Iran allows inspections according to the safeguard agreement.
Iran initially agreed to allow additional protocol which allows immediate access to any place in Iran but Iran's parliament did not approve the additional protocol. For that reason Iran is not obliged nor required to entertain additional requests.
West worries that Iran cancels its agreement and STARTS producing nukes in a later date, not that they are building bomb right now.
Even if they did, they had all rights to do so. You cannot occupy two neighbors of a country and expect them not to think of defending themselves.
Taliban and therefore parts of Al-Qaeda were created by CIA to counter. Both of them are arch enemies with Shiaa government in Iran. What you say is worthless.
Al-Qaeda is financed by US supported Saudi Arabia (which is incidentally another enemy of Iran). And if you have forgotten, let me remind you that Bin Ladan family has been a very close friend to US president Bush.
Now what I said is even documented in public domain sources. What you say is never proved.
The titleof your first link is "Bangladesh: Court Orders Protection for Muslim Girl Punished for Being Raped".
It obviously shows that the official and religious rules do not dictate such pathetic acts. The court has ordered protection for the lady.
If it was a religious thing it should have been valid in all Muslim countries or at least all countries abiding from a specific sect (like Shia, Sunni etc).
Similar acts are performed in African countries (non-Muslim, christian or tribes), India (Hindu) and even in US (mostly Christian).
You are ignorant. Those are not about rape. They are about criticizing a woman of blasphemy. If you criticize a woman of blasphemy you should bring 4 witnesses.
That has nothing to do with Islam. It is the pathetic rules and culture of that country which incidentally has brought to us Osama bi Ladan and still is the main friend of the US in the middle east.
Other Muslim countries do not have any rule to punish a raped person.
He is spreading nonsense and you base your discussion on his nonsense. There is no such rule in Islam.
Rather if you rape a lady or a child you are punished by death. Not the raped person. In some pathetic tribes such things might exist but not in that religion.
Muslims have such rule? I have never heard about that in my 40 years of life and I have lived many years in Muslim countries? Unless you want to invent that or you want to put isolated local pathetic rules under the name of the religion.
You mentioned the reason yourself. Microsoft is a company (incidentally one of the pillars of the US industry and technical influence in the world) and companies are for profit. They are not charity.
On a side note, It is interesting to me when I see people from US call MS evil. Any Anti-US group/organization would agree on the benefit of removing MS out of existence:)
Yes, if they put down their weapons their oil and countries will be owned by US and its allies. If they don't put down their weapons, US will attack, kill hundreds of thousands of their people (aka almost 500,000 in Iraq, several hundred thousands in Afghanistan) and again own their oil.
By having nukes, Iran can stop US and other greedy western countries from thinking about their oil.
Iranians have not attacked any country in the recent history while they have been attacked by Iraq (supported by Europe, US and even Russia).
US has occupied two of their neighboring countries. They have every right to prepare themselves to defend. Otherwise the greedy US might want to own their oil and everything else.
Besides there is no evidence that they are building nukes.
How about hacktacking US military? If we bring their network totally down perhaps we can avoid them from starting/participating in more wars and therefore make the world a more peaceful place? You know that US has started/participated in almost 50 wars.
His theory is to put west in defensive state and Iran in offensive when it comes to talking shit. Most of the propaganda is for that. He accused Khatami (previous president) of putting Iran in defensive in international talks.
However I would prefer to be in defensive in "talks" instead of "actual everyday life".
Cloud itself does not mean anything. It is just a vision. When you do not know or care about things happening in a server farm you can easily draw it as a cloud:)
Just like Grid. I am living in Grid computing lab of a university for the last 4 years and I believe, Grid does not mean anything. It is more a Buzzword than a technical term.
There is open source software for desktop publishing but Microsoft Office still sells good. There is Linux but Windows server is still a cash cow and even.NET and related technologies and software sell for Microsoft. Why not Sun?
Sun's financial performance was always a pain in my heart. I loved (like very much) the company but their financial and management performance was terrible after 2000.
Slashdot Mirror
If we put cameras inside homes we can catch even more (perhaps 8 crimes a day).
Helllooo Mr. Orwell !!
Iran allows inspections according to the safeguard agreement.
Iran initially agreed to allow additional protocol which allows immediate access to any place in Iran but Iran's parliament did not approve the additional protocol. For that reason Iran is not obliged nor required to entertain additional requests.
West worries that Iran cancels its agreement and STARTS producing nukes in a later date, not that they are building bomb right now.
Even if they did, they had all rights to do so. You cannot occupy two neighbors of a country and expect them not to think of defending themselves.
What more lies do I know????!!! WT.?
Which nukes?
Someone should get rid of Israel's nukes. Iran does not have nukes and is under supervision of IAEA.
Taliban and therefore parts of Al-Qaeda were created by CIA to counter. Both of them are arch enemies with Shiaa government in Iran. What you say is worthless.
Al-Qaeda is financed by US supported Saudi Arabia (which is incidentally another enemy of Iran). And if you have forgotten, let me remind you that Bin Ladan family has been a very close friend to US president Bush.
Now what I said is even documented in public domain sources. What you say is never proved.
Yes, you are missing the point that they don't use their brain, they use their money.
The titleof your first link is "Bangladesh: Court Orders Protection for Muslim Girl Punished for Being Raped".
It obviously shows that the official and religious rules do not dictate such pathetic acts. The court has ordered protection for the lady.
If it was a religious thing it should have been valid in all Muslim countries or at least all countries abiding from a specific sect (like Shia, Sunni etc).
Similar acts are performed in African countries (non-Muslim, christian or tribes), India (Hindu) and even in US (mostly Christian).
Not blasphemy, I meant adultery.
You are ignorant. Those are not about rape. They are about criticizing a woman of blasphemy. If you criticize a woman of blasphemy you should bring 4 witnesses.
And I know Christians and people in US who did very similar things. And that's also very real.
You cannot generalize crazy acts of crazy people to a society or religion.
You are obviously more ignorant than me.
Turkey does not have Shia. I very well (I mean really well) know Shia rules. Major Shia countries are Iran, southern Iraq and southern Lebanon.
That has nothing to do with Islam. It is the pathetic rules and culture of that country which incidentally has brought to us Osama bi Ladan and still is the main friend of the US in the middle east.
Other Muslim countries do not have any rule to punish a raped person.
He is spreading nonsense and you base your discussion on his nonsense. There is no such rule in Islam.
Rather if you rape a lady or a child you are punished by death. Not the raped person. In some pathetic tribes such things might exist but not in that religion.
He is spreading FUD. There is no such rule in Islam. It might be a pathetic local tribe rule.
Muslims have such rule? I have never heard about that in my 40 years of life and I have lived many years in Muslim countries? Unless you want to invent that or you want to put isolated local pathetic rules under the name of the religion.
You mentioned the reason yourself. Microsoft is a company (incidentally one of the pillars of the US industry and technical influence in the world) and companies are for profit. They are not charity.
:)
On a side note, It is interesting to me when I see people from US call MS evil. Any Anti-US group/organization would agree on the benefit of removing MS out of existence
And you expect Microsoft develop plug-ins to promote competitor OS and browsers? Which commercial company does that?
There are at least 2-3 countries in between. Don't you want to check the map?
Yes, if they put down their weapons their oil and countries will be owned by US and its allies. If they don't put down their weapons, US will attack, kill hundreds of thousands of their people (aka almost 500,000 in Iraq, several hundred thousands in Afghanistan) and again own their oil.
By having nukes, Iran can stop US and other greedy western countries from thinking about their oil.
They have been successful in killing hundreds of thousands Palestinian without those nukes.
Iranians have not attacked any country in the recent history while they have been attacked by Iraq (supported by Europe, US and even Russia).
US has occupied two of their neighboring countries. They have every right to prepare themselves to defend. Otherwise the greedy US might want to own their oil and everything else.
Besides there is no evidence that they are building nukes.
Idiot me. I was going to give you +funny, the stupid mouse clicked on overrated. I am sorry.
How about hacktacking US military? If we bring their network totally down perhaps we can avoid them from starting/participating in more wars and therefore make the world a more peaceful place? You know that US has started/participated in almost 50 wars.
His theory is to put west in defensive state and Iran in offensive when it comes to talking shit. Most of the propaganda is for that. He accused Khatami (previous president) of putting Iran in defensive in international talks.
However I would prefer to be in defensive in "talks" instead of "actual everyday life".
Cloud itself does not mean anything. It is just a vision. When you do not know or care about things happening in a server farm you can easily draw it as a cloud :)
Just like Grid. I am living in Grid computing lab of a university for the last 4 years and I believe, Grid does not mean anything. It is more a Buzzword than a technical term.
There is open source software for desktop publishing but Microsoft Office still sells good. There is Linux but Windows server is still a cash cow and even .NET and related technologies and software sell for Microsoft. Why not Sun?
Sun's financial performance was always a pain in my heart. I loved (like very much) the company but their financial and management performance was terrible after 2000.