Overview the available documentation, talk with the guy if he is available. A lot of times I ended up reverse-engineering everything although so be ready for that possibility.
Cooperation wins big time. Look at ants and bees. Only use selfishness with subject unwilling to cooperate and still, I have a hard time doing it sometimes...
I would have been happier if Yandex stopped scanning my site for a while but no luck...... 199.21.99.91 - - [02/Aug/2013:14:35:29 -0400] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 403 202 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; YandexBot/3.0; +http://yandex.com/bots)"...
Many high-end scientific computing applications will already take and use as many cores as you give it. Definitely a niche market though.
It took me a while to figure out that we were talking about the smart phones and tablets market here. 8 cores work fine for servers, especially if you run VMs on them.
I guess people running scientific applications on their smart phones and tablets are as much a niche market than people running servers on them although I have seen it done.
Heck, while at it, 8 cores is dumb for desktop too, for average users who just browse the Internet and send emails. Even for gamers, I am not sure how many games can take advantage of 8 cores. Anybody cares to comment about the gaming aspect?
It is likely, though, that this machine is able to produce vastly different results from minuscle changes in code
I guess it could produce different results with no change in the code but then again, virus writers already have similar tools at their disposal to avoid detection.
Heh. No fucking shit. It would be a malware writer's holy grail; software that has no identifiable signature.
I don't think anti-virus software needs to understand, reverse-engineer or decipher a virus program in order to identify its signature. That's not how it works. That's why there is false positives with programs that do not do what the anti-virus software thinks it does.
Just accept the cert the first time you visit the site. Just like logging in for the first time through SSH. Just check the cert/key fingerprint with an alternative manner. Just generate your own cert/keys. It indeed sounds more secure now. Do not forget, technology and information always end up leaking eventually and some criminals may end up with it faster than we think.
Don't forget the symmetric may change several times in a course of an TLS session. It is called renegotiation. It was made to make things more secure than a single symmetric key but funnily enough, it got exploited...
At least it has a dark side. I wonder how many moons have a dark side in the solar system. Meaning, rotation period around its planet equals rotation period on itself.
So you are saying it is a no-go? Damn it, I had a lot of fun last time I was at the assembly in Prague. Since I am solar system specialist, for sure I would have had budget from my employer to go to Honolulu in 2015 but I guess you just ruined everything...
Since Pluto is not a planet anymore, we shouldn't be allowed to call a 20 km wide rock a moon. Let's have a big convention to decide how we should call it.
Slashdot Mirror
Ants and bees are poor examples, being clones, not genetically diverse individuals.
Very interesting point! I didn't think of that.
I still believe in cooperation although ;-)
Overview the available documentation, talk with the guy if he is available. A lot of times I ended up reverse-engineering everything although so be ready for that possibility.
Cooperation wins big time. Look at ants and bees. Only use selfishness with subject unwilling to cooperate and still, I have a hard time doing it sometimes...
Sure, but question 2 was secondary. Technically, I am more interested in an answer to question 1.
Thanks.
I would have been happier if Yandex stopped scanning my site for a while but no luck... ... ...
199.21.99.91 - - [02/Aug/2013:14:35:29 -0400] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 403 202 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; YandexBot/3.0; +http://yandex.com/bots)"
Whoosh Whoosh? ;-)
1) Not trolling here. Are you sure music production takes advantage of 8 cores? Can you please explain a bit?
2) Also, do you do music production on your smart phone?:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4046121&cid=44458907
You can still answer question 1 if the answer to question 2 is no.
Thanks in advance.
Many high-end scientific computing applications will already take and use as many cores as you give it. Definitely a niche market though.
It took me a while to figure out that we were talking about the smart phones and tablets market here. 8 cores work fine for servers, especially if you run VMs on them.
I guess people running scientific applications on their smart phones and tablets are as much a niche market than people running servers on them although I have seen it done.
Heck, while at it, 8 cores is dumb for desktop too, for average users who just browse the Internet and send emails. Even for gamers, I am not sure how many games can take advantage of 8 cores. Anybody cares to comment about the gaming aspect?
I just checked in my KDE menu and it is indeed called Calligra. Note that I use LibreOffice although...
I thought Google defined the data-center.
http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/voy/museum/pictures/display/0-4-Google.htm
Using tor so we go on red or orange threat level? We know who you are AC...
It is likely, though, that this machine is able to produce vastly different results from minuscle changes in code
I guess it could produce different results with no change in the code but then again, virus writers already have similar tools at their disposal to avoid detection.
Heh. No fucking shit. It would be a malware writer's holy grail; software that has no identifiable signature.
I don't think anti-virus software needs to understand, reverse-engineer or decipher a virus program in order to identify its signature. That's not how it works. That's why there is false positives with programs that do not do what the anti-virus software thinks it does.
Cause the game detects it runs in a VM?
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/273480?start=0&tstart=0
If the guy giving the lashes kills him, that guy gets beheaded. It is in the constitution over there. It is their version of the First Amendment.
mod parent up.
Just accept the cert the first time you visit the site. Just like logging in for the first time through SSH. Just check the cert/key fingerprint with an alternative manner. Just generate your own cert/keys. It indeed sounds more secure now. Do not forget, technology and information always end up leaking eventually and some criminals may end up with it faster than we think.
"Early Surface Sales Pitiful"
Maybe they should go underground. Am I missing something?
Well, I wouldn't use fake certs, it seems like a nice way to leave traces and evidences. There must be a better way but this is just my MHO.
Don't forget the symmetric may change several times in a course of an TLS session. It is called renegotiation. It was made to make things more secure than a single symmetric key but funnily enough, it got exploited...
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5746
http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2009/11/understanding_the_tls_renegoti.html
http://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/SSL_CTX_set_options.html#SECURE_RENEGOTIATION
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5746
Verisign or any other signing authority don't have Google private key nor anybody else private key for that matter.
Me too I use:
passSlashdot
passUbuntu
passGmail
etc.
Hehe ;-) you would be surprised on how good I am to call things.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1y_U4s6jfs
At least it has a dark side. I wonder how many moons have a dark side in the solar system. Meaning, rotation period around its planet equals rotation period on itself.
So you are saying it is a no-go? Damn it, I had a lot of fun last time I was at the assembly in Prague. Since I am solar system specialist, for sure I would have had budget from my employer to go to Honolulu in 2015 but I guess you just ruined everything...
http://www.iau.org/public/themes/pluto/
http://www.iau.org/science/meetings/future/general_assemblies/1024/
http://astronomy2015.org/
Since Pluto is not a planet anymore, we shouldn't be allowed to call a 20 km wide rock a moon. Let's have a big convention to decide how we should call it.