They gave tapes with highly sensitive data, unencrypted (!) to an intern and let him walk around with it overnight outside their facility. Can someone really be that stupid?
>And biology is another field of chemistry, witch in it's own turn is another field of physics.
>Should I continue?
so what's your point? you are certainly not arguing to take chemistry out of biology, are you?
This guy just doesn't seem to understand what math is. Substituting theory of computation with his "theory of expressions" just shifts focus on another field of math.
They gave tapes with highly sensitive data, unencrypted (!) to an intern and let him walk around with it overnight outside their facility. Can someone really be that stupid?
>I think Ballmer counts licenses to get high. I'd agree. He just counted sold licences.
some people have more than 1 computer
since my previous post got all messed up, here it is again in readable form:
>And biology is another field of chemistry, witch in it's own turn is another field of physics.
>Should I continue?
so what's your point? you are certainly not arguing to take chemistry out of biology, are you?
>And biology is another field of chemistry, witch in it's own turn is another field of physics. >Should I continue? so what's your point? you are certainly not arguing to take chemistry out of biology, are you?
This guy just doesn't seem to understand what math is. Substituting theory of computation with his "theory of expressions" just shifts focus on another field of math.