Slashdot Mirror


User: EvilTwinSkippy

EvilTwinSkippy's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,256
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,256

  1. Re:Novell is a 6 pound capuchin monkey on Gartner Recommends Holding Onto The SCO Money · · Score: 1

    I blew pizza out of my nose. Good job!

  2. Re:Change your TCP/IP fingerprint on Gartner Recommends Holding Onto The SCO Money · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But can you build a beowulf cluster of those...

  3. Re:.."Unix systems are the best alternatives.".. on Gartner Recommends Holding Onto The SCO Money · · Score: 1
    Oh no, let them come. Let them break the seal on the 1994 suit like the seal of the elder gods.

    I have this hankering to develop a new distro. Cthulu Linux anyone? Or maybe Hast... (Snarf)

  4. Re:Of course analysts are "catching on" on Gartner Recommends Holding Onto The SCO Money · · Score: 1
    Emacs.

    Sure it's a little bloated, but all the double-buckey keystrokes feel like home to me. I dig the code development tools for various languages. Heck, I use Emacs under windows as my preferred source editor.

  5. Re:Change your TCP/IP fingerprint on Gartner Recommends Holding Onto The SCO Money · · Score: 3, Funny

    More like a snow-angel of slightly bad day.

  6. Re:Red Herrings Eat Profits on Gartner Recommends Holding Onto The SCO Money · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Remember though, we had a few 800 pound gorillas in the form of IBM and Novell.

    Far more Earth shattering was the USL vs. BSD lawsuit. BSD went from being on the ropes to routing USL badly. Rumors are that part of the sealed evidence showed the much of Unix was actually lifted from BSD. Especially impressive because it was pretty much Berkley defending itself. There were no industry players coming to bat.

  7. Re:Change your TCP/IP fingerprint on Gartner Recommends Holding Onto The SCO Money · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heck, why not make it look like an System/360 or a DEC. If you are going for deception, make it original.

  8. And 5.... on Gartner Recommends Holding Onto The SCO Money · · Score: 0

    ... Profit!!!

  9. Re:Economics, Economics, Economics on Is Space Mining Feasible? · · Score: 1

    Moderators, give this slashdotter a point.

  10. Re:Economics, Economics, Economics on Is Space Mining Feasible? · · Score: 1
    We aren't talking about $1 here and $0.50 there. We are talking about precious metals whose soul value is in scarcity and where the cost to harvest it is measured in billions of dollars.

    Take gold. Gold is trading a almost $400/ounce. There only reason gold trades that high is because there is more or less a finite supply of it. Sure someone finds a few hundred pounds in a pirate ship, or in ancient treasure every couple of years. But when someone finds a new supply, prices for gold tumble.

    Look no further than 1999. People were shitting themselves when gold was trading at $290/oz. Just about everyone and their maiden aunt Sue was involved in gold futures. In the end 10,000 tons of gold was trading on the market that didn't exist yet. Lenders but the kabosh on gold futures. 3 years later we are trading at $400, but most experts think it really should have been trading at $600.

    Now, a project to bring pay back $10 billion dollars in asteroid gold would introduce, assuming it broke even, would need to introduce 250 million ounces into the market. IF the market continues to sell at $400/ounce (which it wouldn't for very long.) As the price drops to about $300/ounce, the number of units climbs to 333 million ounces. The more you sell, the more you have to sell, the further the price drops, and so on into a death spiral.

  11. Economics, Economics, Economics on Is Space Mining Feasible? · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Folks we are all forgetting supply and demand.

    If we suddenly truck in tons of precious metals from space, and whet our appetite for them, the cease becomming precious. Whoever mines space will have a momentary blip of profit before the costs of spacetravel exceed the newly lowered price of the materials.

    The reason we don't use the gold standard anymore is in part to prevent booms and busts in our currency caused by people flooding the market with new sources of gold. (The american dollar took a bath after the California and the Yukon gold rushes.)

    So just forget about any long-term sustainable industries built on dragging what are presently exotic materials to Earth from space.

  12. Re:Headlines on MS' News: on Microsoft Introduces Competition For Google News · · Score: 1
    I'd Much rather go for the stealth chuckle. Especially for the folks who hop over to the link to my site and see, plain a day, a guy with a beard.

    And I declare all lines Goatse humor hereby unfunny in this thread.

  13. Re:Headlines on MS' News: on Microsoft Introduces Competition For Google News · · Score: 1
    92 percent of Linux users are gay

    I'm a lesbian for sure. Ever since I was 12 I've found myself attracted to women.

  14. Re:second to the punch on Microsoft Introduces Competition For Google News · · Score: 1
    I'm just curious about the timing. All of these bold moves come after the announcement of delays in Longhorn. My thought is that they are trying to develop something to smooth out the revenue stream until they can start overcharging people for the new OS.

    Companies only make bold moves like that in despiration or after a radical change in leadership.

  15. Re:As long as it is not the same stuff on Microsoft Introduces Competition For Google News · · Score: 1
    One of these days I'm going to get around to writing my own diff system for news articles to keep me from getting 2 paragraphs into an AP column only to find it was lifted from Reuters.

    And of course everyone seems to be using the same source. I recall reading one article about how a bomp the struck an American caravan in Palesting was triggered from a building about 330 feet away. Sound's pretty precise doesn't it? They just took someone elses guestimate of 100 meters and converted the units.

  16. Re:Oddly Enough... on Microsoft Introduces Competition For Google News · · Score: 1
    And who can forget 4:

    4. A ham-fisted monopoly "like AT&T"

  17. Re:Paranoid? Maybe not.. on Microsoft Introduces Competition For Google News · · Score: 4, Funny
    Microsoft news...

    The news source you anti-trust.

  18. Seems to be the day for new discoveries... on New 'Mystery Meson' Sub-Atomic Particle Discovered · · Score: 1
    Router's News Service -

    New Element Discovered.

    The heaviest element known to science was recently discovered by researchers at the University of Fulchester. The element, tentatively named Administratium, has no protons or electrons and thus has an atomic number of 0. However, it does have 1 neutron, 125 assistant neutrons, 75 vice neutrons and 111 assistant vice neutrons. This gives it an atomic mass of 312. These 312 particles are held together by a force that involves the continuous exchange of meson-like particles called morons.

    Since it has no electrons, Administratium is inert. However, it can be detected chemically as it impedes every reaction it comes in contact with. According to the discoverers, a minute amount of Administratium caused one reaction to take over four days to complete when it would have normally occurred in less than one second. Administratium has a normal half-life of approximately three years, at which time it does not actually decay but instead undergoes a reorganisation in which assistant neutrons, vice neutrons and assistant vice neutrons exchange places. Some studies have shown that the atomic mass actually increases after each reorganisation.

    Research at other laboratories indicates that Administratium occurs naturally in the atmosphere. It tends to concentrate at certain points such as government agencies, large corporations and universities and can usually be found in the newest, best appointed and best maintained buildings.

    Scientists point out that Administratium is known to be toxic at any level of concentration and can easily destroy any productive reaction where it is allowed to accumulate. Attempts are being made to determine how Administratium can be controlled to prevent irreversible damage, but results to date are not promising.

  19. Re:Double check... on New 'Mystery Meson' Sub-Atomic Particle Discovered · · Score: 1

    You see, it was only a purple dragon to the people it was approaching. Everyone the dragon was moving away from saw it as a green dragon.

  20. Re:Completely wrong analogy on SCO News Roundup · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I would classify Microsoft as a malignant cancer. Malignant cancers spread to other tissues and tries to take over the whole body.

    SCO is an inflamed tumor, at best. It's painful, and obvious, and it's sucking up blood supply. But try as it may, it's still confined to one spot. And the bigger it gets, the more obvious it becomes to all.

  21. Re:Please, SCO, die already! on SCO News Roundup · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, I'm having visions of a horse's head right now. Now whose pillow should it go on?

  22. Re:Linux written to compete with SCO? on SCO News Roundup · · Score: 1

    I laughed until I realized that there is some nutjob out there that would actually try this. And given the strange times in which we exist, there is an infantessimally small, but non-zero, chance they could pull it off.

  23. Re:Linux written to compete with SCO? on SCO News Roundup · · Score: 1

    Of course, SCO continues to distribute Linux so I guess it should sue itself too on those grounds.

  24. Re:Legs no, fingers yes on Attacking the Spammer Business Model · · Score: 1
    Actually they usually employed horses and chains to pull the stake through people. Vlad learned that trick from the Turks. Sure a sharp stake would go right through, so they often used a rounded stake with a greased top.

    The more you know.

  25. Ghandicon 2 on Gates Comdex Keynote Shows Plans, Matrix Spoof · · Score: 1
    It's official, we are at Ghandicon 2.

    • First they ignore you
    • Then they laugh at you Then they fight you
    • ...
    • Profit!!!, er then you win.