Edmonton, Alberta, Canada had pilot less suburb trains in 1981, maybe before.
I agree with your questioning since I have seen so many times on TV major civilian carrier planes crashing because of pilot errors. Some pilots had 30 years+ of flying experience but they fucked-up due to lack of training with new technologies more often than new technologies screwed up.
RAF pilots on principle shouldn't be taken as bozos although, like in the civilian cases I have reviewed but who knows?
Definitely rsync. I backup 500 GB of data over slow links to remote locations. Granted, it might take you a couple weeks to set the first remote images but after that, it only takes a few minutes to update the images.
Don't forget to use the backup dir options to keep a copy of deleted files or files that have changed. You can deleted them after a while. I delete them after 14 weeks.
Relying exclusively on electronic technology introduce a single point of point of failure. Fly by wires, car ecu etc.
Not being able to fall back to some kind of manual mechanical control introduces all kinds of vulnerabilities. Whether it is a glitch in the software, solar flares, aliens or something else;-)
Exactly, not to mention Jupiter is classified as a gas giant primarily composed of hydrogen. So indeed, not that many planets are suitable even with life support like it would be required on a moon base.
Even staying on a moon for a while might screw you up due to low gravity. Astronauts that come back from a reduced time International Space Station mission lose bone mass and it can take them up to 6 months to recover it when they come back to Earth.
I guess life support would have to provide artificial gravity which is possible with a centrifugal device.
Just because you do not know many entities following my "standard" doesn't mean there isn't many following it. So yes, like it or not, it is a standard.
Your argument sounds like my father is stronger than yours. Please go meditating a bit.
What you perceive as realty is more than often an illusion. Get along with it.
Then, as far as I am concerned, you may be a different AC than the 2 different ACs I was replying to. To make things clearer, that would be 3 different ACs total;-)
Very good point, I will work on that and get back to you if you volunteer. Be aware that you would be getting into a lot so you have to be mentally prepared.
Slashdot Mirror
How much will it cost me if I want to buy one of those turnip?
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada had pilot less suburb trains in 1981, maybe before.
I agree with your questioning since I have seen so many times on TV major civilian carrier planes crashing because of pilot errors. Some pilots had 30 years+ of flying experience but they fucked-up due to lack of training with new technologies more often than new technologies screwed up.
RAF pilots on principle shouldn't be taken as bozos although, like in the civilian cases I have reviewed but who knows?
yep +1 funny
kudos to you. You are a smart being.
It would be more efficient to set up a tin can network with many relays:
Tin can telecom:
http://www.darsha.org/?cat=9
I think we do something equivalent in another case. Does rsyncable gzip rings a bell?
https://beeznest.wordpress.com/2005/02/03/rsyncable-gzip/
Definitely rsync. I backup 500 GB of data over slow links to remote locations. Granted, it might take you a couple weeks to set the first remote images but after that, it only takes a few minutes to update the images.
Don't forget to use the backup dir options to keep a copy of deleted files or files that have changed. You can deleted them after a while. I delete them after 14 weeks.
Use cigwin and rsync under Windows, for Mac, look at:
https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/20983/arrsync
Relying exclusively on electronic technology introduce a single point of point of failure. Fly by wires, car ecu etc.
Not being able to fall back to some kind of manual mechanical control introduces all kinds of vulnerabilities. Whether it is a glitch in the software, solar flares, aliens or something else ;-)
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/10/29/208205/toyotas-killer-firmware
http://www.ecutesting.com/toyota.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/ufo/8026971/Aliens-have-deactivated-British-and-US-nuclear-missiles-say-US-military-pilots.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly-by-wire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_control_unit
Exactly, not to mention Jupiter is classified as a gas giant primarily composed of hydrogen. So indeed, not that many planets are suitable even with life support like it would be required on a moon base.
Even staying on a moon for a while might screw you up due to low gravity. Astronauts that come back from a reduced time International Space Station mission lose bone mass and it can take them up to 6 months to recover it when they come back to Earth.
I guess life support would have to provide artificial gravity which is possible with a centrifugal device.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_gravity
Just because you do not know many entities following my "standard" doesn't mean there isn't many following it. So yes, like it or not, it is a standard.
Your argument sounds like my father is stronger than yours. Please go meditating a bit.
What you perceive as realty is more than often an illusion. Get along with it.
I didn't want to mix topics, but next time I talk to that E.S. bastard, I am sure he could do something for me to keep my sig relevant.
I am all about parsing and this is no lies.
Poor ACs, please read my sig.
Didn't you read my sig?
Do you have any other reference for that?
Nope you have to look to look into yourself and decide if you take my words for it. Interesting challenge, isn't it?
Fuck mainstream. Didn't you notice where it got us so far? There is only one truth and many realties in realty.
Then, as far as I am concerned, you may be a different AC than the 2 different ACs I was replying to. To make things clearer, that would be 3 different ACs total ;-)
I am perfectly aware of the mainstream signification of "peaks". I am an actuarian amongst other things.
Very good point, I will work on that and get back to you if you volunteer. Be aware that you would be getting into a lot so you have to be mentally prepared.
Cheers,
ok Sockatume, last explanation. After, I am off to work in some fancy bunker.
For a new born, it might seem like a peak. For somebody who has lived a thousand years, it is nothing new.
I sincerely wish you an happy experience as a new born spirit. That's what makes human so compelling.
Come on Sockatume.
Enough or else I"ll send some men in black to make you shut up.
Not necessarily, I could an emissary sent to make you better overall.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4366765&cid=45210271
You got the meanings of truth and realty mixed up according to my standard but then again, I understand what you're saying...
See? It ain't that hard.
Realty is more often than you wished an illusion while there is only one truth.
what's so great about planting flags? Scientifically it has no value.
Agreed.
Any word you use relates to your own realty, which might be far from what is going in truth. Do I make myself clear enough?