wish to.

  4. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    format shifting for personal use is legal.

    So is taking a dump.

  5. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    Haha. You borrow your words liberally. And I, for one, salute you! :P

  6. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    There is never any trade transaction that is not a mutual 100% pure profit DONATION for both sides. Speak now, or forever hold your peace.

  7. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 0, Troll

    Congratulations. You know nothing. Just know what it means to forget, and all will be forgiven in due course.

  8. Re:What if the book is reprinted later on ? on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    Or it would have been read. I'm sure rational individuals are completely capable of determining matters of compensation in a rational fashion. But whatever, and beg the gods to turn a blind eye to your illegal breaths of their air.

  9. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    By downloading the pirated ebook, aren't you reducing the general market for the used book?

    All Action Implies Increased Demand.

    (not judging/flaming you, I agree: it's an interesting moral dilemma).

    No, it's ok, you can admit that you're stupid and wrong too; to make it a less interesting moral dilemma.

  10. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    Hmmph. Good job. Go don one of those Hawaiian straw skirts. So close ... (watch how you should've better answered)

  11. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    you're not hurting anyone financially or otherwise

    And you'll stop being a victim when you realize you're helping.

  12. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    Bravo! I appreciate the attempt at primitive economic theory. Supply and demand says you nevertheless had an opinion about the outcome.

  13. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Heh. If only words didn't count as action. Suck it up FLEB (312391).

  14. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    Heads I break the Law. Tails I make a Law against Tails.

    Pfft. ... A web of victims is set. Glory be to your slowness, Judges, Lawyers, Persons of Persuasion.

    What if you are Commanded to break the Law by the Law? Still want some? :P

  15. Re:Best use of the Kindle on An Ethical Question Regarding Ebooks · · Score: 1

    Nobody's stealing anything!

    Exactly. Everybody's here to "steal" everything. Let's not pussy pretend play otherwise. What once was not is now Ours. But don't let me force comprehension upon your petty words.

  16. Re:Yum. /Hi. on Scientists Identify a Potentially Universal Mechanism of Aging · · Score: 1

    /bow Excellent! Then you've just discovered the latest inverse relationship. Also called the Las Vegas "Cooler". E=mc^2. Yet another "tool". Take this Cane as an Award.

    Now try putting half the effort into defining science that you spend upon defining religion.

  17. Re:Yum. /Hi. on Scientists Identify a Potentially Universal Mechanism of Aging · · Score: 1

    Nostalgic in an Einstein General Theory or Relative Theory of Relativity Way?

    Dude. Just another Dude shootin' the shit. Go ahead and impress me, and explain why Trade occurs, even when they're throwing both bananas and apples at you on stage? Apply that knowledge to Physics and Biology. In the meantime, my cursor quivers over the link, let alone pressing it and magically traveling through some tubes.

    But what am I saying? Let's hear a renowned Physicist or Biologist give a Correct, and Irrefutable Epistemologically Known, explanation for the Phenomenon of TRADE. Duh?

    Astonish me, dumb asses.

  18. Re:Yum. /Hi. on Scientists Identify a Potentially Universal Mechanism of Aging · · Score: 1

    Welcome to free will punching you in the nose, randomly, as Fred Sanford said, "You Big Dummy!"

    Would you like a multi-verse bedtime story? :P

    Fuck "entropy". Magnetism, baby!

    Oh, excuse me, you were talking about that shit log I dumped? Entropy VIII as it takes its last pictures of our Solar System, n/m. :P

    I Hate that fucking word "entropy"! It disguises 100% Pure Bullshit.

    Entropy is a function of a quantity of heat which shows the possibility of conversion of that heat into work.

    Insert random variable signifying "Work". Plus a Vacuum Error accounting for Experimenter Breathing imperfections.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy

    From a macroscopic perspective, in classical thermodynamics the entropy is interpreted simply as a state function of a thermodynamic system: that is, a property depending only on the current state of the system, independent of how that state came to be achieved.

    AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA! Any other words from which my Buzz- (wrong answer) ards may feed? Brrrrr, it's a bit chilly. But that's energy equivalence between a frog's and a human beating heart. I eat entropy for breakfast. Dinner is served to the toilet god.

  19. Re:Yum. /Hi. on Scientists Identify a Potentially Universal Mechanism of Aging · · Score: 1

    Heh. Here I am again talking to the choir, directing. Physicists and Biologists will continue to be stupid as long as they fail to understand Trade, for what ever petty political motivated reasons they do so. Good luck. :P Keep crawling.

  20. Re:Yum. /Hi. on Scientists Identify a Potentially Universal Mechanism of Aging · · Score: 1

    Ahh yes, Let me give my educated answer. Aging is nothing but a primitive belief in vampires. :P

  21. Re:wtf. on Scientists Get Their Groove On On YouTube · · Score: 1

    Kirk: "Bones! Is that you? Say again! ... I'm going down."

    Bones: Repeat. Obviously, they're just not filtering enough diversity through the elements."

  22. Re:Brings About a Smile on Scientists Get Their Groove On On YouTube · · Score: 1

    Will you by definition settle for an equivocation?

    Ah, hah, hah, excuse me, numbers and words slaughtered upon the road, more bloody traveled by.

    Tick + 1, Tock +2.

  23. Haha, Where's the Funny? on Greenpeace Slams Apple For Environmental Record · · Score: 1

    Apple's new Macbooks (well-received by most technology critics) are 'the world's greenest family of notebooks.'

    Because only 95.4% of them end up in land fills, according to Steve Jobs Sponsored Studies, which are held in the Realm of High Regard, Arrrghh (RHRA).

  24. Re:Ridiculous argument on Excluding Intelligent Design Principles From the Search For Alien Life · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's actually really simple.

    Atheists believe they are themselves, gods. Let them scientifically prove it by staying alive.

    Intellectually or Physically, I don't give a shit. :P

  25. Re:Hell, it's already a movie on Scientists Identify a Potentially Universal Mechanism of Aging · · Score: 0

    Are you sure you don't also want to consider Sir Vanilla Ice, for the World's Most Prestigious Honoure Awarde, in the battle to combat aging?

    "Who let the water out? Who! Who, Who!"

    "Algorithm"? Oooh, fancy word! Al. Gore. Rhythm. {Silent 'h'.}

    I am fully confident

    Loser talk. Either you Know, or, you do not know. Try to start with the word "know", sweetie, and what it means, as by defined by all that it does not. (trot, trot, trot, /horses stop) The subject is called epistemology. How do we know what we know, if we know anything at all, dumbfuck 609?

    P.S. Shrivel up and Die! Don't worry, we'll figure it out soon after you've passed. :P