I also do not statistical methods for serious job like this. I myself use evolutionary, genetic algorithm, NNet and Fuzzy most of the time, but i don't know why I prefer more deterministic algorithms when it comes to security.
Firefox for 4+ years and recently looked seriously at IE9 and Chrome (because why the hell FF should take 1.5G of my RAM and slow down in an extent that context menu takes 5-10 seconds to open).
Used Chrome for 1 month but it is to limited. You should install an extension to add a button to toolbar and extensions are not as good as those available on FF.
I will use IE9 as soon as it comes out to see whether I can use that.
It does requirements and I agree with you. It is dirt cheap but if IBM wanted to specify a price for it, it would be a 4 digit.
I am using it for almost 8 years and I would never use rational over it at least for small to medium size projects.
BTW it does reverse engineering, bug etc. But I am not sure how effective is the collaboration possibilities. I am aware that the corporate version can be deployed in a database server (MySQL, MS-SQL etc) and that should be enough.
This is indeed the way Iranian PCs in nuclear sites were infected. Some people brought the worm inside using USB drives and laptops (based on the intelligence ministry of Iran).
We are talking about public betas. These betas are offered to everyone and normal users are testing them not internal testers. They are supposed to come out whenever they have reached a minimum quality. When you see such a mess, it means they have brought the software to public too early.
How many software projects have come up with a Beta 8!!! in their version 4?!!
This alone is an indication that the software engineering process in Mozilla.org specially Firefox has gone out of control. The software standards have degraded to a record low and open source with large numbers of out of organization comitters is showing its disadvantages.
I used FF4 until Beta 6 and I should say it was the most torturous software test experience I have had in my 25 years of experience in software industry. I guess I will never again beta test any Mozilla software.
The only deal breaker is that non of WD-TVs have wireless network inside. Even version 0 of Apple-TV for example included wireless connection. You should either buy on of those USB wireless adapters (and use a USB port on the device which you could use to attach a USB drive) or you should wire up your home.
So basically if someone takes Unix/Linux , puts a beautiful layer on it and sells it even more expensive that the other company (e.g. MS) which has developed everything, it is fine with you.
ven worse, if the company closes the hardware, forces everyone to buy every piece of hardware from them, it is ok, but if someone else tries to support every hardware provider, we call it a close system and we condemn it.
Are these the new type of judgments from technical people nowadays?
We have both MyISAM tables and InnoDB (depending on the purpose and use).
Throw more hardware, problem solved????!!! Didn't you know that companies are established to produce profit? By adding more servers, server admins, software you are eating from the company profit. Why you should spend more when you can do with less?
You know why SUN and a few more companies went bankrupt? I guess people like you throw more resources to solve problems.
I do not call myself an amateur (or even MySQL if you refer to that) after 25 years of experience in software industry and a PhD in software engineering.
Because PostgreSQL's performance is not enough for large websites and transaction numbers (it will need many times more hardware). We have a website with 2 million members and 200 million page views a month (10,000 concurrent users sometimes). We tried to convert to PostgreSQL but it just did not provide even near to the MySQL's performance on the same hardware.
Is even this one new? US government is always meddling with foreign countries and foreigners. Just look how many wars are started or participated by the US. And calculate how many people have died in those wars.
Then if you were interested, add up the wars being supported directly or by selling U.S. military equipment.
Slashdot Mirror
I also do not statistical methods for serious job like this. I myself use evolutionary, genetic algorithm, NNet and Fuzzy most of the time, but i don't know why I prefer more deterministic algorithms when it comes to security.
Firefox for 4+ years and recently looked seriously at IE9 and Chrome (because why the hell FF should take 1.5G of my RAM and slow down in an extent that context menu takes 5-10 seconds to open).
Used Chrome for 1 month but it is to limited. You should install an extension to add a button to toolbar and extensions are not as good as those available on FF.
I will use IE9 as soon as it comes out to see whether I can use that.
You want to prove your point by using lies. When Iran openly said that?
Whose more crazy?
a) a country which has never attacked any other country in recent history i.e. 200 years.
b) a country which has started/participated in almost 50 wars, has done coup in at least 10 countries and has used 2 atomic bombs?
It does requirements and I agree with you. It is dirt cheap but if IBM wanted to specify a price for it, it would be a 4 digit.
I am using it for almost 8 years and I would never use rational over it at least for small to medium size projects.
BTW it does reverse engineering, bug etc. But I am not sure how effective is the collaboration possibilities. I am aware that the corporate version can be deployed in a database server (MySQL, MS-SQL etc) and that should be enough.
Worms can be created for any operating system including Linux etc.
and your home (I hear that you have windows PCs in home).
This is indeed the way Iranian PCs in nuclear sites were infected. Some people brought the worm inside using USB drives and laptops (based on the intelligence ministry of Iran).
The language you are pushing in multiple messages will never gain enough ground.
English is not the only fucking language on the earth.
And I see only the home page has been updated. Not even the profile pages. They want to do magic by redesigning a few pages?!!
Oh, you mean this one:
http://d.yimg.com/kq/groups/28137547/sn/1480601627/name/JEWISH+AHMADINEJAD.jpg
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR-I7DwsCxvhbdcC6_kCCvZEXD8tVTg1R7CSanjma2m0oqU95s&t=1&usg=__ovlHlg-NLLtGBqKgiV58UyrJCEY=
We are talking about public betas. These betas are offered to everyone and normal users are testing them not internal testers. They are supposed to come out whenever they have reached a minimum quality. When you see such a mess, it means they have brought the software to public too early.
You are a very impolite person.
I have a PhD in software engineering and 25 years experience. I suggest you to learn to be more polite.
How many software projects have come up with a Beta 8!!! in their version 4?!!
This alone is an indication that the software engineering process in Mozilla.org specially Firefox has gone out of control. The software standards have degraded to a record low and open source with large numbers of out of organization comitters is showing its disadvantages.
I used FF4 until Beta 6 and I should say it was the most torturous software test experience I have had in my 25 years of experience in software industry. I guess I will never again beta test any Mozilla software.
I am going to build my own Stonehenge in my yard and take photos of it.
The only deal breaker is that non of WD-TVs have wireless network inside. Even version 0 of Apple-TV for example included wireless connection. You should either buy on of those USB wireless adapters (and use a USB port on the device which you could use to attach a USB drive) or you should wire up your home.
Neither for me.
So basically if someone takes Unix/Linux , puts a beautiful layer on it and sells it even more expensive that the other company (e.g. MS) which has developed everything, it is fine with you.
ven worse, if the company closes the hardware, forces everyone to buy every piece of hardware from them, it is ok, but if someone else tries to support every hardware provider, we call it a close system and we condemn it.
Are these the new type of judgments from technical people nowadays?
But not Iran. Iranian groups don't get even a bed sheet let alone a blanket (license)!
We have both MyISAM tables and InnoDB (depending on the purpose and use).
Throw more hardware, problem solved????!!! Didn't you know that companies are established to produce profit? By adding more servers, server admins, software you are eating from the company profit. Why you should spend more when you can do with less?
You know why SUN and a few more companies went bankrupt? I guess people like you throw more resources to solve problems.
I do not call myself an amateur (or even MySQL if you refer to that) after 25 years of experience in software industry and a PhD in software engineering.
Because PostgreSQL's performance is not enough for large websites and transaction numbers (it will need many times more hardware). We have a website with 2 million members and 200 million page views a month (10,000 concurrent users sometimes). We tried to convert to PostgreSQL but it just did not provide even near to the MySQL's performance on the same hardware.
In case you are interested, genuine alphabet of middle history Iran has been Pahlavi
http://www.omniglot.com/writing/mpersian.htm
and the more older one (i.e. thousands of years of history) is Mikhi alphabet:
http://www.persiancalligraphy.org/History-of-Calligraphy.html
Do you watch TV? or read newspaper?
You talk as if there has been no war crimes. I suggest you take a look at this link for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse
... that people possibly had the right to see and be aware of.
Is even this one new? US government is always meddling with foreign countries and foreigners. Just look how many wars are started or participated by the US. And calculate how many people have died in those wars.
Then if you were interested, add up the wars being supported directly or by selling U.S. military equipment.
uuuuuggg, I cannot continue.